Thursday August 19, 2004 11:01 PM
AP Photo PPC105
By JOHN CURRAN
Associated Press Writer
BRIELLE, N.J. (AP) - An 8-year-old girl who suffers from a rare digestive disorder and cannot eat wheat has had her first Holy Communion declared invalid because the wafer contained no wheat, violating Roman Catholic doctrine.
Now, Haley Waldman's mother is pushing the Diocese of Trenton and the Vatican to make an exception, saying the girl's condition should not exclude her from the sacrament, which commemorates the Last Supper of Jesus Christ before his crucifixion. The mother believes a rice Communion wafer would suffice.
``It's just not a viable option. How does it corrupt the tradition of the Last Supper? It's just rice versus wheat,'' said Elizabeth Pelly-Waldman.
Church doctrine holds that Communion wafers, like the bread served at the Last Supper, must have at least some unleavened wheat. Church leaders are reluctant to change anything about the sacrament.
``This is not an issue to be determined at the diocesan or parish level, but has already been decided for the Roman Catholic Church throughout the world by Vatican authority,'' Trenton Bishop John M. Smith said in a statement last week.
Haley was diagnosed with celiac sprue disease when she was 5. The disorder occurs in people with a genetic intolerance of gluten, a food protein contained in wheat and other grains.
When consumed by celiac sufferers, gluten (pronounced GLOO'-ten) damages the lining of the small intestine, blocking nutrient absorption and leading to vitamin deficiencies, bone-thinning and sometimes gastrointestinal cancer.
The diocese has told Haley's mother that the girl can receive a low-gluten wafer, or just drink wine at Communion, but that anything without gluten does not qualify. Pelly-Waldman rejected the offer, saying her child could be harmed by even a small amount of the substance.
Haley's Communion controversy isn't the first. In 2001, the family of a 5-year-old Massachusetts girl with the disease left the Catholic church after being denied permission to use a rice wafer.
Some Catholic churches allow no-gluten hosts, while others do not, said Elaine Monarch, executive director of the Celiac Disease Foundation, a California-based support group for sufferers.
``It is an undue hardship on a person who wants to practice their religion and needs to compromise their health to do so,'' Monarch said.
The church has similar rules for Communion wine. For alcoholics, the church allows a substitute for wine under some circumstances, however the drink must still be fermented from grapes and contain some alcohol. Grape juice is not a valid substitute.
Haley, a shy, brown-haired tomboy who loves surfing and hates wearing dresses, realizes the consequences of taking a wheat wafer.
``I'm on a gluten-free diet because I can't have wheat. I could die,'' she said last week.
Last year, as the third grader approached Holy Communion age in this Jersey Shore town, her mother told officials at St. Denis Catholic Church in Manasquan that the girl could not have the standard host.
After the church's pastor refused to allow a substitute, a priest at a nearby parish volunteered to offer one, and in May, Haley wore a white Communion dress, and received the sacrament alongside her mother, who had not taken Communion since she herself was diagnosed with the disease.
Last month, the diocese told the priest that the church would not validate Haley's sacrament because of the substitute wafer.
``I struggled with telling her that the sacrament did not happen,'' said Pelly-Waldman. ``She lives in a world of rules. She says `Mommy, do we want to break a rule? Are we breaking a rule?'''
Pelly-Waldman is seeking help from the Pope and has written to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, challenging the church's policy.
``This is a church rule, not God's will, and it can easily be adjusted to meet the needs of the people, while staying true to the traditions of our faith,'' Pelly-Waldman wrote in the letter.
Pelly-Waldman - who is still attending Mass every Sunday with her four children - said she is not out to bash the church, just to change the policy that affects her daughter.
``I'm hopeful. Do I think it will be a long road to change? Yes. But I'm raising an awareness and I'm taking it one step at a time,'' she said.
― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)
I say she should bite the bullet and eat the wheat - better to die and got to paradise than live a full life and lose your immortal soul.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― dean? (deangulberry), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
In short, I think the Church is being very silly about this particular issue. They should give the poor little girl a break and have her First Holy Communion (which is supposed to be a special day in her life) count, and accomodate her from here on out by allowing her to receive rice wafers for communion. Come on. It won't kill them. It'll only kill her, if she has to go with the letter of the law. And honestly, I'd grieve more for the loss of a young girl's life than the loss of some elderly curmudgeon's life.
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Well... not so much the religious organizations, because "religious organization" in the manner that most people speak of is actually composed of the adherents themselves. It's just -- you know, the whole Pharisee setup, people in the tippy tippy top of a particular, um, well, religious organization (ok, so maybe the top echelon of the adherents can be discussed here) whose over-reliance to rules and regulations and order supercedes any sort of human compassion and sensibility and TRUE reverence and worship of God. They end up breaking one of God's commandments in that they put such an importance on the letter of the law that it becomes their false idol, the thing they worship. That was the moral of the whole story with the Pharisees and I'm sorry these officials aren't sharp enough or willing to see how they're repeating this story, in minor and major ways.
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)
I did type something here earlier but it's vanished. Anyway...
Whenever I read about some crazy Bishop doing something that makes the Catholic Church look foolish, it always turns out be a US diocese. I guess pther Bishops have more important things on their mind. I guess the Catholic Church in the US is in a battle with the Evangelicals over who can be the most outrageous in the practice of their faith.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Kevin, I think it's because the Church has become so stodgy and stuffy here in the U.S., and because it hasn't had much of a chance to really struggle and fight. The Catholic Church in many places throughout the world (certain Latin American and African countries, for instance) still undergoes a certain measure of persecution which makes it difficult on the Church and thus keeps it awake to the world around it. I would also imagine it can be a bit difficult to be a Catholic in many Western European countries, unless most people in those countries don't share Wooden's mindset. In the U.S., there still exists a bit of anti-Catholic bigotry in the general population (witness the fact that there's only been one Catholic president in the nation's history, one Mr. Kennedy), but in general life is rather comfortable for the faith here, and one certainly wouldn't hear of one's parish priests or nuns being taken out of their residences and assassinated by members of the national armed forces, for instance.
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)
(And all is right in the world again. *wink*)
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
My experiences with all churches in the UK, not just the RC, is that they are mostly very welcoming liberal places: Most Church of Scotland ministers I've met have been socialist. (another abberation, Christianity is much more a 'lefty' thing than the US; the Labour Party was founded in a Christian Socialist mindset, though now the Christian and the Socialist elements have been dropped. The RC in the rest of the world too has a strong connection with the poor, especially where 'Liberation Theology' is strong.) And most priests here are fairly liberal too - though of course in complete agreement with Rome, especially as regards Iraq, Third World Debt etc.
It's just odd that the US has managed to create a very specific form of Catholicism (obviously not amongst the lay people)that in many ways seems very Right-Wing and at odds with the Christian message. Which is partly where I disagree with the Marxist notion that religion was invented or used to oppress the people - certainly some religions, churches etc. have behaved badly: but they have, at their best, been opponents of power and suffered at the hands of authoritys. I guess all western churches need to rediscover that church is not a country club.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
Nicely done, Joe & Dee.
― jim wentworth (wench), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― aimurchie, Friday, 20 August 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)
Best thing about this article is now Americans now how to pronounce GLOO'ten.
― Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)