picasso admits being pretentious asshole

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
accidentally put on "i rate everything first." oops.

Picasso Confesses- from an article by John Garth, Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, in the ARGONAT. (No date given)
In his book IL LIBRO NERO (1951), the Italian author Giovanni Papini gives this report of an interview he had with the top god of modern art, Pablo Picasso. Here is what Picasso reportedly thinks of himself:

"From the moment that art ceases to be food that feeds the best minds, the artist can use his talents to perform all the tricks of the intellectual charlatan. Most people can today no longer expect to receive consolation and exaltation from art.

"The 'refined,' the rich, the professional 'do-nothings', the distillers of quintessence desire only the peculiar, the sensational, the eccentric, the scandalous in today's art. I myself, since the advent of Cubism, have fed these fellows what they wanted and satisfied these critics with all the ridiculous ideas that have passed through my mind.

"The less they understood them, the more they admired me. Through amusing myself with all these absurd farces, I became celebrated, and very rapidly. For a painter, celebrity means sales and consequent affluence. Today, as you know, I am celebrated, I am rich.

"But when I am alone, I do not have the effrontery to consider myself an artist at all, not in the grand old meaning of the word: Giotto, Titian, Rembrandt, Goya were great painters. I am only a public clown--a mountebank.

"I have understood my time and have exploited the imbecility, the vanity, the greed of my contemporaries. It is a bitter confession, this confession of mine, more painful than it may seem. But at least and at last it does have the merit of being honest."

In my opinion, this interview goes a long way to explain why in his last years Picasso had 'cannibalised' the works of all major European painters, including those of Raphael and El Greco, by doing 'covers' of their famous paintings.
- from here

what say you?

tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Friday, 25 June 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)

makes me think of him even more highly

oops (Oops), Friday, 25 June 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought he was never called an asshole.

J (Jay), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Tsk. Reduced to just another self-hating artist? I fear he thought too highly of his heroes and their own motivations.

Evanston Wade (EWW), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

yea, i should probably give jonathan richman a call.

tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't remember him ever *denying* he was a pretentious asshole!

Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

ARTISTS IN BEING PRETENTIOUS ASSHOLES NON-SHOCKAH.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

yea, it was always an "is he or isnt he?" sort of thing. or maybe just a "he definitely is" sort of thing.

tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Orbit OTM

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

see also "artfuck"

Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

So...amoral con-man now = pretentious asshole?

Evanston Wade (EWW), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

don't take it personally

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 25 June 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Now I admire him more - because I never thought he had the good grace to admit it even to himself, but I was wrong, evidently. He was never a great artist, but he was a great trickster. Braque and Klee were great.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 25 June 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see why we should take his assessment as terribly important, whether he calls himself a charlatan or the greatest artist of all time doesn't affect my opinion of his work.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 25 June 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a fair comment.

A great charlatan is someone who really knows how to hypnotise and manipulate the public. They know what ideas and concepts will do this - and they know the magic of being obscure and mysterious.

Some of his very last works seem painfully honest all of a sudden though. I recall reading something about this in 'The Success and Failure of Picasso' it might have been. John Berger?

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 25 June 2004 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

His admission of charlatanism would perhaps negate his presence of pretentiousness, non?

Herve Villechaize, Sunday, 27 June 2004 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

or maybe that's a trick too

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 27 June 2004 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

the man looked like Michael Jackson

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 27 June 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

martin otm. i think he is a phenomenal artist.

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 27 June 2004 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)


also this just reinforces richman's point, doesn't it. he may call himself an asshole, but he handily admits to never being called an asshole.

not like you.

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 27 June 2004 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.