How often do you call people out on their statements/ideas in person?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This morning a guy in my office made a joke with a fairly mild racial undertone, and I sat there for five minutes hoping he'd elaborate on it so I could be unequivocally offended.

Being snide-and-snippy ILXors we're theoretically all good at calling people out on such things -- but how much do you attempt this in person? How egregious does someone's statement or idea have to be before you'll respond? Feel free to break down responses by situation: friends, family, co-workers, strangers, etc.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:39 (twenty years ago)

i do this allthe time.it's some reflex beyond the scope of my control.

termo, Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:44 (twenty years ago)

my snippiness on ilx is inversely proportional to my passive aggressiveness spikes in real life

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:46 (twenty years ago)

Is it satisfying? I never do this, so I'm not sure whether it'd feel liberating or just cause problems. I tend to get in situations where like cab drivers will go on and on spewing horrible ideas at me and I'll just kind of chuckle and go "I guess that's one way of looking at it" -- just observing more than anything else. Which tends to be more fun than, say, the time I got into a long argument with a cab driver about whether Africans constituted "niggers." (I forfeited the argument, he forfeited the tip.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:48 (twenty years ago)

It's not a question of egregiousness as much as gauging the person's sanity.

If someone says offensive things on a bus who I can tell is not quite there, for any variety of reasons, I'll be far less inclined to engage and argue.. for obvious reasons. It's very rare for people to even blurt out things mildly offensive in a public situation.. at least here. People are very good at keeping their potentially offensive thoughts to themselves. (Seattle is the P.C.-guilt capital of the country, I gather..)

At work, well, a big part of the company culture is to keep personal politics to oneself.. any type of harrassment is ripe for major lawsuit action here.. and people here are even better at keeping their personal political thoughts to themselves than even the folks on the buses. (People will bitch about others only in relation to work issues and nothing more.) It was only slightly awkward and tense when all the anti-Bush stickers adorned every door here before the election. Then they just disappeared after the election. That was that.

What I'm saying, of course, is that ILX is completely void of any mentalism at all.. obviously!

*whistles*

Dom iNut (donut), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:50 (twenty years ago)

If I really disagree with somebody, I'll usually tell them whilst defending their right to talk shit.

Flower King of Flies (noodle vague), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:52 (twenty years ago)

I usually try to provide an alternate way of looking at things that's in some fashion consistent with the other person's broader worldview.

When I call people out, I either could care less what they think, or I care a lot what they think.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:52 (twenty years ago)

strangers: nodding of head, lack of engagement, soon the irritant will be on his way

co-workers: cold put down in front of colleagues, or merely a look of contempt. emotion never shows

friends/family: talk about it i guess

calderdale in the 70s (gareth), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:52 (twenty years ago)

actually i suppose i do the look of contempt thing sometimes

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:54 (twenty years ago)

oh i do this shit

$!@$!@!, Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Funny you ask, because I've decided to call everyone out on catcalls and stupid stuff like that. I had to go to a new deli the other night and the counter-guy called me "sweetie" and was a little too leer-y -- nothing horribly offensive, just...impolite. Normally I'd stuff my purchases in my pockets and go home angry but I don't want that baggage any more: maybe my resolution is to to be nicer to people who DON'T piss me off, and more direct with those who DO. So I told him I wasn't his sweetie, but if he wanted to sell me cigarettes, that was all right with me. Then I stopped by my regular store and thanked the employees for being good neighbors and polite human beings.

Generally I find if I say something to people early enough, then I can do it in a much less loaded way, because I haven't built the situation into one where I have anything to lose. Er, once I get angry it's a really bad time for me to start "opening up".

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:57 (twenty years ago)

it upsets people

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:59 (twenty years ago)

It does depend on all kinds of things. I've described before eventually backing down in an argument with ten or so increasingly drunk and aggressive men in a pub over their use of racist language. I got them to stop (while I was there), but I felt kind of bad about not pushing it farther.

I wouldn't bother much with for instance my mother (if hypothetically I hadn't stopped all communication with her) because she is ancient and stupid and nasty and a dead loss. Then there is the clarity of the offence - there are things that make you mark someone as suspect, but that aren't unequivocal enough to jump on. And I admit that I'd be less likely to call out a professional client - it's my job to be polite and friendly. There are limits to that, obviously, but I'd at least be more reticent, and more polite.

But I still end up doing this quite a lot. It's most often frustrating, and I can't say that I am confident I have changed anyone's mind, in all honesty. But I feel bad enough about not taking things farther on various occasions, so I don't think I'm likely to cut it down.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:00 (twenty years ago)

but no, I'm not usually angry mr. ilx politics man

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:00 (twenty years ago)

I guess for the most part I'm not actually interested in arguing with people (I have the internet for that), so I'll only call them out when they say something that's (to me) nearly beyond-argument wrong -- like I'm more interested in shaming them than having a discussion. Dude's thing this morning was like almost approaching the line, but he still would have claimed he "didn't mean it that way" and made the whole thing vexed -- I was seriously just waiting for him to follow up so I could go off. At least I now have more concrete reasons for finding him really annoying.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:02 (twenty years ago)

man i love arguing

$!$@$!, Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:03 (twenty years ago)

but yeah if i dont think it makes a difference id rather shame em than scream on a wall

$!$@$!, Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:04 (twenty years ago)

Family is the one where I'm the most internally conflicted. I used to openly disagree with my family's racism as a kid, and I got beaten for it, often.

At this point, the worst agents of this are now dead.. and whoever is left over with racist thoughts in my family, I just let them be. They're old enough such that they're not going to change their minds. Absolute avoidance and just nodding my head, as if they were even more detached than strangers, is my policy now. There's just no point to arguing with people who grew up in the 40s and "were there, so they're justified in telling it like it is, and knowing better what these people are like, and what those people are like, etc. etc..

If younger people were able to convince their grandparents to reason (when there's a good excuse for the kid to be more reasonable in the debate), then that could definitely change things. Then again, younger folks tend to not vote even for themselves, if elligible to vote, so I'm not holding my breath.

Dom iNut (donut), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:09 (twenty years ago)

I call people on nonsense a lot, mostly because I want them to defend the thought process that led them to believe something I think is nonsense. If they can defend it, then I back off.

There have been instances where I haven't called people on something ridiculous, mostly because they took me completely off-guard and I didn't have a way to respond that wouldn't have involved me screaming "FUCK YOU I HOPE YOU DIE" and you really can't yell that at work.

Dan (Pitbull) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:10 (twenty years ago)

I think it's tremendously satisfying within certain parameters, esp the understanding that you're probably not going to change anyone's mind. If you're lucky, maybe you can change someone's behavior toward you in particular (assuming you'll ever meet again) but I'm pretty sure my asking for a fair amount of respect from the deli guy won't make him see ALL women any differently.

Calling people out is mostly useful when you have a fair expectation that they'll be ashamed of themselves once the offense is made clear, because they thought you were "with" them somehow, that you were "in on the joke" or whatever; they count on an audience, even of one. I don't want to have arguments AT ALL with these people -- but I do feel a responsibility to make clear that at least one person present won't be going along with the joke.

And finally, I don't want to be complicit in things that make me feel slimy. I mean, I can't stop you from being an asshole but I should let someone else make ME one?

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)

I had coworkers who said a lot of stupid shit, and I just responded with blank stares and "uh-huh". I feel kind of bad that I didn't explicitly call them on it.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:15 (twenty years ago)

Sorry, I meant to add to the last para: If something's going to fester and I'm going to carry away anger & ickiness, I might as WELL say something, neh?? You've kind of got two choices there, and I want to give the burden of bad feeling back to the person who's actually being offensive.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:17 (twenty years ago)

One coworker actually asked my background before saying something, because obviously if I'm not part of said group, I won't be offended!

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:18 (twenty years ago)

Ha, right, this kind of stuff might be reinforcing my most cynical views of people. I tend to smile and nod at bad ideas in part because I'm curious how far they'll go -- I kind of want to know how they talk to people who are in on the joke, you know? This approach nets you a whole lot of really revealing information, but yeah, sometimes it's ugly information, and sometimes I'm probably just reinforcing the jerk's belief that people agree with him.

E.g. I used to do this thing where if someone mispronounced a word I'd mispronounce it the same way -- because I didn't want to be the one who corrected them, didn't want them to think I was trying to be smart/snobby about it. Which I stopped doing because, well, people would probably appreciate not having their errors reinforced!

xpost - I carry the burden. I am too accommodating that way.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:19 (twenty years ago)

I usually don't call people out too much, unless its in any sort of academic setting. I was the bully of my AP English class in high school.

elmo, patron saint of nausea (allocryptic), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:21 (twenty years ago)

Siblings - occasionally, and they give it right back to me.
Parents - never any more, it's not worth the effort
Others - pretty much never.

I worked in sales for too many years and learned to keep all my own opinions to myself while letting others rant and rant. The downside of this is people assume if you don't protest, you agree with their hateful nastiness. I was trapped in a situation once, driving a factory rep to a mine 6 hours away with him gradually spewing more and more and more racist, hateful shit. I put up with it the entire drive there and let the man give his spiel (which was lame and unsuccessful) to the customer. On the drive back, he started up again. I pulled over and said something to the effect that he didn't know me, didn't know my family, didn't know my history or opinion and never would and if he didn't shut the fuck up until we got back to his hotel in Phoenix, I would leave him there in the Arizona desert and he could tell it to the rattlesnakes.

Now, instead of putting up with shit from people I have to work with, I'm more likely to blankly state "I disagree with you, and will not continue this discussion" without feeling any need to argue or defend my own opinion.

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:32 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I have to admit, I'm a little in awe of people who can let offenders go on and on and hang themselves -- there's something more sophisticated about it, whereas I know my approach is really naive and absolutist sort of, like *I'm* the one who's setting the standards. I can think of a friend of Ben's who's a GENIUS at this stuff, in a matter of moments he'll spouting the most shocking things until he's led the original jerk MUCH further along than he or she would have gone alone. But yeah, it only eventually hurts me to be that cynical and I'm so tired of being on the defensive.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:33 (twenty years ago)

cab drivers and whatnot, I'll usually just exit the conversation - a guy in a Manhattan corner store was telling me with great delight how he'd told a woman who wanted to use his phone "honey, I'm not some nigger up in Harlem" (hard to make the connection there, I know) and I was kinda surprised by the jolt of fear I got from hearing somebody talking like that - I guess I grew up sheltered in my nice little lib SoCal world, but all could do was say "wait a minute, wait a minute, why the hell you wanna talk like that?" and exit his store as quickly as I could with him yelling stuff after me

Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:37 (twenty years ago)

By the way, question-wise, I was wondering as much about what happens when you're not the audience. It's much easier to hit back then, either by calling them out or just by ending the conversation -- but what about when you're not part of it? If two coworkers are having a discussion you don't approve of across the room, what would it take for you to make an issue of it?

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:40 (twenty years ago)

They would have to be threatening someone's safety -- otherwise, people are entitled to their privacy, however stupid they're being, aren't they?

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:04 (twenty years ago)

Depends on the level of threat, I guess. I may have said before that I once tried to stop a mob of 13-year-olds from pushing around a tiny old Asian lady on the subway. I don't know if I actually helped any, but she didn't get beat up and neither did I so I guess that's a win-win. What I couldn't believe was that NO ONE ELSE in the car so much as stood up to object, and it's not like it was a full train but I wasn't the only passenger, either.

I guess I'll say something to kids in shops or around the block, for language or disrespect to adults or whatever -- but all you can really do is ask nicely and see if they're inclined to oblige you. And other adults? If I'm not involved in any way, either as target or audience, I think it's just not my business. Perhaps this is what ipods are for.

XP: What Amanda said in 80% fewer words.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:06 (twenty years ago)

Well I dunno: that doesn't count in the workplace, for instance. And people are entitled to privacy, but we're all entitled to object to stuff they do in public, right? Like if people were being really noisy in a restaurant, or cursing in front of your little children, most of us wouldn't think it was out of line to politely ask them to stop. And for some reason I have a hard time thinking ideas don't count on that front. Last year I wound up eating at a lunch counter next to this very old environmentalist woman who spent her whole meal going off on a bitter, deeply racist diatribe; the staff there basically just laughed at her, but it kind of ruined my meal, and I wouldn't have felt like I was invading her privacy if I'd told her to shut the fuck up. (That was a weird situation, though, insofar as the stuff she was saying basically constituted continual verbal abuse of, well, me, even if it wasn't directed at me. I find it hard to take that kind of stuff as just "opinion," because when you're the topic of it, it's no different from if someone's specifically harrassing you. At least in my head.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:28 (twenty years ago)

Jaq OTM.

Also, basicallly, the better I know someone, the more likely I am to be argumentative with them. Calling out a total stranger is a recipe for disaster, unless that stranger happens to be driving like an idiot and is begging me to give him the finger and a long blast of the horn. Is driving "in person"? Probably not.

If someone is using a continuous litany of abusive language in front of my kids, I ask them to shut the fuck up. I've done that and will continue to. I once saw a guy nearly get in a fight with some teenagers when he told them to stop swearing around his mom. Classic.

I wish I was more of a crusading do-gooder when it comes to "mild" racial/sexual/religious intolerance or joking, but I'm not. I just don't have the energy to throw into it like I did when I was in my 20s. Which basically is a pitiful demonstration of morals and conviction.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:31 (twenty years ago)

Like if people were being really noisy in a restaurant, or cursing in front of your little children, most of us wouldn't think it was out of line to politely ask them to stop.
Politely asking someone to stop disrupting the peace and telling them that their opinions are wrong are two different actions though. We're not the thought police.

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:33 (twenty years ago)


A situation in which I would find it appropriate (though ultimately, ineffectual) to intervene:

I tried to stop a homeless dude (clutching a bottle of his own pee) from harrassing a young schoolboy on the train. The boy was about 8 years old and in a little uniform on his way to school. The man was asking him all sorts of personal questions (Where do you live? What's your name? Does your momma love you?) and the boy looked scared, so I sternly told the homeless dude to leave the kid alone.

He told me to "take those small ass titties and shut the fuck up." I think I made it worse, to be honest. The kid was embarrassed, the pee bottle fell to the ground and rolled toward me and the homeless dude was mad. I'd do it again, but I'm not sure if that's right or not.

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:38 (twenty years ago)

Its hard (for me anyway) in a work situ, because you know, I want to be able to get on well with my direct boss, at least. And one supervisor I had was a really nice woman who I had a good working relationship with, so one day at lunch when she stated that all these boat people trying to get into our country should be locked up, and then deported, they have no right to be here damn queue jumpers etc etc, I could do nothing but blankly stare in horror, mumble some vague defense she simply scoffed coldly at, then get up and leave the lunchroom. I never brought current events up in her prescence again. Weak, I know, but she was my boss.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:43 (twenty years ago)

You did the right thing, Milkmaid. xpost That kid will remember that someone stepped in. Too bad you didn't have a snappier comeback--though you doubtless thought of many in the subsequent days.

I'm calmer and more articulate when I confront people by e-mail. If they are uncomfortable with confrontation, this is better for them to. Also, when writing I tend to mull it over longer and occasionally reconsider making my silent fury known.

Laura H. (laurah), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:46 (twenty years ago)

There are actually a few of these sitting in my DRAFTS box as we speak.

Laura H. (laurah), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:48 (twenty years ago)

Well, you know, I'm a bitch, so I've actually asked people to have their conversations out of earshot of my cube. But it's not a single-room arrangement here, and I have the right to peace & quiet in which to work, even apart from the CONTENT of the conversation around me. Would you be willing to speak up to colleagues on the basis of having an equal right to a workplace free of offensive content?

I have a feeling that ownership of the space means something in these cases. If you're at a restaurant, for instance, and someone is being disruptive/offensive, I think you have the right to ask to be re-seated or to ask a staff member to deal with the offender. It should really be the establishment's problem; after all, if enough of their customers were offended etc etc. I guess you could speak to the other customer directly, but if they turn it into an out-and-out altercation, I wonder if you risk being labelled the "cause" of the problem by the staff...?

So basically I'd look for the relevant authority and make it THEIR problem. If they're not available or they don't act...then you have to decide all over again.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:49 (twenty years ago)

xpost

See that's the part I struggle with: sometimes ideas disrupt my peace more than actions do. I never do anything about it, and that's probably for the best. But I do get strong urges to say something -- something polite and non-argumentative, just to register that there are people nearby who don't find it acceptable. And obviously I don't mean that with political opinions or just annoying ideas or whatever, but more like the situation Martin was outlining upthread. Or what you're talking about with the kid. In neither cases did it necessarily "help," but for whatever reason it's important to me to know that someone, in each case, would stand up, however ineffectually, for basic decency.

But I guess I'm more of an observer than an act-on-principle kind of guy, which is probably better for my health in the long run: I don't ever get the crap beat out of me, plus I don't think my blood pressure really rises when people say terrible things. I suppose it's good to be jaded and accepting and people-will-be-people about that.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:51 (twenty years ago)

"Would you like your pee bottle back, sir?"
"I'm afraid you lost something."
"R. Kelly called -- he wants his pee back."

None of these things were running through my head after my titties were insulted. They're not even very snappy. Oh well.

The Tittie Vigilante (The Milkmaid), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure your titties are awesome: you're the Milkmaid!

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)

protecting your kid is generally so obvious that you can't avoid it.

Like the time I'm sitting in front of the guy who's complaining about my kid's T-ball skills. You want to be diplomatic and state the obvious (that my kid is 4, get a fucking clue you jockass) but instead you try to be as polite as possible. Kids bring out the strangest behavior in people.

Basic decency is either relative, or some people have none entirely.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:58 (twenty years ago)

I'm so used to getting called out on things online that if I don't get it in real life I think what I'm saying is fine. Which is usually wrong.

stet (stet), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:59 (twenty years ago)

It's funny, because I find that usually people who make those sort of obnoxious remarks about other people's appearances are rarely very attractive themselves. This should be pointed out to them.

Laura H. (laurah), Thursday, 12 January 2006 22:59 (twenty years ago)

Loudly and at great length. Preferably in front of all their friends.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:02 (twenty years ago)

I'm totally amazed Jaq used to work in sales!

Threads like this make me realise that I've let a really sheltered life.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:13 (twenty years ago)

Haha. Greg, if you were here I'd pat you on the head. Also, I've been meaning to tell you that Ben is one scene away from beating Ecco -- he needed something to do over Christmas while I was away, and was very quickly SUCKED IN.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:18 (twenty years ago)

what about when you're not part of it? If two coworkers are having a discussion you don't approve of across the room, what would it take for you to make an issue of it?

If coworkers are doing this to bait me, then I'll let them know my recourse is to HR. If not, but it's loud enough or annoying enough, I'll ask them nicely to take it somewhere else. And pass judgement on them in my own mind and wish them heavily smoted, then relish the schadenfreude when they are. The last similar issue I had was a coworker who insisted on playing rabid froth-at-the-mouth talk radio in the lab where we both had to work. Wear closed headphones, asshole, or turn it OFF.

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:22 (twenty years ago)

GP, I've led a most varied and eventful life :) I did technical sales to all sorts of industry in Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada for about 6 years before getting into industrial software.

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:25 (twenty years ago)

This is totally unrelated to the thread topic, but so long as we're talking about weird public stuff I feel a need to share the full text of this crazy man's rant-to-no-one in a Brooklyn bodega last night:

These cakes [gestures to display of Entemann's snack cakes] are a hot selling item! These cakes right here. But you always have these cakes [gestures to display of similar non-Entemann's snack cakes] right here in the front. That's not what the people want. These cakes are where the action is! You have to understand the customer -- you're ignoring the customer and you're going to go out of business ... FAGGOTS! [storms out without purchasing either cake]

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:25 (twenty years ago)

hahaha! That is pretty great.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)

I'm totally delighted by that ecco news, predictably.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:35 (twenty years ago)

nine years pass...

ive a young fella at work bristling to call out any and everything, nice lad but desperate to be a martyr. his nerves dont seem so good.

thoughts you made second posts about (darraghmac), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 22:40 (eleven years ago)

If whatevers being said is not directly harming someone in present company, do not care / do not engage.

rip van wanko, Wednesday, 27 May 2015 22:56 (eleven years ago)

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/Pages/register.jsp xp

lex merk a tory ya? (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 23:00 (eleven years ago)

does he sometimes wear a little cape and play the xylophone on letterman?

zionsmommy (mattresslessness), Wednesday, 27 May 2015 23:14 (eleven years ago)

i have a hard time disagreeing with people - it's something i have to consciously work on. i'm getting a little better at it

surm, Thursday, 28 May 2015 03:39 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.