― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)
2. props to that one dude in the core group! (upper righthand side of that particular web)
3. spot the two boys who've slept with the same girl whose circles are also touching! scandalous high school threeway or pdf rendering error?!
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Drake Beardo (cprek), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― jimmytron, Monday, 31 January 2005 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jeff Wright (JeffW1858), Monday, 31 January 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 31 January 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 31 January 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Snappy (sexyDancer), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
he's at nine.
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 31 January 2005 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)
I thought the props were going out to the gay dudes in that web!
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 January 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― W i l l (common_person), Monday, 31 January 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 31 January 2005 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)
Interesting facts -- this accounts for 52% or so of the population, the rest not being sexually active. Second, there's an obvious preference between low-partner ppl. and other low-partner ppl, in part contravened by low-partner girls and higher partner boys with a .9 yr age difference on average.
Finally, there's a social-status prohabition against "small cycles." I.e. if your ex hooks up with someone new, you don't date your ex's current's ex.
i.e. if carol leaves you for bob, and bob leaves alice for carol, then you don't date alice.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Site Admistrator (deangulberry), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)
-- Site Admistrator (power.strik...) (webmail), February 1st, 2005 4:06 AM. (deangulberry) (link)
they should be moping along the border staring at their shoes
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 07:53 (twenty-one years ago)
I would look like a total whorebag now...
― Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 08:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)
For some reason it doesn't seem quite as bad nowadays.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Am I reading this wrong? Otherwise, this study seems to just show that everybody but me really was having sex in high school.
― Augustine (Augustine Bearse), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)
1) We decided it was sad and "too studenty".2) BURNING REASON: It became difficult to let people into our kitchen. They would all go straight to it and start saying things like: "Hey I didn't know they slept together! Wow! Hey, that's my name..." We had one very close call with an infidelity nearly being discovered.
― Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)
perhaps i'm prude, but i feel totally relieved now
i would bet the percentage of sexually active students in my h.s. was closer to 33%
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)
actually i have no way of knowing, really. among my peer group it was perhaps 10-15%.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)