Inspired by the many profiles on OKCupid that say things like this.
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
It probably is just code for having some flimsy self-help book on their shelf.
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
is spelled baha'i and != pantheism.
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― andy, Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― don (don), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, would you like to come up to my place and see my etchings?
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)
AND
"I own a yoga mat - still in its environmentally friendly packaging, but hey"
― penelope_111, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Crickets Dance On Tequila Booty (Barima), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)
(Isn't it more often used in talking about other individuals, rather than oneself, though?)
(I have deeply spiritual feelings for the lovely patron who keeps walk around the department where I'm working.)
x-post: "vision creation newsun!", haha. Yeah, exactly.
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Then again, that sounds almost zen: "not this, not that." Except that most zen people at least have enough sense to know that formlessness still has to be expressed through form, or that the two aren't really at odds. But what do I know?
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
xpost
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)
yes.. i'd count myself in that group.. but i'd never be so smug as to describe myself as "a deeply spiritual person"
i'd more likely say "i'm deeply confused about spiritual things"
― don (don), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)
Posts that make me think Aimless isn't Kurt Vonnegut = 0Posts that do make me think that = 1 billion.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― sexyDancer, Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Keith Harris (kharris1128), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)
This includes people very busy with their jobs, young artists and other egotistical types, women who rely on their looks, middle aged men whose spirit has been crushed beyond repair and now only want to read and drink tea, ribald old bohemians who paint, sew or make dolls and like their wine and sunshine, Satanists and Buddhists too lazy to read their respective scriptures, let alone practise them, and of course the French.
Hence, a lot of my friends are deeply materialistic, and only care for pleasure in this life, and I find that quite acceptable, so long as they never get any money to splash around.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)
How exactly did you come by this epiphany? Was this an "experience" or just an eventual realization after contemplating the matter? I'm always curious about how people come to conclusions about the nature of things.
"I think what they're unintentionally admitting is that they're either too stupid or too lazy to follow thoughts to their logical conclusion - therefore they probably find a lot of things irreducible and therefore spiritual. That, or they want cake and they want to eat it too with regards to having spirituality without those nasty "religious" things that cause so many problems."
While that's partially true, this also assumes the notion (or at least seems to be implying) that ultimately there are only two ways to go: following a religion or spiritual belief system because of ignorance of facts or choosing the more "sensible" idea that the existence of everything can be explained in terms of scientific study or inquiry, even if we are far from understanding everything yet. When someone says they're "spiritual but not religious" it is assumed they are either too smart to believe in religion but not smart enough to disregard it entirely. Often people do believe irrational things (like say, Creationism) because of ignorance of the facts of science. But is it necessarily so that those who are noncomittal and vague are that way because they want to "have their cake and eat it too" and are simply too lazy to commit and see the "true plain facts"? Some people accept and understand the findings and implications of science just fine but feel that they still have a spiritual urge or a feeling that there is "more to it" nonetheless. Though admittedly most people who say "spiritual but not religious" are waffling pseudo-hippies.
"On behalf of those who would describe themselves this way, how about something like: "I have had experiences which have left me strongly convinced that there is a spiritual dimension to the world, but I am not convinced by the claims of any organized religion"? Or something like that?"
OTM
"I think what is especially annoying is the "deeply" part. It's as if they are saying, "Because my spirituality is so deep, it is void of any particular content."Then again, that sounds almost zen: "not this, not that." Except that most zen people at least have enough sense to know that formlessness still has to be expressed through form, or that the two aren't really at odds. But what do I know?"
Again, OTM
I suppose I have some empathy for people who find the cold, empty meaningless of the universe disheartening and seek out meaning in some way other than traditional organized religion. But I also understand as the music mole said that these people are often not fun or comforting to be around.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Off topic: my 4 yr old daughter just said, 'It's bad for your health, the news. It really is!'
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sym (shmuel), Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 27 May 2004 23:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― metalmickey, Friday, 28 May 2004 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)