Chirac threatens to nuke terrorist-supporting states, but that's okay

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...Because he hates G. Bush. Actually, maybe he was threateneing the US because G. Bush is the world's biggest terrorist, according to noted intellectual Harry Bellafonte.

What if an Israeli PM had said similar things? How might the reaction have been different?

agincourt, Friday, 20 January 2006 15:51 (twenty years ago)

i think he said "if they attack france" right?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 20 January 2006 16:00 (twenty years ago)

But Israel says it doesn't have any nuclear weapons

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Friday, 20 January 2006 16:00 (twenty years ago)

Why is Chirac saying this now? What connection exists between his statments and Ahmadinejad's government's recent decision to pursue nuclear power plants without IAEA oversight?

Interesting.

Que c'est charmant!

M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 20 January 2006 16:27 (twenty years ago)

But Israel says it doesn't have any nuclear weapons

no way dude, it maintains a stance of "studied ambiguity".

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 20 January 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

'studied ambiguity' v. 'masterly inactivity'

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 20 January 2006 17:08 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.