Why does Canada suck so bad at the Olympics?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's getting painful to watch.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

do you really want to be good at them?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Even mediocre wouldn't be so bad!

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

so you want to be more like America, eh?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, we have SOME medals...

chrisco (chrisco), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Well you could be like India, a billion people and one medal. Give thanks for what you have :).

svend (svend), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Simple answer. Funding. Other countries, some with GDPs much lower than ours actually support their athletes. We don't, and as a result are subjected to displays such as this every 4 years. When I find myself getting depressed about it, I just think back to double hockey Gold in Salt Lake and I find it takes some of the sting away.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I guess it's that despite the low funding we still seem obliged to field athletes in most events, give them extensive national public TV coverage, and watch them place second-last or so. If we'd just decided that international sporting events aren't a big national priority and so we didn't bother competing in events where we knew we weren't competitive, that wouldn't be so bad. It would even be sensible, given the natl debt etc.

Or maybe I'm exaggerating the situation. It's just felt pretty hopeless the last couple days any time I tune in.

(Props to Karen Cockburn - Yorkie! - and best wishes to Perdita Felicien.)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 23 August 2004 03:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Exactly. There's more success to be had in aiming for excellence in a few sports as opposed to settling for mediocrity in many sports. Of course this is easy to do -- how do I know that? -- because it's exactly what we do for the winter Olympics.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 23 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Australia is probably the country most similar to us in terms of population, size and relative wealth. They decided a while back to only focus on a few sports and it's paid off quite well for them, especially in the pool.

Another problem is that Canadians tend to accept mediocre performances. Say what you want about the Yanks, but any of their athletes who come in 6th place in a heat aren't likely to find themselves on TV. Hockey is the only sport in Canada where the attitude is first place at all costs. Maybe a little more of that in other sports wouldn't be such a bad thing.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 23 August 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

In some ironic way, the Olympics radicalizes our mediocrity.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Australia or the Netherlands are probably the most similar to us in that respect. Both are kicking our asses in the medal count right now.

Also, I don't buy the "Canada accepts mediocrity" argument. We accept mediocrity when we are not expected to do well, and are pleasantly surprised when our athletes exceed expectations. I think this is true of all countries. Nobody would have accepted 6th place from Donovan Bailey or Silken Laumann in their primes.

If the US, China, Russia and all the other Olympic giants expect more from their athletes, it's because they have a lot more favourites in a lot more events compared to Canada.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

What I can't tolerate in the CBC's Olympics coverage (besides Brian Williams - ugh) is the smugness that always creeps in ("See we're showing a cross-section of events, not just the ones we've got atheletes in" "Aren't we great and all about happy pluralism?"). It's this weird inverted anti-jingoism jingoism.

However, I'm still spending my days glued to the set.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)

didn't we just let a shit load fewer athletes in this time around because we suked so bad in sydney or something¿
& i have to admit i've found canada's performance so far kind of funny.
but i've only really been following our baseball team & it's been all good so far.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

We should petition to have (ice) hockey added to the summer games roster. It's always played indoors anyway.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

ha ha. maybe have "unsynchronized swimming". we'd do well at that.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

ITS SUMMER DUDES !!

anthony, Monday, 23 August 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

*peers out window*

WHOLY SHIT¡¡

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

KYLE SHEWFELT!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I feel a bit disappointed whenever Canada loses or gets humiliated in some way at the Olympics, watching the Olympic coverage on the CBC has gotten me a little emotionally invested I guess.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Another problem is that Canadians tend to accept mediocre performances. Say what you want about the Yanks, but any of their athletes who come in 6th place in a heat aren't likely to find themselves on TV.

I kind of noticed something like this the other day on the coverage of some of the medal winners; there was the Calgary gymanst who won gold, and listening to him talking was refreshing, because he sounded very pleasantly surprised that he actually got the gold--pleased, but not arrogant about it. Compare with a U.S. runner who won a gold who was saying things like "this is my DESTINY" and saying that he was designed to win golds, and I started to understand why Canada doesn't do so well: they're there to do their best, but they won't have to commit suicide afterwards if they don't get the gold.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think that's totally fair. we've had our share of arrogant athletes.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad we're sucking at the olympics. It's a HUGE waste of public money. Even if we did alright we'd forget about who won what within a year.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks Noodles; I've been waiting, amid all the low-medal-count bellyaching to hear an argument, any argument as to why a lot of gold medals is an objective national good. We're fucking up our social programs because, apparently, there's no money. Hell, my tuition's doubled in the last 3 years. It's hard to feel concern over our country 'not producing Olympic-caliber athletes', as apparently I should judging by the talking heads lately. How is this good social policy?
I'm ok with current government policy, and I'll be staunchly opposed if they suggest increasing athletic funding. I'm sure it will blow over in a week, and so long as the Olympics never coincide with a federal election, we should be alright.

I think Canada should patent inverted jingoism. It really is a wonderful descriptor of what we do.

derrick (derrick), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

If your still in university, try finding out your football team's budget. It's a mindblowing load of crap that Canadian universities even have teams. UofT and other large Ontario ones perhaps, but when you start getting down to student populations of 2000 - 10,000 you can't hide a 100 players amoungst them.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I know I'd start crying if I saw the athletics budget after going through 6 months of consultations with the admin. last year to get our tuition increase down to fucking 15% instead of 35%.

I'm on a senate committee that lets students into the university based on d1verse qual1f1cati0ns, and fighting every meeting against a tacit approval process that green-lights any kids with a letter from a university sports coach, no matter how crap their grades or academic interest.

derrick (derrick), Monday, 23 August 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think that's totally fair. we've had our share of arrogant athletes.

Yeah, true, but it seems far less glaring. But yeah, we've had our knobs too.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 23 August 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Arrogant gold-medal-winning knobs, R.I.P.: Victor Davis.

And can I claim the "inverted jingoism" thing?

And, following from the Olympics 2004 (US) thread: Have you heard the Canadian national anthem they're piping out in Greece. Makes me cringe.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

i haven't; what's wrong with it¿

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, you'll get yours back at the world cup of hockey in two weeks.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 23 August 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anyone care about that either?

It's a cash grab to try and make up for the fact there won't be a NHL season this year.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I had anything to say.

Huck, Monday, 23 August 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I wouldn't say we accept mediocrity either. I mean, I'm always impressed by anyone considered an international or Olympic level athlete, whether they have medals or not. The Olympics are just another level of relativity b/c seriously, if you were in the pool racing against even a low-level Olympic athlete, you'd get your ass kicked and be impressed by what a person, even a Canadian person!, can do. Sports are just a very tangible way of measuring excellence. There are no Poetry Olympics or Biochemistry Games, or at least no way to make talent in these and other areas highly relatable to those not in the field. Funding issues are difficult to argue for or against b/c the arguement is apples and oranges - people are passionate about and will defend what they love/care about. Certainly, money should be more equally distributed, but measuring the "worth" of things is so subjective.

As a sports-only example though, check out the discrepancy btwn women's and men's sports funding. Holy crap.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

to be fair, it's tough to get good at these summer olympic sports when you've snow year-round and live in igloos

actually, a question: does/would nunavut-ers compete as canadians or on their own a la england/scotland/wales in the world cup?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

we'll let you know when it comes up.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Forget the Olympics, it's all about: http://www.awg2004.ca/The_Games/Contingents_nunavut.asp

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.awg2004.ca/images/mascot/skating2.JPG

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw. The Olympics has nothing on that mascot.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 23 August 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

The anthem, the two times I've heard (once in the gymnastics and once in wheelchair racing (sic)), it's been a kind of atonal avant-garde sounding piece (said this on the other thread). Just one of those things where if you've heard for more than 30 years, you know how it's supposed to sound. They took some liberties with it. Provided we get another gold, keep your ears open.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm afriad i no longer have tv :(

could you hum it¿

dyson (dyson), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Our anthem sucks anyway. Get over it.

Huck, Monday, 23 August 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"Taking Care of Business" sucks?

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Hah, I heard that atonal rendition of our anthem on the radio today, and the announcers were making comments like "holy crap was this ever horrible", and I was thinking "you know, we could probably use more of this kind of horrible in our anthem, because at least now it's interesting!"

They were talking about it like it was some inept Portsmouth Sinfonia-style rendition, but it was actually kind of cool.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

at least they probably had the flag right side up, though, eh?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

But its got swords and crosses!

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 23 August 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Agreed that the anthem is a) horrible, b) the rendition they're playing is a stranger to tonality.
Is it too late to revert back to "God Save the Queen"? That's a fantastic anthem.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)

wasnt that `roider ben johnson a canadian? you guys got that going for you..

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I did find it rather jarring, but strangely pleasurable to hear it done up like that. I'm not too particular about "national hymns" as my German friend calls them (and he really likes the Canadian anthem). Not getting upset, because indeed it is a sucky anthem.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

He was indeed. And I think any Canadian who was watching the race that night knows exactly where they were (in Bar St. Laurent, now the Jupiter Room in Montreal). And where they were when they found out he was hopped up (at home watching Omega Medina on CFCF news). A proud moment.

Guymauve (Guymauve), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

They still play 'God Save The Queen', you just got to hang out near members of royality or the Lieutenant Governors more often.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 23 August 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"Sporting event matters to participants, attending crowd: Film at 11."

We'll make sure to check with you before we enjoy any sporting events in the future, ok? Plus I'll make sure to check in with you to see what I should consider important. Glad that's settled.

Bill Magill, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)

yes and I'm sure all those people affected by the quake don't give a flying fig that they have no home, cause YAY LOOK AT THE LIL GIRL DO THE FLIPPITY DO!

-- Granny Dainger, Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:12 PM (Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:12 PM) Bookmark Link

i'm sure they don't give a flying fuck about the current state of the american economy but that doesn't mean it's not important.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)

Water is wet, too, you guys.

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)

Although I still HATE the fact that Beijing won these games over Toronto, maybe it was for the best

I wish Toronto had gotten the Olympics for the simple reason that Vancouver wouldn't have it in 2010. I've only lived in the lower mainland for three months and I'm already sick of all the Olympic blahblah out here.

Ugh, and listening to the CBC whine, whine, whine at every opportunity about the lack of medals. SHUDDUP. Canadian pride is is a funny thing, indeed. And not just every 4 years at the Olympics.

kate78, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)

how can any of you people even enjoy music and art, let alone sports, when there's earthquakes everywhere.

s1ocki, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)

just trying to raise your unathletic Canuckian spirits

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:44 (seventeen years ago)

slocki you're to blame for spending so much time filling your piehole rather than doing handstands

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)

i'm sure they don't give a flying fuck about the current state of the american economy but that doesn't mean it's not important.

can't argue with that logic!

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)

can't argue with that logic!

that doesn't surprise me.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)

ok guys what i'm saying is over here... and you're over on Planet Zing.

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)

all my fault for positing the radical notion that perhaps Olympic success is overvalued in most if not all cultures. thanks for setting me straight, ILX.

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:54 (seventeen years ago)

and thank you sir, for setting us straight on earthquakes

Mr. Que, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)

i for one welcome our planet zing overlords

rrrobyn, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:56 (seventeen years ago)

Planet Zing, locked in perpetual intergalactic combat with Planet Butthurt

dan m, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:56 (seventeen years ago)

Mr Que you need to step up your game. Maybe get your country to increase its support of zinging?

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

ok, enough of that.

i really liked what robyn said :
i think the argument as to why canada isn't 'kicking ass' at the olympics goes far beyond wealth and technology - this is an extremely culturally complex country when one really looks at it, and it's only getting more difficult to fully understand and 'manage'/govern in any traditional way - our federal government barely touches on 'what's best for all canadians' in the long term (e.g., see latest cuts to arts funding re: international stage, see diminishing # of health care practitioners, even see migration of hockey to US) and we don't have a solid, organized private patronage as the states does. our ongoing national/regional/individual nebulous multiple identity issues, as wimpy as such an issue may seem, are much more at the heart of this matter than access to wealth and technology.

we have no myth! there is no 'blood' myth for canada, e.g. france or germany, and no 'independence' myth either, i.e. american revolution. it doesn't really matter if canada is better or triumphant or anything, because we're not really sure what we're defending.

the thing with the 'sting' is that we all forget about it after the games are over. this thread exactly parallels what actually happened in canada. in 2004, we talked about how badly we did at the games. then we talked about a lot of other things, and now it's 2008. oh, surprise, we're in the same place. it is what it is - the lack of attention on yr average non-olympic newsday (i.e. almost every day ever) is indicative of how much it actually matters that we aren't winning.

oh, vancouver. i'm in a debate right now about whether to leave town for 2010 or not. my home is 5 min walking distance from the figure skating practice rink, and apparently we could get a huge amount of money by renting our place out. like, $10,000+ dollars for the 2 weeks. we go to the island and hide out, come back and pay off our student loans, while some rich dude gets to stay at our place and watch the games. win-win.

at the same time, how could i leave my city when we're about to go through the biggest gong show of our short history? it's like having the farm next to woodstock and leaving for the weekend to avoid the noise. i kinda want to see what happens on a day-by-day basis. can i still get a cup of coffee like every other day? i want to find out!

derrrick, Friday, 15 August 2008 07:05 (seventeen years ago)

oh, kate78 you should have been here for our little vote in 2003. and back in 2002, when the hip thing to do was to have a "salzburg 2010!" sticker on yr bag.

now we have "no olympics on stolen native land!" stickers. uh, it's a little late for that now :(

derrrick, Friday, 15 August 2008 07:08 (seventeen years ago)

some blogger type i just read, sports frog maybe, says it's all ben johnson's fault

jergins, Friday, 15 August 2008 07:13 (seventeen years ago)

lol yahoo.ca headlines:

'Don't give up on us'
Canada's struggle to win Olympic medals highlights an old problem with a 'bleak' future.» What?

rrrobyn, Friday, 15 August 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)

it's the What? as link/punchline

rrrobyn, Friday, 15 August 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)

LOOK AT THE LIL GIRL DO THE FLIPPITY DO!

pretty sure this is illegal

HI DERE, Friday, 15 August 2008 21:04 (seventeen years ago)

The real reason why Canada sucks at Olympics is that it's impossible to assemble that many Canadians without at least half of them failing the drug test. Every time.

fields of salmon, Friday, 15 August 2008 22:41 (seventeen years ago)

congratulations canada on the gold. ms hunyh is very cute and funny

jergins, Saturday, 16 August 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)

All this is, is the common fallacy of projection and confused identification that sports fans all seem to share.

A Canadian athlete is just a person with athletic skills who has the accidental attribute of Canadian citizenship. "Canada" does not suck at the Olympics. But the Olympics encourage these mass delusions of national idenity. Sorry.

But isn't accepting this reality better than continuing to feel bad that you somehow participate in some mythical Canadian suckitude?

Aimless, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)

The Olympics are, more often than not*, a reflection of the facilities and systems of support provided by their countries to encourage athletes to pursue their chosen sports professionally.

*except there are athletes who overcome lack of support by their determination/passion/genius organizing and 'revolutionary' training methods...

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)

It's not just at the Olympics that Canadians think they suck. I think the whole country suffers from an unnecessary inferiority complex that manifests on a national level every four years at the summer games when nobody wins a medal for a week.

kate78, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think canada sucks

rrrobyn, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

I agree that the suckitude is mythical.

kate78, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)

our current fed government is totally fucked up however and there is a huge amount of complacency in the general population but seems things've gotta get worse before they get better in this case, e.g. wake up wake up wake up

rrrobyn, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

listening to the CBC whine, whine, whine at every opportunity about the lack of medals

This is why I finally clicked on this. WTF people get some priorities. Also hosting the Olympics is for cities with something to prove (Atlanta, Athens, and especially Beijing!), doesn't Toronto have self-confidence? Well maybe not.

Casuistry, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

Ugh, the CBC. Today they'll be prattling on about women's wrestling. Somebody please start the "CBC: Classic or Dud?" thread. Really wish I could pick up NPR here...

kate78, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)

Since 4 yrs ago, I think I've pretty much come around to just thinking the govt should spend less on sports and not bother sending such a big team. (I think it was the discrepancy between the size of the contingent and their actual success that seemed jarring?)

CBC = classic though.

Sundar, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

Surely there are NPR podcasts.

Casuistry, Saturday, 16 August 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

Oh, there are. I usually download the weekly programs I want to hear, but I don't think you can download the complete daily news programs (Morning Edition and All Things Considered).

kate78, Saturday, 16 August 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)

Also, the CBC's French news podcasts don't seem to want to work. Not that I could really understand them well anyways. Still it could be funsies.

Casuistry, Saturday, 16 August 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

Judging by your French Scrabble playing, I wouldn't have imagined that they would be hard for you to understand.;)

Sundar, Saturday, 16 August 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)

The Scrabble board, she does not talk.

Casuistry, Saturday, 16 August 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)

rowin n wrasslin, dudes

rrrobyn, Sunday, 17 August 2008 13:06 (seventeen years ago)

I felt kinda sorry for the Canadian bloke who got lapped in the 10,000 metres final. He was really trying hard.

jel --, Sunday, 17 August 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)

If he made it to the final, he's obv among the best in the world. Just not in the top 3.

Aimless, Sunday, 17 August 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

not top 3 = dead 2 me

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Sunday, 17 August 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

wow - seven now - look out Kazakhstan!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Sunday, 17 August 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)

There's no heats for the 10,000!

jel --, Sunday, 17 August 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)

"Since 4 yrs ago, I think I've pretty much come around to just thinking the govt should spend less on sports and not bother sending such a big team. (I think it was the discrepancy between the size of the contingent and their actual success that seemed jarring?)"

Got some numbers Sundar? Britain has sent about 300 athletes compared to China and US who have sent 600 each.

I think govt should spend more on sports at the activity kids level (I reckon the UK is appalling at it and the only downside about the success at this level is that it covers this up) than what we have now which is that spend quite a lot at the higher end so that anyone that shows ability has a better chance of developing into a medal contender. A more bottom up approach.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 18 August 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

So it looks like we don't suck THAT badly... 13 medals now, which is more than in 2004 (12) more than we got in '76 when it was held in Montreal (11), or in any Olympics prior to that. And the countries that have more are for the most part bigger than us in population, GDP, etc - the usual suspects for mega medals.

I haven't seen any medal count lists that take into consideration a country's relative size/wealth/# of athletes sent/etc, but this is a pretty cool tool.

Rob Bolton, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

xyzzzz: 332, according to this article.

Sundar, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

we never sucked in the first place!
i love that canada excels in trampolining and rowing
and yaaay Alexandre Despatie! and Priscilla Lopes-Schliep!

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

I read somewhere that Canada in '76 is the only host country not to take a gold medal.

Bill Magill, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)

(The UK has something like 1.9* Canada's population for the sake of comparison.)

Sundar, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, but the UK suck too (but not this year)

Tom D., Tuesday, 19 August 2008 16:01 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.