Anybody hear Michael Moore on Stern this morning?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Such a great show. I almost cried..

Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 25 June 2004 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i only heard the 1st 5 minutes of it. had to get out of my car and into the office right after he stated that the bin ladens own 20% of disney. did i miss anything after that¿

dyson (dyson), Friday, 25 June 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Same with me, dyson.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, just Debbie the Super Zionist calling in to attack Moore, and getting taken apart handily in debate.

Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 25 June 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

...he stated that the bin ladens own 20% of disney.

Whoa, that's so supremely fucking incorrect, it's unbelievable.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Who does own Disney?

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Hitler's Clone Army

Huk-El (Horace Mann), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, it was the Saudi royals owning 23% of Euro Disney.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

the theme park? How could that possibly be broken out in Disney's earnings statements? Moore is now officially a fucktard.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

To really beat the saudis, make them buy 100% of euro disney!

Skottie, Friday, 25 June 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Make them GO to EuroDisney.

Huk-El (Horace Mann), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Markleby, Yahoo! Finance is your friend.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, Saudis are usually known for being more scrupulous in their investments. Ask Arbusto.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

haha i bet saudi royals constitute 72% of euro-disney's attendance.

xpost you fucs

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

TOP INSIDER & RULE 144 HOLDERS

Holder Shares Reported
DISNEY, ROY E. 16,510,280 25-Jul-03
MURPHY, THOMAS 1,948,462 31-Dec-02
MURPHY, THOMAS S. 1,628,508 31-Dec-03
WATSON, RAYMOND L. 45,271 31-Dec-03
ESTRIN, JUDITH L. 24,616 31-Dec-03

TOP INSTITUTIONAL HOLDERS

Holder Shares % Out Value* Reported
Barclays Bank Plc 77,076,202 3.76 $1,926,134,240 31-Mar-04
FMR Corporation (Fidelity Management & Research Corp) 62,844,912 3.06 $1,570,494,312 31-Mar-04
State Street Corporation 61,538,902 3 $1,537,857,123 31-Mar-04
Citigroup Inc. 60,950,848 2.97 $1,523,161,654 31-Mar-04
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. 46,068,300 2.24 $1,151,246,788 31-Mar-04
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co 42,224,118 2.06 $1,055,180,683 31-Mar-04
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 40,649,300 1.98 $1,015,825,982 31-Mar-04
Mellon Bank, N.A. 35,270,665 1.72 $881,413,896 31-Mar-04
Montag & Caldwell, Inc. 35,021,339 1.71 $875,183,240 31-Mar-04
Lord Abbett & Co 33,646,946 1.64 $840,837,160 31-Mar-04

TOP MUTUAL FUND HOLDERS

Holder Shares % Out Value* Reported
Fidelity Magellan Fund Inc 19,201,500 0.94 $387,294,249 30-Sep-03
Vanguard 500 Index Fund 18,467,379 0.9 $430,843,957 31-Dec-03
Longleaf Partners Fund 18,465,000 0.9 $461,440,338 31-Mar-04
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund 14,203,515 0.69 $321,567,570 31-Oct-03
College Retirement Equities Fund-Stock Account 11,407,561 0.56 $266,138,401 31-Dec-03
Putnam Fund For Growth and Income 9,865,709 0.48 $223,359,645 31-Oct-03
SPDR Trust Series 1 7,999,419 0.39 $161,348,278 30-Sep-03
Van Kampen Comstock Fund 7,975,656 0.39 $186,072,056 31-Dec-03
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund-Institutional Index Fd 7,569,915 0.37 $176,606,119 31-Dec-03
Growth Fund of America Inc 7,000,000 0.34 $174,929,995 31-Mar-04

maybe you could argue that the bin Laden group owns these funds, but I have a hard time believing they would disclose their financials, esp. to Moore.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Dear Michael Moore,

Just wanted to drop you a line to inform you that we own Disney. Also, apple pie. Thanks, k bye,

The Saudis.

Huk-El (Horace Mann), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway there's plenty of foreign investment in the U.S. that comes from dubious sources. Hell, the Chinese are the only ones left buying our bonds, and they are not so nice to their citizens.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

hstencil, to correct...Moore didn't say bin ladens, it was a different Saudi family member, one person specifically, but I can't remember the name now. It's been edited out of every other interview he's been in, but maybe today on O'Franken he'll say it again..

And the name he said it was under was something American sounding. So it's probably indirect, and Yahoo!Finance wouldn't have it I don't think.

Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Euro Disney courts Saudi prince's money

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The multibillionaire bailed out the Paris resort once -- his help is
needed again.

By Richard Verrier
Sentinel Staff Writer

January 26, 2004

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia -- The Walt Disney Co. needs a real-life prince.

His name is Alwaleed bin Talal. His grandfather was Saudi Arabia's
founding monarch. With huge stakes in companies ranging from Citigroup Inc.
to the Four Seasons luxury-hotel chain, he is one of the planet's
richest men.

That's why Disney needs him. The company's Paris resort is suffering
severe losses. Alwaleed came to the rescue once before and is being
courted once again.

The relationship between Disney and the prince is one of the most
unlikely in the corporate world. Disney is notoriously insular and fiercely
protective of its brand and its image as America's premier
family-entertainment company. The prince is outspoken and ostentatious, a man whose
nationality alone attracts controversy these days.

A month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, he found himself
at the center of a tabloid dust-up with then-New York City Mayor Rudolph
Giuliani. The mayor rejected Alwaleed's $10 million contribution to a
victims fund after Alwaleed suggested U.S. policies in the Middle East
were partly to blame for the attacks.

But the coupling of Disney and Alwaleed is not about personalities or
nationalities. As Disney Chairman Michael Eisner recently said, in a bit
of understatement, Alwaleed "has a pretty sophisticated understanding
of capitalism."

In the mid-1990s, the prince chipped in $300 million to help keep Euro
Disney afloat. Now, Eisner would like another helping of his largess.

Disneyland Paris and its new sister park, Walt Disney Studios, have
been ravaged by recession and a dramatic decline in global tourism
triggered by the terror attacks. Executives of the resort, which includes
seven hotels, have said that it could soon default on a series of loans
unless it restructures its debt of $2 billion. The prince's original
investment has lost a third of its value.

Today, Eisner and Alwaleed are scheduled to meet at Disney headquarters
in Burbank, Calif., to discuss Euro Disney's future, among other
things.

"We faced crisis No. 1. Now we have to face crisis No. 2," Alwaleed,
48, said in a recent interview at his ranch near Riyadh. "In my latest
telephone call with Mr. Eisner, we agreed on one thing: This time the
problems of Euro Disney will have to be resolved once and for all."

'God has blessed me'

Last year, Forbes magazine ranked Alwaleed the fifth-richest person in
the world with a net worth of nearly $18 billion.

His Kingdom Holding Co. spans four continents. It has held major stakes
in companies such as Apple Computer, News Corp., Fairmont Hotels and
fashion retailer Saks Fifth Ave.

On his desk sits a Mickey Mouse figurine facing two model jets. The
prince owns three real ones, including a 747. That's on top of his
317-room castle -- with a bowling alley -- in Riyadh and a 288-foot yacht once
owned by Donald Trump. He calls the boat "Kingdom."

"God has blessed me with so many things," says Alwaleed, a slightly
built man who speaks in rapid-fire sentences.

His windowless office has eight television monitors, two of them always
tuned to his favorite news and business channels, CNN and CNBC. On the
wall behind his desk are his "hundred wives" -- plaques bearing the
corporate logos of his various investments.

Alwaleed says he sleeps five hours a day, which gives him more time for
long walks in the desert or for working out.

"I play 31 sports," he says. "I'm good at all of them."

Alwaleed's parents were considered palace outsiders. His father, Prince
Talal bin Abdul-Aziz, raised eyebrows in Saudi's staunchly conservative
society when he married outside the ruling family, choosing the
daughter of Lebanon's first prime minister. At one point, Alwaleed's father
disavowed the royal family, moved to Egypt and declared his support for
its anti-monarchist government. He returned to Saudi Arabia and made a
fortune in construction and real estate.

Like his father, the prince left home, too -- for an education in
America.

"I don't think I ever saw somebody who worked so hard," said Carlos
Lopez, who served as Alwaleed's academic adviser at Menlo College near
Palo Alto, Calif., where the undergraduate business program is popular
among Saudi royals. "He was at the top of his class."

After earning a master's degree from Syracuse University, Alwaleed
started building a kingdom of his own.

With help from his father, the prince began buying and selling Saudi
real estate. Before long, he was forming partnerships to land lucrative
construction contracts during the oil boom of the 1970s. Alwaleed is
said to have received millions in commissions often paid by foreign
companies to princes and other influential Saudis when doing business in the
tightly controlled monarchy.

His specialty is investing in struggling brand-name companies whose
shares can be purchased for a bargain.

In 1991, Alwaleed bought a $590 million stake in Citigroup, then called
Citicorp, effectively bailing out the financial-services giant. The
investment, he said, has increased in value 16-fold.

"He's a good guy to have on your side," said Citigroup Chairman Sandy
Weill, who has dealt extensively with Alwaleed.

Like other foreign investors, Alwaleed was drawn to the glamour and
opportunities of the entertainment world. This led to some high-profile
flops, including a $30 million investment in the Planet Hollywood
restaurant chain and a movie-production company with pop star Michael Jackson
that never got off the ground.

French sensitivities

In 1993, a Wall Street financier named Steve Norris approached the
prince with a proposition. The prince had worked with Norris on the
Citicorp deal and had hired him to shop for something new. Norris dropped the
Disney name.

The idea of a European theme park took off after the successful 1983
launch of Tokyo Disneyland. The only question: where to build.

Some top executives favored Spain because of its warm climate. Eisner
preferred France, citing government cooperation and his fond memories of
vacations in Paris.

Hungry for the 14,000 jobs and tourism revenue Disney would bring, the
French sold the company 4,400 acres of parkland at a discount, provided
a low-interest loan and agreed to extend the Paris Metro to the site 20
miles east of Paris.

Disney invested $100 million for a 49 percent stake in a new publicly
traded company, with the rest owned by bankers and investors. Disney was
also guaranteed a steady stream of royalty and management fees in a
complex arrangement to operate the park and hotels for the new company,
Euro Disney.

The project, which opened in April 1992, cost more than $3 billion and
was Disney's most lavish resort. The hotels, boasting more than 5,000
rooms, were designed by such famed architects as Michael Graves and
Robert Stern. There were dozens of restaurants and an entertainment village
called Festival Disney.

But Disney's American executives badly misjudged French sensitivities.

One faux pas was banning wine inside the park. Another was failing to
appreciate the French tradition of lunch from noon to 2 p.m. The
restaurants were too small to accommodate the crush.

Disney did make some cultural concessions: The turret atop Sleeping
Beauty's Castle was changed to reflect 15th century French design, rather
than the Bavarian style of Disneyland. But French intellectuals
expressed horror at an American cultural invasion. One critic famously branded
the park a "cultural Chernobyl."

In response, Disney slashed prices and lifted the ban on wine, among
other steps. But the company was powerless to affect larger economic
forces. The park opened in the midst of a recession. French and Italian
tourists stayed home.

Euro Disney shares plunged on the Paris stock market. The impact was so
severe that its American parent, Walt Disney Co., reported its first
quarterly loss in nine years. Bankruptcy loomed for the park.

Well-heeled investor

In Burbank, Disney's chief financial officer, Richard Nanula, was
trying figure a way out of the quagmire in 1993 when he got a call from his
former colleague, Norris, who was looking for new place to put the
prince's money.

"I've got somebody who'd like to invest," he said.

Alwaleed spent months negotiating with Eisner and Nanula, culminating
with a conference call in the dead of night in the Saudi desert.

The prince, camped in a tent, had been distributing food to Bedouin
tribesman during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. As always, his
encampment included a fleet of sport utility vehicles and a mobile
communications truck equipped with computers, fax machines and a satellite phone.

The 3 a.m. call started awkwardly. The prince's phone connection
crashed several times and Eisner, unaccustomed to royal courtesies, balked at
using the prince's official title, "Royal Highness."

Ultimately, Alwaleed took a 24 percent stake in Euro Disney, valued at
about $300 million, making him the second-largest shareholder behind
parent company Disney, which reduced its ownership to 39 percent.

"He knew what he was doing," Eisner said of the prince. "He's smart."

Disney's relationship with Alwaleed benefited the company in ways that
transcended his investment. He became a kind of diplomat for Disney in
the tricky politics of the Middle East.

In 1999, controversy erupted at Disney's Epcot theme park in Orlando
because of an Israeli government exhibit that offended some Arab and
Muslim groups. The Arab League called a meeting at the United Nations to
discuss a Disney boycott.

But the league backed off at the behest of Alwaleed and other
influential Saudi royals working behind the scenes.

Alwaleed said that once Eisner assured him that "Disney has no
religion," he contacted Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

"I told him, 'It's not worth it. If you boycott Disney, this will be
seen as Mickey Mouse,' " Alwaleed recalled.

Of course, a boycott of Disney also would have hurt Alwaleed's economic
interests, just when things were looking up.

Tourism soars, plummets

By then, Euro Disney had become the most successful tourism business in
Europe. The turnaround was helped by a new marketing plan, admissions
discounts and a broader range of food concessions. The name was changed
to Disneyland Resort Paris.

Encouraged, Disney executives decided to build a second park outside
Paris, Walt Disney Studios, in the hope that guests would stay in the
area longer and spend more on food and gifts. Such a multi-park strategy
had been hugely successful for Walt Disney World.

Then came Sept. 11. The global tourism market crashed.

When Walt Disney Studios opened in March 2002, it was Euro Disney
redux; the expected crowds did not come.

Disney executives said the park was victimized not only by the travel
slump but by subsequent events such as the war in Iraq, the outbreak of
SARS, harsh weather and a series of transportation strikes. Analysts
cited another factor: high admission prices. The park cost the same as
Euro Disney, but had only eight major attractions, compared with 45 at
its sister park.

To give its subsidiary some breathing room, the Walt Disney Co. last
year decided to forgo millions of dollars in its royalty and management
fees from the French resort. It also provided another $50 million in
back-up financing.

Disney executives hope the measures, along with an advertising blitz,
will buy Euro Disney time to restructure its debt and allow the company
to press the prince for help.

"We don't have a product problem," Eisner said. "We have a problem that
stems from opening a park in a recession."

'I believe in it'

At his ranch outside Riyadh, Alwaleed is relaxing at sunset, sitting in
a deck chair in front of a shimmering fountain. The patio overlooks the
farm where he grows date palms and keeps gazelles and ostriches.

Three striking women in Western attire stand nearby with pots of
coffee, ready to refill the prince's cup. One of two big-screen TVs is
broadcasting a music video by American Idol winner Kelly Clarkson.

The prince is reading a column in the International Herald Tribune.
It's about him. He had recently called on Saudis to accelerate social,
political and economic reforms after a terrorist bombing in Riyadh that
killed nearly 20 people.

"I sincerely wish to bridge the gap between Arabs and Americans," he
tells a visitor. "It's a role that no one else has in the Arab world."

More immediately, the prince is pondering how he can help Disney -- and
himself.

Among his options, Alwaleed could increase his ownership stake in Euro
Disney, gaining more control -- even though his original investment has
dwindled by more than $100 million. He could also try to buy some of
Disney's hotels in France -- which would appeal to the prince, insiders
say, because he could grab some plum assets at a discount.

Alwaleed may also bring up with Eisner the possibility of adding a Four
Seasons to the roster of hotels at Walt Disney World.

Investors are closely following his moves. When Alwaleed met last fall
in Paris with Euro Disney management, the stock shot up nearly 9
percent on speculation that he was going to finance a bailout.

"Everyone is watching what his next step is doing to be," said analyst
Tristan d'Aboville of the brokerage firm Aurel Leven. "The prince has
to find a solution and find it rapidly."

Although the prince is coy about his plans, he says he his not going to
turn his back on the other kingdom in his life.

"I'm not very happy," he said. "But I will stay with it because I
believe in it."

Richard Verrier can be reached at [email protected] or
1-800-528-4637, Ext. 77936.

Copyright (c) 2004, Orlando Sentinel | Get home delivery - up to 50%
off

Visit OrlandoSentinel.com

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Remember, google is your friend.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

An article as of 4/4/04, states that his ownership is currently at 17%.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

wow! aaaand case closed!

Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

is it just me or is it really specious of Moore to say it's a bad thing that a Saudi businessman owns a large part of Euro-Disney? like he's saying "ohh Saudis are all baaaad, and Disney does business with them..."

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

he's saying that's (at least partly) the reason why Disney wouldn't distribute his movie, for obv. reasons...

Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Gear, he's pointing out the US's divided view on such things - the right wing business/politics leaders who decry anything remotely connected to "terrorism" but are quite happy to take "blood money" to bolster their bank accounts, political parties and corporations.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Rats, you guys are fast. x-p0ost

According to Disney's 2003 annual report, it only owns 39% of Euro Disney S.C.A., which operates the Disneyland Resort Paris. http://disney.go.com/corporate/investors/financials/annual/2003/f/pdf_popup.html

Investor information at Euro Disney SCA lists Prince Alwaleed as a 16.3% stakeholder. http://www.eurodisney.com/index.php?idPage=11385&lng=en

From Forbes: Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud , 46 , self made
Source: investments
Net Worth: $17.7 bil
Country of citizenship: Saudi Arabia
Marital Status: married , 2 children
Menlo College, Bachelor of Arts / Science
Syracuse University, Masters of Science

Skottie, Friday, 25 June 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I still think he's playing off more right-wing fears by saying that, but I do see your point.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

An article as of 4/4/04, states that his ownership is currently at 17%.

I assume that those articles have some way of confirming this, because I'm not even sure how or in what format European companies disclose their financial statements. EuroDisney is traded on a number of European exchanges.

Anyway, I don't see what's so wrong with Saudi Investment in Europe or the U.S. or anywhere else. It's not like Americans and Europeans don't invest heavily in S.A.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

if EuroDisney isn't even controlled by Disney proper (and at 39% they maybe the majority, but it's not a definitive one), I still don't see how not distributing Moore's film has jack and/or shit to do with this.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

He may be a socialist, but Moore is no internationalist. He'd rather see people in Flint keeping jobs than people in Malaysia getting them.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, no shit, Momus.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Euro Disney SCA is a european company, but it conforms to U.S. GAAP. (generally accepted accounting principles). Therefore, they breakout more information than a pure-play european company might.

Skottie, Friday, 25 June 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

weren't the people in malaysia doing fine before the west got there?

People love Gravity and Ebullition! (ex machina), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud is an Orangeman, he can't be that bad.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I assume that those articles have some way of confirming this, because I'm not even sure how or in what format European companies disclose their financial statements. EuroDisney is traded on a number of European exchanges.

EURODISNEY'S WEBSITE LISTS THIS INFORMATION

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The 44.6% "other investors" could easily include other members of the dread house of saud. But until they reach (I think it's) a 5% ownership stake, they can remain anonymous.

Skottie, Friday, 25 June 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

DEAN STOP SHOUTING I SAW IT OKAY THANKS?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I would just prefer that you looked at some info before officially declaring "fucktards".

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean it just seems to me that Moore is perhaps using the same fear tactics with the Saudis that conservatives used with Iraq and Afghanistan, which I find pretty head-scratching. It seems like he's trying to imply without ever saying it (so he can say 'I didn't say that!') that the Saudis Disney does business with use blood money. Like he can say "Disney + Saudis!!" and people will go "ohhh shit, that's messed up".

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

of course I agree with MM on most other things (even if he is a bit of a bastard apparently)

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

He may be a socialist, but Moore is no internationalist. He'd rather see people in Flint keeping jobs than people in Malaysia getting them.
-- Momus (nic...), June 25th, 2004.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yeah, no shit, Momus.
-- hstencil (hstenc!...), June 25th, 2004.

That's not true at all. I heard him say so. Just because he did a film about life in Flint doesn't mean he's some sort of isolationist.

That's just a bunch of stereotyping, perpetuated by people who never have and never will deal with the effects of downsizing.

:(

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

In the UK you have to declare any stake above 3%.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.fisherycrisis.com/racoons.jpg

People love Gravity and Ebullition! (ex machina), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I would just prefer that you looked at some info before officially declaring "fucktards".

well I wish you would realize that ownership stakes in a company doesn't mean you run a company. And that foreign investment is a good thing.

That's not true at all. I heard him say so. Just because he did a film about life in Flint doesn't mean he's some sort of isolationist.

Check his comments about GM's Mexican factories in Roger & Me.

That's just a bunch of stereotyping, perpetuated by people who never have and never will deal with the effects of downsizing.

I was "downsized" from my last job, so fuck you very much. And that was last year, Bank of America's laying off 12K this year.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

And I'm sure you're stuck in an industrial town with three kids to feed.

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sorry to be so vulgar, Kerry, and I take back the "fuck you." Still, your naivete is mind-boggling, esp. for someone whose comments I usually find to be right-on. White-collar workers get downsized all the time, and usually without the union protections (or benefits) that blue-collar workers have.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

And I'm sure you're stuck in an industrial town with three kids to feed.

1. Almost all manufacturing has left Brooklyn because of what, exactly?

2. Don't blame me because I practice birth control.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

well I wish you would realize that ownership stakes in a company doesn't mean you run a company. And that foreign investment is a good thing.

Among his options, Alwaleed could increase his ownership stake in Euro
Disney, gaining more control -- even though his original investment has
dwindled by more than $100 million. He could also try to buy some of
Disney's hotels in France -- which would appeal to the prince, insiders
say, because he could grab some plum assets at a discount.

Alwaleed may also bring up with Eisner the possibility of adding a Four
Seasons to the roster of hotels at Walt Disney World.

Investors are closely following his moves. When Alwaleed met last fall
in Paris with Euro Disney management, the stock shot up nearly 9
percent on speculation that he was going to finance a bailout.

"Everyone is watching what his next step is doing to be," said analyst
Tristan d'Aboville of the brokerage firm Aurel Leven. "The prince has
to find a solution and find it rapidly."

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"influencing" vs. "running"

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sure he's on their board, if they have one, but I'm assuming it's a board made up of more than just Saudi-bootlickers.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

DANCE BREAK! WE NEED A DANCE BREAK!

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000002O6V.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Kingfish of Burma (Kingfish), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Roger Moore films: appearance of charisma

bnw (bnw), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

wait, which flick did A-HA do the opening theme for?

Kingfish of Burma (Kingfish), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I've never been so offended as when I was called Richard Dreyfuss.

Skottie, Friday, 25 June 2004 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

but emilymv would have loved you!

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Demi Moore films: appearance of acting

bnw (bnw), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS

AdamL :') (nordicskilla), Friday, 25 June 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

(Nick, the reason I was so harsh on that other thread was because no one seemed to be understanding that the breadth of distribution/possibility of mass appeal had nothing to do with J0hn's reaction and I was really, really PMSy about it. To me, it was akin to telling someone who keeps kosher that it wasn't be that big a deal that someone put bacon into the communal chip dip after kosher person had just finished stuffing his/her face. If you have a deep philosphical objection to something that someone does, a whole bunch of people going, "Wah wah, what's the big deal, crybaby?" is not likely to cause you to change your mind.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 25 June 2004 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

todd expressed how I felt quite well. Maybe it was a misunderstanding, but I took the 'birth control' reference to mean that people should not have children if they're going to lose their jobs someday. Or maybe that poor people should not have children at all. I actually thought about what hstencil wrote, and I could not see it any other way. I do find this concern about how people 'breed' to be....disturbing, to put it more gently. It's also personal, since I interpret that as saying that my parents should not have had children. And what is this Catholic stuff? Since when am I a Catholic? I'm not against birth control ; I'm against people saying that other people, especially poor people, so-called 'third world' people, etc. *should* use birth control. I mean, it was hard to read the argument as anything other than : people in Flint should quit whining about not being able to feed their kids since they failed to use birth control. That's either quasi-eugenicist (I'm trying to be nice here), or, if
it applies to all types of people, it's certainly misanthropic and entirely unrealistic. Either way, it still bothers me.

Kerry (dymaxia), Saturday, 26 June 2004 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, ILE is the crankiest place on earth this week...

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Saturday, 26 June 2004 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

"He may be a socialist, but Moore is no internationalist. He'd rather see people in Flint keeping jobs than people in Malaysia getting them."

He's a national socialist!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not funny.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)

[he may] be Rumanian
Could be Bubarian
Could be Albanian
Might be Hungarian
Could be Australian
Could be the Alien
Send her to me

Skottie, Saturday, 26 June 2004 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

He's a national socialist!

I snorted, anyway. (Thereby providing work for some poor Columbians.)

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 26 June 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

God, sometimes I don't understand how you all have built this really interesting community here and what do some of you do with it? Use it to get a rise out of others and pick childish fights... Are you that guy who intentionally cuts me off in highway traffic just because, upon getting behind the wheel, you know you have free license to be a complete and total asshole in public, and to force everyone else to deal with it?

daria g (daria g), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Wouldn't it be awful if those drivers could copy and paste big blocks of text too, cluttering the road behind them and forcing other drivers to swerve and scroll?

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

One day.. they'll be able to deploy oil slicks from their SUVs.

By the way, that "you" wasn't you, Momus. Just a general. A "vous," if you like.

daria g (daria g), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The leaden albatross of mixed metaphor, there, Momus.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)

(I mean, I really really hate to get at you, but, you know...)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Mixed metaphors are great, I don't know what you metophor segregationists are complaining about. Can't the metaphors live in peace, together?

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Saturday, 26 June 2004 09:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Daria, I didn't assume it was for me. I assumed it was directed at 'an impervious material perforated with lettering or a design through which a substance is forced onto a surface to be printed'.

Pashmina, I was deliberately evoking a sort of bizarre hybrid image. In electronic space everything is metaphorical, and all the metaphors get mixed up. For instance, why do 'windows' spring up from a 'desktop'? We take these absurdities for granted, but it's fun sometimes to play around with them.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 26 June 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, is there anywhere I can download the MP3s from Stern?

Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 26 June 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

(I will admit that I like the term "leaden albatross of mixed metaphor" and will use it wherever I can, so my apologies momus)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 26 June 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

hop on the p2p networks, and you should be able to find mp3s of the show, if you look well enough

Kingfish of Burma (Kingfish), Saturday, 26 June 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

(cough)
http://213.158.119.37/template/undefined/torrents/2022/062504-cf%5B1%5D%5B1%5D-mp3.torrent
(cough)

J (Jay), Saturday, 26 June 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

oh. I guess that one's dead, actually.

J (Jay), Saturday, 26 June 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

This is the quote:

"This is what I haven't been able to say on televison, or anywhere: The Saudi Royal family owns 23 percent of Euro Disney." He then goes on to talk about Prince Wallee or however it's spelled, I don't know because LIKE THIS FIRST HALF OF THIS THREAD WAS DISAPPEARED.

J (Jay), Saturday, 26 June 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a really pointless fact. it demonstrates nothing. Moore is a dangerous demagogue who will shoot his causes in the head with useless or inaccurate facts.

So a Saudi invested in Euro Disney, So what.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 26 June 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal

gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 26 June 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(and it's still up there)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 26 June 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I'm dumbass -- I must have changed my reader settings and forgot about it. I AM A PARANOID

And Ed the only reason I even bring it up is because of what happened upthread, in case you weren't paying attention

J (Jay), Saturday, 26 June 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I wanted to make my point upthread but things got a little distracted.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 26 June 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Moore is a dangerous demagogue who will shoot his causes in the head with useless or inaccurate facts.

Exactly what in Fahrenheit 9/11 is dangerous?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Sunday, 27 June 2004 07:03 (twenty-one years ago)

hop on the p2p networks, and you should be able to find mp3s of the show, if you look well enough

It's also all over alt.binaries.howard-stern

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Sunday, 27 June 2004 07:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I would just like to say how proud I am of this thread. The group hug with the bodybuilders was fine comedy work.

You veterans may think this is sarcasm, but it isn't. I was introduced to ILM almost two months ago and now I know why I haven't forgotten about it and left like all other message boards. I was bored at work and simply brought up what was on my mind...and it turned into this. How great is that!!?

Richard K (Richard K), Sunday, 27 June 2004 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)

To elucidate, there wasn't anything in F9/11 that I strongly objected to, except for the "Iraqi's have never threatened" line. I actually wanted less of Bush and more of the corporate-promo videos.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Sunday, 27 June 2004 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Moore is far too scattergun with his 'facts'; although I agree with a lot of his causes and a lot of the information he provides, he gives his enemies too many chinks in his armour with little exagerations, terrier like obsession with things that don't matter that much and stuff that hasn't been properly checked out. The right will sieze on any little fault so you haveto, al franken style, get it all painstakingly correct.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 27 June 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

furthermore, the right will blow up any little foible out of all proportion, cry foul at any little slip. So you can't give them that opportunity.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 27 June 2004 08:29 (twenty-one years ago)

The right will sieze on any little fault so you haveto, al franken style, get it all painstakingly correct.

Which hasn't stopped them from attacking Al Franken anyway. Based on the early criticism I was expecting that the Saudi airline flights and the prisoner footage would be a major part of the movie and they actually weren't.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Sunday, 27 June 2004 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)

It's all about stopping criticisms gaining creedance though.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 27 June 2004 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Ed my mother saw it last night and she said that while she would have done things differently, she's on a "no talkin bad bout Michael Moore" kick and though I haven't seen the movie I kind of agree with her; we've had nice, patient lefties for decades in the USA and that's been good in some spheres and continues to be, but ultimately what's more important, his personality or the things he gets people to think about (and frankly I don't have a problem with his personality at all)

as far as not making watertight arguments goes, hey it's politics; if a Republican wants to criticize his movie the only effective way to do it is to make another movie ((c) Godard) and I don't think the Repubs have either the ambition, or the material, or the know-how to make a movie that can match him

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean after awhile you get sick of punching with gloves on when your opponent's been using nunchucks for 8-10 years

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

look at your phone, hand boy.

Arguments that are not watrtight inevitably backfire. Look how bad Micheal Howard was stung last week over his waiting list claims which a 30 second phone call could have fixed. I like the man but the message often seems to be less important than him.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently there's a film being made called "Michael Moore Hates America". That alongside the book "Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man".

I wish this was me trying to make a joke.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"Arguments that are not watrtight inevitably backfire. ... I like the man but the message often seems to be less important than him."

Why do I have a feeling that somewhere out there in the cyberrealm there is some moderate Republican message board where these exact sentiments are being expressed about George W. Bush?

There have been incredible lines to see the film at the theater in my neighborhood (which is admittedly a rather liberal 'hood) all weekend long, starting early Friday. They've not yet let up through the weekend. If this movie mobilizes people that are sick of this administration to get out to the polls in anything like the numbers they are going out to see the film, I'll be thrilled.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Oops, just noticed that film has already been mentioned in the other thread (x-post)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I figure there's so much muck you can rake thatis actually true, why bother with half-truths.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)

in Knoxville all shows were sold out for opening night and all shows were sold out yesterday.. ALL shows.. ie. Foothills Mall, Downtown West, East Towne Mall, Powell, etc

Ed because no one wants to go see a long Newsnight doc at the theatre

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 27 June 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

This movie is not going to become a campaign issue, and Moore's reportage or lack thereof isn't even going to make it into next week as a topic of discussion, no matter how much some of the loonier elements of the right might want it to. The Bush campaign will look absurd if they start campaigning against a movie. And besides, they won't pursue it for the same reason large corporations so often settle liability lawsuits behind closed doors: because having a dialogue about the whole horrible truth out there in the open -- which would have to happen to seriously refute Moore's work, if it is as sloppy as some claim -- is often so very much worse than having fragments of truth, tied together by speculation, floating on the breeze.

Again, if it rallies the otherwise apathetic or startles the unquestioning at least into a state of mild alertness, so much the better.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Sunday, 27 June 2004 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's the link to the article that debunks the Hitchens thing:

http://www.efilmcritic.com/feature.php?feature=1150

Please pass it on.

MD, Sunday, 27 June 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.