anti-war events in DC, Sept 24-26

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Protest events and goings-on, along with the Washington Monument concert hyped on Pitchfork today:

http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?list=type&type=91


http://www.opceasefire.org/


As I'm already coming that weekend for a Mets-Nationals game or two, I suppose I'll try to link up with some NYC activist acquaintances for marching ... but WHY oh why has the anti-war theme been "dramatically expanded" to a "Peace & Justice Festival"??? The inability of the Lib/Left to STAY ON-MESSAGE is part of why the Evildoers kick our ass most of the time.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

I was planning to go to the march, but I didn't even know there was going to be a concert too. I hope I can make it at least for Ted Leo.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

but WHY oh why has the anti-war theme been "dramatically expanded" to a "Peace & Justice Festival"??? The inability of the Lib/Left to STAY ON-MESSAGE is part of why the Evildoers kick our ass most of the time.

remember the pre-war demos with the "free mumia" speakers?

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I remember those all too well.

I'm assuming this weekend was picked due to the annual IMF/World Bank meeting, which means there'll be the usual black-clad 'anarchist' clowns.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

dude, mumia should be free.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

oh, and you think the far right "narrowcasts" its msg!?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

I misread that as "Peace and Juice Festival"

Maria :D (Maria D.), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

dude, mumia should be free.

dude, no shit. thanks for telling me that.

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

sure sterling but what about the folks who are solidly middle of the road but oppose the war? they come out to protest our involvement in iraq and suddenly their presence is being used to support a trillion causes they might very well disagree with! i found the big nyc protest frustrating for this very reason.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

i mean on that day i can think of at least three occassions where i saw people LEAVE THE PROTEST cuz they were sick of the undergrad fuck da police bullshit and the high-school-dropout-gone-chomsky bush = hitler posters.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

yeah -- tack center y, it's been working great so far!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

don't forget the drum circles!

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

right now a majority of americans are opposed to the war (54% i think) even though the news media continues to portray us as "anti-war extremists." the dc protest (which i hope to attend) will be a great time make the fact that WE ARE NOW A MAJORITY obvious with bake sales, shuffleboard and a big ole game of pin the tail on the donkey. or not. at the very least present an image that americans can feel safe with, because i do think it's true that mainstream america these days tends to side with whomever is being protested AGAINST. i.e. there's a huge blowback potential here, and we should neuter that if we can to put more pressure on the admin, to possibly take back the senate for the dems (that's assuming that more of those fuckers decide to show some backbone) and to just maybe stop killing/be killed every goddamned day. there's a class strata that so clearly informs the iraq debate: to those in govt and the media the war seems cold and distant, a passing thought. to those w/ less wealth/access who have relatives in iraq (which i do), it's far from that. it's a daily nightmare, flesh + blood, all of these things. and because of the masculinity of our culture and the admin's insistence on out machoing its opposition ("bring em on" "cindy sheehan is a bitch" etc) has given it primo ground as the aggressor and those who oppose them as radical sore losers. but with a unified, clean, aggressive and sensible message, we can change that equation, make it look like (just as sheehan did) bush is hiding from a very ugly truth.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

"Peace and Justice" instead of "anti-war" = because there are loads of complaints people can have about the war and its history and its execution and its methods without actually thinking, at this late date, that there's any way we can responsibly just stop doing it.

Having an "anti-war" message at this point is kind of like rounding up paper towels for a "don't spill the milk" rally.

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

tack center y, it's been working great so far!

wtf are you talking about? since when does "this thing we're doing today is about the war and the war only" automatically equate to "we're changing our position on the war"?

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

since when is war only war?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

I'm all for protests and have marched in a few myself, but I always wonder if they really have their intended effect. I think it's great for the people marching to see other people marching and to not feel so hopeless, to feel like they're doing something, but I don't know if the people in power really see hundreds of people marching and think "oh, maybe I should change my policy". I think other tactics usually work better.

Maria :D (Maria D.), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)

i'm not saying it is, i'm saying that having an event that's about a particular subject(Iraq) and trying to focus on that is not the same as "[tacking] center y".

A single event on a single cause cannot lift the immense weight of moving all current leftist causes forward. Having folks talk about one issue will be a lot more effective/persuasive(b/c that is part of the game here) than having them talk about 15. I'm not saying that those events are worthwhile or very important, just that you focus on this one thing that's now the majority position(against the war). the other issues can be related, but discussion of nuanced connection is a bitch when you have a hundred thousand people milling about.

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

sterling's right - the left should abandon the tactics of the early 60s when it accomplished none of its goals and embrace the tactics of the early 70s when it accomplished all its goals. if people don't agree with 'free milosevic' or 'bomb texas' or 'don't listen to the zionist media' then they're not really anti-war and shouldn't be at our demonstration right? who said protests had anything to do with gaining support or affecting change? it's about letting the world know we're right and they're wrong.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

and sterling's right about the right never staying on message - i mean can you imagine rightwing talk radio and foxnews and even the white house and the halls of congress suddenly becoming focused on say a vegetative woman for a month just to cater to the pro-life crowd? they can never get their shit together, bush is always straying off-message, throwing in random thoughts that occur to him, digressing from the topic at hand, classic riffing. i mean - wild hypothesis - can you imagine him at some photo-op where he's there to, i don't know, sell some bbq and someone keeps asking him about something non-bbq related and he just kept retorting 'i'm here to sell bbq'? unimaginable! and can you imagine this tactic working? of course not!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

The protest in DC right before the war began was both the first and the last such event I will probably ever attend, thanks to fucktards like these. Never have I been more depressed to be grouped with people that I by and large agreed with.

Going to that protest actually made me feel far more hopeless about the state of things - particuarly the potential to actually make an impact on policy decisions, because it pretty effectively dispelled my illusion that my "side" was any more intelligent/reasonable/focused than the other guys. Fuck those assholes, their drum circles, their eight million unrelated causes (debate the mumia shit all you want but it did not belong at a protest ostensibly focused on ONE specific event), their see and be seen, self-congratulatory atmosphere, and most of all their goddamn puppets.

oh, and good, the world bank thing too...fantastic. these d-bags better not fuck up my birthday. ted leo & wayne kramer might be worth seeing though.

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

if people don't agree [that mumia is guilty] or the [troops need to stay around for some time anyway] or [the main enemy is islamic fundamentalism] then they're [too extreme] and shouldn't be at our demonstration right?

also, d00d, blount, if yr. gonna invoke the opinion of the whole world here i mean you'd find elected leaders of most nations on earth who would be lots more vicious and strident about u.s. foriegn policy (among other things) than plenty of the foax organizing this demo to begin with.

also xpost but see blount that's exactly the point. iraq and pro-life and god and church and flag-burning and martha stewart secretly eating lesbian babies and anti-evolution are all packaged in one big bundle! they're not just each an "issue" -- they're a component of a whole way of being and thinking.

(also wtf about the early 60s and early 70s are you on about "civil rights was fine and good until those negroes got it into their skulls that they could begin to organize outside of the church and the kennedy clan")

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

wait, the "kramer" advertised is just "kramer," not "wayne kramer", right?

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

http://www.homevideos.com/bestpicturesPHOTOS/kramer.jpeg

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

are all packaged in one big bundle!

but which bundle, aside from just "the conservative mindset"?

what's been the recent packaging for it(aside from say, "family values" or "Promise Keepers", both of which have not gotten much play since the clinton years)?


they're a component of a whole way of being and thinking.

no argument there.

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

i mean like when do we see bush and cheney being all "we're staying on the war mesg. here people, and the schavio case and all this anti-abortion stuff and trying to teach creationism is *making us lose credibility* - i went to one of those conservative uber-rallies becaue i supported the occupation, but all those kooks complaining about immigration *really turned me off* and now i don't think we can win over mainstream america."

right, get it?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

xxxxpost - it's MC5 wayne kramer, not the shockabilly dood

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

sterling show me photos of one rightwing demonstration where they're bundled together plz. also my point is that king and marshall affected more policy change than the weathermen, though the weathermen were more effective at pissing off the middleclass. some people are more concerned with affecting change than merely pissing off the middle class (these people are a pluarality but maybe not a majority at antiwar demos). but then some of us are middle class or even lower class (but not you right "sterl"?).

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

I cried when they shot Medgar Evers
Tears ran down my spine
I cried when they shot Mr. Kennedy
As though I'd lost a father of mine
But Malcolm X got what was coming
He got what he asked for this time
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I go to civil rights rallies
And I put down the old D.A.R.
I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy
I hope every colored boy becomes a star
But don't talk about revolution
That's going a little bit too far
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I cheered when Humphrey was chosen
My faith in the system restored
I'm glad the commies were thrown out
of the A.F.L. C.I.O. board
I love Puerto Ricans and Negros
as long as they don't move next door
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

The people of old Mississippi
Should all hang their heads in shame
I can't understand how their minds work
What's the matter don't they watch Les Crain?
But if you ask me to bus my children
I hope the cops take down your name
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I read New republic and Nation
I've learned to take every view
You know, I've memorized Lerner and Golden
I feel like I'm almost a Jew
But when it comes to times like Korea
There's no one more red, white and blue
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

I vote for the democratic party
They want the U.N. to be strong
I go to all the Pete Seeger concerts
He sure gets me singing those songs
I'll send all the money you ask for
But don't ask me to come on along
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

Once I was young and impulsive
I wore every conceivable pin
Even went to the socialist meetings
Learned all the old union hymns
But I've grown older and wiser
And that's why I'm turning you in
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

xxxxpost

gotcha. okay. i was confused by the "crusty scene vets Kramer and Jello Biafra" line in the pitchfork thing.

yup, and here it is on the main site: WAYNE KRAMER OF THE MC5 WITH THE BELLRAYS. This could be cool.

has anybody even seen Wayne Kramer solo, lately? i mean, apart from the MC5 thing that happened last summer? the Bellrays would be a band that could pull off the pseudo-MC5-backing-band thing, if i remember correctly...

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

btw I may attempt to get into the Roberts hearings that Monday, if citizens are STILL permitted such an honor.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

Learned all the old union hymns

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

There were just as many weird fringe groups and splinter factions and everything else going on in the 60s, you just didn't hear as much about it because the U.S. wasn't yet in complete media saturation mode.

Any mass demonstration is going to attract disparate elements. If you feel really, really strongly about the war, though, I don't think you should let the possibility of finding yourself standing alongside a few wingnuts keep you at home.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

xpost

the ice cream trucks in portland play "just look for the union label" along with "turkey in the straw" as they go about their rounds

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

you know what scares mainstream america away from demos even more than "free palestine" signs? poor people and negroes!

i think the demo should have a dress code -- no jeans, no sports logos, no wallet chains, no sneakers. also rsvp. and kronos should play the festival, along with wynton marsalis. don't let stanley crouch in though!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

no "We are a Gentle Angry People" please...

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

i mean alot of us who's lives are actually affected by politics, who know people fighting and dying in iraq, who can't hide behind trust funds to shield us from the fallout of bushco's actions, who would get their teeth worked on first if their was universal health care, who can't wait til it's $6 a gallon before they even think about changing their driving habits, we really really wish that certain elements of the left would treat politics as more than excuse for a t-shirt, would actually try to convince people (even people that - eek might listen to country music or believe in god or watch american idol or didn't go to college or omgwtf voted for bush last year but are having second thoughts), get in power and enact change, accept for better or worse the current nature of the media and public debate and try to win on those terms for now instead of just taking their toys and going home and meantime the poor and the middleclass (but not the rich) will just have to ride this storm out. alot of us are getting sick of politics in this country being a polo match between two different segments of the rich (same as it ever was).

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

sterling poor people and negroes are mainstream america, albeit maybe not in your neighborhood.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

sorry, i forgot to put "'mainstream america'" in scare quotes!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)

would actually try to convince people (even people that - eek might listen to country music or believe in god or watch american idol or didn't go to college or omgwtf voted for bush last year but are having second thoughts),

ding ding ding ding

kingfish fucked up his login (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

i mean for fucks sake blount you hide behind cheap class-baiting anytime any issue comes yr. way. its the populist equiv. of "think of the children."

and in this case its triply ridiculous coz the whole *point* of keeping demos "clean" is to remove "alienating" issues like, uh, race and class and cops and etc. precisely in *order* to make a bid for not the really rich (like forbes rich) but the upper middle class at the v. least.

"all us foax without trust funds can't *afford* not to keep our heads low so the upper middle class feels comfortable around us" wtf!!!?!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

sterling the "upper middle class" (take out 'middle' and your closer to being honest) element is precisely who i'm railing against here

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

i mean you've put yr. finger fine on the mainstream liberal attitudes of like some of the big organizers of these demos -- but for fucks sake that's hardly the same as the ppl who are trying to *broaden* the demos -- the "keep it narrow" msg IS the upper-middle-class triangulation one!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

and nice 'class warfare' dodge there btw, i guess the t-shirt left can learn something from the right's tactics

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

yeah well stop accusing any and everyone of being trustafarians like the fact yr. not doing much better than the rest of us makes you *special*.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

sterling how is making people check off eight boxes instead of one before they can show up at a demo gonna 'broaden' the demo?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

the "upper middle class" (take out 'middle' and your closer to being honest) element is precisely who i'm railing against here

and you're buying right into Rove's strategy. you would have us recuse ourselves from exercising power? what is the alternative you envision?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

i mean if you want more lower class foax at demonstrations you *SHOULD* talk about wealth and inequality and class. and if you want more integrated demonstrations you *SHOULD* talk about mumia and cop brutality and racism. and if you want more immigrants at demonstrations you *SHOULD* talk about immigrant rights.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

and if you want more upper middle class ppl at demos yeah then just keep talking about terrorism and gas prices.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

I'm wondering what form "actually trying to convince people" should take. I mean, the Swift Boat ads certainly seemed to "convince" a certain segment of the population that John Kerry wasn't fit to be president.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)

Great, I saw stickers for this today telling me to "end imperialism". And then it mentioned "Iraq, Palestine, ..."

and I said ARGH. Can't the anti-israel people shut up ever? fuckers

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:00 (twenty years ago)

They're not impossible, just very, very ambitious and hard. An assumption of evil makes such an evaluation impossible, however.

JKex (JKex), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:05 (twenty years ago)

actually, they are impossible, since they seem to not take in account actual reality(thus the "reality-based" comment from last year), and that their hunger for this kinda thing cannot be sated.

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)

In a way, the antiwar movement is superfluous. The Bushies are being undone not because their goals are evil (though they mostly are), but because their goals are impossible.

but what's possible or not depends on the choices individuals make -- history happens thru people, not through logic alone.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:21 (twenty years ago)

i'm real uneasy with "antiwar = superfluous" kind of talk if the underlying assumption is the "war"s impossibility... i mean, is that an i tolja so, or what? we had better hope that at least a couple of the short-term goals are achievable (an iraqi constitution, let's say), or we're fucked, and so are they (the iraqi they).

geoff (gcannon), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:25 (twenty years ago)

with the present state of the constitution that may or may not be signed, they're fucked anyway.

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:26 (twenty years ago)

i mean my opposition to the war was based on a lets say literary certainty that hubris = disaster. i knew these men would do nearly everything wrong. but i'd be overjoyed to see the whole adventure "succeed" in a few things.

xpost ok now which they is that? there are a few when it comes to those negotiations

geoff (gcannon), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

they're fucked anyway

Wrong. They really aren't.

JKex (JKex), Friday, 26 August 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)

you're right. allow me to clarify: the WOMEN are fucked anyway.

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 06:05 (twenty years ago)

They're not, either, but you keep cheering for them, because they can use it, and it can only help.

JKex (JKex), Friday, 26 August 2005 06:10 (twenty years ago)

as i recall, the whole "ppl. spat on soldiers" thing is far more a myth than a reality.

sterling otm

this is possibly interesting too (the dateline at least) - http://www.slate.com/id/2080735/

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 26 August 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)

bah - http://www.slate.com/id/1005224/

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 26 August 2005 06:20 (twenty years ago)

we had better hope that at least a couple of the short-term goals are achievable (an iraqi constitution, let's say)

Why exactly should a new Iraq constitution be a goal? Obviously it will give the Bush administration cover to start drawing down troop levels, but what purpose would it really serve for Iraq? Isn't it probable that no matter what sort of cosmetic charter the Iraqi parliament approves and no matter when the U.S. military eventually departs, the country is going to Balkanize and/or be invaded by its neighbors? Indeed, isn't this already happening to a certain degree with the huge numbers of young foreign fighters who are streaming into Iraq daily?

If the Bush administration wanted to maintain a strategic bulwark between Iran and Israel, they could have just left Hussein in power. The U.S.-manufactured constitutional process is a farce.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 26 August 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)

and I said ARGH. Can't the anti-israel people shut up ever? fuckers

Why should they?

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Friday, 26 August 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

Why should they?

see above, clouding the issue, etc.

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

>Can't the anti-israel people shut up ever? fuckers<

No, we can't (tho I'd limit myself to anti-Zionist). Cuz the Bushies will soon turn us into a similar theocratic state that suffers regular suicide bombings.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

I think that aligning the anti-war stuff too closely with Anti-Israel stuff is BAD. Most Americans, left and right, are of the opinion that "uhhh the jews are our friends". No need to keep people out of the Anti-war tent because they perceive it as being anti-semetic.

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

While I agree that there are plenty of reasons to be critical of Israel (as with just about any other government), I also agree such criticism is best left separate from criticism of the war. The war is enough of a malignant, reeking disaster on its own.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

Jews /= Israel.

this is a very unhelpful conflation. please stop it.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Jews /= Israel.
this is a very unhelpful conflation. please stop it.

true. the problem is that folks on both sides are either confused by or just confused, and thus reinforce that.

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

YES THAT WAS MY POINT YOU MORON

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

AND I AM AGREEING WITH YOU AND RESPONDING TO SHAKEY MO

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)

THAT WAS AN XPOST YOU MORON

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)

THANK YOU FOR E-YELLING

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

W's positive rating down to 36%. Will this result in a broader turnout than enormous "usual lib suspects" marches of the past?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't get my hopes up. To me, Dubya's dipping approval ratings are so much "sour grapes". Oh, NOW you don't like him, after you re-elected him, supported the war, etc. thanks for nothing.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

Okay, NOW will more "rookies" be motivated to show up? There are almost 3 weeks to shake off some trauma and get usefully angry.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i'm wondering if turnout was just doubled.

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

b-but won't all this talk about katrina harm the oh-so-vital "single cause" focus?!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

Not if you link it to National Guard depletion from the jihad, nope.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

Air America News just reported an expectation of 100K+ folks showing up, and several conservative groups plan to do "Support The Troops & Their Mission" events.

Interesting change.

Also, the conservative groups plan to "line the parade route." Yeah, this'll go well.

ah fuck. ANSWER is organizing some of the anti-war events.

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 September 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, whaddya expect, some woman was handing out flyers on the F train and was doing OK (aside from screaming in that humorless 'activist' way) until she got to "9/11 was an inside job..." Great.

Who else is traveling for this?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 September 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

"9/11 was an inside job..."

yeah, a guy with these flyers was at the local al gore event last tuesday, too.

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 12 September 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

Given Bush's current approval rating, wouldn't it make good sense to turn this into an Anti-bush march instead of anti-war? That would be the one common sentiment with 100% of attendees, more so than any particular "pull out troops now" type of thing.

richardk (Richard K), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

But what would be the goal of an overarching "anti-Bush" march? Impeachment isn't (yet) (remotely) possible.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Is an immediate 100% pullout of troops any likelier at this point?

richardk (Richard K), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)

not with so many bases being built, no.

But they'll slowly begin to lower troop levels, running up into the election, no matter what the situation is...

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 12 September 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

Battle Lines Behind the Battle Lines
Protest to Make D.C. A Flash Point for Rift Among Military Families

By Petula Dvorak
Washington Post Staff Writer

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- In military communities across the United States, a debate over the Iraq war is being waged by reluctant, neophyte activists. Their microphones chirp and squeak, or don't pick up their quiet voices at all. Their signs are too small. They forget the banners.

"This is my community. I don't want to offend people here. But my husband is a soldier; he can't say anything. So it's my duty as a citizen to speak up," Kara Hollingsworth, a D.C. native and Army wife at Fort Bragg whose husband served two tours in Iraq, said as she took a seat on a panel of antiwar activists last week.

A few hours earlier, another Army spouse stood in the red-brick village square near the base and held up a handmade sign supporting the war. She threw it together after she heard that an antiwar caravan was coming to town.

"I've never done this before. I'm usually a quiet military wife. But I can't take this anymore," said Marlene Lowrey, whose husband also served in Iraq. "This isn't right, coming into a town like this with that antiwar stuff. Those people don't realize this brings down morale."

Military families, stoic and tight-lipped during most of the nation's wars, have become a powerful voice on both sides of the bitter argument over U.S. involvement in Iraq. And their growing prominence will add a poignant note to Saturday's antiwar march and rally near the White House.

Organizers of the protest, who anticipate a crowd of about 100,000, estimate that thousands of military families and veterans will join in the demonstration. Three busloads of military families have been touring the country since Aug. 31 and will converge on Washington today to promote Saturday's rally.

In recent weeks, war supporters have been countering those bus stops, rallies and vigils with demonstrations of their own. They've got their own bus touring the country and are planning three days of counter-protests in Washington this weekend.

Both sides embrace the slogan "Support our troops." They just disagree on how to do it. They also were inspired by the same person: Cindy Sheehan, who lost her son in combat and kept a vigil near President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Tex., through most of August.

Because of Sheehan, "military families across the country are stepping forward to speak out" in support of U.S. policy, said Iowa state Sen. Charles W. Larson Jr., who recently served a year in Iraq with the Army. "You don't normally see people like this do that. They are angry and frustrated, and that is why they have become engaged in the debate."

Sheehan also galvanized Phil and Linda Waste, who were riding one of the "Bring Them Home Now" buses through the hills of North Carolina last week. Their three sons, grandson and granddaughter are all in the military and have served a total of 58 months in Iraq, and the Wastes have white-knuckled their way through each of those tours of duty.

They sat in their Hinesville, Ga., living room for months, cursing at the television reports from Iraq.

"Then we saw Cindy in Texas," said Linda Waste, holding tight to the table's edge on the bumping bus. Her husband picked up her thought: "And then we heard people call her unpatriotic. And that was it."

The Wastes finish each other's sentences and kiss each time they say "bring them home now" in unison. The people on the bus have started to call them Philinda.

"It's something I've got to do. Otherwise, I can't live with the guilt of what I did to my sons," Phil Waste said. He served in the Navy and has the blurry, sagging tattoos to prove it. He never fought in a war and used the mechanical skills he learned in the military to earn a decent living repairing elevators. "I told them the military was a good place to start out, a good place to learn a skill." He shakes his head and begins to cry.

The three buses have stopped in small towns and state capitals, the riders helping one another step onto makeshift stages to tell their stories and assure other folks that being antiwar doesn't mean being anti-soldier.

"You wouldn't believe how many people in the military are relieved to hear us speak. It's like they have permission to be angry now," said Julie Cuniglio of Dallas, who comes from a large military family. She joined the bus tour in Crawford, mourning the death of her nephew, Staff Sgt. Aaron Dean White, who was killed in May 2003 in Iraq.

The antiwar tours have hit 51 cities in 28 states, covering the South, Midwest and North.

Sheehan has met up with each tour at various times, flying from one city to the next, making quick speaking appearances and signing a few autographs.

Some families have joined the tour for a few days. Others, such as Philinda, are in it for the long haul -- from Crawford to Washington in 24 days.

Last week, the riders on the southern tour had been wearing the same clothes for days and were begging their chain-smoking, ex-Navy driver, who goes only by "Chito," to stop for a bite to eat. In some cities, like-minded families served them fried chicken and potato salad dinners and sometimes put them up for the night. Other nights, they slept on the bus or occasionally splurged for a cheap hotel.

Sometimes, the mere threat of the tour barreling through town spurred people on the other side into action. In downtown Raleigh, N.C., a group of veterans quickly assembled a small rally to counter Sheehan's message. The antiwar tour never showed up at that spot, but Matthew Delk did.

"I'm really not into going to protests. That's not me," said Delk, a beefy Iraq war veteran who spent weeks recovering at Walter Reed Army Medical Center from burns on his hands and chest. A National Guardsman, he is the manager for Halifax County in North Carolina, and he was sweating in a charcoal suit far different from his desert fatigues. "As a soldier, I'm not supposed to get involved in this stuff. But I believe that our mission is a noble mission. And I feel like I had to come here and say my piece."

Carolyn Culbreth, whose father is a retired Special Forces soldier, came to downtown Fayetteville on her lunch hour to meet the antiwar bus. "What they're doing is unpatriotic," Culbreth said, spangled head to toe in red, white and blue. "And in a place like this, it's just like a slap in the face."

When Chito parked the Bring Them Home Now bus in the center of Fayetteville the next day, cars whizzing by it honked and drivers barked at the slogans all over the windows and sides.

A woman in a silver Mercedes leaned out and shouted, "Go home!" A man in a red muscle car gave members of the group an obscene gesture. A soldier in a beat-up Olds Cutlass gave them a peace sign.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

The march will be coinciding with Rita hitting Texas, so if you see more than 20 seconds on TV, yell 'bingo.'

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

Ok.


then what?

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

I dunno. Hopefully at some point Jello Biafra will upset someone at the concert stage.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

it'll be more fun to see the number of "see? look at all these radical left-wing extremists; they hold their treasonous event while people are suffering in (texas/louisiana/florida/etc) from the hurricane!" comments that are made on the 24/7 news channels...

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

Fox & Friends.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 September 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

well, yeah, but to see if they make an effort for one per show that weekend...

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/23/102830/522

undercover/plainclothes Feds will be everywhere, due the interesting timing of the beginning:

"GRANITE SHADOW", a massive Pentagon exercise simulating the declaration of a martial law in Washington, DC.

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 23 September 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

BLACKWATER.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 23 September 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

gunz gunz gunz, baby!

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 23 September 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Oh Well

TOMBOT, Friday, 23 September 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

hey tombot, has there been any scuttlebutt over the wires on your end about all this, or have you not heard anything?

kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 23 September 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)

I hafta say when the Lakota Nation reps wrapped Cindy in a ceremonial blanket, I cried. Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton in good rhetorical form.

Off to dash thru Warhol @Corcoran cuz you couldn't get near it yesterday and it's closed Mon, dammit.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 25 September 2005 12:35 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.