this is from today's herald:
Green turned to red yesterday as a banking blunder by Greenpeace led to supporters being out of pocket over Hogmanay.Thousands were feared to be affected, after shocked members discovered the environmental organisation had mistakenly moved the decimal points in regular monthly donations. The accidental withdrawal of £300 instead of £3 led one supporter in Glasgow to cancel the donations she has been making for 13 years.Although Greenpeace paid the money back as soon as the problem was identified, it will take about three days for banks to clear the cash.The disgruntled 32-year-old supporter said: "I phoned up and the woman said it had happened to a high proportion of members. Three hundred pounds is a lot of money, especially at this time of year. I've been with them since I was a student, but I no longer want them going into my bank."The organisation has apologised to its members, and promised to pay any banking charges that may have been incurred as a result of the error. A spokesman said: "We don't know how it happened, and we're really very, very sorry. It is very kind of people to make donations so we don't want them to get a financial whacking for supporting our work."
first of all: despite what they're saying, i haven't had an apology from them.
second: the greenpeace spokesman on radio 4 this morning was so fucking blasé about it, i wanted to strangle him. "oh yeh, but everyone's protected. they'll get their money back, and charges will be refunded." hmm: i'll believe that when i see it. right now i'm a grand out of pocket, over new year, with bank holidays approaching.
i'm lucky: i'd just been paid, and i had funds to cover it. i imagine a lot of people will be seriously fucked for a few days. and it's just as well nobody else was trying to take any money from my account - BT, say, or my energy suppliers.
fuckers, i say. i think my poxy tenner-a-month might be better directed towards, say, friends of the earth from now on.
or am i over-reacting?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 30 December 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 30 December 2005 11:51 (twenty years ago)
BUT FUCKING HELL IF THIS HAD HAPPENED TO ME I WOULD BE SERIOUSLY FUCKED MONEY-WISE AND THIS MAD AND ANGRY AND WOULD PROBABLY ALSO BE IN THE MOOD TO CANCEL MY DONATION.
But on calm reflection would probably just continue to give them money.
― Zoe Espera (Espera), Friday, 30 December 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)
and zoe, that's the point: i've no fucking idea what greenpeace are getting up to right now. to tell the truth, when i heard the report on the radio i had to think: "do i give them money or not?"
there's a resolution for 2006: sort out my direct debits and make sure i'm doing something useful, rather than bunging the odd tenner to arbitrary places.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 30 December 2005 11:55 (twenty years ago)
That's definitely a good idea. I couldn't even remember is I had any Greenpeace DDs or not...
― ledge (ledge), Friday, 30 December 2005 11:58 (twenty years ago)
I'm not a fan of Greenpeace and I'm not sure why, which is probably the same as giving them money and not being aware of it. Except I'm £10 a month better off for my ignorance.
They should be on the phone to you saying a big sorry, mind.
xpost
― Zoe Espera (Espera), Friday, 30 December 2005 12:00 (twenty years ago)
― Mike Hanle y 3000 (hanle y 3000), Friday, 30 December 2005 12:13 (twenty years ago)
if you hadn't said they could take any money from your account at all and they took £1000 -- I'd say you could react a little more than you have/are
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 30 December 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)
i'm sure i am over-reacting, but hey: over-reacting is what i do best ;)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 30 December 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)
― Zoe Espera (Espera), Friday, 30 December 2005 12:53 (twenty years ago)
However, I do think you'd be are over-reacting by cutting off Greenpeace because of it. They have (apparently) reacted pretty quickly to reverse things. What you need to cut off is giving Greenpeace, or anyone, the ability to direct debit your account. Sure it's convenient, but do you really want to give ANYONE the ability to regularly stick their hand in your wallet?
I'm not sure how things work in the UK, but here in the US most banks allow you to set up an automatic payment. The difference is that you authorize your bank to PUSH money out of your account regularly, rather than letting someone else PULL it away. A subtle difference, but I've found you have a bit more control. Mobile phone providers, gyms, etc. like you to set up automatic direct debits, but if you want to cancel, you'll often find that they won't let you do it immediately -- they'll almost always say it takes 30 days. Meaning that they'll take one more payment AFTER you've decided you don't want to give them anymore. Great scam.
― Mitya (mitya), Friday, 30 December 2005 13:35 (twenty years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Friday, 30 December 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)
DDs are protected by all manner of guarantees etc, meaning that even if anyone does get slapped with automatic bank charges because of this, it'll all be refunded. however, it could also cause all manner of other problems. i pay my gas, electricity and phone charges by direct debit; by doing so, i qualify for all manner of discounts etc. if, however, i miss a payment, the small print tells me the discounts go right out of the window.
say this disappearing grand had wiped me out; taken me way into the red. the bank wouldn't honour the other direct debits. sure, it wouldn't have been my fault, but i'd still have to go pleading to everybody to whom i owed money, explaining the situation and hoping they'd understand.
like i keep saying: it's not about the money, or "o noes, greenpeace made a fuck-up". it's about their attitude, which seems to be nothing more than a vague shrug. so they've acted quickly to reverse things: i'd fucking hope so! i still don't have an apology, and i still think the guy on R4 this morning was a fucking wank. if/when i cancel the donation, i will make this clear to them.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 30 December 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)
i don't think we (i) would get any discounts from direct debit. they just bombard you with the idea that you won't have to think about the payment. but if the charge is regular -eg i pay a flat $40 for mobile service -- it's just as easily for me to set up an automatic payment (standing order) and not think about the payment either. but if i got a $5 monthly discount, i might think about it.
― Mitya (mitya), Friday, 30 December 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 30 December 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)
― patrick bateman (mickeygraft), Friday, 30 December 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)