― Sym Sym (sym), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 00:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Poppy (poppy), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sym Sym (sym), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sym Sym (sym), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)
I voted for STV, but I think one of the reasons why the NDP did well last night (and why they won in 1996 with less votes than Gordo) is that First-past-the-post doesn't penalize the poor for having much lower turnout than the rich. It makes it all dependent on the population of an area, whether or not the population gets out and votes. OTOH, if proportional representation was in right now, Carole James would be Premier with a NDP-Green coalition.
― Sym Sym (sym), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Not really. They came in second in a lot of places last time. Their percentage actually dropped.
― Sym Sym (sym), Thursday, 19 May 2005 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)