― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:38 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
"but not the title track", oh no, gawd bless you ma'am
― zebedee (zebedee), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
But hey. He's snorted loads of coke, so he must a cool and groovy touchy feely guy!
― Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
Two parties with a broadly similar approach to free market economics, with one being slightly more liberal on social issues. Also, the point where the personality of the party leader has completely eclipsed policy and ideology in terms of their electability.
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
-- Venga (des230...), December 6th, 2005.
haha WHICH IS WHICH?
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
― beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
yup.
well, that and fear.
― kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
hell, they even had cowboy hats at the goddamn national convention! the daily show book made a joke about this(marketing an ivy league multi-millionaire legacy as "outsider").
but instead of derailing a UK politico thread into another US one, let us just agree that bullshit narratives can play more a part of one's politics than one would necessarily like.
― kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)
David Cameron is the cousin of the Conservative political journalist and editor Ferdinand Mount and the grandson of Sir William Mount, 2nd Baronet. Through the Mounts, he is related to many British aristocratic families, being descended from the 7th Earl of Denbigh, the 1st Earl of Ducie, the 1st Earl of Carnarvon, the 2nd Earl of Egremont, the 6th Duke of Somerset and the 2nd Earl of Shrewsbury, as discussed here. He is also related to the British Royal Family by descent through his paternal grandmother from King William IV and his wife is a descendent of King Charles II.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
crosspost
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
didn't they posh thatcher up a fraction?
― Pete W (peterw), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
Cameron wins I fear
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)
blair = posh scot
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
xpost
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
thatcher had elocution lessons.
one reason why David Davis wasn't gonna win was cos the grassroots would always think him a bit vulgar; a bit council. (look at that stupid DD t-shirt stunt)
english electorate has problems trusting scots (with some good reason what with them having their own parliament but being allowed to nevertheless partake of ours).
blair and brown should still easily enough waste cameron and osborne at the dispatch box to win in 2009. Brown's analytic ability/grasp of policy will stand in particular contrast to Cameron once he becomes leader and it'll be a refreshing contrast after 2 years of cameron/blair airy rhetorical competition. after that, brown should appear as the grounded alternative. all these machinations could work out very well for him in the long run, if he's allowed to play it right.
― barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)
those who tended to sing along to common people most in popscene and the like were the exact posh public school subjects of the song
― barbarian cities (jaybob3005), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)
Performance at the dispatch box doesn't count for much. William Hague was widely considered to have performed well in parliament, but that didn't do him much good at election time. What counts for more is performance on TV, and Cameron has more natural charisma and easy-going charm than Brown. Depending on the state of the economy in a couple of years' time, I think Cameron stands a pretty decent chance of beating Brown at the next election.
― jz, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― Oh No, It's Dadaismus (and His Endless Stupid Jokes) (Dada), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 09:40 (twenty years ago)
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 09:54 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)