Anti-ambition: is it self-denial or self-preservation?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Is anti-ambition of means of trying to keep from being (or even seeming false)? Is it accepting what one already has and is? A lack of insecurity about not having accomplished (or not having to accomplish) anything? A means of keeping yourself from adding more stress to your life? A sense of being fully realised?

Or is it limiting one's self, holding one's self down, and (ugh, sorry for the administrative terminology) ignoring one's full potential? Does it actually prevent someone from realising who they really are?

And does the act of simply setting out and seeing whatever you can do without having any particular goals or destination in mind constitute as ambition or not?

Your thoughts, s'il vous plait.

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of social estrangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

Anti-ambition is basically the lazy coward's attempt to make him or herself feel better about being too paralyzed by the possibility of failure to attempt anything. People like this should be killed.

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)

I am anti-ambition.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)

At least I give a shit
about the stuff I eat
Yeah, I care about nutrition!

Draw Tipsy, ya hack. (dave225.3), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

KILL ALBA (Vol 1)

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

I am pro-ambition

cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

Those who wish to change the world
According with their desire
Cannot succeed.

The world is shaped by the Way;
It cannot be shaped by the self.
Trying to change it, you damage it;
Trying to possess it, you lose it.

So some will lead, while others follow.
Some will be warm, others cold
Some will be strong, others weak.
Some will get where they are going
While others fall by the side of the road.

So the sage will be neither extravagant nor violent.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

I am pro-anti-ambition

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

OK, I am anti- any ambition that revolves around money, fame or status.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

I mean, anti-pro-ambition

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

someone should create a word for "anti-ambition"

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

i don't like people waving their ambition around, like what i did the other day.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Taking it easy as over-riding life principal: c or d?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

Lazy and Cowardly are pejoratives often used by ruthless bullies.

I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

What I like most about anti-ambition is how unattractive it is to the opposite sex.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

for a few "antiambitionists" i know, they do this because they don't want to be part of a corrupt capitalist society and basically wanna have as little blood on their hands as possible. i gotta admit, success in the conventional sense can be pretty hard to reconcile with certain political and personal beliefs.

matlewis (matlewis), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

At what age [did you]/[do you expect to] give up on your dreams?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

I'm into antidisambitionarianism

Draw Tipsy, ya hack. (dave225.3), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

This is so goofy, ambition does not have to involve money, fame or status.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)

No, but it usually does, and if it doesn't, then people tend to see the person concerned is lacking in ambition.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

"as lacking", I mean

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

hey, i know: it depends on what the ambition is towards. i *think* it will almost always involve 'status' in some way, however, if not fame (in the narrow, celebrity sense) or money.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

I am lazy

cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

which is probably why Alba specified it that way.
xposts

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

i think it is possible to be ambitious and lazy.

windows i have open: funding application, ilx.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

Ambitions outside of money, fame or status = family, spirituality/salvation and maybe artistic achievement (without being interested in recognition)? Anything else?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)

for a few "antiambitionists" i know, they do this because they don't want to be part of a corrupt capitalist society and basically wanna have as little blood on their hands as possible. i gotta admit, success in the conventional sense can be pretty hard to reconcile with certain political and personal beliefs.

well yeah. a lot of people interpret "doesn't want to do ethically dubious things towards an end of corporate greed and mad money" as "anti-ambitious," as if that's the only way one can be ambitious.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)

I am ambitious towards the reception of text messages

cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

now spot the lie

cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Lazy and Cowardly are pejoratives often used by ruthless bullies.

Damn straight!

The Ghost of Black Bully (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Ambitions outside of money, fame or status = family, spirituality/salvation and maybe artistic achievement (without being interested in recognition)? Anything else?
-- Alba (albab...), August 17th, 2005.

people like fidel castro were ambitious, i suppose. not that i'm bigging him up. i think a lot of people are ambitious in the 'moral crusade' sense.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Academic achievement, is another, I guess. All these things do tend to be mixed up with status and fame though.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

Ambitions outside of money, fame or status = family, spirituality/salvation and maybe artistic achievement (without being interested in recognition)? Anything else?

Personal goals/experiences? Such as having read x number of books by the end of the year, etc. That's not really a status thing unless you're the type of person who has to keep talking about it.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

Why is ambition for money a bad thing?

(xpost: Gawd, people who go on and on and on about the number of books they read a year are FUCKING TEDIOUS and need to be killed before the anti-ambitious.)

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

money is bad for the soul, dan, gosh!

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

Why is ambition for money a bad thing?

depends how much money. after a while, you don't... really... NEED any more.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

What I like most about anti-ambition is how unattractive it is to the opposite sex.
I suppose not being ambitious (on a wider scale, so to speak) implies that a person won't do anything for himself or around the house?

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of social estrangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

people who go on and on and on about the number of books they read a year are FUCKING TEDIOUS and need to be killed before the anti-ambitious.

Yes, they are worse than almost anybody.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

i think the notion of doing *anything* 'purely' 'for oneself' is unlikely. i think people are driven not so much by desire for status but for approval of their peers (read: chiX0rz).

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

OK.

Wealth, status (fame is just a type of status, really), salvation, spiritual growth, intellectual growth, artistic growth, hedonism, philanthropism (in the broader sense), environmentalism, and family.

That is my comprehensive list of possible ambitions.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

people who go on and on and on about the number of books they read a year are FUCKING TEDIOUS and need to be killed before the anti-ambitious.

maybe not "before," but otherwise otm.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

lost's on in two hours.

Enrique, naked in an unfamiliar future where corporations run the world... (Enri, Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

Why is ambition for money a bad thing?

It's just that of all the ambitions, I find it hardest to imagine anyone sitting there at the end of their life thinking: "Well, thank God I spent as much time and effort as I did amassing all those possessions, because in the final analysis, that's the most important thing."

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

(Yes, I am obsessed with the verdict of history and the lessons of my forefathers. I should just go out and concentrate on owning a string of sports cars and learning my own "money doesn't buy you happiness" lesson at a later date. Well that's just me.)

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

i do have tons of respect for billionaires that use their $$$ for philanthropic purposes. and there are quite a few wealthy people like that, but not enough.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

Oh. I forgot LOVE off my list. Dur.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

Ambition for wealth as a stepping stone to other ambitions seems fine, as many of them require having a certain amount of money, and all of them require free time (which more or less equals money).

Ambition for wealth as an end in itself = dud.

xposts

already disheveled hair projection (wetmink), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

i think the notion of doing *anything* 'purely' 'for oneself' is unlikely. i think people are driven not so much by desire for status but for approval of their peers (read: chiX0rz).

Hmm. What about doing something just to soothe one's self? For example, I don't really strive to write compositions or create music but I just get a sort of artistic itch that needs to be fulfilled and after it's done I feel much calmer. So essentially, I'm doing it to please myself, but in a therapeutic sense instead of just finding a way to pat myself on the back. Would that constitute as ambition?

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of social estrangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

Only in the same way that wanking constitutes love.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

Only if you would say one is ambitious for wanting to scratch an itch.
xpost

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

I think Nabisco needs to become my Life Trainer or something: lots of things he's saying on this thread are hitting pretty close to home for me.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

I really object to the idea that owning a house means you're some kind of overly ambitious, ladder climbing victim of the American dream.

More than fair. In turn I'd object to the idea that NOT owning a house means you are some kind of willful slave to the system and some loser who can't take charge of your own affairs. (I'm not saying anyone here says that, but I am saying that's often the strong subtext I sense -- again, around OC in particular, and that could mean a skewed vision -- in pitches, ads, financial offerings, etc.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

We're in a neighborhood that is not going to tank when the housing market crashes because it isn't prohibitively expensive. We are in way better shape than we would have been had we continued renting and, with even a tiny bit of research, you can put yourself in a location near where you need to be that will be a good return on investment.

see, if i buy a house, i don't wanna have to think about selling it. i want to, like, LIVE in it. put my roots down there. not have to move (which would be one nice thing about owning, as opposed to renting). some people are too eager to get a financial "return on their investment" before they've even bought the place.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

Y'all are laying out a lot of specific in-the-moment reasons not to want to own a place, which is fine, but the point is something larger -- someone, somewhere, might have a perfectly-reasonable ambition to own a home. (Also Jody even if buying runs more expensive over certain periods, well, if you're actually settling into someplace -- like planning to retire into that mortgage-paid home -- there's no question that you're better off buying, no?)

I need to work on being my own life-trainer, J: I feel like I've come to believe all this stuff lately, which is good, but I'm still working on putting it all into practice. The two things that started me thinking a lot about "ambition": (a) freelance writing, where as soon as you sit back and start thinking stuff sucks and you could do better, some voice in the back of your mind should go "well then you should pitch them, you lazy idiot," and (b) fiction writing, where a dozen MFA students can talk shit and be brilliant all they want, but it's the ones who bother finishing books and getting agents who are going to get published.

nabiscothingy (nory), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

bottom line is that some places are renter's markets and some are buyer's markets, but no matter where you buy a house the expenses of upkeep will be EXACTLY THE SAME. but if you rent in a city with cheap rent, the building owner will be the one losing the money since he's gotta keep your rent down.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

The idea of upkeeping a house depresses me.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

Or at least the spending time and money part of it.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

x-post -- I'm actually opposite of that in that I'm not only perfectly fine with moving, I love moving! It's what I was used to growing up, and feels like a good series of fresh starts each time. In that regard the concept of house = home = roots is foreign to me, it was always the people and the sense of self that was the core, rather than the place, 'the old house' -- and that sense was reinforced when my folks moved from Coronado and I felt no sense of loss or separation from the home that we had lived in off and on for many years. The family home just transferred to Carmel, and if for some reason my parents moved again (I highly doubt it), the family home would be following them as such. And home for me is where *I'm* at -- I really don't feel any sentimental or other attachment at all to where I lived before on my own and when I leave the apartment I'm in now, whenever I do, I doubt I'll feel it for there either.

it's the ones who bother finishing books and getting agents who are going to get published

Finishing books has been no problem for me, my friend, but I will admit the 'getting agents' part has been frustrating when even the agents who say they want to hear from you just send back 'thanks but we've got too much to look through already' notes in turn. I'm not giving up but I *am* highly preferring other ways of getting their attention through work I've done...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

Or at least the spending time and money part of it.

Well, as noted by Walter, really it's all down to the person and preference. My folks, for instance, are home-improvement fiends, and very good and practical ones at that -- they enjoy spending both the time and the money.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:07 (twenty years ago)

The idea of upkeeping a house depresses me.

i would LOVE LOVE LOVE to be able to putter around with interior design, little construction jobs, things like that, but that's all cosmetic, and too much of "upkeep" is drudgery like keeping pipes working and making sure termites aren't eating the foundations.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

Oh I know, Ned, I'm just saying, I can't imagine myself finding it all that worthwhile or fun.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

xpost - Yeah, Ned, cause I get the feeling you're geniunely "ambitious" about trying to make something of your writing! So if one channel isn't offering you entry, you'll find another one to get started on. Which is really all I'm saying -- the difference between putting yourself on the effort-making line and sitting back doing nothing, waiting for your brilliance to be discovered by someone else. I think a lot of people want that magical scenario where someone swoops in and gives them the opportunity to do the one thing they love and are good at -- and I can think of basically only two fields where that's even a possibility. What possible pursuit doesn't require pushing yourself forward?

nabiscothingy (nory), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

So if one channel isn't offering you entry, you'll find another one to get started on. Which is really all I'm saying -- the difference between putting yourself on the effort-making line and sitting back doing nothing, waiting for your brilliance to be discovered by someone else.

Well, oddly enough, I feel like something like that last point *has* happened with the writing, but I'll not explain in a public forum (might be easy enough to guess, though). Part of the problem has also been the feeling that this has been a transitional year, and that I've put my foot forward -- in many different areas, not just writing -- only be essentially told to wait. The result has been a building frustration all around, thus leading to alternate things to dig around with. But when friends I know are successful or rewarded in their own fields and I feel stuck, thus the grating. Mind you, I know where and how I am lucky -- good friend Stripey has had a truly awful and truly frustrating year on that front, so strictly speaking I should count my blessings (even if she owns a home and I don't, y'see. ;-) )

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

I'd never want to own a place, personally, but that's partially because I too would hate the upkeep -- not that I expect to be able to afford to own a residence at all in my lifetime. Admittedly, I'm not really fond of the notion of rent either, having to pay money over and over long after you could've bought the residence with the money you've spent. Rent-to-buy might be the way to go, but it seems very uncommon to find such a place, plus I don't know enough about the benefits of it compared to owning or renting a place -- not to mention that I've got a Proudhon-fuelled discomfort about owning a residence.

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of social estrangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

someone, somewhere, might have a perfectly-reasonable ambition to own a home.

Obviously, but I reserve the right to not listen when their "we're so much better off buying" becomes a sales pitch for the National Association of Realtors. Every geographic market is going to be different, and in retrospect I'm glad I never pulled the trigger on a mortgage. To be fair, I'm happier flitting about from place to place and would rather not have the long term drag of dealing with a house and/or permanent residence.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

Basically, I'll sleep when I'm dead.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

when i win the lotto i'm gonna have a pied-a-terre in every city.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

Ah, I see, Ned. But yeah, what I mean is that the important part is that you've made attempts, that you still think about alternatives, and that you're honest about what attempts you've made and what you might try in the future -- as opposed to having all sorts of rationalizations about how publishing is stupid, and you don't really care anyway, and you wouldn't publish with anyone but FSG, and so on and so on.

nabiscothingy (nory), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)

Hey, but you're right on that last point! All other publishers aren't worth the paper they're printed on! (This might be a lie.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm not anti-ambition; I'm pro-choice.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm anti-imperial, anti-trust, anti-gun if the shit won't bust...

Ian Riese-Moraine: a casualty of social estrangement. (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

In turn I'd object to the idea that NOT owning a house means you are some kind of willful slave to the system and some loser who can't take charge of your own affairs.

I absolutely agree. I didn't mean to imply that but my defensiveness probably gave that impression. I think people on both sides of the rent vs. buy issue can get extremely defensive -- the renters feeling like they're under intense sales pressure or are somehow losers, and the owners feeling the need to justify their decision while being faced with all of the financial pressures involved in home ownership. My house hasn't given me any kind of extra status in life and has actually caused some weird friction with people who don't think I look like the type of person who should own a house.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 18 August 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

Wow, crazy. I would never hold someone's appearance against them in terms of home ownership! Jeez, how rude.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 August 2005 00:42 (twenty years ago)

(How rude of them, I should clarify, not how rude of you! ;-) )

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 August 2005 00:42 (twenty years ago)

Enough about buying a house already. More about ambition.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 18 August 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

My ambition is to buy your house.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 August 2005 00:59 (twenty years ago)

Here's where I am: I'm ambitious in that I want to be good at things. I've done so many things I was bad at that now I have a very real drive to be good at something. Anything. That may sound like a bit of a self-pitying, Ignacious Reilly way to look at my life so far, but you try being a mortgage loan officer. You try getting up every morning and struggling to muster the will to still care. I couldn't do it. Therefore, I was bad at it. Same with being a baker. Just no damn good.

On some other thread recently, jaymc freely admitted that he's not a very "ambitious" person, and I agreed that I'm the same way. But jaymc is not a lazy person, and is not in denial about many things, at least not as many as the thread question implies. He's not exactly avoiding life. The man hosts a variety show, fer chrissakes. He plays in a band. So what if he doesn't want to buy a house? He wants to be good at something, for whatever reason -- maybe for personal satisfaction, for something to be proud of, for approval, I won't pretend to know.

And I'm the same way. Maybe not as social, but I understand. I know this about myself: I don't like failing. And I've done it enough to know that I don't like it. With every passing day, my resolve becomes stronger to make myself proud of myself. I don't care about getting ahead, I really don't. Jody's comment about how being poor and miserable is OTM, and I know that tune too, and I'd like to not be poor. But mostly I'd like to feel like a competent member of society. That's my ambition. I am not capable of rationalizing away the fact that I have no real career because careers are for money-grubbers. That's something that people who are both much smarter and much lazier than me tend to do. I try, goddamnit, and often I just plain fail. My ambition is to not fail quite so much.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)

Hooray!

NB I could Jaymc as "active" in kinda the same sense of "ambitious." Band, variety show, writing criticism, blogging -- this is all the kind of active involvement in stuff you like that lets you accomplish stuff and puts you in position to maybe make something "bigger" of it, should you care to. This is the whole thing about "ambition" -- it doesn't necessarily mean trying to instantly take over the world. It can mean just doing your thing as well as you can, which at least puts you in a position where it can grow naturally into something serious. (Twenty years from now, Jaymc is the TV variety-show Oprah, saying "it started small, but I just kept at it, and what do you know...")

nabiscothingy (nory), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

it freaks me out when people who are younger than i am become homeowners. wtf?? maybe that was common when my parents were in their 20s, but how the heck does a 25-year-old have the money or the established good credit necessary to purchase a home?

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

I think a lot of people want that magical scenario where someone swoops in and gives them the opportunity to do the one thing they love and are good at -- and I can think of basically only two fields where that's even a possibility.

Which fields are these, N.? :)

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

I coulda been the greatest trustafarian of all times. Knowing I'd never have the chance kinda set me back for twenty years or so.

Jody, my best friend (same age as me) just finished paying off his 30-year mortgage in 13 years, the bastardo. And that 13 years included totally chucking his first career and going back to school to become a massage therapist.

Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)

I think a lot of people want that magical scenario where someone swoops in and gives them...

Yes. Yes they do.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

And here's the deal with that line of thinking: You either save yourself or you don't get saved. That's the score. Deal with that, and you may suddenly find yourself being a lot more ambitious.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

I'm not speaking from experience. Oh no, never.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)

Wow, crazy. I would never hold someone's appearance against them in terms of home ownership! Jeez, how rude.

Yeah, after living here for several months our neighbor attempted to build a fence on our lot. When we protested he said "oh, I thought you guys were renters." My old boss used to make a lot of strange, pointed comments about it as well.

Anyway, to tie this back into ambition...uh, let's see. Well, it's a very personal thing isn't it? To criticize another person's ambition or to be anti-ambition just seems like jealousy. If you are really free from the desires and ambitions of the world in a completely zenlike way then you probably don't even think or talk about the concept of "ambition" ever, let alone pass judgement on the dreams of others.

xpost...
it freaks me out when people who are younger than i am become homeowners. wtf??

Yes, that's exactly the attitude I was referring to above.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 18 August 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, after living here for several months our neighbor attempted to build a fence on our lot. When we protested he said "oh, I thought you guys were renters."

uh.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)

Yes, that's exactly the attitude I was referring to above.

it's not an "attitude," it's a reflex reaction. it's just strange... admittedly there's a little envy that people who are younger than i am have their shit together in such a way that they can make such "adult" moves.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

uh.

uh, what?

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:12 (twenty years ago)

admittedly there's a little envy that people who are younger than i am have their shit together in such a way that they can make such "adult" moves.

I always wonder what's going on behind the scenes with people like that... maybe they're running a giant debt (in addition to the mortgage). A former co-worker (way younger than me) bought a house, but couldn't take a vacation or really buy anything else for at least ten years.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:20 (twenty years ago)

but couldn't take a vacation or really buy anything else for at least ten years.

that would kill me. it's not worth the compromise just to own a house.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)

my dad is terrified of debt. whenever he makes a large purchase, he pays with cash. when he does use a credit card, he pays that off immediately.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)

Best thread ever (or after the other ones on which I've said the same). I'd like to think that N. and N. have made up now. For me, a big problem has been doing things because I think I should and then not feeling right or just not going through with them properly, starting from running for office in elementary school.

youn, Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)

the TV variety-show Oprah

Nabisco, did you really need to specify?!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 18 August 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

I have no issues with buyers vs renters, what goads me is that people feel it necessary to inflict upon everyone in their vicinity the capital gains accrued due to their latest flip. To wit, at the drugstore the other day, a younger woman going on and on and on to an older woman, we bought it for 250, we're selling it for 450, our new place costs blah blah blah but it's really great because grandma can live in the front room etc etc ad infinitum. Then later at the nails place, a quite unnactractive middle aged woman, to no one and everyone in particular, we own this piece of property, it's blah blah acres, I'm sure we can sell it for 900, I'm sure we will have no problem asking 900, I mean I'm sure the way the prices are going around here it will sell for 900 etc etc etc.

Why do people think others want to hear about how much money they made selling their house? And why is it socially acceptable for people to discuss such topics? I feel like it is this rampant one-upmanship gone amok.

Mary (Mary), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:08 (twenty years ago)

only the nouveau-riche discuss stuff like that at the drugstore (within earshot of at least five other people).

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, and it's like the area where I live, is very mixed economically, I mean the staff at the nails joint, came to America from Vietnam, working hard doing people's nails . . . they don't need to be listening to this shit. Ditto the drugstore.

But similar conversations occur among friends, I think. It seems to be more socially acceptable to talk about how much money you made from your home, than it does to talk about, how much money you have invested, how much you make, how much you've saved, etc. I think because it has this element of chance, of play, people can talk about it under the guise of, look how lucky we got, but it's really just a veiled way of saying, look how much money we are getting. Maybe it's like the version of SAT scores for adults.

Mary (Mary), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)

I'm gifted with that magical combination of ambition AND laziness.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)

I mean the staff at the nails joint, came to America from Vietnam, working hard doing people's nails . . . they don't need to be listening to this shit.

doing nails seems to be a pretty easy way to make money. and the korean nail salon near me gets loads of business, so i wouldn't say they're struggling. i see your point now.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)

now though

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)

Ugh, people who talk on and on about their homes and buying homes and real estate and everything are insufferable. I would never do that in real life so I don't know why I went on about it so much on this thread.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.