I hate it when a film/TV critic uses a metaphor based on the subject matter of the thing they're reviewing. Two examples from this weeks Guardian Guide:
On Pushing Tin (A film about air traffic controllers):
"...conventions of the plot bring it down to earth a little at the end, but otherwise it's smooth flying."
On Six Feet under:
"You'd have to be an actual stiff not to love this."
Why do they employ these people?
― Wooden (Wooden), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
it's a great site, put together by the Columbia Journalism Review folks
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)
http://casa.colorado.edu/~jcollins/shalit.gif
SHAAAALIIIIIITTT!!!
― Harold Media (kenan), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)
"garden state certainly is the catch of the day!"
― amateur!!!st, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― na (Nick A.), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Titanic: All clear for take-off!Murder On the Orient Express: Rough waters ahead in latest Agatha Christie shipwreck!Pirates of the Caribbean: Stays on-track!Planes, Trains & Automobiles: More fun than a weekend in bed with comic books!My Step-Mother Is An Alien: Merry Christmas, Julie Andrews!Sex, Lies & Videotape: Houston, We Have a Hit!Showgirls: Don't forgot your sunscreen!
― Huck, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Harold Media (kenan), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― na (Nick A.), Monday, 16 August 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Monday, 16 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Monday, 16 August 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/screen/story/0,6903,1283171,00.html
"but if you type 'the Fulfords' into Google you currently end up with page after page of (f***ing) estate agents, though probably not for very much longer."
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,6903,1283233,00.html(which manages to do both)
"The Oxford English dictionary defines a guerrilla as 'a member of a small independently acting group taking part in irregular fighting, esp. against large regular forces'. Type the word into any search engine, however, and you quickly get the sense that its old belligerent connotations are being nudged to one side. Battle fatigues, bullet belts and Marxism are nowhere to be seen; instead, the latter-day guerrilla is likely to be an advocate of a very modern, self-motivated creativity. As five minutes on Google proves, the term's use spans the arts - it may only be a matter of time before someone stages the first guerrilla opera."
grrrr
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I haven't seen anyone use the dictionary definition lead in a long time. I thought it was a high school essay cliché outlawed many years ago.
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)
You might be surprised.
And OTM about Google lede = new dictionary lede.
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 16 August 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 August 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 16 August 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Monday, 16 August 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 16 August 2004 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
It's wrong. Yes, there are some amateurish moments - the boom falling into camera-view - but I like it a lot. I imagine that you object to the slow pacing and simplicity, which I take (gladly) as a reflection of Navajo life.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 16 August 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 16 August 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
nice one
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Monday, 16 August 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― andrew l. r. (allocryptic), Monday, 16 August 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 16 August 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)
For an album that was effectively seven years in the making, Always Outnumbered, Never Outgunned is about as Zeitgeist-y as it gets. ‘Spitfire’ is a fantastically bootylicious slice of mayhem, and like Aphex Twin’s ‘Windowlicker’, ‘Girls’ is a hugely infectious ode to high-octane smut. In short, the album is consistently refreshing and neatly experimental, although the collaboration with brother-in-law Liam Gallagher on ‘Shoot Down’ is just plain bizarre. Not in a good way either.
Add to that Howlett’s other collaborators (Princess Superstar, Kool Keith, Juliette Lewis and Twista), and you get an insight into the many stylistic directions in which he wants to take the album.
As Fat Of The Land’s follow-up, this album was always going to be something of a statement of intent. Always Outnumbered, Never Outgunned makes for wonderfully vital listening.
Tanya SweeneyRating: 8½ / 10"
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 16 August 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)
1. The readership is addressed in the plural. It's possible more than one person is reading it but readers don't think of themselves as being multiple entities.2. "To those of you who thought X, think again" is a cliché.3. "the boy Howlett". Ick.4. "X years in the making" is a cliché.5. "In short" is inelegant.6. So is "you get an insight into the many stylistic directions in which he wants to take the album."7. "makes for" should be replaced with "is" and "wonderfully vital listening" is hideous.
Not sure why I typed all this up but once I started I couldn't stop.
― beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)
Quite frankly I have been on the Str4nge Fru1t mailing list for years tho and haf therefore seen all examples of worst-writing in the world ever so that Prodigy wotsit seems palatable to me.
Of course it is all spelt entirely inkorrektly.
― nervous, Tuesday, 17 August 2004 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― spittle (spittle), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)