I'm back from Israel, so lets talk about the Gaza disengagement plan

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I didn't realize it before, but a date has actually been set -- in August Israel intends to pull out some 8,000 settlers from the Gaza strip, many of whom are religious or secular Zionist extremists, in other words, they, to varying degrees, believe Israel should take more of historic Palestine for Israel. Many of them are also fairly nasty towards Arabs.

Disengagement was the main conversation topic everywhere I went -- most Israelis support it, but there is a large minority that do not. Attempts are, as I understand it, being made to get as many of them as possible to leave peacably in advance, and they are being compensated. There have been Arab attacks on the settlements as well, probably in anticipation of the pullout, which is neither being cheered nor opposed by most Palestinians as far as I can tell, because the terms of it were dictated by the Sharon government rather than negotiated (which may have been a political necessity for Sharon in order to pull this off at all.)

I find many of the settlers in Gaza detestable, from what I have heard. A well known Israeli TV newsman had just made a documentary about them when I was there, and although I didn't get to see it, I read about its contents. He filmed grafiti that said "Arabs to the crematoria." A settler woman told him that Israel should keep the territories and make the Arabs their servants.

It's possible that there will be strong resistance from these settlers (no one is sure exactly what percentage of them are actually of these extreme views, though certainly not all of them are). Many of them are armed, and threatening to fight the Israeli army. I doubt they can put up much of a fight, but many Israelis are now worried that bloodshed could spark some kind of larger conflict. Personally, I doubt that there will be a civil war -- the settlers are not so stupid that they'd give up the protection of the Israeli army and expose themselves to inevitable Palestinian attacks.

Sharon's intentions are probably much more to help Israel than to further peace -- the security cost of protecting those 8-10,000 settlers in an area of 1 million Arabs is simply too great. And yet I recognize that even this small pullout is EXTREMELY difficult for him to do, and I give him some credit for that. I also doubt that Sharon will attempt any significant pullout from the west bank, but if the Gaza pullout goes well, it could serve as both a precedent and a blueprint for some future more peace-minded leader. My father compared it to Jefferson, who ended the importation of slaves but allowed slavery to continue and made no real attempt to end it. In other words, it's a small first step that, while a long way from solving the problem, is difficult to make and is in the right direction.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I am just back from Israel also. I was sad to go just before, as you say, the interesting months coming.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)

My trip was pretty fascinating -- maybe I'll start another non-Gaza thread so we can talk about everything else.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Come August, 95% of the settlers will leave peacefully. The other 5% may put up some sort of protest, but the mere notion that a few hundred thugs could incite a civil war in Israel is ludicrous. But the media likes to play up these sorts of conflicts, and the "KILL TEH ARABS" wackjobs make for eye-catching TV, so this aspect of the pullout has been blown way out of proportion.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I tend to agree with you, though I wouldn't go quite as far as you. I think the anti-Arab attitude is actually more present among extreme nationalists and religious both in the territories and in Israel than you say. Still, I don't take the civil war threat seriously, though I think something ugly will happen.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Because I am a mentalist I may be going on holidays to the West Bank this year. In August. So I'd be interested in a separate thread about tourism to That Part Of The World.

Anyway, the Gaza plan. I read some Israeli government guy in Ha'aretz talking about how the whole point of it was to get rid of Gaza and one or two isolated West Bank settlements as a way of strengthening Israel's hold on the rest of the West Bank. So eh, I don't know.

One of the big questions with Israel and Palestine is whether Sharon is a master strategist or just some bozo who reacts to events in an irrational manner. If he is the former then the whole Gaza showdown thing is very convenient, and allows him to say to the world "Look how hard it was for me to pull a few thousand of those guys out of Gaza... you can't seriously expect me to uproot a couple of hundred thousand in the West Bank, can you?". On the other hand, if the settlers in Gaza act like total cockfarmers they might piss off Israeli public opinion to such an extent that it turns decisively against anyone living on illegal settlements anywhere beyond the Green Line. I can dream.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

In the meantime, Palestinian municipal elections are soon approaching, with a chance for Hamas, with their official policy of "KILL TEH JEWS", to gain some significant power. Yet 85% of media outlets have been saturating the "what will the nutjob settlers do?" angle. In the meantime, the issue of "what will Hamas do if/when they gain power?", which is 1000000000000000000000 times more critical for the future of Israel and Palestine, is relegated to a byline in most papers. What's the word on the Israeli street about that these days?

Sorry about the slight thread derailment.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Fortunately, things are starting to turn on that front, since Abbas recent White House visit is widely seen as a way to give him more legitimacy back home and turn the tide away from Hamas in the upcoming elections.

I read some Israeli government guy in Ha'aretz talking about how the whole point of it was to get rid of Gaza and one or two isolated West Bank settlements as a way of strengthening Israel's hold on the rest of the West Bank.

This is hardly news. However, given how much hand-wringing was involved in the Gaza plan, any predictive policy statements, even from Knesset officials, may not have any correlation with what will actually end up happening.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the anti-Arab attitude is actually more present among extreme nationalists and religious both in the territories and in Israel than you say.

But there's a difference between having those extremist attitudes, and taking up arms against the army. Yeah, there is a not insignificant faction that feels this way and regularly organizes anti-disengagement rallies attended by 200K people. But I can't believe that these people are about to seriously rumble with the army over this.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

One of the big questions with Israel and Palestine is whether Sharon is a master strategist or just some bozo who reacts to events in an irrational manner. If he is the former then the whole Gaza showdown thing is very convenient, and allows him to say to the world "Look how hard it was for me to pull a few thousand of those guys out of Gaza... you can't seriously expect me to uproot a couple of hundred thousand in the West Bank, can you?". On the other hand, if the settlers in Gaza act like total cockfarmers they might piss off Israeli public opinion to such an extent that it turns decisively against anyone living on illegal settlements anywhere beyond the Green Line. I can dream.

I don't like Sharon much, but I've given up on trying to read his mind. The fact is, eventually, one way or another, some settlements need to be pulled out, and no matter what Sharon's ultimate motivation is, I'm happy that it's going to happen. In the long run, if it works, I believe that it will make further pullouts more possible.

As for Israeli public opinion, I think a lot of secular Israelis already hate the settlers, as they do religious extremists in general (I heard a fair amount of bitching about the Rabbinate and its refusal to recognize more progressive branches of Judaism, recognize non-Jewish weddings, etc.) My girlfriend always tells me how much a lot of the soldiers she served with hated defending places like Hebron.

Mind-in-Rewind: I think the Hamas elections are probably a lot harder for the Israeli media to cover, but you're right. I heard very little talk of that in the week I was there. Everyone likes the drama of the pullout -- it's historically unprecedented, and it's a Jew vs. Jew story. The racism adds to things -- many Israelis are shocked by what they're hearing.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

given how much hand-wringing was involved in the Gaza plan, any predictive policy statements, even from Knesset officials, may not have any correlation with what will actually end up happening.

OTM. In Israeli politics, which are much more volatile than US politics, Sharon has a very difficult balancing act -- he has to appear to be both working toward peace and behaving completely indifferently to the Palestinians.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

And at this point, I don't care so much about ultimate motivation as I do about potential result.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Hurting generally OTM. Barry, after Yigal Amir, it's not particularly unfair of the media to draw attention to the KILL SHARON graffiti. Do you really think the withdrawal will happen without violence?

Sym Sym (sym), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 01:23 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a different issue, though. Every country has their crazy fucks who want to kill the president/PM. Also, I didn't say that there wouldn't be *any* violence. However, I do think that a lot of the macho talk amongst the settlers will amount to idle threats. Like I said upthread, most of them will end up leaving peacefully. Any violence that does happen will not spread beyond the core people who started it. They're smart enough to use the disengagement as a platform to attract worldwide attention to their "cause", but they aren't stupid enough to fight to their death against the army. It won't turn into Masada. Absolute worst-case scenario = FLQ, 1970.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)

For any interested non-Canadians

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

well, I hope you're right.

Sym Sym (sym), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I was cynical about the when and how of Sharon's initial announcement of the plan, but Arafat's leaving the scene did change things a little. It's useful to have some actual Israeli disengagement going on at the same time the Palestinians are at least stumbling toward coherent self-governance again. But the Gaza withdrawal is such a tiny part of the picture, and there are so many more substantial things yet to deal with. The permanent settlements in the West Bank are a much greater encroachment on Palestinian territory and resources, and they're not going anywhere. And as long as Sharon's government makes all its deals contingent on what Hamas and Islamic Jihad do or don't do, they're still basically ceding control of the situation to the terrorists. I can't even tell what Sharon wants anymore. I'm not sure he can either.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Hurting generally OTM.

pain is good.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)

interesting editorial in Ha'aretz: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/583406.html

It's funny how unguarded the Israeli media can be (even more so in Hebrew, I hear). If some non-Israeli journo published an opinion piece like that the pro-Israeli people would be down their throat for bias and suchlike.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

whatever. moshe ya'alon's just using his anti-Israel stance to hide his deep seated anti-semitism.

Sym Sym (sym), Thursday, 2 June 2005 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

seeded, rather.

Sym Sym (sym), Thursday, 2 June 2005 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

It's funny how unguarded the Israeli media can be (even more so in Hebrew, I hear).

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Unguarded? Israel has a free press. Haaretz is a left-leaning newspaper. It's no more surprising to see this editorial than it is to see criticism of the Iraq war in the New York Times -- perhaps even less so, since Haaretz generally has a better track record.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Yaalon's change of heart, however, is surprising and encouraging. I've thought for at least a few years now that Israel is overstating its territorial/defensive needs considering the proven superiority of its military. I also never bought, even from the most cynical point of view, that the Palestinians could simply be kept in a vise until they submitted. Far from being naive, I think Rabin was quite pragmatic and recognized that Israel was better off using its position of strength to negotiate than to intimidate.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

What I'd really like to hear, though, is an admission in mainstream Arabic media that the strategy of suicide bombings is both abhorrent and disastrous for the Palestinians.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm pretty sure Abbas has said those kind of things.

Sym Sym (sym), Friday, 3 June 2005 01:37 (twenty-one years ago)

if so, barely...I'm amazed at how much the left, especially in America, writes off the tactics of sucide bombings with a simple, 'what would you do?' Well, hopefully I wouldn't target people going to work/school/home.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 3 June 2005 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm amazed at how much the left, especially in America, writes off the tactics of sucide bombings with a simple, 'what would you do?'

Wha? Can you cite me some examples of "the left, especially in America" saying this?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 3 June 2005 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Huh? The "Palestinians don't see any hope in their future, so you can understand why someone would want to become a suicide bomber" argument is used all the time.

I'm pretty sure Abbas has said those kind of things.

Both Abbas and Qorei strongly condemned the Tel Aviv bombing in February.

But Abbas has been playing a deft game of political footsie with regard to terrorism in general. He's been taking credit for the lull in violence, but I don't think he has had much to do with it, rather, Hamas et al are choosing to keep things quiet in order to further legitimize themselves in the lead-up to the elections.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 June 2005 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I just tried to google abbas' comments, but it is difficult for obvious reasons. However, I believe he criticized terrorism as being bad for the palestinian cause or at least counterproductive.

Sym Sym (sym), Friday, 3 June 2005 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Sure, he says stuff, but he hasn't confronted Hamas or done anything to curb their activities. And last week, Hamas rebuffed Abbas' request to renounce violence and join Fatah. So no matter what Hamas does now, Abbas can cover his ass by saying "I tried to get them on our side!" (as if there was any hope in hell of Hamas accepting that offer).

With the election, Hamas finally has a real oppurtunity to grab legitimate power, so they're not going to risk it by getting overly trigger happy. And Abbas doesn't want to try and clamp down on them because that'd boost their popularity leading into elections, which would significantly hurt Fatah. Hence, we have a "cease fire", and Abbas can claim that terrorism is down by 90% or whatever number he's been throwing around.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 June 2005 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

The "Palestinians don't see any hope in their future, so you can understand why someone would want to become a suicide bomber" argument is used all the time.

Well, for one thing that's a little different than shrugging it off with a "What would you do?" as alleged above. But even at that, I'd like to see an actual instance of suicide-bomb apologism being advanced by "the left, especially in America." I don't doubt that some anonymous Indymedia poster has yahooed the "martyrs" now and then, but I hardly think that's a common position on "the left, especially in America." It sounds like a specious statement to me. I know a lot of people who would more or less fall on the left -- especially in America -- and while I haven't taken a straw vote, I'm pretty sure they're all anti-suicide-bombing.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 3 June 2005 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think the ppl you're talking about really do excuse it per se. they just talk about why it's understandable.

Sym Sym (sym), Friday, 3 June 2005 07:23 (twenty-one years ago)

In some ways I think people on the left don't really engage with the whole suicide bomber phenomenon, like as if it doesn't exist. Anyway, it's the bombing civilians I have a problem with, not the suicide.

I'm weary of discussing Israel-Palestine politics, but I was interested by a report on a downloadable computer game produced by an Isreali peace group to mobilise opposition to West Bank settlers. Read about it here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4095364.stm

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40628000/jpg/_40628436_game203.jpg

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 16 June 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
I was thinking that the settlers were looking like a busted flush, and would either slink away pathetically or resort to terrorism, and now it looks like they have found this generation' Baruch Goldstein: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4746591.stm

I'm hoping they don't find their Yigal Amir while I'm in the country.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 5 August 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)

Happy Ides of August, everyone.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 15 August 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

This is a pretty good interactive feature on the subject, particularly the "Settlement Street" section.

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/international/2005_GAZAPULLOUT_GRAPHIC/index.html

Interestingly, all the people on the block are at least paying lip service to the idea of staying until forced out, but most of them seem in fact resigned to leaving. I wonder if there's kind of a need to make a ceremonial protest so as not to be spit upon by your neighbors.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 15 August 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

sadly, it looks like only half have left by the deadline.

shout out to PA and (especially) IDF for their relative professionalism, civility and restraint. let's hope it keeps up.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

GIT ORF MY LAAAANNNNNNDD

amon (eman), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)

Basic knowledge of the history of Ireland between 1880 and 1922 puts Gaza in much more perspective.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.