How I Got the Sack

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Now, I was a temp, but it was agreed that I'd do four weeks. On the Friday of the third week, this landed in my inbox. As the sender knew, I wasn't working at my computer, so didn't receive it till 1.20pm. Naturally I got work for the next Monday anyway because I bloody rock.

But this, for me, goes down in the annals of cuntiness. At a month's remove, how ought I respond to this fuck?

From: S**** R*c*e*t
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:25 AM
To: Henry Miller
Subject: Good news, well depending on how you look at it!

Hi Henry



Well it seems that you have done a great job at getting us back up to speed
again and I think that we are now back up to date, so> ...> we won> '> t be
requiring your excellent services next week. I hope this is ok for you and that
you can get another assignment sorted out.
>
>
>
> We> '> ll probably look for temps for odd days though over the next few weeks
so I> '> ll bear you in mind> ...>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> S***n

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)

You were working too quickly and not fannying around on ILX enough. Schoolboy error in temping terms.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 08:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Matt DC OTM.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 27 May 2004 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)

That's so patronising. See if your agency can't get you paid for the full term, as there's something in it for them too.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, and kick him in the nads for saying 'up to speed.'

Pack Yr Romantic Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Good point suzy -- I kind of let it go since life is quite short. But yea-ah.

For real, bluds, NO FUCKING ILX FOR THREE WEEKS. Result: £76 phone bill. Nora. The company produced books for modellers and military obsessives: 'FA 18 Hornets of Operation Iraqi Freedom' was one recent title. Bogs had a big print of a German half-track by the basins. It excorcised my inner Airfix-modeller, anyway. However, it *still* attracted some outwardly bright 'people who want to get into publishing'. Memo to anyone who listens: don't try it!

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)

you should send him an email asking if he really thinks it's a good idea to punish people for being too smart/quick...

matt is right. but only because it's really true that smart people can work themselves out of a job when temping. which is stupid.

colette (a2lette), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)

also, e-mailing pretty cowardly innit?

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)

From a distance of 2 metres!

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:12 (twenty-two years ago)

sweet jesus, that's pathetic

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Why does everyone have a problem with this? It's the nature of temping. You are temporary - until the person you're covering for comes back from whatever they're doing or whichever antiquated system you've brought up to date is now in operation until the day after you've gone when it all falls to pieces again. That means you're not going to be there for good. That's how it works.

And if you can do the work more quickly it is obviously advantageous for the company because you take up fewer hours and consequently can be paid less.

It's like that and that's the way it is. People who don't like it - go get a permanent job!

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Marcello OTM.

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Manners, in a word, maketh the man. It's not very classy to give 3.5 hours' notice. Yeah, he was 'within his rights'. But nonetheless a cunt.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:18 (twenty-two years ago)

No argument with that, but the two metre email is a fairly pisspoor step

x-post

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Marcello is right (without the side order of 'you made t'bed)...

In theory, you are exchanging your employment rights (job security, holidays, notice period, sickness benefit, other) for an improved payment. (Don't laugh).

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

you didn't get the sack either, you were laid off. Getting the sack is for a misdemeanour.

And much as it pains me ghorribly to say it, Marcello speaks a bit of sense.

chris (chris), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, presumably you would have had the option to give them 2 hours notice of nicking off.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Things generally aren't much fun if you're a temp. You don't get sick pay and are lucky if you get holiday pay. And there will always be a wall of apartheid between permanent incompetent staff who will form an alliance against any smartarse temp (as they perceive it) who comes in and does their job better and faster. They get the staff perks, they go to the pub on a Friday, and you're not invited. And look at them the wrong way and they'll gang up and find any excuse to report you and get rid of you.

Being a temp is basically the fag end of the employment food chain.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Hang on, isn't the issue the fact that notice was given in an email?

Pack Yr Romantic Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I was an IT consultant. I never had that kind of seperatementalism. Is that because I 'm a nice chap that is not smartarse?

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Adam: no, that's merely an interesting side-bet

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)

If you retaliate to this, Enrique, it will lose you karma points, increase our blood pressure and add another little black ball of hate to your intestines. I know these things, trust me.

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

From past experience I reckon Enrique was lucky even to get an email. Usually what happens is that, unless you've been given a fixed date for your engagement to end, your agency rings you and gets you out of the job. Once you've done what they paid you to do, the company essentially washes their hands of you - "not our problem, speak to the agency!"

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)

The fellow is called Satan and therefore to expect decent behaviour of him seems a bit much.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, all you can do is go "It's a drag" and haul ass.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)

You do have holiday rights, but no, you don't have improved payment (£6.50ph).

Some employers treated me well as a temp, others didn't. I don't mind about the status of temping at all, it's actually my preferred MO (don't take work homw with you).

I obviously admit that he did nothing wrong as per the rules. The legally-minded will of course see that as the be-all end-all.

But gosh darn if those value-judgements don't creep in in the last instance viz: you are basically favouring a more brutal way of life based on contract-determined human contacts. Which is to my way of thinking sad, but you're totally entitled to it and, you know, sauve qui peut I guess.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)

The boss may have been legally right, but when people working well and conscientiously get scant reward because cockfarmers higher up the food chain act like cockfarmers, things ain't going to get better. The world is like it is generally because there are enough cunts in the world who act cuntishly, and those non-cunts either accept it / can't be arsed. So in the interests of making the world a slightly better place - this boss is a cockfarmer of a cunt, and the legality of his action doesn't remove the immorality of it.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)

In this case the employer is in breach, no matter how Thatcherite some of you lot want to be about this. Yes, the worker may be temporary, but it is not unreasonable to expect that the time committment the employer agreed to (and budgeted for anyway, as I'm sure H budgeted for four weeks' wages) should be honoured as with any other contract. A temp is disposable in the sense that once his short-term contract has ended, then he goes. Not before, and especially not for being good. The agency should definitely pursue a claim.

It's disingenuous to say a temp could leave an assignment on two hours' notice. Yeah, and if the assignment had some time to go the agency would never use that temp again. Not exactly like-for-like, is it?

Also isn't the employer a temp is assigned to meant to notify the AGENCY and not the worker when it's over whether it's a wuss-out or a sacking? Damn stupid office manager could get in a heap of trouble for mailing you directly.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:29 (twenty-two years ago)

From past experience I reckon Enrique was lucky even to get an email. Usually what happens is that, unless you've been given a fixed date for your engagement to end, your agency rings you and gets you out of the job.

Yeah -- that just hasn't been my experience. Obv MC is older than me, but I have been at it for a few years. I know it wasn't 'the sack', but I wanted a snappy title. I've always been given fair warning -- this kicker here was that I had a verbal agreement to do four weeks, and it was terminated at three, with a few hours' notice.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Only verbal?

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Suzy, what you say is all true. But, basically, that's how it goes. The employer can do what they like, and it ends up your word against theirs regarding some minor point...

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Verbal is still actionable, even if it's harder to prove. I actually would pursue this, and use the e-mail as evidence in your favour.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

It isn't a question of favouring it Enrique, I'm just saying welcome to the world of free market capitalism with which, until someone comes up with a better and workable alternative, we are all stuck. You want rights, get a permanent job and you'll get them. The company has no value invested in you. They are under no legal obligation to be nice or friendly or polite. They're not even "employing" you (your agency is just hiring you out). They are perfectly entitled, legally, to terminate your contract at a moment's notice (as conversely are you). You've done what we paid you to do, thanks now fuck off. We don't like your trousers, you don't smile enough at customers, now fuck off. Go ahead, sue us. We don't recognise unions and we'll make sure you never work here again. That's the way the world works, chum. I'm afraid you need to get used to it.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

No, because the agency has a contract with the employer. A copy should be in your posession...

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

This also covers notice periods and suchlike. Although the stuff I did may well have been subject to a well different agreement, I'd be surprised if it didn't cover things like 'shortening contract periods' and such.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way, steal as much as you can on the way out. It's your duty as an oppressed worker to do so.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

and if the Agency don't want to take it up for fear of upsetting a client, get them to pay.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)

if you are a temp you must always do bare minimum, keep it ticking over, always something more left to be done, string it out

charltonlido (gareth), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

If the agency thinks the employer has been out of order then they are perfectly at liberty to (a) tell them so and (b) terminate their contract.

In theory, of course.

All those commissions? All that contract tendering?

In practice?

I don't think so.

As I said, any temp contract can be terminated without any notice given, for virtually any reason. It says so in the contract which you sign when you register with any agency.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(that's not what it said on mine, anyway)

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Naturally it depends on the agency you're under. Yours must be one of the very few that doesn't say that on their employee contract.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Pursue it verbally with your agency. If the client is still keen on having you as a 'day to day' temp, they might well do the right thing, or the agency may well 'make good'.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Marcello, the employer here is also fucking the agency over, and would not be as likely to blow off a legalish challenge from the agency, as the result 'against' in the relevant court could, if they were bloody-minded and never paid, show up as an unpaid debt and screw their credit rating.

The only two things these companies are truly scared of are Experian and the press.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)

if you get taken on to do a job that *should* take four weeks and you do it in three, the job's done, there's now work and that's it. this is not thatcherite. it sucks, but the answer is to work slower.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, you Stalinists. Why would you want to pay people for not working? This is worse that the common agricultural policy!!

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)

The trouble is, Suzy, that the two things that temps are truly scared of are Experian and the bailiffs...the old "you're two payslips away from being homeless" meme.

Also it would depend on how big the client is. There's one agency I know of who had Enron on their books and knew full well that Enron were (a) crooks and (b) treating their temps like human offal, but nevertheless they were shit scared to do anything about it because Enron kept saying to them, menacingly: "Well, **** never had a problem with us and their contract was cheaper."

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

The real mistake may be confusing "paid by the hour" for "paid by the job".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, he did the piece of work that was meant to occupy a worker for four weeks in only three. I'd say let him go home early and pay the flat rate and find a way to make money that doesn't involve margin-screwing people who were depending on a certain amount of money for a certain amount of work.

I don't have much time for people who collude with the whole 'might equals right' thing by saying 'tough luck, that's just the way it goes'.

Marcello, you've just given me all the proof I need that agency bosses are thick as pigshit. If Enron were on the phone using 'X was cheaper' menaces my first question would be 'Is that so? What possible advantage does telling me that actually give you?'

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The agency in question had very little business elsewhere, even though they also had the secretarial contract for the Houses of Parliament (no jobs going there, you see - all those MPs' wives and/or mistresses...). So they weren't really in a position to argue. Had they known that all their cheques from Enron would presumably have ended up bouncing, they probably would have tried it a bit more.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

tough luck, that's just the way it goes

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

But, I guess when it comes down to it, the agency (presumably) got you work for the next working day onwards, so they can show no loss of earning anyway. So, strike what I said before about pursuing it...

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

(I mever thought of Marcello being the 'uncomplaining' type...)

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

well, y'know, i've been there...

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)

heh. Right, next thread. The one about Hook man.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)

having said that i do feel for enrique, temping's horrible.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, Dave, for all your antiestablishment bluster you sure do roll over and allow that establishment to kick you in the nads as a matter of course. But that's okay, because they're bastards! Hooray for bastards!

I think that's lazy, journalist.

Marcello, if you're some kind of senior manager are you not in effect someone who can bring cool working practices to your neck of the woods? And if so, why persist in condoning the complacency of other companies just because people in management were shitty to you?

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Abuser, abused, abuses etc...

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:18 (twenty-two years ago)

i have no problem with "the establishment" per se, it's people i don't like very much.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

and if you are paid to do one job that should take four weeks, don't do it in three weeks.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)

A yea it came to pass that cynicism proved to eb a corrsove foprce and everyone shrugged their shoulders, and verily, the world continued to be run by cunts, and people wree treated like cunts and everyone shuffled through their moral coil feeling that something wasn't quite right about things but couldn't be fucked to do owt about it.

Coming next - all politicians are cunts, so lets cede power to the meejar or global politicians.

xpost - I see your point Dave. And everyone does this, and we all turn out to be on the make, out for what we can get. I think we're worth better and more than that, and the moment my life comes a big fiddle with the bosses I'll shoot myself.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Suzy you're confusing two different ways of working. There are contractors who are contracted to do work, and temps, who are paid by the hour. Enrique was employed as a temp. He may well have been taken on to do a specific task, but he was paid by the hour under temp terms of contract.

It sucks for him, but unless his agency had negotiated it as a contractor type project, with a sum for the work, then there's nothing he can do. If I'd been the employer and estimated a budget for that task and it had come under budget because he'd finished quickly, then I'd have looked around the office to see if there was another task he could have worked on for a week, but I definitely wouldn't have given him the week as gardening leave. (but I wouldn't have written that email, and if there'd been an after work drink then I'd definitely have invited him along)

Vicky (Vicky), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Well it seems that you have done a great job at getting us back up to speed
again and I think that we are now back up to date, so> ...> we won> '> t be
requiring your excellent services next week. I hope this is ok for you and that
you can get another assignment sorted out.

did he actaully type

we are now back up to date, so> ...> WE WON> '> t be requiring your excellent services...

cos that sounds like he's really rubbing it in

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)

but yeah i'm afraid i agree that that's the nature of temp work - the convenience is both ways - you can leave as you wish without notice, and they can lay you off just as easy.

The stuff about better pay is bullshit though. my last job i went from being temp to permanent and suddenly my income increased. but it depends on the hours you do of course.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Ken is right about the pay.

My temp experiences have always been pretty decent tho', and holiday pay is sometimes part of the deal. Worst experience, and it was kind of tame as it was after the fact, was discovering I was meant to be kept on at a job, but was laid off for hanging out with the receptionist too often (now a good mentalist buddy). My agency actually rang me up to confirm I had another week, but the lady I worked for/with quickly shot it down (and promptly let me go). It took the now ex-receptionist a year to tell me this though, but whatever.

Crickets Dance On Tequila Booty (Barima), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been temping at the same place for nearly a year (last day is tomorrow), and I think after I had been there three months or so holiday pay eligibility kicked in. No other benefits though, no raises, etc.

They tried to hire one Jeffrey Dahmer-looking motherfucker to replace me as a temp with an open-ended. He was here two days and they called and said, "Sorry, it's not working out." Poor guy (he really was v. slow though).

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

In theory, you are exchanging your employment rights (job security, holidays, notice period, sickness benefit, other) for an improved payment. (Don't laugh).

Some people (including me) are temping because right now we cannot get a regular job with those benefits.

it's really true that smart people can work themselves out of a job when temping. which is stupid.

That has happened to me. On the other hand, at some workplaces they've said "As long as we've got a temp in, can she do...?" and then "Can she come back tomorrow and do...?" which gets my assignment extended.

Also, doing the work quickly is sometimes not as much about the temp being smart as it is about the work being so boring that you don't want to look at it any longer than necessary.

j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

The problem I always had is that they wouldn't really tell me what the full project was, just what each part was as I got to it. Without a full idea of how much work I had to do, I never knew how I should pace myself. The default was to work fast. The only time I got sent home early was when I was answering a phone for a business on Memorial Day, when they were closed and only two employees were there. My job was to answer the phone and tell whoever it was to call back the next day. The phone rang, on average, once every 45 minutes. The person in charge realized that I was really not needed and sent me home at 3. I had one weeklong assignment where I finished the main project in two days. But fortunately, they just kept finding little piddly things for me to do for the rest of the week.

NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I once had a temp-to-perm job that I was really enjoying in a Human Resources Department. I would sift through resumes, answer emails, sort the mail, and do other generic office stuff. I think I did a damn good job. Several months in, I was let go. I thought I was a shoe-in. What happened is that I heard talk about them bringing in a second person to do my job (2 people used to do it). I explained that I was handling everything myself and didn't think they needed a new hire. Instead, they brought in this second person (from another department in the same company), decided one person could do the job after all, and then let me go because she was hired internally. GRRR!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I do both home health/private duty and staffing for my agency. With staffing, we work one day (or less--I get called in to finish shifts for people a lot), and that's it. They are required by law to pay me for two hours work if my shifts are canceled at short notice.

Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Gosh, that's a rarity -- an advice thread that worked. Thx to all. It's hard to do these because you have to leave out info: in this case, the happy tone of the email was extra-weird, not to mention the crazy subject field, because the guy had bitched and pissed at me for taking a call on my mobile phone two weeks previously--a call from the agency!!!

I'll go back the agency, whose response was nil first time round. It's hard to say whether I had a task to complete, and was paid for that--it's not very clear-cut. As with most publishing work, it was on-going, ie picture rights have to be checked off every week, artwork (massive panoramas of Operation Epsom around Caen 1944, that sort of thing) processed. Most amusingly I had to do the honours with the rejection letters (done from incredibly poorly phrased templates) to people pitching savoury-sounding books like 'Uniforms of Concentration Camp Guards 1943-4'. I wasn't really on a project, but you never know. Anyway, what do I give a fuck for, it's all gravy now.

It never came to the 'Crime de Monsieur Lange' ending.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)

We had a temp recently to cover the receptionists job. Also include facilities management & company travel. She was so much better than the person she was replacing. This is the second time this job has been covered & the temp is far more competent!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 28 May 2004 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.