No thread on the Australian Pot Smuggler 20 year Sentence?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Right outta Midnight Express and that Vince Vaughn flick about idiots abroad....

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/world/0505/gallery.corby/images/gallery.corby.bars.ap.jpg

(CNN) -- The Australian government is offering to send a team of lawyers to help Schapelle Corby fight her 20-year prison sentence for drug smuggling in Indonesia.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/05/27/corby.appeal/index.html

20 years in an Indonesian prison for smuggling nine pounds of marijuana. She'll be 47 when she gets out. Seems a bit harsh to me, but fuck do I know.

Your thoughts?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I think she's a fucking idiot and tough luck.

Orbit (Orbit), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Oy, we're all a bit sick of it over here thats probably why. It has been #1 thing in the media for MONTHS now, no joke. The general opinion is that she was set up, and thats actually likely because not long after she got caught, a whole bunch of Aus baggage handlers got done for using their position to run drugs domestically. The theory is someone stashed dope in her bag thinking it'd go from Brisbane to Sydney but it went with her to Bali - bam.

My only thought, harsh as it is, is "at least she didnt get death". Though 20yrs in a bali jail cell is perhaps worse.

The ANNOYING thing is not whats happened to her but how the media here have treated her like some fucking martyr. Theyve done live TV polls, TV crews have snuck into her cell to try and interview her, etc. Now some media and people are clamouring to boycott Indonesia right down to diverting tsunami funds away from them. Its become a joke, but one has to understand the delicate and dodgy history Australia has with Indonesia, so I can see why people have such attitudes (foolish as they are).

I mean we lock people in detention for years simply for being refugees, so I cant get angry about this at all. Plank, eye, etc. Argh.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

...I know nothing about this. Being pretty staunchly in favor of legalization, however, this leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Epecially if she got framed (xpost). That being said: if she WASN'T framed and was in fact guilty: INFORM YOURSELF LADY. Any drug dealer worth his/her salt should probably find out what the potential punishment is before taking the plunge.

Also: nine pounds is a LOT of weed.

giboyeux (skowly), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Why would she take pot *to* Indonesia???

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

....globalization? Shit, I don't know.

giboyeux (skowly), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Thats the first thing a lot of people (mself included) say, but apparently pot goes for way more there than here, which I didn't know - so from that POV it would make dealer-sense.

xpost

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)

pot goes for way more there than here

????!?!??!

What's the point of going to Third World countries then? Christ.


(...does Bali even count as 3rd world?)

giboyeux (skowly), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)

As a point of comparison, should anyone be interested, at the moment we also have the so-called "Bali Nine" who have been caught smuggling a HELL LOAD of drugs into Bali. No one has ANY sympathy at them, unlike Corby. Theyre all male (bar one I think?) so I guess people are doing the "stupid druggies" thing. None of them have cried foul either, they're all trying to excuse being "caught up" in smuggling rings.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Bali is a MAJOR tourist destination for Aussies. Its said thats the cause for the Bali bombings - right in the middle of the Aus tourist/Aus footy players on holiday season. One feted AFL footy player died in said blasts.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, i thought fox news was skewed but i read an online article from an aussie news website on this story and it was so biased in her favor it was hilariously absurd. it kept mentioning the "fight" she had in her, like when her mother had an outburst in the courtroom it showed where she got her "fight" from, etc.

Amon (eman), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh we have some news outlets just as bad as Fox, fraid to say. And yeah, the reportage has been a sick joke.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

the bali 9 were smuggling drugs OUT of bali. the contentious bit there is - given the aussie cops knowledge/involvement - why weren't they allowed to get busted in australia and face sentencing here rather than there? (cos we don't give death sentences for such activities)

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh were they? I hadn't picked that bit up.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Baggage-wrap business thrives

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)

and fuck i am tired of the descriptions of corby (with pictures) as an AUSSIE BEAUTY therapist.

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Amusingly though, if you go to the US, theyre allowed to break your luggage locks without telling you to inspect your bags on route. Which means you could be framed without ever being able to prove it, I mean WTF???

xpost hahaha AMEN gaz!

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)

wait, is she a therapist who is arguably a beauty? Or is she a Beauty Therapist (whatever that might mean)?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

is this the new sheepfuXor thread?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i think she does nails alex. and shes decent enough to look at. its all a bit kylie has breast cancer for me. AND WE'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO HAVE A OPINION. yesterday the newsroom was crowded with people huddled around the tvs watching the verdict muttering and shaking their heads.

haha eisbar. does that email work? i'm sending you some H&C ysi's.

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

mully: it should -- lemme know if it doesn't!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm only really starting to pay attention to the story, but saturated coverage or not, it is a compelling sorta saga. It makes me never want to fuckin' go to goddamn Bali, that's for damn sure.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It cant help but be a sheepfuxor thread rilly Tad ;) But yeh, I'm torn between relief and disappointment that this story has not reached outside of australia.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

re this subject: well, if yer in another country and you break their laws then you face the possibility of doing time in that country's jails. there's tons of americans rotting in mexican jails for trying to smuggle or peddle drugs.

which isn't to say that i favor harsh drug laws.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex - yah thats the consensus. And its a damn shame. Balinese and Indonesian locals are VERY poor and in many cases tourism is their only dollar. I mean it isnt our fault their govt is corrupt and twisted, but to lay that on the average citizen? Ugh.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Also it should be made very clear that this is NOT a new thing - aussies get done for this in asia ALL THE TIME. Its just it isnt usually pretty white girls.

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 28 May 2005 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

the main contention of the media here was that she never done it. that evil drug smugglers use unsuspecting travellers baggage to ship drugs and that it was supposed to be removed from her bag at a stop in brisbane but wasn't. see how much i know? its been impossible to avoid here.

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

on the other hand we have the best pot in the world yeah!

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

why weren't they allowed to get busted in australia and face sentencing here rather than there?

the idea is that they committed the offence in bali and hence were arrested there.

disappointingly (but expected i suppose) the front page of the west (worst) australian today has massive headlines that say "convicted bomb planner: 2.5 years, dope smuggler: 20 years". the poor indonesians. i gotta say i feel more sorry for them than for the beauty school drop out.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)

20 years in Indonesia for 4.1 kilos of pot is already very lenient - considering that the defense had a really weak case. Without the extra publicity, she would have gotten a much, much higher penalty. Think about it, if an Indonesian citizen had come into Australia carrying 4.1 kilos of weed in their suitcase and then claimed that someone at the Indonesian airport must have put it in there, would this have made such a compelling case?

Also, I think she might have gotten an even lower penalty if she hadn't been such a noted drama queen in court. Speaking as a law student, I know you should never, ever piss off judges (in ANY country) and waste court time by feigning illness and breaking down every few days. It's not surprising if she really was innocent, but judges just don't have sympathy for that sort of thing.

Roz (Roz), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Still....fuckin' twenty years? She's only twenty-seven. How could she not act like a drama queen in court?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i reckon that's a bit harsh roz, you only saw her breaking down because it was newsworthy so made the 6pm news, so that might have given a different impression to reality. and there's really no way of knowing if she 'pissed off the judges'. it was more likely the weak defence case that pissed them off than her being in tears.

i read an article in the oz a couple of weeks ago pointing out that the defence would have been a reasonably weak case here as well. roz is spot on too, imagine if an indonesian got caught with 4kg of pot in their bag trying to enter this country, the attitude would be extremely different.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

actually in today's oz there is an extract from the verdict that says she got a reduced sentence because she was 'well-behaved during the trial'

http://www.theaustralian.com.au

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 05:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex, I'm not talking about the day the sentence was passed - breaking down is understandable then. I'm talking about during the trial itself - passing out and non-stop crying in court really doesn't win you any brownie points.

gem: Yea, I agree that with what you said too - but the fact is, everytime she broke down, it wasted court time. Seriously, judges hate that. There's a difference between simply crying in court and completely disrupting the day's schedule. I just thought that if she just held back just a little bit, she might have gotten some sympathy.

And yes, they also probably were pissed off that the case got so much publicity even though the defense was very clearly weak.

Roz (Roz), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)

my understanding is that judges in general don't deal in 'sympathy', they usually at least attempt to make their decisions according to law. also her sentence is a lot more lenient than death in any case. i have to say i'm sick tod eath of it being front page news here. i think that if australians being imprisoned overseas is worthy of our attention we should devote more of it to those who are on death row.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Do people in Australia generally believe her to be innocent?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)

yes i'd say the general feeling is that she has been set up by some organised drug trafficking network where the legwork is done by baggage handlers. although in my opinion the evidence of that is somewhat sparse. nevertheless. but the vast majority of australians would have arrived at their conclusion by way of front page news stories with pictures such as you have posted and media hysteria on 'current affairs' news magazines that pander to the middle of the road mums and dads out there who aren't overly critical of journalistic integrity. there seems to be a lack of understanding of the fact that the indonesian legal system is quite different to ours, the onus of proof is characterised as 'guilty till proven innocent' rather than innocent till proven guilty as in the australian system. there is also a lack of understanding that the defence mounted a fairly weak case and an apparent reluctance to consider what would have happened had the shoe been on the other foot so to speak - had she/an overseas national been caught with 4kg of pot in her luggage here.

the balinese rely on the australian tourism dollar, it supports their whole economy. this kind of poor media is not going to be helping them one bit.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:11 (twenty-one years ago)

when i say onus of proof, i mean that here even if teh same weak defence case was mounted there is a likelihood she may have been acquitted or convicted of a lesser charge as it is possible the prosecution would have been unable to show that she had done it 'beyond a reasonable doubt' judged objectively.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

We should really be focusing on the tremendous good that was done by preventing these 8 lbs of psychotropic drugs from wreaking their special brand of havoc on the Balinese people.

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i must say, the last time i was in bali (2001) the pot i tried was kinda crap. as it happens i think most pot there would be sold to australian tourists .

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

even better! drugs were kept from harming white people!

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I do think that she got a (relatively) lighter sentence because of the press her case got and the delicate relations between Australia and Indonesia. At the same time, it is still seen a heavy blow, and is clearly going to damage tourism in Bali. A shame.

It makes me a little bit uneasy that top lawyers here are trying to get her out of the country when there's quite a few others on death row for drug-smuggling in other countries.

There's a guy on death row in Singapore I think and another guy who's serving 15 years in Thailand.

Roz (Roz), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost haha

yesterday i heard about one of the local far right wing radio shockjocks here questioning the ability of the indonesian judges to make a proper verdict because 'they don't even speak english'! ummmmmm...

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Ummmmmmmm.... is right.

Roz (Roz), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)


yesterday i heard about one of the local far right wing radio shockjocks here questioning the ability of the indonesian judges to make a proper verdict because 'they don't even speak english'! ummmmmm..

This is more depressing than can be adequately expressed.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 28 May 2005 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)

The reason pot is expensive in Bali (and thus worth smuggling in) is because white tourists don't tend to want to buy it from Balinese or Indonesian because of the widespread use of entrapment by the police. A white drug dealer can apparently make a lot selling the stuff at several times the street value.

Also I was under the impression that many of the laws in Australia in relation to drugs were not too dissimilar from those in Indonesia - the prosecution don't have to prove intention, and instead it's up to the defence to show that the smuggling of the drugs was an honest and reasonable mistake. The penalties are higher in Indonesia obviously...

An interesting aspect of the story is that Western govts actively encourage countries like Indonesia to have super-harsh drug penalties ie. harsher than their own. It's not generally envisioned that this will end up hurting Western citizens of course...

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 28 May 2005 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)

intention is certainly an element of some drug trafficking laws in australia. i am only familiar with what is in the WA criminal code though, and obviously trafficking across international borders would fall within the commonwealth criminal code. in any case, the matter of proving or not proving intention doesn't go to onus of proof - the prosecution would still have to show beyond reasonable doubt that she was responsible, and i think they would have struggled to mount a case to that onus here. in criminal law the eviedential onus is very rarely on the defendant - if the defendant could raise grounds for the defence of honest and reasonable mistake, it would then be up to the prosecution to negative it beyond reasonable doubt. of course that is a fairly ill-informed opinion given i have only read what is available in the media, which is not likely to be the most balanced view of the actual evidence.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 28 May 2005 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm only really starting to pay attention to the story, but saturated coverage or not, it is a compelling sorta saga. It makes me never want to fuckin' go to goddamn Bali, that's for damn sure.

-- Alex in NYC (vassife...) (webmail), May 28th, 2005 1:56 AM. (vassifer) (later) (link)


BBBBBBUT I LOVE GAMELAN ALEX

Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Saturday, 28 May 2005 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

In general, I don't have much sympathy for people who go to foreign countries and break laws. But of course if she was set-up it's another thing. Does any of that blanket media coverage divulge what sort of person she is? Is she a drug user? Was she going with friends to Bali and what kind of people are they? 9lbs is a whole lot of weed, so obviously it wasn't for casual use. I would think that a drug smuggler's personal history would have some sign of trouble.

Super Cub (Debito), Saturday, 28 May 2005 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Im getting nothing on this here in the US but my mom is filling me in with snippets of the case during my thrice weekly phonecalls home. she was, until our last discussion on this, completely convince of corby's innocence. now i dont know if this is fact (i cant find it on the internet) but last time we spoke about it went a little something like:
me:"so whats happening with Schapelle Corby?"
mom: "well they found out shes been to bali something like 17 times in the last year"
me:"ohhh"

sunny successor (katharine), Saturday, 28 May 2005 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

In some countries it's punishable by death. like Thailand?

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 28 May 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

in Philippines any dealing no matter how small can recieve the death penalty.

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 28 May 2005 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

In some countries it's punishable by death. like Thailand?

Yes, but it's not always given. I saw a docu on telly focussing on a Bangkok prison. Personally, I think death penalty would be better than being stuck there.

nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Saturday, 28 May 2005 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, I heard her brother had a hydro farm. mmm.
time to legalize the bitches i say.

Nellie (nellskies), Saturday, 28 May 2005 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

it is depressing that this has only got such publicity cos she's young, femaile, and "pretty"...(like Trayce says). Reminds me of the woman killed on the Lower East Side a few months back - was all over the papers because she was an aspiring (young, pretty female) actor.
Like Tim Finney says, Westerners in Indonesia only want to buy from Westerners - and therefore drugs have a much higher price. But, you have to wonder if this kind of profit margin (for something comparatively cheap like weed) makes any risk / payoff worth it.

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 28 May 2005 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

She looks 47 already!

Unfortunate Prankster (Unfortunate Prankster), Saturday, 28 May 2005 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a guy on death row in Singapore I think

There certainly is. Curious how that sentence came down with scarcely a mention in the press. Would it be overly cynical to suggest that this was because he is male and of Asian extraction himself, and utterly lacking in immaculately sculpted eyebrows?

Even Chambers and Barlow (the last and possibly only [?] Aust'n traffickers so far executed in S.E. Asia) seemed to have got more sympathy back in '86.

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Saturday, 28 May 2005 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Where's her cute, blonde troublemaker friend (preferably Claire Danes)?

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Saturday, 28 May 2005 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently the dope we'd be sending there is hydro, superfuckoff green smack and it is highly prized over the local grass.

Also, for our american viewers, it has been revealed that her father was up on drugs charges in the seventies, her brother is serving time for armed robbery and there's some shifty indonesian connections in the mix. Makes her looks slightly dodgy, a bit of a villian.

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Saturday, 28 May 2005 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

all of the above is just what we know from the media though. also her sister is married to an indonesian (i have no idea if he is or is not 'shifty') and i understand has lived in bali on and off for the last several years. so that could explain why she has visited bali multiple times. also i understand her father was done only for possession of a minimal amount of pot in the early 70s - hardly any kind of reason to believe she might be a drug smuggler, after all that could happen to almost any of us i'm sure.

i think all the different comments on this thread are more an indication of how the media can manipulate a story rather than any kind of true version of the 'facts'.

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 01:32 (twenty-one years ago)

also her sister is married to an indonesian (i have no idea if he is or is not 'shifty') and i understand has lived in bali on and off for the last several years

maybe this is unfair, but this raises red flags to me.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 02:00 (twenty-one years ago)

red flags of what? i don't get it

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 02:20 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe red flags is not the right way to put it, but I was imaging her as a typical australian holiday goer with no connection to Bali. I imagined this as a week-long trip with a couple of friends for the beaches and local flavor.

her connections to bali suggest that she may have had the means to move that much weed.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 02:50 (twenty-one years ago)

her 'connections'? how does visiting a relative who lives there mean she has the means to sell drugs? my brother lives in adelaide... does that mean i have the means to sell drugs in adelaide? i don't really follow your reasoning

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

my reasoning is of course based on pure conjecture. however, my point, which I think I made quite clearly, is that a tourist with 9 pounds of weed might have trouble getting rid of it in a week's time. so unless he or she is functioning as a mule in a crime syndicate and receives a lump sum for the trip, it is hard to undertaking such a bold enterprise. however, someone with a sister living in bali who has visited there 17 times in a year is more likely to have the means (ie. social network, knowledge of the drug market for foreigners, etc.) to sell that amount of drugs.

it just makes the drug smuggling scenario seem more plausible to me, is all.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

my reasoning is of course based on pure conjecture. however, my point, which I think I made quite clearly, is that a tourist with 9 pounds of weed might have trouble getting rid of it in a week's time. so unless he or she is functioning as a mule in a crime syndicate and receives a lump sum for the trip, it is hard to imagine someone undertaking such a bold enterprise. however, someone with a sister living in bali who has visited there 17 times in a year is more likely to have the means (ie. social network, knowledge of the drug market for foreigners, etc.) to sell that amount of drugs.

it just makes the drug smuggling scenario seem more plausible to me, is all.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)

fair enough. i think the '17 times' thing upthread was a wild exaggeration by the way, it was more like 3 or 4 times or something.

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:26 (twenty-one years ago)

whoops, sorry for the double post. the bottom one makes more sense.

I think I want her to actually be guilty, because the alternative is so horrible. It's every traveler's worst fear.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

true dat. it has become so sensationalised in the media here that i honestly think there is absolutely no way any of us as observers could make any kind of objective decision about her innocence or guilt.

one thing that has become increasingly noticeable is a fundamental lack of understanding of the legal system, any legal system (ours or indonesia's). in my lunch break just now i read the local sunday rag and the letters to the ed are full of 'john howard should just get her out' and 'primitive bloody monkeys how can they ignore all the evidence and sentence the bomber bloke to 2 years and 'our schappelle' to 20'. there is some kind of denial about (a) the fact that she has been convicted of smuggling a not inconsiderable amount of drugs and (b) 'evidence' like some rapist's hearsay and petitions would not be remotely admissible in the australian legal system either. i dunno.

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know much about law, but I would think the onus would be on the defence to prove some kind of conspiracy. The drugs were found in her bag. That's an extremely solid piece of evidence.

Super Cub (Debito), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't know what the onus was, i am only familiar with the australian legal system not the indonesian one. by my post i meant that my understanding is that in australia, it is unlikely that the evidence given by the bloke who claimed to have overheard some fellow prisoners talking about a smuggling ring would hold much weight in an australian court. similarly, petitions signed by people who believe in the defendant's innocence would not go towards the court's decision here either. so people ranting on that the indonesian court was unfair in not considering this evidence are coming at it from an odd viewpoint.

gem (trisk), Sunday, 29 May 2005 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

Now she's 'clinically insane'

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25973488-401,00.html

wilter, Monday, 24 August 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)

The Australian doctor, believed to be employed by Corby's family, said he was shocked by what he saw during his time at the Indonesian jail, saying the 32-year-old was delusional and paranoid, Sky News reports.

I'm not bloody suprised, I would be too.

Spy in the Cab Sav (Trayce), Monday, 24 August 2009 05:35 (sixteen years ago)

delusional and paranoid

they let her keep the weed in jail?

miss pamela and the gtfo's (sic), Monday, 24 August 2009 06:26 (sixteen years ago)

A top psychiatrist, eh? Why doesn't he cure her then?

StanM, Monday, 24 August 2009 10:19 (sixteen years ago)

The Indonesian government should hire the same guy to do just that, for the lols.

StanM, Monday, 24 August 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)

lol nice point-by-point breakdown in the story lead

* Doctor "shocked be what he saw"
* Visit arranged by Corby's family
* She's not faking it - psychiatrist

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 24 August 2009 13:18 (sixteen years ago)

Well known fact that there is a strong link between marajuana use and mental illness. No surprises here.

Posted by: Phil of Sydney 3:06pm today

^king boy pato??

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 24 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)

haha

incidentally her lawyer admitted last year to making up the story about corrupt baggage handlers putting the weed in her bag.

pizza supremacist (haitch), Monday, 24 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

That's the kind of thing that never gets as far as our papers, but indeed, here it was: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/articles/2008/06/22/1214073089726.html (do they add the time she's out of jail and in hospital to the time she actually spends in jail?)

StanM, Monday, 24 August 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.