"Starship Troopers" - Verhoeven is a mad genius!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I remember waiting for this to come out in 1997 and excited by the prospect of another Verhoeven sci-fi film, even though the early word was that it was mediocre. It ends up being only an even more devastating satire than Robocop!

It ranks highly in my list of favorite films from the past ten years, and I imagine it will only grow in stature over time.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:33 (twenty years ago) link

we've had at least one other thread on this, i believe.

i was flipping channels the other day and came across what seemed to be some kind of made-for-cable sequel to this film. i didn't bother watching it.

i have really mixed feelings about this film. it's already a certified "classic" amongst a growing number of cinephiles, with one of the few voices raised in protest being noel carroll's. it is definitely wonderfully made, and VERY scary (some will no doubt disagree with me on that point, but i was scared shitless). as for it's political pertinence, hm, i'm not as sure...

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:39 (twenty years ago) link

Which parts did you find scary?

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:40 (twenty years ago) link

I've always been struck at the parallels between the world depicted and the past couple of years in our country. Ultimately, I think the film implies that the bugs weren't responsible for the Buenos Aires attack at all, and that we just needed an enemy to rally against.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:41 (twenty years ago) link

Rally round Nazi Doogie.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:44 (twenty years ago) link

Which parts did you find scary?

the parts with the giant bugs! especially the dien bien phu-like part.

i don't remember the details well enough to recall if the film lends any ambiguity to the buenos aires thing in particular (part of the intentional cartoonishness of the film: despite being from buenos aires, the characters are hardly latin, not to say barely differentiated). but certainly there are a few mentions that if we had just left the bugs alone, they wouldn't be bothering us. it's a critique of hawkishness that's pretty broad; one can see it in "troy," too.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:45 (twenty years ago) link

I always imagined that the characters were not in fact Latin because by that point in the future, the world had been McDonald-ized and Americanized beyond recognition.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:48 (twenty years ago) link

No way a bunch of N European crackers are going to outbreed the Catholic world!

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:49 (twenty years ago) link

right.

i think a LOT of the credit (and i suppose blame) for this film should go to its screenwriter--Ed Neumeier (sp?). he wrote the scrip to "RoboCop" as well, and both films exhibit a similarly pungent satire and a similarly elegant plot design (and a similar black humor).

my film prof. thought "showgirls" was v's masterpiece, and he had to do a lot of rhetoric contortions (read: rationalizations) to express this feeling. i think part of it was that he wanted to exalt verhoeven as "auteur," and since joe esterhasz (sp?) can be fairly easily dispatched, "showgirls" is prob. a better object for doing so.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:51 (twenty years ago) link

x-post

yes i think the lack of ethnic signifiers can be read as a joke about macdonalization.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:52 (twenty years ago) link

I imagine if the producers knew Verhoeven was making a $100 million film that was a satire about fascism and America they would have passed on it. He's what Scorsese refers to as a "smuggler".

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:58 (twenty years ago) link

i think that's nonsense.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 05:59 (twenty years ago) link

how so?

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:03 (twenty years ago) link

well, for one, what makes you think the producers missed the myriad in-your-face satirical elements in the film?

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:10 (twenty years ago) link

The other thread on ST Starship Troopers *roolz* big tyme.

jesus nathalie (nathalie), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:14 (twenty years ago) link

Enough critics and audience members did, that's for sure. And I think the more obvious satirical elements somewhat masked the fact that the movie is made like a propaganda film, and is almost intended to be one, and that you're being told to cheer on heroes who live in a fascist utopia. All the cues are pro-Johnny Rico and company and pro-fascist. It's endlessly fascinating for me.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:17 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I love this movie, too. I was watching it the other day.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:21 (twenty years ago) link

"And I think the more obvious satirical elements somewhat masked the fact that the movie is made like a propaganda film,"

well there is a play of voices in the film.

you have the overt "propaganda" shorts (like with the kids stomping on the bugs), most of which--like those in robocop--are both hilarious and too over-the-top to be mistaken for anything but satire. IIRC, the film concludes with one of these propaganda pieces, celebrating the heroes of the film in a too-cheery-for-comfort way. i really have a hard time imagining anyone taking it at "face value"--which is almost a misnomer, for it is satirical on its face.

the film ITSELF, as opposed to these little segments which are overtly eminating from the future reality of the film, is organized like a lot of war movies, both jingoistic and not. the focus on the home lives of the characters--with the various interpersonal problems being carried over into and sometimes resolved by the war--is in keeping with, say, "the big parade" and a zillion others since.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:26 (twenty years ago) link

i mean, i think it's unsubtle, and i think that can even be a virtue. maybe in 1997 (?) it didn't seem such, but nowadays putting out a film like this would carry a real sting.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:28 (twenty years ago) link

"I always imagined that the characters were not in fact Latin because by that point in the future, the world had been McDonald-ized and Americanized beyond recognition"

yeah, exactly. the world in the film is run by a one-world government.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:29 (twenty years ago) link

One of the best movies evah. Nuff said.

Pingu, Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:30 (twenty years ago) link

if anything i like VERHOEVEN is sometimes a little fuzzy on the satirical specificity of his films. ok, well maybe not--the efficiency and elegance of this film and of "robocop" seem to discount such an idea--but if you listen to his portions of the "robocop" DVD commentary, he really is all over the place. at one point he insists that it's a jesus parable (yawn). whereas neumeier (again, sp?) is really concrete about what he is parodying and what effects he desired. i think this helps to explain why "hollow man" was such a missed opportunity.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:34 (twenty years ago) link

hollow man was pretty shitty.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:36 (twenty years ago) link

aw fuck

"if anything i think VERHOEVEN"

this was meant to answer the comment about the producers. but i typed "like" instead. sorry.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 06:41 (twenty years ago) link

i don't think the lack of subtlety in Troopers argues for it being satire.

verhooeven has always been, imo, a heavyhanded director who has gotten way more positive press than he deserves - imo, the films that 'made' his reputation do not hold up on later viewing - feel its like early Tony Scott in Hunger era, something looks cool, stylish, feels smart but when you look back with the unfortunate hindsight of later works makes you wonder why you bothered in the first place.

H (Heruy), Saturday, 29 May 2004 08:31 (twenty years ago) link

The fact that he's set it up so that the audience is rooting for the Nazis argues for it being satire. I don't see how there can be any question of his intent there.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 29 May 2004 08:33 (twenty years ago) link

"- feel its like early Tony Scott in Hunger era, something looks cool, stylish, feels smart but when you look back with the unfortunate hindsight of later works makes you wonder why you bothered in the first place."

What, Top Gun wasn't a masterpiece? Surely you jest!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 10:14 (twenty years ago) link

It finally hit sometime in the summer of 2001 that The Fan wasn't a great film.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 13:26 (twenty years ago) link

Oh god. The Fan

Starship Troopers is incredibly entertaining, but all the "classic" talk could kill its enjoyability by implying we should respect the film.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 29 May 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

The film is really amusing because of the way it plays about with fascist imagery. That doesn't mean its actually a profound comment on fascism.

Jake Busey on neon violin! Huzzah!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 29 May 2004 15:22 (twenty years ago) link

See it's not just imagery, the whole society is supposed to be fascist in the film, it's essentially a cruel and exclusive world. The trick is in how the film presents the society, which is shown in a positive and unquestioning light. The obvious nudges such as the "do you want to know more?" asides and SS uniforms are great but it's not all there is, what with the world in the film being described by Verhoeven and Neumeier as a "what if the Nazis had won?" type of world. It's all the more interesting to me for being presented in the guise of a gory, "brain-dead" sci-fi action flick about giant killer bugs.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:03 (twenty years ago) link

See, that take sucks all the fun out of the movie for me. The idea that you're being deceived by the intentional use of actors like Patrick Muldoon and Casper Van Diem.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

there's also a whole teen-movie thing going on in ST that i really love, with the football game and the big dance and the will-they-or-won't-they with van dien & whatsherface

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:13 (twenty years ago) link

i also like the way the dystopia (or whatever) in the movie is presented as not being entirely bad--obv there seems to be pretty much equality b/w the sexes and no racial strife either, it makes it more ambiguous and interesting in that way to me

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:14 (twenty years ago) link

I will admit that Verhoeven is incredibly hard to pin down as to whether or not he's intentionally making camp or just making a bad movie. Complete shit like The Hollow Man doesn't help.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:17 (twenty years ago) link

I think this movie is brilliant on pretty much every level discussed in this thread.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:18 (twenty years ago) link

verhoeven, sometimes he swings and sometimes he misses you know

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:20 (twenty years ago) link

but i think defining his better movies as "intentional camp" is a bit reductive

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:21 (twenty years ago) link

Haha just a bit!

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 29 May 2004 16:21 (twenty years ago) link

"The film is really amusing because of the way it plays about with fascist imagery. That doesn't mean its actually a profound comment on fascism."

well, maybe or maybe not, but interviews with the filmmakers from before and after the movie was released make it clear that they intended on satirizing fascism with the movie.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 17:43 (twenty years ago) link

"verhoeven, sometimes he swings and sometimes he misses you know "

robocop and starship troopers---hit! showgirls and hollow man---steeerike!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 May 2004 17:45 (twenty years ago) link

"whether or not he's intentionally making camp or just making a bad movie"

i'm sure not i know what you mean. the only film i can even imagine conforming to this notion is "showgirls."

what do you mean by a "bad" movie? most of his movies are--if nothing else (and never nothing else)--very well put-together. "showgirls" included.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:19 (twenty years ago) link

hollow man not so much included

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:31 (twenty years ago) link

The book it is based on is unironically fascist, isn't it? What did the writer make of the film? I may have got all this wrong but I am too tired to check my facts.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:35 (twenty years ago) link

maybe the 2nd half of 'Hollow Man' was directed by somebody else, or the point was 'Verhoeven is now invisible'

dave q, Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:35 (twenty years ago) link

the writer (robert heinlein) was already dead

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:41 (twenty years ago) link

Oh well.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 29 May 2004 20:47 (twenty years ago) link

the movie departs from the book pretty aggressively, not just in tone but in content. in the book there are three races, not just the humans and the bugs.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

it's true. i re-read it again recently actually

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:04 (twenty years ago) link

Is it any good?

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

this thread needed more dr morbius

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 2 December 2005 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

YOU IDIOT

-- Theorry Henry (miltonpinsk...), December 2nd, 2005.

;-)

latebloomer: The Corridor (Yes, The Corridor) (latebloomer), Friday, 2 December 2005 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

i keep thinking of ren hoek!

http://www.bdt.com/david/images/rs003.jpg

latebloomer: The Corridor (Yes, The Corridor) (latebloomer), Friday, 2 December 2005 09:46 (nineteen years ago) link

so, would you guys want Verhoeven directing the Halo movie?
or Uwe Boll?

-- kingfish hobo juckie (jdsalmo...), December 2nd, 2005. (later)

I'd watch it.

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Friday, 2 December 2005 11:47 (nineteen years ago) link

latebloomer otm!!!

'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Friday, 2 December 2005 12:39 (nineteen years ago) link

latebloomer otm!!!

http://ourworld.cs.com/WeezelX/rs/maybegood.jpg

HOW IS THE MAGIC BUTTON IN REN AND STIMPY EPISODE "SPACE MADNESS" A METAPHOR FOR THE COLD WAR? WHO DOES REN REPRESENT? DISCUS.

'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Friday, 2 December 2005 12:41 (nineteen years ago) link

LOOK FASCISM

http://renandstimpy.org/img/106_4.jpg

'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Friday, 2 December 2005 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

http://brianclark44.home.comcast.net/black-ops-s.gif

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 2 December 2005 12:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Recommend important ("important"), mainstream, English-language, films from 1990 to the present


Starship Troopers
Big Lebowski
Fargo
Royal Tenenbaums
Suicide Kings
Rushmore
How High
Something About Mary
Zoolander
Dogma
Good Will Hunting

fuck xpost with a nairn nevermind.
Rush Hour
The Fifth Element

-- TOMBOT (brucewillisandbenstillercontroltheunivers...) (webmail), May 14th, 2004 12:10 PM. (link)

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I'll second "How High"

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:01 (nineteen years ago) link


2004 SUMMER SESSION COURSES

POOP 514 USG OF "IMPRTNT" + "MNSTRM" FR MGMT MTWRF 0900-1700 INSTR: TOMBOT LOC: URANUS

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link

SELECT * FROM ilx WHERE USERNAM...OH FUCK IT

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Rush Hour?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Attn: Amateurist -- any memory of where the screenwriter of this talks about Puig and Kiss of the Spider Woman? I'm actually working on a thing related to this and could use the, umm, primary source. (I don't know why "my friend Amateurist" can't constitute a primary source.)

nabiscothingy, Monday, 19 December 2005 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

(Or wait, was it maybe on DVD commentary? Guess I'll re-rent along with the sequel.)

nabiscothingy, Monday, 19 December 2005 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Rush Hour?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 19 December 2005 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link

At the risk of repeating others, it is gobsmacking that one could see Starship Troopers and not recognise a clear, loud, in-your-face satire on the US military - and by extension, on Western foreign policy. It is a brilliant movie! Right up there with Team America.

moley, Monday, 19 December 2005 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

...

recognizing bludgeon-you-over-the-head satire and liking it or respecting it are vastly different things but let's not get into that again.

RUSH HOUR?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 19 December 2005 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Rush Hour is really important.

TOMBOT, Monday, 19 December 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

and moley is a complete and utter dumbass.

TOMBOT, Monday, 19 December 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

moley is right, though! that's what it is!

gear (gear), Monday, 19 December 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

but not everyone likes the effort of course

gear (gear), Monday, 19 December 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

That's 'dumbarse'.

moley, Monday, 19 December 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm kind of surprised that one ofthe shanghai movies didn't get the nod over rush hour. owen wilson and all!

'Twan (miccio), Monday, 19 December 2005 20:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I am just as surprised as you are.
It is highly possible that that list was pulled out of my ass. Hurriedly.

moley is right, though! that's what it is!

Why is it the US military? The US military is actually extremely diverse. Why would the US military be any more or less fascist than the military of any other country. Why is it Western foreign policy? What about what we were doing in 1997 bore any resemblance to the action in Starship Troopers? I certainly didn't hear about any boots-on-the-ground scorched-earth invasion operations in the Balkans.

At any rate, read one thread before you post self-congratulatory bullshit repeating what 90 other posters have already said better, then you don't get called a nincompoop. It's pretty simple.

TOMBOT, Monday, 19 December 2005 21:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I have yet to see Shanghai Knights.

Is it worth it?

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 19 December 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, see it.

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 19 December 2005 22:49 (nineteen years ago) link

yes.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 19 December 2005 22:54 (nineteen years ago) link

four months pass...
Featured on wikipedia today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_Troopers

JW (ex machina), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:20 (eighteen years ago) link

one month passes...
not exactly Gundam 1978, but still charming:

http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/6392/giantrobottattoo7dt.th.gif

kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 26 June 2006 05:37 (eighteen years ago) link

one year passes...

Can anybody recommend any of Verhoeven's pre-Robocop work that's actually worth tracking down? (assuming it's available)

kingfish, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 06:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Flesh and Blood is pretty brilliant.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 06:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Can anybody recommend any of Verhoeven's pre-Robocop work that's actually worth tracking down? (assuming it's available)

Just about all of his early Dutch films are worthwhile. Spetters, Soldier Of Orange, and The 4th Man are essential

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link

two months pass...

Verhoeven is directing the sequel to Thomas Crown Affair

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 12 November 2007 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Met Het Oog Op Morgen

good lord, they now have dutch morning zoos

kingfish, Monday, 12 November 2007 22:05 (seventeen years ago) link

hollow man is more interesting when you look at it strictly as a take on what horrible things a pretty typical asshole might do if given a chance to do them without consequence, and less as a "mad psycho scientist run amok" thing. but it's still a bad flick.

omar little, Monday, 12 November 2007 22:18 (seventeen years ago) link

four months pass...

Jake Busey on neon violin! Huzzah!

-- Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 29 May 2004 15:22 (3 years ago) Link

latebloomer, Saturday, 22 March 2008 06:19 (sixteen years ago) link

four months pass...

starship troopers 3: marauder

omar little, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

There was a Starship Troopers 2?

ledge, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

lol "This movie sucks. Would you like to know more?"

still having neumeier writing + directing is a good look

and what, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i heard there's a musical sequence in this one! wtf is up that

s1ocki, Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:50 (sixteen years ago) link

ledge otm, i accidentally caught the beginning of ST2 on telly recently and was all WTF? It was shit, much like this one will be prob

Ste, Thursday, 7 August 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

one year passes...

what about tom of finland, reclaiming fascist aesthetics, when he was actually under the threat of death by fascists?

can you start a thread about this?

-----always tackling the big issues

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Saturday, 9 January 2010 08:38 (fourteen years ago) link

four months pass...

what shocking news

SeƱor Communications Adviser (sic), Sunday, 30 May 2010 01:59 (fourteen years ago) link

just throwing it up there

LINGO FROM THE BURGER KING KIDS CLUB (latebloomer), Sunday, 30 May 2010 02:11 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.