a diaper-clad maestro conducting an all-animal orchestra

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
HBO criticized for pitching animated TV special to infants and their parents
By David Crary
NEW YORK (AP) — An HBO special premiering Saturday features a diaper-clad maestro conducting an all-animal orchestra, but the cute images and world-class score haven’t deterred critics from assailing Classical Baby as an inappropriate attempt to introduce infants to television.
HBO is deeply proud of the animated half-hour show — which was developed by award-winning producers in consultation with a Harvard Medical School child psychiatrist, offers music by famous composers, and is intended to be watched by parents and babies together.
“To leave a child alone in front of a TV as a babysitter is terrible,” said the consultant, Dr. Eugene Beresin. “The whole idea of this production was to find and create a medium that could help a parent and child interact.”
Critics, though yet to see the show, are unconvinced that any TV is good for children under two. The Boston-based Campaign for Commercial-Free Childhood has called the program a “classic hoax” and is urging parents to avoid the show while protesting with phone calls or e-mails to HBO.
Susan Linn, founder of the commercial-free campaign and a psychologist at the Harvard-affiliated Judge Baker Children’s Center, said the idea of exposing infants to culture through TV shows “is nonsense.”
“There’s mounting evidence that too much TV is harmful,” she said. “It’s a battle parents are going to be fighting with their children until they leave home, so why would you want to get babies started on watching TV when they’re not even asking for it?”
A variety of home videos and computer games are available oriented toward under-two children, including a Baby Einstein video with music by Vivaldi that’s marketed for use with babies as young as six months.
However, it is rare for a TV network or cable channel to promote a program specifically for infants, as HBO has done with Classical Baby.
“Stimulating, soothing, and full of heart, Classical Baby fulfils the potential for TV to inspire and engage a baby’s imagination and sense of wonder, while serving as a wonderful tool for early learning and family bonding,” says a news release promoting the show, which premieres at 7:30 p.m. EDT Saturday. There was no immediate word on a Canadian airdate.
The show consists of short musical pieces by Tchaikovsky, Bach, Duke Ellington, Irving Berlin and others, accompanied by animation depicting clowns, fairies, animals and glimpses of great artworks such as the Mona Lisa. HBO plans to expand it into a three-part series later this year with episodes focusing on art, dance and music, accompanied by a manual offering tips for parent-infant interaction.
“It’s part of the whole baby video scam, escalating ever since Teletubbies, pushing the false notion that watching these videos is good for babies,” Linn said. “You can create a bond doing things that aren’t potentially harmful to children.”
She contended that videos and TV programs geared to infants are part of an industry effort to teach children to turn to TV screens for stimulation and soothing.
The American Academy for Pediatrics, in an official policy statement, says quality educational TV programs can be an asset for preschool children, but it explicitly refuses to recommend TV for children under two.
“During this time, children need good, positive interaction with other children and adults to develop good language and social skills,” the academy says. “Learning to talk and play with others is far more important than watching television.”
However, Beresin argues that Classical Baby is designed to encourage exactly the sort of interaction that the pediatrics academy would endorse.
“To say that this kind of TV is bad is tantamount to saying art is bad,” Beresin said in a telephone interview. “It’s no different from listening to CDs together, or reading storybooks together.”
Beresin said children could benefit from learning at an early age that TVs can be part of a positive, engaged family life.
“Children are exposed to TVs and computers and GameBoys for the rest of their lives,” he said. “If they’re left alone with these things, we’re sending them a bad message. Let’s make them part of human interaction.”

Huk-L, Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

This is like criticizing Napoleon for inventing war.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Doesn't HBO air its shows without commercial breaks?

Huk-L, Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

That's correct, Huk. This is merely one facet of how the people protesting this are complete fucking idiots. For fuck's sake, you might as well say "RADIO IS BAD FOR CHILDREN" and forbid any contact with media-based technology until age 18.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It seems to me they're throwing the baby maestro out with the bathwater.

Huk-L, Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Well there is something to be said about how lots and lots of entities have spent the last couple decades trying to push television's market outward and downward, to kind of induct children early and keep it part of their lives the way pretty much all products try and do that. It's just that, dude, a thirty-minute HBO special some people might use to make their babies giggle is pretty low-impact, even in those terms. (And dude, the work various-entities do to bring up kids on a television diet is pretty much zero when compared to the work parents do by, you know, being like the vast majority of Americans over the past several decades and already watching loads of television themselves. Jesus: we watch tons of television in this country, the boat has been totally missed on sending up warning flares.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)

"People watch too much TV. We must make a 30-minute special highlighting the dangers that can be shown in between 'Desperate Housewives' and 'Gray's Anatomy'."

The Ghost of Only A Short Step Away (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Which is just to say that it's way too late to get all "alarming trend!" about it, which is roughly equivalent to, I dunno, watching people kick the crap out of some guy for twenty minutes and then suddenly going "wait, wait, did you just kick him in the back of the head? cause that's just dangerous, you totally just crossed the line."

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Of all the things I learned from ABC's After-School Specials, too much TV is bad for you is not one of them.

Huk-L, Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)

NB Dan it's "Grey's Anatomy!" I find that really kind of hilarious, they've differentiated titles with a subtle spelling irregularity. (I assume there's also some character on it named Grey, making it a really lame triple / sexual pun?)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I wanna get
triple-sexual
witchoo
baby girl

I wanna get
dark chocolate
strawberry-cream
awwww

Double-boiled and
Triple-sexual
Not intellectual
Give it to me

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, I'm bored.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Now you've dirtied up my diaper-clad maestro thread.

Huk-L, Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahaha!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the critics come off as a little hysterical, but I know what they're getting at. There has actually been quite a lot of research lately that suggest that children under two should really be watching little or no television (it can hinder social and cognitive development at that age), and that there is no educational or cognitive benefit of any television program for a child that young.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 13 May 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Our little one is completely entranced by the TV, to the point that she'll stop nursing if she knows its on. We promptly turn it off.

Rotgutt (Rotgutt), Friday, 13 May 2005 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

TS: TV vs Boobies!

Huk-L, Friday, 13 May 2005 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope to god that's a rhetorical question.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 13 May 2005 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Compromise: The L Word!

Huk-L, Friday, 13 May 2005 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)

eighteen years pass...

I would rather have seen this than Maestro

Expansion to Mackerel (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 28 December 2023 03:46 (two years ago)

I thought this was about a Captured by Robots side project

sarahell, Thursday, 28 December 2023 04:36 (two years ago)

I thought it was gonna be an ai prompt...

m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Thursday, 28 December 2023 04:49 (two years ago)

This sounds better than most of the HBO content of the last few years.

papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 28 December 2023 05:42 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.