So have we had anything like this yet? I suspect that isn't easy to answer, as my first two would hardly have seemed like epochal Modernist moments at the time, and if I'm talking about the tone of the century being set, it's kind of hard to know that just yet. I guess 9/11 followed by Afghanistan and Iraq could be it, but I'm interested in whether anyone has any other nominations.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― andy --, Friday, 6 May 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)
1946-1963
fun!
― Masked Gazza, Friday, 6 May 2005 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)
1974-1979
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 6 May 2005 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)
1815-1914
― Masked Gazza, Friday, 6 May 2005 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)
now
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 7 May 2005 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 7 May 2005 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 7 May 2005 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 7 May 2005 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
On the other hand, we can't just sit back and wait for the fucking test of time, as that isn't proof of anything. The only perspectives we've got is the current set.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 7 May 2005 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 7 May 2005 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 7 May 2005 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 7 May 2005 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)