― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 02:58 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)
― captin crunchheart (dr g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:12 (twenty years ago)
― captin crunchheart (dr g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:13 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)
― captin crunchheart (dr g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)
― captin crunchheart (dr g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)
Gear is totally right - it was a pretty great story to build on, if you had a good director. It was way too sterile for the story of a Depression-era mob enforcer. Thinking back on all the elements I remember (roadside diner, kindly rural farmers, hunting down Capone's money), their's nothing stands out as a huge mistake but none of it fit together well.
― Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
― Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)
― Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 29 October 2005 03:49 (twenty years ago)
Sure, worst film ever, why not.
― dar1a g (daria g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 04:02 (twenty years ago)
As clear as mud.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 October 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 October 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― captin crunchheart (dr g), Saturday, 29 October 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)
― Matt #2 (Matt #2), Saturday, 29 October 2005 06:26 (twenty years ago)
And by "love," I mean "hated," of course.
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Saturday, 29 October 2005 06:33 (twenty years ago)
you ever see that Ladykillers remake?
― sffd, Saturday, 29 October 2005 09:34 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 29 October 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Saturday, 29 October 2005 10:30 (twenty years ago)
Very Bad Things
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Saturday, 29 October 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Saturday, 29 October 2005 10:32 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 29 October 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Saturday, 29 October 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Saturday, 29 October 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Sunday, 30 October 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)
I don't think Road To Perdition was great, but I don't think it was bad either. Just sort of middling.
Thanks.
― F.R.I.E.N.D. (nordicskilla), Sunday, 30 October 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― squirl plise, Sunday, 30 October 2005 02:48 (twenty years ago)
― -rainbow bum- (-rainbow bum-), Sunday, 30 October 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Sunday, 30 October 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― the pr00de abides (pr00de), Sunday, 30 October 2005 06:45 (twenty years ago)
― ian in brooklyn, Sunday, 30 October 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 30 October 2005 08:36 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 30 October 2005 08:38 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 30 October 2005 08:41 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 30 October 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 30 October 2005 08:44 (twenty years ago)
I hate the ad campaign already.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 30 October 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 October 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 30 October 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Sunday, 30 October 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)
― Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Sunday, 30 October 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Sunday, 30 October 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Sunday, 30 October 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)
― Stuh-du-du-du-du-du-du-denka (jingleberries), Sunday, 30 October 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 31 October 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Monday, 31 October 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 31 October 2005 09:37 (twenty years ago)
-- Melissa W (MelCarame...), October 29th, 2005.
what does this mean? it's like saying 'orson welles just HAD to put in a pointless multi=pane deep-focus shot' or 'trust hitchcock to throw in a high-angle'.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 31 October 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)
Oh, hey, and how about that neat trick where Hanks gets shot standing in front of a picture window and the bullet a) passes through his body and splatters the window with blood, and yet b) somehow doesn't break the window.
― Floyd the Barber (Floyd), Monday, 31 October 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)
― Dan (Excruciating Back Pain) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 October 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 31 October 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Monday, 31 October 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)
― F.R.I.E.N.D. (nordicskilla), Monday, 31 October 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 02:45 (twenty years ago)
Tom. Hanks.
― Dan (Irrational Hatred) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)
i've not seen the film and Tom Hanks is the reason for that.
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 13:07 (twenty years ago)
― So so Krispie (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)
I kind of want to see Road To Perdition even though i am thinking I will hate it?I've recently read a few books by the bloke who wrote the graphic novel. I have enjoyed them. They were both about a hit man. The hit man likes tits and ass. The books I read were pretty /funny/. Are there any Max Allan Collins fans up in this bitch? He has written a lot of books and I am not sure where to go. I kind of want to read his Richard Stark pastiches about hardboiled heister Nolan. I like stories in that style. A
― i guess i'd just rather listen to canned heat? (ian), Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:33 (thirteen years ago)
Funny does not come within two parsecs of the Road to Perdition movie. Unless you have a unique sense of humor.
― Aimless, Thursday, 21 March 2013 17:51 (thirteen years ago)
This movie was a true turd. Tom Hanks is an awful actor most of the time but this is extra bad.
― "Turkey In The Straw" coming from someplace in the clouds (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 21 March 2013 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
Without getting into the merits, or otherwise, of the film as a whole, I do love the "Road to Chicago" sequence, set to the most beautiful piece of music in the whole film; the aerial tracking shot of the car crossing plains, and Hanks's passenger son stirring from sleep to see the city rising around them just as the strings hit is quite wonderful (prob open to complaints about the rendering of cgi-chicago, but I dunno, it still looks pretty good to me).
― that mustardless plate (Bill A), Thursday, 21 March 2013 20:29 (thirteen years ago)