Does it seem weird to anyone else that Woody Allen is going to be 70 this year?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Or that he's still making a movie a year? Counting by IMDB, only in six of the last 39 years has he not released a movie. His new one looks great -- I think I'll go see it tomorrow.

Anyway, yeah. He's old, he's stupidly prolific, and he's not done yet. Love for the old guy goes here.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm indifferent to woody, mostly, but i sort of think of him as being even older than 70. i mean, my mom's almost 70... woody is sort of a mount rushmore figure.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm indifferent to woody, mostly

pfft. Yeah, you and everybody else. You'll miss him when he's gone.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The shitty David Denby review was really snide and actually made it sound like something I'll like. Especially because he also trashed Millions, and I thought that was fantastic!

Remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

You think its weird for you, think how it must be for Soon-Yi.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like him. I really hope Melinda and Melinda's good, though I fear it won't be. The problem is he hasn't gone off the boil, there's still flashes of the old Woody in there, so you keep hanging on in there, hoping.

I was more freaked out when I found out Schwarzenegger was in his fifties though.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not sure i see flashes of the old woody in the old woody, honestly.

well except for what's up, tiger lily?

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Oddly enough I've just finished off the collected prose this morning. More focussed than a lot of the films.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Innit wonderful? I also read a book of his plays a few years back... very impressive. I think that the fun of making a film might distract him from what he's really good at, and that's writing.

Remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think I've seen a full movie of his since Deconstructing Harry (or Everybody Says I Love You, which ever came last). I think its weirder for me that it might be almost a decade since I saw a new Woody Allen film then that Woody Allen is old. I would have thought he was already 70! I mean he's nuts about the 30s.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I know, but I still think of him as 40-something. He's had those jowels since he was in his thirties, the same sallow complexion. He never looked very good, so you can't go by looks. I guess what's strange to me is that he's been so consistently active that I never considered that he was getting old all that time.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

my pal lance and i were talking about woody last week, we are both big fans from way back, and we wondered if people in their 20's even cared about him at all. or even knew about the great movies. or whether he had become kinda irrelevant to younger folk. do they just see him as this creepy old guy who pops up in unfunny movies on cinemax or do they know the history. um, i guess ilxers are exempt from this cuz i know how smart and savvy you all are. but he has had an almost entirely new career divorced from what people consider his great stuff. i can imagine a lot of younger people seeing him and going "ugh, not that guy again". but maybe a lot of not so younger folk do that now too.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I've got an immense amount of respect for his work ethic - a film a year is just insane, *nobody* in Hollywood does that. And I like how lately he was delving into just doing genre films (a musical! a mystery! a caper comedy!). With so much stuff, of course he's hit or miss, but he's still consistently hitting high marks when he's on - "Sweet and Lowdown" was fabulous, for example. Even that "Curse of the Jade Scorpion" was pretty entertaining. Tho the one with Jason Biggs was terrible... I think his movies stand or fail on the actors, a lot of times. I imagine the younger generation has no idea who he is (and why should they? his references are all off their radar).

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i like his earlier films. I'm still surprised at how much support he has after the soon yi and mia farrow allegations.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

the soon yi *thing*, I meant to say. she didn't have any allegations.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)

i dunno scott, i think his new films have an audience thanks to the fact that he's woody allen. which explains why his forays into non-woody-allen movies, like ones with "teen appeal", don't do all that well.

xxpost

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I was at the video store a few months ago, and these bubbly teenage girls came in and were looking at the box for Anything Else. They were like, oh this might be good, it's got Christina Ricci and Jason Biggs in it! I hadn't even seen the movie, but I actually interrupted them to say that I'd heard it wasn't that great. I was all, "not to influence you or anything!" but I kept imagining them taking it home and being disappointed with it.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

this might be good, it's got Christina Ricci and Jason Biggs in it

does not quite compute

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I laugh so hard at his humor. His early stuff is so excellent, but I also loved Mighty Aphrodite and Everyone Says I Love You. I thought Deconstructing Harry blew.

Je4nne Ć’ury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

soon yi = who cares. they're obviously happy together, she's not his "daughter", etc. I've never dismissed artists based on their personal lives, that's just ridiculous.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

Really? That's one of my favorite later films. Very angry, very ballsy, very nasty and mean and vulgar and FUNNY. It's painful as hell, too. "You think I enjoy getting a blowjob from a big-breasted 26-year old?"

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I imagine the younger generation has no idea who he is (and why should they? his references are all off their radar).

The "August Strindberg award for emotional maturity"? How transparent can you get?! I mean, he may as well have referenced Madonna.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I discovered Woody in 1993, when Husbands and Wives came to video. I then made it a habit of going to see all of his movies in the theater, and I enjoyed them all (Manhattan Murder Mystery, Bullets Over Broadway, Mighty Aphrodite, Everyone Says I Love You) to varying degrees. Deconstructing Harry was the first I really didn't care for: it just seemed way too shrill. It might benefit from a second viewing, though.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, another vote for Deconstructing Harry, one of his more solid later efforts. Bullets Over Broadway was another relatively recent high point. (Tho really I think Sweet and Lowdown was the last one to really rank with his best)

I don't think I could even compose a top 10, he's got such a wide and varied ouevre.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I've seen Manhattan many many times since it came out, and only recently (ie, within the last year) learned who August Strindberg was.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyone Says I Love You blows.

i had a perversely satisfying experience following that one, when i friend and i left shaking our heads in sorrow and an older woman came up behind us and said, "that was a stinker, huh?"

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

soon yi = who cares. they're obviously happy together, she's not his "daughter", etc. I've never dismissed artists based on their personal lives, that's just ridiculous.

I agree, I was just surprised that Hollywood felt the same way.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

aw, I liked the musical. endearingly sloppy performances.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I like that film too, it was the last Woody Allen film I felt compelled to watch, for some reason.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Tho really I think Sweet and Lowdown was the last one to really rank with his best

Yeah, I've said time and again that it's his best film of the last 10 years.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to see him make a movie with old people. like, really old people. Like the thread title says, he's 70. Surely he has some thoughts on being a senior citizen. Although even when young he seemed perpetually trapped in middle age.

xpost: I totally forgot about that film. it was great.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I've seen Manhattan many many times since it came out, and only recently (ie, within the last year) learned who August Strindberg was.

It's because of that movie that I looked up who August Strindberg was.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

and the world has never been the same

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

haha
Yeah... well.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i gave up on him after Celebrity, a high-handed rant abt the vapidity of mass culture that features the all-time worst Allen-surrogate stand-in, Kenneth Branagh!

ajl, Friday, 25 March 2005 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I think he's brilliant, frankly. I never thought I'd miss any of his films, have the majority of them on VHS, but even I skipped out on Anything Else and Hollywood Ending!

Great, Brave, True, Strong, Great, Real, Wise, Great, Crazy/Beautiful, Grea (nor, Friday, 25 March 2005 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

but the blowjob-banana scene in Celebrity is hilarious! and I like how that movie starts and ends with the same scene - celebrity = trapped under glass.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm also fond of his use of stand-ins - just getting different actors to play the "Woody" character. Some are better than others, but I think the tactic is a testament to the durability of his writing. Could there be any better evidence for the enduring strength of his premier comic creation, his "persona"?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

you could have thrown him off a cliff after Manhattan Murder Mystery as far as I'm concerned.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Woody's been pretty hit-and-miss since the early 90's (mostly miss), but even still, "Deconstructing Harry", "Sweet and Lowdown" and especially "Husbands and Wives" are far better than most of the junk coming out of Hollywood.

He just seems too formulaic now. I almost wish he'd make another "Interiors" just to mix it up a bit.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

he should make another sci-fi movie. or maybe a western.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

He should do a musical comedy based on Weezer's Pinkerton.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

starring Jason Schwartzman as "Rivers" and Soon-Yi as "Butterfly."

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Two things:

he has had an almost entirely new career divorced from what people consider his great stuff

That's not fair. He's entirely Woody no matter whether it's great or merely treading water, and I won't deny he's done a lot of that, esp. in the 90's. He makes so many movies, so cheaply and so (seemingly) on-the-fly, that he can afford to make a movie about nearly every idea that pops into his head. Some are better than others, but nothing is divorced from anything. It's him.

I'm still surprised at how much support he has after [the soon yi thing]

She's having his babies, is the thing. Young woman or no, it's pretty hard to deny at this point that she loves him. At this point if anyone's judgement is in question, it's hers.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

one thing often left out of the "he sucked after Deconstructing Harry/Manhattan Murder Mystery/Husbands and Wives/Crimes and Misdemeanors/The Purple Rose of Cairo/Hannah and her Sisters/Manhattan/Take the Money and Run" complaint... he was never that smart/funny to begin with

gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)

A matter of taste -- to a point. His personality, issues, style and concerns are not everyone's. Still, Annie Hall and Manhattan are two of the best films of the seventies.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:26 (twenty-one years ago)

esp. Manhattan.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's weird coz my uncle told me he died in the tsunami

fcussen (Burger), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)

"I think that the fun of making a film might distract him from what he's really good at..."

....playing clarinet

kate/thank you friendly cloud (papa november), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha

no.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Entertainment Weekly has a table showing the gross receipts of his last 10 movies. my quick standing-at-the-magazine-rack math totaled up $80 million. for some reason this blew my mind. right above it, robots had done just under half of that (i think) in one week.

john'n'chicago, Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)

wow, Woody Allen hasn't been 70 for the last 20 years? wow ... coulda fooled me

lemin (lemin), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)

my quick standing-at-the-magazine-rack math totaled up $80 million

In theaters, that's about right. But he makes them for about $15 mil each -- unheard of. And they have a better life on video, so studios let him do whatever he wants.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:45 (twenty-one years ago)

The Best:
Annie Hall (1977) (written by)
Mighty Aphrodite (1995) (written by)
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex * But Were Afraid to Ask (1972) (screenplay)
Zelig (1983) (written by)
Sleeper (1973) (written by)
Bananas (1971) (written by)
Take the Money and Run (1969) (written by)
Manhattan (1979) (written by)

The Rest
Anything Else (2003) (written by)
Hollywood Ending (2002) (written by)
Small Time Crooks (2000) (written by)
Deconstructing Harry (1997) (written by)
Bullets Over Broadway (1994) (written by)
Manhattan Murder Mystery (1993) (written by)
Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989) (written by)
Radio Days (1987) (written by)
Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) (written by)
The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985) (written by)
Stardust Memories (1980) (written by)

& The Unmentioned:

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Not my list at all. Gimme a minute.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Top five, in no order:

Annie Hall (1977)
Manhattan (1979)
Hannah and Her Sisters (1986)
Love and Death (1975)
Husbands and Wives (1992)

The next five:

Sweet and Lowdown (1999)
Sleeper (1973)
Stardust Memories (1980)
Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989)
Deconstructing Harry (1997)

Five more:

Bullets Over Broadway (1994)
Radio Days (1987)
Bananas (1971)
The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985)
Another Woman (1988)

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Zelig is boring.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Love and Death was easily the funniest movie I've ever seen. I had to turn off the VCR several times because I was laughing too hard to catch all the jokes, nor could I see much of anything until I dabbed my eyes with tissue.

Particularly like Husbands and Wives as well.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 26 March 2005 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I love you. Inn't it great?

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 07:04 (twenty-one years ago)

To be honest... I watched a lot of those during summers in high school with my cousin when we were smoking way too much pot to do anything real. I'd probably reevalute my list I sat through most of these again. Only one I really disagree with is Crimes & Misdemeanors. And I've never seen Husbands and Wives, but it's in the video-store queue.

Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 26 March 2005 07:04 (twenty-one years ago)

It made the second five because it was edged out by a couple movies that are genius instead of just funny, but one of my biggest movie laughs ever was in Sleeper. When he makes the future pudding, and then you see him in the doorway in the background, beating it with a broom. Ranks right up ther with "What are you gonna do, bleed on me?" on my all-time laugh meter.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyone Says I Love You blows.

aw, i loved that one...

i think woody's film-making is betraying the ageing process pretty evenly, swinging from successful moents of abject whimsy ('everyone says i love you', 'sweet and lowdown', 'manhattan murder mystery') and some of his bleakest material ('celebrity', 'husbands & wives', 'deconstructing harry') - bleak, in that they present characters with *no redeeming factors, something he was working with towards in 'crimes & misdemeanours' - films about the essential injustices, the hopeless. woody in 'husbands & wives' is the one frozen out in all the relationship swapping, a hopeless case. 'celebrity' is about the branagh's character's essential hopelessness, his irredeemability, his refusal to learn the bitter lessons of his experience - the eternal and sorrowful fool. i find the bitter movies hard to swallow, but they seem very truthful. and the whimsy is all the sweeter. previous allen movies had weak and unlikeable characters at their centre, but now those dark characters are likely to lack vulnerability or regret, also.

stevie (stevie), Saturday, 26 March 2005 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

My personal top five off the top of my head

Manhattan Murder Mystery
Husbands And Wives
Bananas
Sleeper
Annie Hall

miccio (miccio), Saturday, 26 March 2005 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

A matter of taste -- to a point. His personality, issues, style and concerns are not everyone's. Still, Annie Hall and Manhattan are two of the best films of the seventies.

you write this as though it were an incontrovertible fact and not itself a matter of taste.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 March 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I am aware of that.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

well the "still" transition sort of confused me.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)

The thing is, I don't care.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

http://backyardmissionary.typepad.com/backyardmissionary/wayne.jpg

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, now gentlemen...if you want to get into personal attacks over films, ILF is a much better arena for that.

Woody Allen is just one of those "love him" or "indifferent to him" filmmakers. I consider myself in the former category, but it's easy to see how he could be unappealing to some people. I've found that I've been able to convert Allen hatas by showing them films that Allen himself doesn't actually appear in. A lot of people are just put off by him, or the "Woody Allen" character, as he's not anything like the neurotic, whiny extrovert he plays in his films.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

This is not directly relevant, but I remember meeting with a professor in college and thinking he must be my parents' age, except he seemed so much younger.

youn, Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll throw "Play It Again Sam" in my top 5, just because I don't think anyone has yet, and because it's the black sheep of his scripts...

Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Sunday, 27 March 2005 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

When I consider that Mr. Allen was born more than 69 years ago, then his upcoming turn at 70 seems utterly natural. After all, he got his start writing skit humor for Your Show of Shows with Sid Caesar and Imogene Coca in the 1950s.

Probably his greatest misfortune as a filmmaker has been the fact that he so often writes, produces, casts and directs his films. When he's mediocre there's nobody to blame but himself. Hundreds of mediocre or worse films are made each year, but they are made by a gaggle of people and its hard to put your finger on the culprits to blame for those failures. Not so, Mr. Allen. He can't slink away anonymously or affix the blame on someone else. When he stinks, he stinks and it is obvious.

His second greatest misfortune was self-inflicted, too, but much, much more personal. I am not more moral than he is, but his actions verged on moral brain death, so it's hard not to feel he brought it on his own head and should have known better.

Aimless (Aimless), Sunday, 27 March 2005 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)

He's been making entertaining and varied movies about writer's block for a decade now, that's nothing to sneeze at.

Oddly enough I've just finished off the collected prose this morning

Yeah, it's been on my beside table for the last week as well. I thought that's what Scott meant by "but he has had an almost entirely new career divorced from what people consider his great stuff". I mean, he makes some nice films and all, but he's not going to beat Death Knocks, or his stand-up album.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 27 March 2005 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I wouldn't have said I was a huge fan, though I've really never seen a film of his I disliked, but reading this thread has made me realise he's not going to be around forever. And that when he goes, it's going to be a blow almost on a level with John Peel.

Similar thing crossed my mind over the week long Robert Crumb retrospective in the Guardian; you get used to the idea these geezers will be around forever, but . .

Soukesian, Sunday, 27 March 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes but no-one has read anything Robert Crumb's done in the last ten years, so for me at least it's more "Oh he's still alive".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 27 March 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

> my quick standing-at-the-magazine-rack math totaled up $80 million

In theaters, that's about right. But he makes them for about $15 mil each -- unheard of. And they have a better life on video, so studios let him do whatever he wants.


This may be coming to an end soon. Woody Allen's next film (already finished shooting) is called Match Point and was shot entirely in London with English financing. The budget on the movie was so low that they couldn't afford to license music. The film ended up being scored with some cheaply acquired, newly recorded opera music.

Dogboy, Monday, 28 March 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

What may be coming to an end soon, exactly? He's always used cheap music, and barely pays his actors anything, and does it (as I understand) so that he will have the freedom to fuck up if he needs to. What I mean is, the studios still let him make whatever movie he wants, because it's such a small risk to them, and when he still pulls actors like Will Farrell, they can be sure to at least get their money back.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm bothered that he'll be 70 only cuz I am now older than he was when I started going to his films... I was aware of him as a comedian when I was 7, 8 years old, when he still made scattered TV appearances.

btw Love & Death, which along with Sleeper is the best of the "early funny ones," is totally a primo Bob Hope movie filtered thru Russian novels. (cf Monsieur Beaucaire)

The thing that makes Allen seem older is he has always championed the pre-rock culture of his childhood and youth: Dixieland, Marx Bros, Gershwin, George S Kaufman, etc.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Would Bob Hope have described Death as "worse than the chicken at Lindy's"?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

just watched Sleeper again this weekend for the first time in many years. "I'm Rags. Woof. Woof." high-larious.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 March 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The thing that makes Allen seem older is he has always championed the pre-rock culture of his childhood and youth

Ah yes. Events pre-Paul McCartney.

And the thing that makes him seem younger, I suppose, are the woman he surrounds himself with.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Monday, 28 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.