i am actually looking forward to "collateral"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
because

1) the funky new hi-def video michael mann is using looks totally amazing

2) though i really don't like tom cruise, him playing a totally amoral character makes a lot of sense

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:24 (nineteen years ago) link

3) i like jamie foxx

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:25 (nineteen years ago) link

it's gonna look awesome no matter what

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link

i am not looking forward to "the aviator"

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link

the funky new hi-def video michael mann is using looks totally amazing

this was my thought too--my thought exactly. no matter how much the trailer tried to make the movie look like a routine thriller, there was something very unusual and arresting in the images mann got of the city.

i hope the hyperrealism of the photography and the hollywood stylization of the characters don't clash in unproductive ways.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link

is that what it is, hi-def video? the color saturation in the previews looks slick

xpost

kephm, Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

plus i like tom crusie a bit more with the grey-white hair

kephm, Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link

i always associate the distinct look of mann's films with the cinematographer dante spinotti, but he didn't shoot ali and he didn't shoot this new one, either.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Camera
Panavision Cameras and Lenses
Sony HDW-F900 CineAlta
Thomson VIPER FilmStream Camera, Zeiss Digiprime Lenses

Film negative format (mm/video inches)
Video (HDTV)

Cinematographic process
HDTV (1080p/24)

Aspect ratio
2.35 : 1

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:46 (nineteen years ago) link

apparently it's like 20% film, 80% video, which might be interesting.

mann, in the press kit (i filched this from some website):

"Film doesn't record what our eyes can see at night. I wanted to see into the night, to see everything the naked eye can see and more...[to] see this moody landscape with hills and trees and strange light patterns."

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:46 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah it's that sony camera that's supposed to be some cool shit

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:47 (nineteen years ago) link

this is an exciting time for movie technology. all these competing processes, companies trying to outdo each other by introducing new products every few months (it seems). someone should wait about 10 years and then write a book about it.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm looking forward to todd-dv

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:49 (nineteen years ago) link

p.s. has anyone seen mann's "director's cut" of ali? is it as bad as his other "director's cuts"?

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:49 (nineteen years ago) link

but yeah you're right! i love all this video crap (i just read a touching mini-elegy to analog video by guy maddin in his review of lars von trier's production of carl dreyer's unproduced "medea" script)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:49 (nineteen years ago) link

i haven't seen any of mann's director's cuts, what's up with them?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link

A friend of mine was on the camera team for this and can vouch for the Viper being hot shit.

dean? (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link

When I first saw the preview for this, I thought it was going to be a Planetary film with TC as Elijah Snow and I was way-psyched! Still, it looks like it'll look cool, which is sometimes enough.

Huck, Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link

i'd like to read an interview where mann talks about technology and aesthetics. specifically, i'm interested in his use of the widescreen frame (which he obviously prefers, his beginnings in TV notwithstanding). nowadays the habit is still to shoot with both the widescreen and TV ratios in mind, so that directors are discouraged from introducing important elements in the extremes of the frame. but i get the feeling, from memories of his films, that mann doesn't quite subscribe to this. heat in particular uses the whole widescreen space pretty aggressively IIRC.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Just wait for the inevitable Armond White review trashing Collateral for reasons to do with its use of DV technology.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:53 (nineteen years ago) link

the interesting thing about the widescreen thing is that when mann did his tv show last year (i forget the name) he purposefully shot it full-frame (as opposed to all the shows now that shoot in 16:9 and are presented letterboxed), arguing that he might as well use the whole space

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link

i watched carlito's way again the other day & i had totally forgotten it was in crazy 2.35:1!! (i know it's not michael mann but i'm just saying)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, i find that whole "widescreen-on-TV" thing kind of weird. in the beginning (sopranos? E.R.? i forget which was first) it was obviously a sop to the idea that widescreen TVs would take over. but they obviously haven't, and won't for a while. so now the use of letterboxing on TV is just a signifier of prestige; you even see it used for car commercials (!!). it makes the shows seem more film-like, hence classy. there's nothing really wrong with that. and in a sense these shows don't have the "shoot for two ratios" constraints that contemporary films often do.

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:56 (nineteen years ago) link

i think the boldest use of the whole wiiiiiidescreen i've seen is in leone's "good/bad/ugly" and many of jancso's films.

interestingly "once upon a time in america" is in the academy ratio--maybe producers wanted it to look like "the godfather"??? or maybe leone had something in mind...

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Michael Mann should just stop fooling around already and work with Anthony Dod Mantle or Christopher Doyle.

dean? (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link

why does he need to?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link

http://arkames.emu-france.com/imagetrad/k/kid_icarus_02.gif

dean? (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I think this movie will be good for Jamie Foxx alone. He was so brilliant in Ali, and I think he is great as a sort of pained funny man.

Scott CE (Scott CE), Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:31 (nineteen years ago) link

his ray charles looks pretty good too!

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I just saw the trailer for this, and I am very very intrigued. (It was one of like 8 trailers before Anchorman!)

jaymc, Monday, 26 July 2004 04:40 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm gonna go see this just to find out how the movie explains the dummness of its setup, ie why wouldn't a richass hitman drive himself around, or hire someone who was cool with it?

g--ff (gcannon), Monday, 26 July 2004 04:55 (nineteen years ago) link

he had a flat

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 05:01 (nineteen years ago) link

are you serious?

g--ff (gcannon), Monday, 26 July 2004 05:07 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't know.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 05:09 (nineteen years ago) link

the ray charles thing looks like it might be okay! jamie foxx definitely was a good choice

dave k, Monday, 26 July 2004 05:29 (nineteen years ago) link

wow, i'm on top of the statscock. i wish i had more to do with my time these days. at work especially...

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 05:31 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm gonna go see this just to find out how the movie explains the dummness of its setup, ie why wouldn't a richass hitman drive himself around, or hire someone who was cool with it?

i'm sure at the end we'll find out he was planning to kill jamie foxx as soon as his "work" was done

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:17 (nineteen years ago) link

i think you can safely remove those question marks, considering this is a michael mann movie.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean quote marks, duh.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah you had me confused there for a second (i thought you were being all poetic and shit)

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:35 (nineteen years ago) link

there is no poetry in my soul

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:36 (nineteen years ago) link

is this that thing with benicio del toro? long time comin'.

ENRQ (Enrique), Monday, 26 July 2004 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

david denby has a very enthused review in the new "new yorker."

"shot by shot, scene by scene, mann, whose recent work includes 'heat' and 'the insider,' may be the best director in hollywood. i don't mean that he's the greatest artist. he lacks such qualities as the tormented humanism of scorses, the generous showmanship and warmth of spielberg, the moral curiosity of the clint eastwood who directed 'unforgiven' and 'mystic river.' but mann has become a master builder of sequences, the opposite of the contemporary action directors who produce a brutally meaningless whirl of movement. methodical and precise, he analyzes a scene into minute components--a door closing, an arm thrust out--and gathers the fragments into seamless units; he wants you to live inside the physical event, not just experience the sensation of it."

why does rosenbaum dump on denby all the time?

amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:24 (nineteen years ago) link

p.s. as for the "warmth" spielberg, that familiar accolade sits uncomfortably beside (i mean that in two ways) all the loving portrayals of bloodshed in his films, from "saving private ryan" to "a.i."

amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

loving portrayals? it's not like he is tarantino...

i saw Heat just recently for the first time. muy bueno. im excited for collateral

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 23:24 (nineteen years ago) link

visual phenomena that can't be filmed or videotaped

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 23:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i actually like david denby! not all the time, but he has won favour from me in the past.

that said:

as for spielberg's "warmth" i'd say it's mostly queasy sentimentality and middle-aged cuteness so i don't know about that.

also to say that mann lacks "moral curiosity" doesn't make much sense to me, although i'm not really sure what denby means by that.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 5 August 2004 03:36 (nineteen years ago) link

also what is an example of rosenbaum dumping on him? that seems like exceptionally bad form

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 5 August 2004 03:37 (nineteen years ago) link

"Now the dark vision of Mystic River is being touted as a form of higher wisdom graced with noble feelings that for some reviewers mysteriously translates into high art. The New Yorker's David Denby, who can usually be counted on for such judgments, doesn't disappoint: 'Mystic River, with its gray, everyday light, is a work of art in a way that, say, The Big Sleep and Out of the Past, which were shaped as melodrama and shot in glamorous chiaroscuro, were not. Mystic River is as close as we are likely to come on the screen to the spirit of Greek tragedy (and closer, I think, than Arthur Miller has come on the stage).' If Denby had given it more thought, he might have put even Aeschylus (and his lighting schemes) second to Clint."

jaymc, Thursday, 5 August 2004 04:08 (nineteen years ago) link

On Kill Bill: "David Denby in the New Yorker speaks for many critics when he complains that the 'dorky' scenes 'don't work,' but surely they're not supposed to. This isn't homage -- it's parody."

jaymc, Thursday, 5 August 2004 04:09 (nineteen years ago) link

my roomate worked on this movie with the camera crew! you can see him during one of the featurette clips fumbling around in the background.

Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Tuesday, 21 June 2005 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost: This movie will not cure you: same old ego warrior bullshit. Jaime Foxx does get to shoot him in the face, though.

Another Allnighter (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 June 2005 15:30 (eighteen years ago) link

i thought he was shot in the heart!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 21 June 2005 18:30 (eighteen years ago) link

That too.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Tuesday, 21 June 2005 18:33 (eighteen years ago) link

cue bon jovi

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 21 June 2005 18:37 (eighteen years ago) link

six years pass...

this dialogue is excruciating

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:27 (twelve years ago) link

ive seen this film probably 7 or 8 times

nakhchivan, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:29 (twelve years ago) link

i ching

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:30 (twelve years ago) link

tom cruise empowers jamie foxxxxx

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:33 (twelve years ago) link

he does

nakhchivan, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:34 (twelve years ago) link

look at us talking about digital video upthread like it wasn't about to completely engulf all filmed entertainment.

(and big lols at us being all like, "widescreen tv isn't gonna be a thing for a LONG time")

the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:39 (twelve years ago) link

diggin this no belt look

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:47 (twelve years ago) link

maybe in the end... it will be jamie foxxxxxx who teaches tom cruise about ~lyfe~

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 01:48 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, this is a fun thread to read seven years later. Maybe the only time a post of mine was part-composed by a cat?

A Lip in the Blandscape (jaymc), Saturday, 29 October 2011 02:07 (twelve years ago) link

cool dog crossing street

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 02:23 (twelve years ago) link

underselling a COYOTE TROTTING ACROSS THE ROAD TO CHRIS CORNELL

encarta it (Gukbe), Saturday, 29 October 2011 02:35 (twelve years ago) link

I think tom cruises facial hair is growing at a millimeter a minute

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 02:36 (twelve years ago) link

lol @ cgi cruise

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 02:56 (twelve years ago) link

RUFFALO

"How are things?"
"Mezzo-mezzo."

your way better (Eazy), Saturday, 29 October 2011 03:58 (twelve years ago) link

bardem was dope in his small role, and how ruffs got sonned in this movie was a nice touch. appreciate the statham cameo, too.

omar little, Saturday, 29 October 2011 05:09 (twelve years ago) link

there are a few scenes in this that are just completely stunning

the one in the glass office building at night, and the first few minutes or so when they're in the train towards the end

iirc

J0rdan S., Saturday, 29 October 2011 05:11 (twelve years ago) link

Definitely the glass office blackout scene is amazing, especially on the big screen.

your way better (Eazy), Saturday, 29 October 2011 05:18 (twelve years ago) link

RUFFALO

"How are things?"
"Mezzo-mezzo."

― your way better (Eazy), Friday, October 28, 2011 11:58 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

hah I don't think I've ever consciously noticed ruffalo in a movie before, didn't know that was him until I checked the credits

kind of felt like "oh, so that's who the ladies on ilx go crazy over?" :\

this gives me an idea - create "dinner party" cuts of films like this, all the shots of LA cut and driving cut together with no people in 'em, and you just loop it on the 57" plasma hanging on the wall of your 60th floor penthouse while you berate the porter for insufficiently chilling the shrimp cocktails

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 13:18 (twelve years ago) link

haha @ this piece of trivia

To prepare for the movie, Tom Cruise had to make FedEx deliveries in a crowded LA market without anyone recognizing him as Tom Cruise.

dayo, Saturday, 29 October 2011 13:21 (twelve years ago) link

i think the ruffalistas would probably remove his 'collateral' look from consideration

still he is pretty great in his small role

nakhchivan, Saturday, 29 October 2011 13:24 (twelve years ago) link

three years pass...

Didn't see this when it came out, watched it two or three times on DVD, saw it at the Lightbox tonight. I think the first half's as good as Heat, starts to drag the last half hour. I like seeing Ruffalo and Bardem a couple of years before Zodiac/No Country. IMDB says Debi Mazar plays a Young Professional Woman; missed her completely, tonight and every time. Same godawful rock song shows up a couple of times. Some funny lines scattered about.

clemenza, Friday, 13 March 2015 03:45 (nine years ago) link

The rock song is Audioslave, right?

jaymc, Friday, 13 March 2015 04:23 (nine years ago) link

Ha, OK, yes, as people have said upthread.

jaymc, Friday, 13 March 2015 04:27 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, that's it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DKX-2pa-UE

Ugh. I did find a great YouTube title searching for it: "Collateral Cab Scene."

clemenza, Friday, 13 March 2015 05:07 (nine years ago) link

sometimes I wonder if Audioslave made it to three albums because Michael Mann was secretly bankrolling them

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 13 March 2015 05:22 (nine years ago) link

Debi Mazar is half of the arguing couple that's Foxx's first fare of the day, right at the movie's start.

with HD lyrics (Eazy), Friday, 13 March 2015 05:24 (nine years ago) link

Deleted scene that must have cost a lot to make, considering they flew over LAX:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BisMTKjKgi4

with HD lyrics (Eazy), Friday, 13 March 2015 05:31 (nine years ago) link

Still love this movie. I know people complain about the last 30 minutes but there's good stuff there, even if it is more standard action fare. Was happy to see EW give it a ten year treatment last year. http://www.ew.com/ew/static/longform/collateral/desktop/

Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Friday, 13 March 2015 06:09 (nine years ago) link

wow, that shot over the airport in the deleted scene!
now we all know how to shake a chopper in LA, thanks vincent

dutch_justice, Friday, 13 March 2015 07:42 (nine years ago) link

Mazar--of course, duh. I was having trouble last night even remembering any females in the film outside of Pinkett Smith; all I could come up with was the FBI woman and Jamie Foxx's mother.

clemenza, Friday, 13 March 2015 23:01 (nine years ago) link

six years pass...

genuinely the best movie ever

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 18:02 (three years ago) link

miami vice still my fave mann but every time i rewatch this i find it masterful, the way the successive escalations of the plot eventually push it into this dream/nightmare space that max is stuck in, and then a coyote walks across the road to an audioslave song

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 18:07 (three years ago) link

I guess I should finally watch this

intern at pepe le pew research (Simon H.), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 18:17 (three years ago) link

There are elements of Collateral that have stuck with me for years, like the coyote at night, or the subtle detail that Foxx's cab driving skills, which get Jada to her destination early, are what throws off punctual ninja Cruise and set the whole movie in motion.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 April 2021 19:33 (three years ago) link

miami vice still my fave

― mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Wednesday, April 14, 2021 1:07 PM (one hour ago)

avatar of a kind of respectability homosexual culture (Eric H.), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 19:34 (three years ago) link

I like Collateral; it's as good as Heat, I'd say, and you don't have anything like Pacino's hammier moments.

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 April 2021 19:39 (three years ago) link

heat is one of my favorite gay films of all time but yeah i think collateral is better. hard for me to choose between it, miami vice, and (the beguiling) blackhat

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 19:44 (three years ago) link

I don't love Heat as much as other people, though I haven't seen it since it played in theatres, so there's a fair chance I might have a different perspective on it these days. Collateral I liked better at the time, and would probably be more inclined to rewatch today.

edited for dog profanity (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 14 April 2021 20:06 (three years ago) link

it's definitely shorter

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 April 2021 20:52 (three years ago) link

one month passes...

1) the funky new hi-def video michael mann is using looks totally amazing

― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, July 23, 2004 3:24 AM (sixteen years ago)

it's gonna look awesome no matter what

― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, July 23, 2004 3:40 AM (sixteen years ago)

Just watched this for the first time. It does indeed look awesome, Mann's use of available light (= hundreds of different types of artificial light) makes the early HD digital look like Super 16 saturated colour and grain.

noted earlier but lol at many of the OG posts itt. the past is a different country:

yeah, i find that whole "widescreen-on-TV" thing kind of weird. in the beginning (sopranos? E.R.? i forget which was first) it was obviously a sop to the idea that widescreen TVs would take over. but they obviously haven't, and won't for a while.

― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, July 23, 2004 3:56 AM (sixteen years ago)


i'm sure at the end we'll find out he was planning to kill jamie foxx as soon as his "work" was done

― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, July 26, 2004 11:17 PM (sixteen years ago)

And you say you object to Law and Order "on principle"... what principle? It's a police procedural!

― Harold Media (kenan), Saturday, August 7, 2004 5:15 PM (sixteen years ago)

so are hollywood movies really not supposed to show people smoking? cos strangely for a film involving taxi drivers and world-weary cops, i don't think ANYBODY lit up a cigarette. well, i guess smoking is banned in LA nightclubs/bars, so maybe it was a touch of realism...

― ||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Sunday, August 8, 2004 3:02 PM (sixteen years ago)

What phone number can I call you at right now?

― Harold Media (kenan), Monday, August 9, 2004 3:35 PM (sixteen years ago)

bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Wednesday, 26 May 2021 15:54 (two years ago) link

Funny, I just watched this again the other night. Holds up really well, not just the bits of comedy but Foxx playing against type, and Cruise, well, playing to type, but a different kind of type. I had forgotten about all the stuff with Jada again at the end, which is pretty generic, but Mann (and Cruise, actually) find some new ways of doing it. For example, one of my favorite moments is Cruise standing outside the train door at maximum pissed off intensity, gun raised, just waiting for Foxx or Jada to poke so much as a finger out. Memorable bits like that almost make up for the relative silliness of those last several minutes, even if Foxx-finally-as-hero does pay off, thematically.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 27 May 2021 16:36 (two years ago) link

three months pass...

Just rewatched this for the first time since it came out. I remembered it fondly — I'm a Mann fan — but it was better than I even remembered. So gorgeous. A fine entry in the it-all-happens-in-one-night canon, which is one of my favorite subgenres.

ten months pass...

Just saw this for the first time! So good! I love LA at night

calstars, Friday, 22 July 2022 20:56 (one year ago) link

Fox and Cruz are very good , esp Fox

calstars, Friday, 22 July 2022 20:57 (one year ago) link

Ruffalo and Bardem too!

deep luminous trombone (Eazy), Friday, 22 July 2022 21:00 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.