― Moe Blanchot, Friday, 5 August 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 August 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― Alec Tea-Skirt (kate), Friday, 5 August 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)
― Alec Tea-Skirt (kate), Friday, 5 August 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 August 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel, Friday, 5 August 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 5 August 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― Anti-Pope Consortium (noodle vague), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 August 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)
I think a better concept to deal with those things is apatheia (apathy, or detachment): not seek to extinguish emotions, only to avoid emotional troubles by developing clear judgement, because escapism is philosophical duck tape, it doesn't fix anything; the getting away from/ getting back to one's empoisoned condition brings a dichotomy of self that is avoidable, and if one tries to "never come back", like, living in denial, especially if the mental escapades piles up in different areas of one's life, it can equal living as a quixotesque character, attracting tragicomic situations. like, one would daydream of calm weather when vis car is in the eye of a tornado etc The only crime I could see in all this would be not to live as good as one could,
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 5 August 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)
― richardk (Richard K), Friday, 5 August 2005 23:11 (twenty years ago)
― chap who would dare to thwart the revolution (chap), Saturday, 6 August 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)
― Land Ho (dymaxia), Saturday, 6 August 2005 04:53 (twenty years ago)