― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
but this thread isnt intended to focus on any systemic social issues, or prostitution. more so for a recounting of personal experiences and sticky situations you've gotten yourself into, that you wish you never had
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)
If you didn't understand that, I don't know if you've been there? I was talking more out of the context of emotional manpulation I suppose...sometimes people wind up or agree to having sex with others only to avoid hurting feelings. But there are other instances.
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 29 May 2005 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― [that bastard] jaxon (jaxon), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabe (gabe), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― kevin says relax (daddy warbuxx), Sunday, 29 May 2005 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Sunday, 29 May 2005 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Riese-Moraine's Plateau Rouge! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 30 May 2005 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 30 May 2005 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
i'd quite like to share the details because they're actually quite funny, but ... it's a small world, and i'd hate her to read this. (stranger things have happened, believe me.)
as for what i did about it ... well, the next time, i pretended to be asleep. the time after that i used the powers of my imagination. and the time after that ... well, there wasn't a time after that because i decided it was time to deal with it and say, look, this isn't gonna work, there's no spark at all.
unsurprisingly, she agreed. most amicable break-up (after, what, a week?) ever. end of story, hurrah.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 30 May 2005 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Riese-Moraine's Plateau Rouge! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 30 May 2005 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― mouse (mouse), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― mouse (mouse), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of STOP RUINING NIPPLES (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miss Misery (thatgirl), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of This Thread Has Much To Answer For (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
Alba, you're going to hell for that.
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.x-mencharacters.com/images/WilliePiotr.gif
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)
drilling out blocked-up holes?
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of WAAAAAAAAAAAAH (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
man, I totally forgot Kim Catrall was in that (and I think as an "asian", no less... *sigh*)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Suggestions:- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.- Try different keywords.- Try more general keywords.- Try fewer keywords.
and then I tried searching 'hair pie'. Oh my.
― C J (C J), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
this is my third favorite movie of all time
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
It's one of those films I regret not having seen until fairly recently. Given my Buckaroo Banzai love I should have been all over Big Trouble when it came out.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Hott green-eyed damsel-in-distress Miaio Yin is played by January 1981 Penthouse Pet Of The Month Suzee Pai.
I could not have made her name up if I tried.
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Nonetheless, to the degree that I feel compelled to acknowledge complexity and complicity, and to the extent that I perceive a single-gender lens as unnecessarily reductive, I may in fact look very much like an "anti-feminist."
What we're discussing is indeed a gender issue, and one where isolating the discussion to a single gender misses the point entirely. Ditto quibbling over who has it "worse."
Okay, I'm sorry I was so snappy. I don't normally want to look things through a single-gender lens either, but at the point I made my comment to you, people were actually saying that body issues are merely a matter of individual choice and have nothing to with gender stereotypes and gender expectations, and I was being on the defense and trying to say, "No, it has everything to do with women, with gender, with how those who fail the gender expectations are treated!". So I'm sorry if I was being dismissive to you. I'm very much concerned with how gender expectations put pressures on men as well (being a man who differs from the norm quite a lot I have to deal with the issue personally). It's just that I thought in this particular question I felt I needed to defend the women's point of view, because the discussion was steering towards "We're all just individuals with different tastes, this has nothing to with gender inequality".
Also, I do believe that mixing up, blurring and loosening gender expectations and stereotypes would be beneficial to all people (men, women, and all the other categories people are put in - and those who don't want to belong to any), because it would relieve the pressures of trying to be a "real man" or a "real woman".
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 3 June 2005 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― not-goodwin (not-goodwin), Friday, 3 June 2005 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't think anyone said that specifically. I, for one, was mostly reacting to the overuse of the 'personal is the political' meme and defending nipple hair loathers from the specious accusation that they're necessarily chauvinists.
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 3 June 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― think harder, Saturday, 4 June 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)
ps Onimo I've brought this up before. It is ok to denigrate anyone besides females on ILX. ANYONE AT ALL.
― Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Sunday, 5 June 2005 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― to let - flats (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 5 June 2005 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris H. (chrisherbert), Sunday, 5 June 2005 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Sunday, 5 June 2005 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris H. (chrisherbert), Sunday, 5 June 2005 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Er, what about black people (there are a zillion threads on ILE where someone who doesn't like, say, gangsta rap, is called racist), hancicapped people, homosexuals & transgendered people, homeless, mentally ill? You don't see them much denigrated here either, and there's a perfectly sensible reason for that. These groups, as well as women, are on the shorter end of the stick when it comes to the power relations in the society. To mock and denigrate them will usually just reinforce the inequal power balance, whether or not that is you intention. I know that sensibility towards these issues can go too far; for example, it can be difficult to criticize the values of hardcore rap without being called a racist. But to mock someone for something that for them is "normal" (like body hair), and what is only considered offensive because the unequally balanced beauty norms say so, is frankly quite stupid. What it boils down to is this: because the unequal power relationship, it is not the same to denigrate men than to denigrate women. Obviously I'm not all for mocking men either (though sensible criticism is often useful), but I do realize there's a difference between calling someone a "chauvinist pig" than a "feminist bitch". Only in a wholly equal society it wouldn't be so.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 5 June 2005 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)
Can't you see how extremely silly and stupid this is getting? Chauvinists are almost seeming more tolerable than the PC-brigade on this thread. At least most so-called "chauvinists" have a sense of humor.
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 5 June 2005 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― don't get me wrong feminism's cool and all., Sunday, 5 June 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)
I sometimes enjoy having candle wax dripped onto my nipples, at least from a suitable height (tip for anyone thinking of trying wax play: the higher up the candle is, the cooler the wax when it hits you). Candle wax doesn't do much for hair removal though - it's not sticky enough to take hair with it when you pull it off.
― logged out cos you don't need to know *every* kink, Sunday, 5 June 2005 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)
i'd like to leave you all with one final thought:
where would we be without drugs and saturday nights?
― think about it., Sunday, 5 June 2005 08:35 (twenty-one years ago)
It wasn't just that one complaint, it was the reaction it got ("Ewww! Hairy nipples! Learn how to shave!"), and from there one we moved to bigger íssues of body image and how women "should" look. Don't you really think women needing to modify their body from it's natural state to look "like a woman should" (and being mocked by men if they don't, like Maria pointed out), has nothin to do with gender inequality. Hairy nipples may seem funny and trivial, and compared to some other things they may indeed be so, but they're part of the bigger picture which includes things like bulimia and anorexia - and that isn't funny at all.
i second jody, i mean holy shit, i can barely look at my own hairy nips w/out vomiting.
No offense, but I find it kinda sad you can't look at your own body without getting sick.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 5 June 2005 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 5 June 2005 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Je4nne ƒur¥ (Je4nne Fury), Sunday, 5 June 2005 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 5 June 2005 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Je4nne ƒur¥ (Je4nne Fury), Sunday, 5 June 2005 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 5 June 2005 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
yeah and what's with the hair brushing thing? or getting a flattering hair cut for that matter? everybody let's just get thumb our nose at societal conventions by grooving on some righteous tunes and munching on this bitchin' granola my yoga teacher made.
― oops (Oops), Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― ft, Sunday, 5 June 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 5 June 2005 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Sunday, 5 June 2005 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 June 2005 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vichitravirya XI, Monday, 6 June 2005 06:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 June 2005 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Monday, 6 June 2005 08:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Monday, 6 June 2005 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)
this is kind of strange because i've always imagined females have it easier when it comes to attracting mates. (as tuomas has said upthread re: hands down pants)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 6 June 2005 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 6 June 2005 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 June 2005 10:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 22 September 2005 06:26 (twenty years ago)
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/39/2009/07/504x_coverlies-glam.jpg
― Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 22 July 2009 22:58 (sixteen years ago)
Boobs, boobs, boobs! Unwanted nipple hair? Tweeze that shit!