I would say I[an] P[enman] was one of our great minds on the basis of his 1984ish NME tv column alone, Michael.-- Jerry the Nipper (jerrythenippe...), April 22nd, 2003.
-- excited me.
but i have no firm grasp of this, and if the nme ever really went all out for film (in my day the coverage was pitiful, i doubt they even had a weekly review column). has there ever been a great 'project' in music press film coverage, getting behind stuff the way it got behind eg punk, baggy, shoegaze etc?
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 24 March 2005 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
right up until about 5 years ago they did a double page review of the year in film and a chart of the best 20 films in the xmas edition.
they had a book reviews section eavery week too believe it or not.
― piscesboy, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)
I remember reading a fantastic Penman piece about Beneiex's 'Mauvais Sang' which really opened my eyes about film in many ways (ie it showed me the way I could love cinema in the swoony way I loved certain pop groups) but I think that may have been in The Face.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)
i guess i'm under the impression that in the 80s especially yer 'art-house' movie had some connection to 'youth culture' -- 'mauvais sang' is a great example and a great film. i think it's more a development in european filmmaking that makes this no longer the case so much, and afaik no-one in the uk is that interested in, say, jon brion or other musicians who bridge the pop/scoring thing.
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
intense in-house conflict sadly ensured that this inventiveness only reached the rest of the mag in botched form, and the quality of the writing became very defensive and strained
*ie (arguably) consistently the best writing on film in the uk at that date, esp.if you were allergic to eg screen's use of theoretical jargon (s&s wz UNBELIEVABLY TERRIBLE at that point)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)
i will be getting a ticket to colindale* post-post-haste! bah!
*super place btw.
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
smith wz sacked when - as part of their gag-rich world - they feted the arrival of c4 w.a listings which wz totally invented, made up of things they WANTED c4 to run
a LOT of (fun-hating) readers rang to complain
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
mark, did you ever review films (ect) for 'em [nrq is reviewing 'if...': this = some kind of theoretical background to what nrq perceives as the uk's Great Film Crit Lacuna...]
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)
even the dream of this wz lost when nme policy shifted from multi-constituency uneasily yoked together to single-constituency
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
And Brian 'Choccy' McLair who had just bought a CD by Win called Freaky Trigger. Did Pat Nevin have a front cover? I remember he was interviewed in the Christmas 83(or 84) edition, talking about the Smiths etc
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Hahah, no way! Big picture of Choccy on TMFD from now on, please!
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 24 March 2005 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
MY LUNCH BREAK
on tip-off from another thread i go to rupert street to find old nmes. i ask man in shop: he says the place i want is round the corner in brewer st, and he has 20 years' worth of nmes, and would i be innarested -- then he says brewer strett geez sells them at a fiver a pop. blimey.
go to vinmagco (for it is there) in brewer street and amid the vintage pr0n, there is a lot of moldering ipc newsprint, but "a fiver" is actually understating: that will get you an nme from the late '90s. '80s nme can be A TENNER. they also had old copies of the face, but well, you couldn't work out from the cover whether they were worth getting (only burchill and kent got cover space).
so i now have to take a LIBRARY HOLIDAY at some point to nail this thing ('this thing' = inverstigatory music press 'film reviewing style' thing).
BLAH.
― N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
Holy cow, I have a goldmine festering away in my loft. Somehow though I can't imagine the one with Campag Velocet on the cover going for a fiver.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)