― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Amazing Jaxon! (jaxon), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Amazing Jaxon! (jaxon), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Amazing Jaxon! (jaxon), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― mikef (mfleming), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:09 (twenty-one years ago)
From what I can speculate, this bubble in US property values has given property owners an illusion of consumer confidence despite a lackluster economy/job market.
If the Feds hadn't cut interest rates to all-time lows and pressured banks to offer no-interest mortgage loans, could you imagine the affect on the economy? When was the last significant real-estate crash in the US?
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)
"The whole "prosperity" of the past four years has been built almost exclusively on very low interest rates. In fact, real interest rates in the US may well be negative now. If interest rates rise significantly, the entire foundation of the US economy is undermined. Consumers are already overstretched; the US savings rate is supposedly a measly 1.5%, but may in fact be negative. Outstanding consumer debt is greater than GDP. As consumers face rising interest rates, they will have to cut consumption, since they can't easily cut their interest payments on mortgages, home equity loans, and credit card debt. The Bush "recovery" was the result almost wholly of consumer spending. If consumer spending falls, the recovery must falter.
Higher interest rates will have a direct impact on two pillars of the US economy -- new home construction and property values. The recovery was fueled largely by new home construction. With higher interest rates, new housing starts will fall. At the same time, US consumers have relied heavily on rising property values to allow them to convert equity to current consumption through mortgage refinancing and home equity loans. As interest rates rise, property values will stop rising, and at some point begin to decline. Because their house represents most Americans chief financial asset, the average American will watch their net worth level off and then fall."
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Not that I disagree with the bleak commentaries about the current U.S. economy, nor do I discount the bleaker future.
(Let's put it this way.. I may never buy property in the U.S. in my lifetime ever.)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
The short answer is, I doubt it. Three key reasons come to mind: First, the housing cycle is extended and increasingly vulnerable to a downturn. Second, the American consumer must now face up to the legacy of an asset-driven consumption binge -- a debt overhang with a painful workout. A third consideration could prove most vexing. The Federal Reserve is doing everything in its power to forestall the endgame. Monetary policy is being aimed increasingly at prolonging the housing cycle -- a strategy that runs a growing risk of adding yet another bubble to the Fed’s recent track record. To me, all this paints a picture of an increasingly slippery slope for an already precarious US economy."
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut e-g (donut), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)