― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 11:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Thursday, 27 January 2005 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― mms (mms), Thursday, 27 January 2005 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 27 January 2005 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Now can someone rerun Just Another Saturday?
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 January 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)
If I see one chopper bike on this I'm outta here.
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
In the book, I loved the way it slowly dawned on you/me/the reader what was going to happen at the end of The Chick and the Hairy Guy. It was quite chilling, and very sad. Poor Chick, poor Hairy Guy.
It is good, I suppose, and quite clever, that someone has made something romantic out of that event.
Did they recreate a Berni Inn?
I bet people had Mud LPs too.
― Peter Stringbender (PJ Miller), Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)
If I see Stuart Maconie on this I'm outta here.
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Adam Faithless (Adam Faithless), Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― bham, Thursday, 27 January 2005 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)
yeah, the kidz in this are at posh school, and coe does make the connection between this and their rockist (pseudo-classicist) mindset.
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Thursday, 27 January 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
I feel that Coe's 1970s Birmingham is bound to be quite accurate, insofar as that's possible. He knows what is writing about, in that instance.
I don't know whether they recreated a Berni Inn.
Coe can, when he's up for it and up to it, do plot as well as anyone. What A Carve Up! is an extraordinarily plotted book. And in a certain sense, yes, he can Do Style: that is, he can write pastiches. But he can't Do Style as Martin Amis, Geoff Dyer (maybe), Don DeLillo, Vladimir Nabokov, Joseph Conrad, or whoever else can. (That list is embarrassing: it looks pretentious, masculinist, snobbish. But the point I am trying to get at remains true.) His 'own' style (the concept sounds dubious, but I think it's valid: the style that makes up most of the books) is functional when it's working well (WACU!), and when it's not (as in The Closed Circle) becomes downright slack. When he's off form, his prose is among the most prosaic of all Major Contemporary British Authors.
I think that the TV programme may have been a better TV programme than the book was a book, even if the book is better than the TV programme. I'm not sure which is better.
I agree about Lois and Malcolm. I like the line 'Freaky times on the event horizon'.
If I see George Steiner on this thread, I'm in there.
― the dreamfox, Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't think that not being a stylist is a merit.
I like him.
― the bellefox, Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 27 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
When I look at old family photos from this period, apart from my brothers' hair (like Godber from Porridge but longer) and flary trousers, it may as well be 1961 by the look of it all. It's different now but outer/suburban B'ham was never one to keep step with the times. Many of the older men, like my dad who, now I think of it, was only just a bit older than I am now in '74, wore glasses with thick, black rims and had quiffs or vague equiv of.
But anyway, really liked the prog on the whole. The intercutting with contempory news footage (and the odd for-laughs naff TV advert) is a nice touch as is the depiction of the casually contemptuous teachers - I recognised the returning of excercise books by spinning them across the room and the throwing of board rubbers at pupils' heads, and the frequent clips round the ears, of course.I never got round to reading the book for some reason, but as a programme it felt like a cross between Our Freinds in the North and The Grimleys.
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Thursday, 27 January 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 27 January 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 27 January 2005 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)
It's a good thing that PJM explained, what it means!
― the bluefox, Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)
do you think they chose the girl who is playing cicily because she looks quite like joanna lumley?
i'm happy that there's a programme i really like on telly, this is the first one for ages...
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)
i can't remember of the lumley comment is in the book, but my g/f said 'she looks like joanna lumley' minutes before the on-screen comparison.
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 3 February 2005 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)
I still like the programme a lot.
A boy (Philip Chase) last night said: 'Whatever', to (I think) his mother - meaning, let's say: 'OK, whatever you say, I don't care'.
I found this incongruous: I don't think that people in the UK said this, to meant this, in the mid-1970s. I think of it as an Americanism, a bit like (more extreme, infamously Friends-derived-type example:) 'That's, like, so not true!'. I have been trying to think of when people in Britain started saying 'whatever' in this way, and wondering whether Oasis's 45 'Whatever' (1994) is a clue.
― the bellefox, Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)
i agree that the 'whatever' remark seems odd for the reasons pinefox gives
the sex scene was funny (i am a perv)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― stew, Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― stew, Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Angus Muldoon, Fife (Dada), Thursday, 10 February 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 10 February 2005 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)