If it's not wheat, it's not the body of Christ

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Church Says Girl's Communion Not Valid

Thursday August 19, 2004 11:01 PM


AP Photo PPC105

By JOHN CURRAN

Associated Press Writer

BRIELLE, N.J. (AP) - An 8-year-old girl who suffers from a rare digestive disorder and cannot eat wheat has had her first Holy Communion declared invalid because the wafer contained no wheat, violating Roman Catholic doctrine.

Now, Haley Waldman's mother is pushing the Diocese of Trenton and the Vatican to make an exception, saying the girl's condition should not exclude her from the sacrament, which commemorates the Last Supper of Jesus Christ before his crucifixion. The mother believes a rice Communion wafer would suffice.

``It's just not a viable option. How does it corrupt the tradition of the Last Supper? It's just rice versus wheat,'' said Elizabeth Pelly-Waldman.

Church doctrine holds that Communion wafers, like the bread served at the Last Supper, must have at least some unleavened wheat. Church leaders are reluctant to change anything about the sacrament.

``This is not an issue to be determined at the diocesan or parish level, but has already been decided for the Roman Catholic Church throughout the world by Vatican authority,'' Trenton Bishop John M. Smith said in a statement last week.

Haley was diagnosed with celiac sprue disease when she was 5. The disorder occurs in people with a genetic intolerance of gluten, a food protein contained in wheat and other grains.

When consumed by celiac sufferers, gluten (pronounced GLOO'-ten) damages the lining of the small intestine, blocking nutrient absorption and leading to vitamin deficiencies, bone-thinning and sometimes gastrointestinal cancer.

The diocese has told Haley's mother that the girl can receive a low-gluten wafer, or just drink wine at Communion, but that anything without gluten does not qualify. Pelly-Waldman rejected the offer, saying her child could be harmed by even a small amount of the substance.

Haley's Communion controversy isn't the first. In 2001, the family of a 5-year-old Massachusetts girl with the disease left the Catholic church after being denied permission to use a rice wafer.

Some Catholic churches allow no-gluten hosts, while others do not, said Elaine Monarch, executive director of the Celiac Disease Foundation, a California-based support group for sufferers.

``It is an undue hardship on a person who wants to practice their religion and needs to compromise their health to do so,'' Monarch said.

The church has similar rules for Communion wine. For alcoholics, the church allows a substitute for wine under some circumstances, however the drink must still be fermented from grapes and contain some alcohol. Grape juice is not a valid substitute.

Haley, a shy, brown-haired tomboy who loves surfing and hates wearing dresses, realizes the consequences of taking a wheat wafer.

``I'm on a gluten-free diet because I can't have wheat. I could die,'' she said last week.

Last year, as the third grader approached Holy Communion age in this Jersey Shore town, her mother told officials at St. Denis Catholic Church in Manasquan that the girl could not have the standard host.

After the church's pastor refused to allow a substitute, a priest at a nearby parish volunteered to offer one, and in May, Haley wore a white Communion dress, and received the sacrament alongside her mother, who had not taken Communion since she herself was diagnosed with the disease.

Last month, the diocese told the priest that the church would not validate Haley's sacrament because of the substitute wafer.

``I struggled with telling her that the sacrament did not happen,'' said Pelly-Waldman. ``She lives in a world of rules. She says `Mommy, do we want to break a rule? Are we breaking a rule?'''

Pelly-Waldman is seeking help from the Pope and has written to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, challenging the church's policy.

``This is a church rule, not God's will, and it can easily be adjusted to meet the needs of the people, while staying true to the traditions of our faith,'' Pelly-Waldman wrote in the letter.

Pelly-Waldman - who is still attending Mass every Sunday with her four children - said she is not out to bash the church, just to change the policy that affects her daughter.

``I'm hopeful. Do I think it will be a long road to change? Yes. But I'm raising an awareness and I'm taking it one step at a time,'' she said.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Can't the priest say a few word to magically turn it from rice into wheat, before transubstantiation occurs?

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Noise board was on this one two days ago:
R0CK TH3 B0DY OF CHR15T AM3N!!

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh great, now I'm thinking like that lto.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Luther should have mentioned that on his posting - "I know a little girl who can't take communion because you guys say it has to have wheat in it. She can't eat wheat. Messes her up. Whats that all about?"

I say she should bite the bullet and eat the wheat - better to die and got to paradise than live a full life and lose your immortal soul.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I wouldn't mind dying if I was guaranteed to go to Heaven.

dean? (deangulberry), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

She's a little girl - she can't have done anything *that* bad yet...

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

About this story: The Church is killing itself slowly, from the inside, with its insistence on following every single regulation to the letter. Thirty years down the line, there will come a time when a Vatican Council will proclaim that communion wafers don't have to contain wheat in order to "count" and that little child and others like her will then be adults who will throw their hands up in frustration. I was talking to my mother about her faith life when she was almost about my age, and she told me that back then, they were all taught that you would go to Hell if you ate meat on Fridays, if you so much as even THOUGHT a member of the opposite sex was "hot" (and God help you if you thought a member of the SAME sex was "hot"), if you skipped even one Sunday Mass, etc., and now it's okay to eat meat on Fridays, it's okay to ogle members of the opposite sex (but not act on any "impure" thoughts -- oh, no way) (BTW, I think the Church is starting to accept this even wrt members of the SAME sex), etc. (Though it still frowns upon skipping Sunday Mass -- even I was taught that was a no-no and I'm from the post-Vatican II school of thought.

In short, I think the Church is being very silly about this particular issue. They should give the poor little girl a break and have her First Holy Communion (which is supposed to be a special day in her life) count, and accomodate her from here on out by allowing her to receive rice wafers for communion. Come on. It won't kill them. It'll only kill her, if she has to go with the letter of the law. And honestly, I'd grieve more for the loss of a young girl's life than the loss of some elderly curmudgeon's life.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

This story proves how irrideemibly insane all religious organisations are. Sorry if that offends anyone, that's just the way I feel.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

This story proves how irrideemibly insane all religious organisations are. Sorry if that offends anyone, that's just the way I feel.

Well... not so much the religious organizations, because "religious organization" in the manner that most people speak of is actually composed of the adherents themselves. It's just -- you know, the whole Pharisee setup, people in the tippy tippy top of a particular, um, well, religious organization (ok, so maybe the top echelon of the adherents can be discussed here) whose over-reliance to rules and regulations and order supercedes any sort of human compassion and sensibility and TRUE reverence and worship of God. They end up breaking one of God's commandments in that they put such an importance on the letter of the law that it becomes their false idol, the thing they worship. That was the moral of the whole story with the Pharisees and I'm sorry these officials aren't sharp enough or willing to see how they're repeating this story, in minor and major ways.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Obviously religious organisations are made up of the adherents. I'm an athiest, and I think anyone who bases their system of morality on things that were written down a couple of thousand years ago (at least partially as a means of keeping a population of serfs docile) rather than what they observe going on around them in the world today (to whit: which actions are likely to cause the least amount of human suffering) to be at least slightly gaga. Again, I've no wish to offend, but I'm being entirely honest here.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:30 (twenty-one years ago)

My suspicion is that Jesus would probably give the little girl a rice wafer.

Maria (Maria), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Or one of his scabs.

I did type something here earlier but it's vanished. Anyway...

Whenever I read about some crazy Bishop doing something that makes the Catholic Church look foolish, it always turns out be a US diocese. I guess pther Bishops have more important things on their mind. I guess the Catholic Church in the US is in a battle with the Evangelicals over who can be the most outrageous in the practice of their faith.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Wooden, I wouldn't be offended if you'd just said that that was what YOU personally felt, that that was part of your own personal world view. But since you said that you were being "honest" here, which demands of it some semblance of authority and "I'm right and you're wrong", I, a member of a religious organization, have no choice but to be offended. I'm sorry, but that's just the way it has to go.

Kevin, I think it's because the Church has become so stodgy and stuffy here in the U.S., and because it hasn't had much of a chance to really struggle and fight. The Catholic Church in many places throughout the world (certain Latin American and African countries, for instance) still undergoes a certain measure of persecution which makes it difficult on the Church and thus keeps it awake to the world around it. I would also imagine it can be a bit difficult to be a Catholic in many Western European countries, unless most people in those countries don't share Wooden's mindset. In the U.S., there still exists a bit of anti-Catholic bigotry in the general population (witness the fact that there's only been one Catholic president in the nation's history, one Mr. Kennedy), but in general life is rather comfortable for the faith here, and one certainly wouldn't hear of one's parish priests or nuns being taken out of their residences and assassinated by members of the national armed forces, for instance.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Halo, I said I was being honest, as in I was honestly communicating MY opinion. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OHHHHH. Okay. Never mind, then. Sorry for the misunderstanding!

(And all is right in the world again. *wink*)

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

(p.s.: Please call me Dee. Thanks!)

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

No problem, Dee.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm Joe, by the way. First time I've told anyone on ILX my name. Epiphany!

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I live in Western Europe - Scotland more accurately, and Catholicism becomes more complicated here (especially Glasgow) with it's connections to the 'Irish Problem'. As far as atheism/agnosticism goes, it's mainly a western european thing - there are far more atheists here than anywhere else in the world - about 50-60% believe in a God, and I believe in the US it is about 90%. The rest of the world of course are mainly theistic.

My experiences with all churches in the UK, not just the RC, is that they are mostly very welcoming liberal places: Most Church of Scotland ministers I've met have been socialist. (another abberation, Christianity is much more a 'lefty' thing than the US; the Labour Party was founded in a Christian Socialist mindset, though now the Christian and the Socialist elements have been dropped. The RC in the rest of the world too has a strong connection with the poor, especially where 'Liberation Theology' is strong.) And most priests here are fairly liberal too - though of course in complete agreement with Rome, especially as regards Iraq, Third World Debt etc.

It's just odd that the US has managed to create a very specific form of Catholicism (obviously not amongst the lay people)that in many ways seems very Right-Wing and at odds with the Christian message. Which is partly where I disagree with the Marxist notion that religion was invented or used to oppress the people - certainly some religions, churches etc. have behaved badly: but they have, at their best, been opponents of power and suffered at the hands of authoritys. I guess all western churches need to rediscover that church is not a country club.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

Nicely done, Joe & Dee.

jim wentworth (wench), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I must weigh in on ...everything. The Catholic church in the U.S.(especially the Irish Catholics) are Democrats.They are not socially liberal, but they are fiscally wise. The Italian Catholics are also Democrats. It's the fundamentalist, quasi protestant (based, to some extent. on the Church of Scotland) that are the real wackos. of course, y'know, I'm HAPPY here in Masachusetts knowing that my democracy is being torn asunder by a right wing christian who decided to get Jesus just about the time his oil business failed.G.W.Bush was a failure at everything he attempted. His family are conservative Episcopalians. But they are the new royalty in a country founded on terrorism to reject a monarchy.
Catholics are liberal. Witness the Kennedy's. The religious right in the U.S. is fundamentalists - and they consider Catholics papists.
Oh - the little girl should have received the sacrament. I forgot the point of the thread. The Catholics are wacky these days - they keep fucking up.

aimurchie, Friday, 20 August 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

It's nonsense logic anyway, as the wafer TURNS INTO A TOTALLY DIFFERENT SUBSTANCE ANYWAY.

Best thing about this article is now Americans now how to pronounce GLOO'ten.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.