New U.S. Secretary of Education prefers her TV characters nice & closeted

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Her first week on the job!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/01/25/national2141EST0795.DTL

Education secretary condemns public show with gay characters
BEN FELLER, AP Education Writer

Tuesday, January 25, 2005
(01-25) 18:51 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

The nation's new education secretary denounced PBS on Tuesday for spending public money on a cartoon with lesbian characters, saying many parents would not want children exposed to such lifestyles.

The not-yet-aired episode of "Postcards From Buster" shows the title character, an animated bunny named Buster, on a trip to Vermont -- a state known for recognizing same-sex civil unions. The episode features two lesbian couples, although the focus is on farm life and maple sugaring.

A PBS spokesman said late Tuesday that the nonprofit network has decided not to distribute the episode, called "Sugartime!," to its 349 stations. She said the Education Department's objections were not a factor in that decision.

"Ultimately, our decision was based on the fact that we recognize this is a sensitive issue, and we wanted to make sure that parents had an opportunity to introduce this subject to their children in their own time," said Lea Sloan, vice president of media relations at PBS.

However, the Boston public television station that produces the show, WGBH, does plan to make the "Sugartime!" episode available to other stations. WGBH also plans to air the episode on March 23, Sloan said.

PBS gets money for the "Postcards from Buster" series through the federal Ready-To-Learn program, one aimed at helping young children learn through television.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said the "Sugartime!" episode does not fulfill the intent Congress had in mind for programming. By law, she said, any funded shows must give top attention to "research-based educational objectives, content and materials."

"Many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode," Spellings wrote in a letter sent Tuesday to Pat Mitchell, president and chief executive officer of PBS.

"Congress' and the Department's purpose in funding this programming certainly was not to introduce this kind of subject matter to children, particularly through the powerful and intimate medium of television."

She asked PBS to consider refunding the money it spent on the episode.

With her letter, Spellings has made criticism of the publicly funded program's depiction of the gay lifestyle one of her first acts as secretary. She began on Monday, replacing Rod Paige as President Bush's education chief.

Spellings issued three requests to PBS.

She asked that her department's seal or any statement linking the department to the show be removed. She asked PBS to notify its member stations of the nature of show so they could review it before airing it. And she asked for the refund "in the interest of avoiding embroiling the Ready-To-Learn program in a controversy that will only hurt" it.

In closing, she warned: "You can be assured that in the future the department will be more clear as to its expectations for any future programming that it funds."

The department has awarded nearly $100 million to PBS through the program over the last five years in a contract that expires in September, said department spokesman Susan Aspey. That money went to the production of "Postcards From Buster" and another animated children's show, and to promotion of those shows in local communities, she said.

The show about Buster also gets funding from other sources.

In the show, Buster carries a digital video camera and explores regions, activities and people of different backgrounds and religions.

On the episode in question, "The fact that there is a family structure that is objectionable to the Department of Education is not at all the focus of the show, nor is it addressed in the show," said Sloan of PBS.

But she also said: "The department's concerns align very closely with PBS' concerns, and for that reason, it was decided that PBS will not be providing the episode." Stations will receive a new episode, she said.


kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Pathetic posturing as usual by the Prez's voiceboxes.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

the powerful and intimate medium of television

Sex on the TV is bad, but sex WITH the TV...

Andrew Sullivan noted on his website: "Why didn't Spellings forbid Mary Cheney and Heather Poe from attending the Inauguration?"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

SUGARTIME!

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

They should give the money to Dave Chappelle so he can expand his children's show skit into a series.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Someone should protest how cartoons present a sugar-eating lifestyle as acceptable and normal.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Fuck it all. I hope my generation isn't so uptight about this sort of thing.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

PBS is just as bad for not showing it.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, yes and no; it's "spineless" but as a corporate entity that's perpetually begging touchy Americans for money they kind of can't afford to have a backbone.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

But nobody can, which is why it's important to have a backbone.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't agree, Dan, PBS wasn't always this craven. And they've always depended on public money, obv.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"we wanted to make sure that parents had an opportunity to introduce this subject to their children in their own time,"

Man, they just loooooove stigmatizing homos. Newsflash: black people exist. Parents, please introduce this "subject" to your children when you feel they can handle it. Meantime, UPN has cancelled Moesha, Eve, and the Hughleys.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

To be fair, black people are scary. Not every child can handle them. They might just, you know, freak the fuck out.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

They talked about this on Talk of the Nation today. Previous eps have dealt with a trip to chicago to meet a Muslim family. No complaints there, apparently.

kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I disagree with "just as", not "bad".

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"I don't agree, Dan, PBS wasn't always this craven. And they've always depended on public money, obv."

They depend more on pledges and corporate foundations now than they ever have before. I don't think it's particularly classy backing down, but I also think PBS is probably wise to choose its battles with this administration too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex OTM.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

PBS has to beg three different kinds of people for money: the govt, grant-giving orgs, and the public. If this was just about a few prudish classical music lovin, Charlie Rose watchin, grannies (i.e. "the public" as beheld by PBS and NPR) I doubt PBS would have much cared; those people aren't watching kid's shows one would imagine. No this is a totally unveiled threat from the Dept. of Education for PBS to censor itself regarding an issue on which federal law is agnostic and mute. I thought this sort of overt blackmail was beyond the pale but the Bush admin keeps surprisin.

The solution to all this would be to allow PBS to run proper commercials.

xposts

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

well see Alex that's the thing, PBS is less dependent on gov't these days, so why care about the Dep't of Education's bullshit (obv. it's a lie that it played no factor in the non-distribution)? It's funny how rightie "less government" types always crow about the "efficiency" of the private sector. Tho surprisingly at least some big conservative companies are more progressive (in a sense) than the fed gov't (Rev. Phelps picketed Bank of America when I worked there because of their domestic partnership benefits, for example).

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"Education secretary condemns public show with gay characters" = one (1) happy christian coalition.

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you really think that PBS could survive without government subsidy?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

well it's certainly a smaller portion of their budget than corporate and individual donors.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The solution to all this would be to allow PBS to run proper commercials.

I disagree.

The only thing I keep thinking, along the lines of http://www.buyblue.org/, is to start a nationwide boycott of all companies that give money to the party which most appeals to its base through homo-baiting, ecological myopia, and willfully irrational religion and to let the companies know that until they decide to behave bravely and decently, they won't get my money if I can help it.

Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 22:00 (twenty-one years ago)

So, did this actually air today? Did anybody's PBS station put out a wussy comment why they wouldn't?

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I love WGBH for still airing the episode. Also, ERIC IN THE EVENING.

Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw it on WGBH where I am. Thank god I have a PBS station that lives in the 21st century (and they did make the show to begin with). It was as innocent as can be. It was mostly about Mother's Day and maple sugar. Fuck Bush, Fuck PBS, Fuck Bush's Education Secretary. Fuck this country.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 5 February 2005 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.