― Alan Trewartha, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Trevor, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― katie, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― suzy, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sarah, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In a similar vein the only line of Eminem's that really makes me wince is (paraphrase) "It is now officially OK to smack bitches" from 'Drug Ballad', because it's about the general not the specific and also because it's in the middle of a really funny and well-done song.
― Tom, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Most bizarre time I took offence: during very short-lived Christian fundamentalist phase aged about 12, I thought Talk Talk's song 'Life's What You Make It' was indicative of the pride of man.
― Mark C, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The (jam and spoon?) Sex on the Beach thing made me think "hang on that's a bit much". not actually offended though.
I think a lot of people were pissed off with the vid for smack my bitch up. it was just shit.
― Jonnie, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
westlife are grate
That BaxenUPHILLDOWNdale song is called "My American Cockfarmer", btw.
That's useful to know.
not to mention that the song, especially with its 'fred durst breaks it down for you' bit at the end, is a flaming pile of toss.
also offensive to me at the time was the aaliyah dedication after missy elliott's performance of 'one minute man' at the mtv video music awards, but now that i've heard and seen the video for 'rock the boat,' it makes a little more sense.
― maura, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
and, really, changing the lyrics to the song is just unforgivable. because i think the changes are extremely telling -- changing "picket lines/and picket signs" to "barracades/can't block our way" and "who are they to judge us simply 'cause our hair is long" to "who are they to judge us/together we can all be strong" transforms the song from one of confused alienation to some sort of idiotic steamroller anthem.
― jek, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The most offensive lyric change I've ever heard was at my company's day out last year. A group of musicians were hired to walk around at lunchtime performing alt-pop hits in a comedy French cafe fashion. They did Anarchy In The UK, apallingly as you might expect but in itself this was hardly bad. They dropped the IRA-UDA-UK verse as you might expect, but they also changed "Your future dream is a shopping scheme" to "Your future dream is a housing scheme", a massive inversion of values which left me staggered.
― Ronan, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Menelaus Darcy, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
They did not keep that line. The good lines they did keep died a screaming tortured death so it was for the best. They also did Bob The Builder and Smells Like Teen Spirit.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
And hanging around with Piers Morgan, really.
― Samantha, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ethan, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Sinatra? Greed before death begets greed after death. Strike one for karma.
The current version seems to be a lazy way to make some quick money for charity. Couldn't any of our "artists" write something original and germane to current situations?
(and besides WGO's is really about race riots not vietnam like most people think.)
I think charity singles in general are a lazy way to make money for charity. It would be a lot more economically efficient for these artists to donate proceeds from concerts, but they want to look pious by making a grand public statement (ie releasing a single).
― Pete, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Besides, I prefer the Temptations version of Grapevine.
Mmm...I have a problem with this. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that someone who is sincere *can't* be a good/great performer. Rather, praising someone for his or her sincerity as an automatic validation of his/her work is far too simplistic. One can be terribly sincere about something and still create work that someone else finds garbage. Thus:
RANDOM PERSON: "Bruce Springsteen is such a SINCERE performer! That's why he's so great!"
ME: "Bruce Springsteen is the aural equivalent of fertilizer soaked in heavy rancid syrup. He may well be sincere, though."
I'm not so much offended as morally irritated by the new Alicia Keyes song. Particularly because the video portrays her spewing that dreck to an impressionable child. It's a step up from the Shaggy mentality discussed in certain other threads, but it's still stupid.
― Nitsuh, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(Admit seems not is, not admit Nitsuh is a telepath. Which everyone knows.)
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― alix, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The answer: "Rollin'" by Limp Bizkit.
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
And they play that Afroman song about getting high, yet censored Technohead's drug references on "I want to be a hippy".
― Kodanshi, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
why have i not heard of this? how can i hear it?
― di, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― rosemary, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― maryann, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Rumpie, Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
i found the song offensive for it's lack of creativity in blatant condescension of it's audience. something she'd been able to pull off pretty well up until that point.
― nein Socken (nein Socken), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)
― rocknrolldetox (rocknrolldetox), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
― nein Socken (nein Socken), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)
― Ally C (Ally C), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)
― The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)
funny, the only place you hear T-Spoon's "Sex on the beach" is at kiddie parties.
Anyroad, did anyone mention MickJag's "Let's Work"? Not for it's tory sympathies, more for that at that point the rStones were the damn lazybunch group on the planet!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 14 May 2008 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
not *just* for it's
i should say...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 14 May 2008 13:35 (eighteen years ago)