Here's one of the NYT's own editorials about its reporting.
It's fascinating how it echoes some of the standard criticisms that are made by critics of the mainstream media (e.g., the information is there, but it's burried near the end of the article in some remote section). And this is not a case of unveiling a particular reporters fabrications. The NYT comments treat the problem as, in some sense, systemic.
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)
I think this is a lot different from the Blair case, where it was focused on one individual reporter.
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
what led to the Blair case was a systemic problem as well.
where the system was a byproduct of the editorial personality. it's an issue wrt Miller as well
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 27 May 2004 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 27 May 2004 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)