Allawi on US re last weekend's Iraq National Guard massacre: "Gross negligence."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hmmm, indeed.

"A terrible crime was committed in which a large number of the ING were martyred," Allawi said. "We think this shows, in addition to gross negligence on the side of some of the multi-national forces, it shows the kind of insistence to hurt Iraq and its people."

The rebuke was an unusual public condemnation of U.S.-led forces from the prime minister, who has such a cordial relationship with U.S. commanders and officials that he is often criticized by the Iraqi people for being too close to the Americans.

In a statement on Tuesday, the U.S. military called the massacre of the recruits "a cold-blooded and systematic move by terrorists" and said coalition forces were not responsible. The terrorists "and no one else must be held fully accountable for these attacks," the statement said. "The Iraqi interim government is investigating this tragic incident. Multinational forces will fully support and cooperate to establish the facts and avoid repetition of similar events."

Attempts to face-save all around?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

The use of the term martyred is discouraging.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Not very surprising, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Too bad the Bush admin couldn't "help" Allawi with that statement, too.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Martyrs to the cause of Iraqi freedom, blah, blah blah. It's really no worse than much of our cant, Spencer, and I'm sure it's a translation from the Arabic for 'innocent victim' or something.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I think it's a bit more complicated than that. Also, I think it's indicative of the kind of ideological disconnect that plagues our attempts at dropping secular (or pseudo-secular) democracy on countries without that tradition.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree about the ideological disconnect but note that we still use words like 'crusade' without it necessarily having anything to do with reconquering territory and forcibly evangelizing the inhabitants.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, that was used idiotically (but tellingly) by W and then there were complaits and he decided not to use the term anymore. I mean you don't hear it on CNN everyday, right?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I suppose the disconnect then is that we live in a self-described secular society which at least pretends to be considerate about terminology (not that our actions are necessarily more justified). I mean we have our own transcendental signifiers which we use without thinking, but I think there's a real non-analogous difference.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.