Little Lady Fauntleroy - Last Night

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OMG WTF?

This was Pushy Parents meets Watchdog meets "that one about being an actor in a month with that nutter woman who pops up to probe your inner psychoses" meets Keith Allen!

(KA made the prog)

By the end, I was as angry as Keith was.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Agreed. Fascinating, perverse, car crash TV.

Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Can you give a summary of what happened at the end. I watched the first 10 minutes but turned as it looked horribly depressing, plus I was totally knackered and couldn't stay awake.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The father was the least featured person in the show. But ..... !

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Why was Keith angry? I thought his interview w/ the subject was unduly harsh: 'a bow-tie and a DJ does not a genius make' -- well, okay, but neither does appearing in 50 million shit Brit-flicks more-or-less as yourself.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)

He was only really angry with the bullshit of the rest of the family, the parents particularly.

Up until that point, he asked questions strongly, treating his interviewee as an intelligent person. No-one got upset with him until the end. And that 'acting class'.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Basically, Keith confronted the entire family about their fake degrees/diplomas and accused them of being charlatons before finally walking out, leaving them to their little enclave of lies and hopeless self-delusion.

The "drama lesson" where Keith sat and watched Lauren "coach" a student is probably the most disturbing thing I've seen on TV for quite a while.

Curiously, I came away from the programme feeling absolutely no dislike for Lauren Harries. Watching her at karaoke night down the local pub or singing (atrociously badly) in the family kitchen was just desperately sad.

Highlight of the programme for me was a brief glimpse of Lauren's Big Brother audition tape. Just imagine....

Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Argh, I'm annoyed I missed this. Got a puppy and it's kept me awake for a few days, so when I finally got someone else for him to bite so I could get some sleep it was 9 last night and missed the show. I'll read the thread as it grows and try to get a sense of it anyway...

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

enrique otm

i've got a pretty high tolerance for intrusion and sneering in the name of low grade entertainment but i was really appalled by this programme. keith allen seemed to think he was paxman or roger cook or something when in fact he was just bullying the mentally ill. shouting 'you're fucking mad' at people who are clearly, well, fucking mad, doens't strike me as something to be particularly proud of.

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the overly stylised ending ("this is the bit where...","now you'd expect a trendy documemtary maker to..." etc) had Victor Lewis-Smith written all over it - and lo, he was the producer.

Should instead have just let it run - I thought by focussing more on Allen's ego it diminished the power of the whole denouement a bit.

But then I am a trendy documentary maker.

Huey (Huey), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)

He, even to the end, treated them as intelligent people.

Even his closing "You have to be much more on-the-ball if you are living these lies all the time, you're not good enough at it!"

The end was frustration. They clung to their lies, treating him as dumb enough to believe it.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Again, Keith Allen has to implicate himself. He does this all the time. Fat Les after the WorldNewOrder thing...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought this was maybe the most patronising, exploitative piece of tv I have ever seen. Especially laughable was the way that Allen seemed to consider himself a "hip, young documentary-maker" and took every opportunity to get his own leery mug on screen. It was sneery, self-regarding, lots of it (ie passers-by shouting "he's a tranny!") seemed self-evidently staged, and at no point did Allen seem to consider that he was just as complicit in the whole desperate screenlust as the weird, unsocialised family he took such great pleasure in kicking. I think KA came out of it seeming much more fucked up, and certainly much less sympathetic than LH.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

the witless attempt to pretend the programme was a commenting on form at the end was crap too. "they like appearing on telly, telly people like making programmes about them; it's a symbiotic relationship". really, keith? i don't think that was perfectly obvious to everybody within ten seconds.

i do love fat les though

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Aside from Keith Allen now...

Do you get the impression that James Harries' 'gayness' was perceived to be a problem to 'sort out'? "We took him to Gay nightclubs, but that didn't work, so he had a sex change". I'm not saying that it was wrong in his case anyway, but the idea that all the 'counselling' was kept within the family?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)

oh. i didn't see that bt, that sounds suspect to say the least

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

To get a Sexchang3, you have to have two years of independant counselling. Basically, his mother has certificates (bought from usa, but anyway) under a 'professional' alias. So she did the 'work'.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

An oddly compelling programme, made the worse by Allen's constant gurning at the camera. I was quite excited that it made me so angry actually (the tone wavered SO much that it was next to impossible to grasp half the time if it was sarious or comic or even true). I think I have decided that it was great television, but not particularly good for anyone involved.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I could have done without all the stupid organ music and without the stylised ending also, but I don't think you can invade the privacy of people who want their privacy invaded that badly. I do feel sorry for the younger generation - taken out of school at the age of 11, all still living with their parents (or that was the impression I got), no contact with the rest of their extended family, living on the edge of a housing estate full of people who hate them (and no wonder). You'd wonder whether the social services shouldn't have stepped in when these kids were removed from school. It might have solved a few problems.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

You'd wonder whether the social services shouldn't have stepped in when these kids were removed from school

Yeah, but who would complain? Their removal from school gave the school one less headache (three obv)

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Baran feels on the money.

The Nipper is utterly on the money. The programme made me angry, in a way. I was amazed at its... hypocrisy? Allen is talentless, I think. His own burst of anger at the end was either false or a major character flaw. It is nice that some people on this thread can see the thing in this perspective.

One thing that has been puzzling me is -- was this the only child prodigy of the 1980s? Cos I don't remember antiques being a big deal - I seem to remember a prodigy who was a great mathematician, went to Cambridge at 13 (?) (PS / no, not YMOF) - but this clearly cannot have been Harries.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:09 (twenty-one years ago)

It was a girl who went to Cambridge at 13 wasn't it? Probably a guy now.

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Ruth someone? I remember her parents were *very* doting and her dress was Laura Ashley overload.

chris (chris), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Ruth Fletcher was her name I think.

Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

no, Ruth Lawr3nce - now a lecturer at Harvard I believe. She and her rather creepy, beardy dad were interviewed on Wogan. She said she liked classical music and turned up her nose when Terry asked her if she liked Abba. I don't remember anything else about the interview at all.

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~ruthel/

Tag (Tag), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

that's the one, educated at home? Featured in a where are they now thing in the Observer not long ago

chris (chris), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd always been led to believe that the only fields where genuine child prodigies exist are mathematics, chess and music - certainly not antiques!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Mark H - you're right. Apparently Ruth and her dad used to ride around Oxford together on a battered old tandem. Now she has a child of her own and is no longer in touch with her father.

Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

There are child prodigies in art, shurely?

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

There are?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Sharron Davies had one of those 'pushy dads' I believe. There was a major bust up after she left competitive swimming (he was one of those 'slavedriver' types, up every morn to make her practice, etc)..

I say her last year in Swindon, shopping, with her dad, so I guess all is resolved there.

Sport is so arse by the way.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Sport is so arse by the way.

Yes!!

I'd have probably watched this if I had a telly, but I'm sure I'd have got really annoyed. K allen + V lewis smith = major shitehawkishness ahoy.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes Keith Allen AND Victor Lewis Smith *shudders*

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but I seriously think they did not know quite what they were getting into.

The freezeframes on facial reactions told.

KA certainly less manipulative/fake than Louis Theroux, mostly saying what was on his mind rather than 'giving them enough rope to hang themselves with.

btw, how many of you arguing here actually saw it?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)

S Davies: Well, I've made much more money from TV than I ever did when I was swimming, haven't I?

S Davies's Dad: True enough.

S Davies: And I don't have to ask you to lend me money anymore, do I?

S Davies's Dad: That's true too.

S Davies: In fact, I always said I'd help you out if *you* were short of a bob or two.

S Davies's Dad: Indeed so. Let's go shopping!

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd always been led to believe that the only fields where genuine child prodigies exist are mathematics, chess and music - certainly not antiques!

Howard Gardner's Seven Intelligences: Musical, Bodily Kinesthetic, Logical-Mathematical, Linguistic, Spatial, Intrapersonal.

Presumably you can be a prodigy in any of these - he gives the examples of Yehudi Menuhin (Musical), Babe Ruth (BK), and TS Eliot (Linguistic).

I have a few problems with his theory, but thought I'd throw it into the pot anyway.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Were Babe Ruth and Toilets prodigies?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, she bought him a starbucks latte anyway.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sharron Davies had one of those 'pushy dads' I believe. There was a major bust up after she left competitive swimming (he was one of those 'slavedriver' types, up every morn to make her practice, etc)..

haha I read that as 'slowdiver' -- must be a thames valley thing.

Theroux is manipulative but not disrespectful -- but define 'manipulative' here, any doc has an angle on things.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Theroux is sly, and nasty. I distrust him. I certainly wouldn't ask him to mind my pint while I went to the bogs

chris (chris), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm kind of glad I got rid of the telly before theroux' schtick became tiresome. He was occasionally funny though. Unlike victor lewis smith.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

At the age of ten, T.S. Eliot created a magazine alled “Fireside” to which he was the sole contributor. In a three-day period during his winter vacation, he created eight complete issues. Each one included poems, adventure stories, a gossip column, and humour. Some of this material survives and it displays the talent of the poet (see
Soldo, 1982)

...

Fifteen-year-old Babe Ruth played third base. During one game his team’s pitcher was doing very poorly and Babe loudly criticised him from third base. Brother Mathias, the coach, called out, “Ruth, if you know so much about it, YOU pitch!” Babe was surprised and embarrassed because he had never pitched before, but Brother Mathias insisted. Ruth said later that at the very moment he took the pitcher’s mound, he KNEW he was supposed to be a pitcher and that it was “natural” for him to strike people out. Indeed, he went on to become a great major league pitcher (and, of course, attained legendary status as a hitter) (Connor, 1982). Like Menuhin, Babe Ruth was a child prodigy who recognised his “instrument” immediately upon his first exposure to it. This recognition occurred in advance of formal training.

Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I think KA came out of it seeming much more fucked up, and certainly much less sympathetic than LH.

what world are you all living in? are you honestly telling me that these people should be respected and treated like normal human beings? i'd have fucking blown my stack with them way before the end. they were liars, they turned their son into a one-man freakshow by the age of 10 and then when he began to develop his own personality (ie his gayness) took control of him yet again and basically maimed him for life. they are sick, sick individuals. i didn't like the way it was filmed, did think it was exploitative and i do hate keith allen, but he was indisputably the most normal person involved. i really do feel for james/lauren, but his/her parents should be locked up and the key thrown away.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Thank you Dave. Exactly.

I actually do like KA's stuff. But the point is the same.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't KA just as desperate to get on TV as any of them? So much so that the only way he can get back on is via condescending, bullying mockeries of documentaries like this? How many of his acting or drama projects were rejected by CH4 before he stooped to this. What was he exposing exactly: a fucked up, miserable family. It's not like he was uncovering Watergate. And a show like this is likely only to deepen that fucked-upness, like a continental shelf. It was a cheap holiday in other people's misery, and Allen acted like he should be applauded for it.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the editing etc made it clear that it was all the things you say. i don't think it was making any claim to be doing much for the common good. and i stand by my belief that the parents were disgusting and anyone who thinks they have a right to do that to their own child is almost as sick as them.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

He acted like he was complicit in it. (xpost Keith Allen I mean)

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

> Victor Lewis Smith

about half of everything i watched on sunday (mostly bbc4's sixties weekend programs about experimental music / radio phonic workshop etc) were voiceovered by VLS and done for his Associated Redifusion company.

their 'halftimbering' using creosoted planks was dreadful.

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

> mockeries of documentaries

mockumentaries?

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

hey, but enough of my yakkin.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

'crockumentaries'

VLF really should be killed. I don't think that of many people.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

personally i had issues with the show being fundamentally "hey, let's laugh at a victim of child abuse".

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

VLF? Do they make crocumentries?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, VLS

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought Wogan did that more than Keith did, to be honest.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I think what was both so nauseauting about it and possibly clever therefore was that by using Keith Allen the auidence were clearly implicated in the act. The Louis Theroux school, which this is obviously a variety of, hides the condescending behind a camera crew, we the audience are allowed to laugh at those in the middle because Louis does, whilst he is perfectly polite when with them. Allen was not polite, the audience does not like him and therefore the exploityation implicict in other forms was made all the more explicit here. Allen did come a cropper a number of times and looked a fool as much to deliniate him from any form of identification figure.

I think KA was probably chosen especially because he is so reviled, I doubt it was a project initially close to his heart. Equally the family have probably signed consent forms up to their arses, and have always been complicit in this kind of behaviour. Suggestion partially by the programme is that television itself made Lauren what she is, it being hungry for eccentrics and freaks (I remember that Jeff Goldblum, Frank Skinner Wogan interview being one of the most uncomfortable shows I ever saw even at the time).

I think VLS is consistently interesting, if sometimes lazy, contributor to the debate about television.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Kid : "My family are hated"
Wogan: "Don't you think, that's your fault?"

also, Frank Skinner's crack about a clip round the ear...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I have been so xposting, almost catching up...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

it was billed 'un film de keth allen', so he had some input beyond it being his face on screen. the thing is, i don't think theroux really does invite people to laugh necessarily, not half as much as people reckon. it's more than people blame him for the fact that they find themselves laughing, and feel guilty about it.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

The amoun of love/trust in James' face when he was first on Wogan was very disturbing, especially as Keith Allen is more to be trusted, which is saying something...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

wogan is a genuine hero of broadcasting and i won't hear a word against him

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

coughcoughEurovisioncoveragecoughcough

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

coughcoughFloralDancecoughcough

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

That late night chatshow he did after the "wogan" prog ended was very bad. With Frank Skinner, Craig Charles? or some other alternative comedian type. Wogan looking completely lost. very bad. Not Wogan's fault, I grant you...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

his eurovision coverage is frequently genius and the floral dance was better than fat les

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

although obviously manipulative, louis theroux is always sure to encourage his subjects to become at least partly complicit in the joke - he doesn't tell people that they're nutters but he does try to push them gentluy towards a little self knowledge. i would imagine pretty much everybody who's been 'done' by louise theroux would see it as having been a reasonably positive experience. in short, he doesn't , as someone said upthread, just sneer at and bully victims of child abuse.

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

He didn't bully Lauren. Where?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i didn't think he was bullying and the only people he took to task were the parents. the main problem of the show was in the editing - the organ noises, daft pauses and jump cuts etc.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

H ebullied everyone else, he was rather nice to Lauren generally (except of course abusing her family might upset her, but then he blamed her family...)

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought the woodward and bernstein inquisition of lauren about whether or not she was really a child prodigy was a bit bullying as was him dragging her off to an antiques fair just to faces behind her back, though that was probably just because of the tone of the programme overall. i agree he was nicer to her than anyone else but he was pretty nasty to her siblings who clearly had problems of their own. my main problem with it all was that he set out to make a programme about a massively disfunctional family and then triumphantly revealed to them that he didn't like them becuase they were wierd. i just didn't see any point other than to make ka look good and a few ghoulish viewers (like me) feel superior.

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

that's *make* faces...

adam b (adam b), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I almost liked him for a minute there because I felt that he was kind of siding with Lauren and shouting her case at her family in a way that she never could. I still don't think 'what teacher would complain when those kids were taken out of school?' is a good enough answer to the question of why social services didn't step in when these kids were pulled out of normal social interaction. I'm also slightly surprised that the 'counselling' dished out by her mother met any criteria set out by the National Health. I sincerely hope you guys weren't paying for that sex change out of your tax dollars.

I suppose on the most basic level the programme was a success because we're all talking about it (and a few people who came into my shop today were talking about it). I feel that it was kind of slapped together though. Why was Terry Wogan not interviewed for it? I'd love to know if he met The Mother beforehand and therefore decided he hated James.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

That is a good point. It would have been nice to see Wogan interviewed (though i can understand why he might not have wanted to take part, it is not exactly befitting with his image to have his part in this sorry tale brought up).

The other interview, the hideous daytimey one showed exactly what Alan Partridge was based on (and indeed the prodigy epidoe of KMKY did a pretty accurate facsimile of it).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

The child prodigy episode on the radio version of KMKY was so obviously based on James Harries

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

It was interesting, quite stunning in it's weirdness. Keith Allen was silly though. How does he really expect the deluded to react to being called deluded? I, I mean Louis Theroux woulda done it much better

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

No Jel, you pretending to be Louis Theroux would have done it best.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Interview Wogan? that's a good point actually. I shall assume that this never happened because the programme makers never thought of it.

But, after all, Wogan does/did 'use' these kinds of people for his programme, so should be accountable in part. But then, nobody died.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 1 July 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

One of the Nipper's best posts EVER!

It's not like he was uncovering Watergate. And a show like this is likely only to deepen that fucked-upness, like a continental shelf. It was a cheap holiday in other people's misery, and Allen acted like he should be applauded for it.

He even says 'continental' shelf, not 'coastal'.

the bellefox, Thursday, 1 July 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.