― percypants, Saturday, 21 May 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― rwillmsen (rwillmsen), Sunday, 22 May 2005 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amon (eman), Sunday, 22 May 2005 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 22 May 2005 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Awful, but I assume that's what they were going for.
― Paul in Santa Cruz (Paul in Santa Cruz), Sunday, 22 May 2005 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 22 May 2005 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Sunday, 22 May 2005 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amon (eman), Sunday, 22 May 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amon (eman), Sunday, 22 May 2005 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)
HOW THE HELL DOES THIS PICTURE MAKE SADDAM SEEMED WELL ENDOWED?
I mean, those are HUGE whities he's wearing. I don't see any extra creases in the undergarment based on the online pic. I'm not sure I'd really want to. (But who I am kidding?) Are you guys judging this from some 1000 x 1000 pixel rendition that sharpens the edges or something?
Besides, any guy who has participated in the "what do you look like in your underwear?" thread knows the tricks in making yourself look *COUGH* well packaged.
(Also, Saddam could be really short, so if he is "well endowed", it may just be a proportional thing.)
― donut debonair (donut), Sunday, 22 May 2005 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)
I pronounce "tyrant" as "tie rant"! I may not be typical, though, I dunno.
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 22 May 2005 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbarianthefirst, Sunday, 22 May 2005 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― moley, Sunday, 22 May 2005 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― blahbarianthefirst, Sunday, 22 May 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 22 May 2005 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
(and obviously Saddam couldn't possibly just have "low hangers")
― donut debonair (donut), Sunday, 22 May 2005 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)