I spend a lot of my time reading and trying to get to grips with issues of political philosophy, economics, modern history, international affairs etc and generally what is going wrong with the world and what ought to be done about it. I usually lump these things together as 'politics', for convenience.
Although I do a lot of reading, I worry that reading is not really enough, and if I want to understand better I need to debate and talk to other people. There a lot of things I don't understand and perhaps won't without someone explaining them to me.
I have looked around for places on the internet, but all the forums I find either concentrate on rather limited domestic political developments, or are full of bickering idiots.
I'm interested in talking to people who have any kind of views whatsoever so long as they have thought a lot about them and are willing to explain and argue without dismissing ideas arbitrarily or point-scoring.
So, my question is, do you know of anywhere that would suit what I'm after? Or, if you don't but would be interested in joining a discussion group that I started, that is just as good and perhaps better.
I also find that a big problem I have when trying to talk to people is that when people haven't read the same books as you, you're going on such completely different information that debate becomes almost impossible without you both trying to reeducate the other person entirely based on your version of history. I wonder whether it might be worthwhile starting a sort of email-based politicsy book group. If I was doing that, I think I'd only really need a handful of people to make it worthwhile, but it would take a fair bit of commitment from them. If you are interested in that or know anyone that might be, that would be great too.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:14 (twenty years ago)
― yvette yreka (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:16 (twenty years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:18 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:18 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)
lbo-talk is a forum for the discussion of economics, politics, and culture from a broad left perspective, sponsored by Left Business Observer.
― S. (Sébastien Chikara), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:29 (twenty years ago)
What you gain by limiting the people you admit to your group you lose in terms of restricting opinions. Debate depends on disagreement, and there's a fine line between disagreement and bickering. And in a faceless environment like the Internet its very easy to misunderstand somebody else's use of rhetoric, cos you've got no tone of voice or body language to read. This tends to accentuate the bicker factor, especially when you factor in some people's apparent hypersensitivity to being disagreed with in any way.
I think we all need to master the skills of listening and filtering out bullshit at the same time.
― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:33 (twenty years ago)
I wish I could go to the pub and talk to liberal leftist Finns.
Thanks very much for the link, Sebastien.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:35 (twenty years ago)
― ;- ), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:45 (twenty years ago)
It seems like the ideal thing would be to assemble a small mailing list of interested people. The question is, where do I find the people? I have maybe one or two existing friends who might be interested.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:16 (twenty years ago)
From my experiences at university, I would not recommend that, unless you luck into a group of intelligent students.
I'd also recommend not settling too much into talking just to liberal leftists. It is often more pleasant, and causes less anger, but it is vital to get opposing views - there is nothing more valuable in developing your ideas on a subject than a genuinely clever person who disagrees with you.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:21 (twenty years ago)
(None of this reflects any will on my part to be involved - I gave up paying any attention at all to news and international affairs and all that a few years ago, and I don't miss it at all.)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:23 (twenty years ago)
Hello. I'd sign up to this.
― theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:26 (twenty years ago)
I'm certainly with you on that, Martin. My own views (perhaps I should say tendencies, as I have not yet made up my mind about very much), borrow from across the political spectrum, though admittedly far more on the left. But I'm quite into Green thinking which can transcend left/right.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:35 (twenty years ago)
― theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:43 (twenty years ago)
― Gatinha (rwillmsen), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:45 (twenty years ago)
I'll let you know as soon as I've recruited a few more people and thought a bit more about the best way to do this.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:51 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)
I disagree with this to some extent. An advantage of communicating about this kind of stuff is that you have at least the option to structure your thoughts better than in conversation.
But anyway, I wuv the politics, I would be interested in whatever kind of endeavour you would go for. I also think that limiting it to liberal leftists would be a bad idea, as you will just get the effect of people broadly agreeing with each other all the time, which is a bit pointless.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)
If you call it ILP too much you will put off those of us who are thereby reminded of their most loathed band ever.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 22:58 (twenty years ago)
Who are ILP?
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:01 (twenty years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:07 (twenty years ago)
This venture, how many people doing it would be former or current politics students,
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:13 (twenty years ago)
It has also been my experience that university has not given me any opportunity to develop my ideas or benefit from the ideas of others. I write the odd essay, it comes back with a mark and a few scribbled comments, and that's it. Tutorials are a bit of a joke, unfortunately. This year, as I said, I'm not at university. And I'm learning a lot more than I did there, so far.
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:21 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:23 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:26 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)
http://www.caffepronto.com/upload/photos/24coffeehouse.gif
― Abbott (Abbott), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:58 (twenty years ago)
http://www.eurotrib.com/
― dar1a g (daria g), Monday, 16 January 2006 05:58 (twenty years ago)
i think political talk on ile has faded some just because so many people (americans, anyway) are so tired of the bush administration. i just feel worn down by them. my capacity for outrage is close to exhausted. illegal spying? weird "signing statements" on bills? sam alito? oh god whatever. here, take the constitution, do whatever you want with it, just give it back to us on your way out the door.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 January 2006 06:25 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 16 January 2006 06:26 (twenty years ago)
― Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 16 January 2006 08:17 (twenty years ago)
Dammit, I'd be willing to discuss philosophy here! I've been scouting around today for another place to do so, and the available possibilities seem rather limited-- I'm seeing a lot of sub-undergrad stoneresque rambling and obscenely open-ended questions (like "What is truth?"-- one half of my favorite Bible quote, true, but not that useful a thread starter) on the boards linked off of Wikipedia's "philosophy" entry. I don't expect to be able to keep up with the professionals, but a small community with like-minded grad student types I could probably hack. Anyone have any suggestions?
― Dave B (daveb), Monday, 16 January 2006 10:18 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 16 January 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 16 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 16 January 2006 21:04 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:24 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:26 (twenty years ago)
Whoops! That was from you guys?!? Cathy, could you invite me again?
― Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:41 (twenty years ago)
― Gatinha (rwillmsen), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Monday, 16 January 2006 23:21 (twenty years ago)
― theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Monday, 16 January 2006 23:39 (twenty years ago)
I'd just like to register that I think this is a dismaying attitude, as is the idea that politics can't be discussed right here on ILE, or that political discussions serve only as ways to vet potential one-to-one chat partners. Jesus wept!
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)
― Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:48 (twenty years ago)
― Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:54 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:56 (twenty years ago)
It is taking shape, perhaps not exactly as what I envisioned but I hope as something worthwhile.
― Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 06:47 (twenty years ago)
― t0dd swiss (immobilisme), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 07:18 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:21 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:25 (twenty years ago)
newsgroups groups etc. like cathy's = classic, ie a more localised and multifaceted response to news/politics, one not beholden to business/capital/sponsors/shareholders etc
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:36 (twenty years ago)
Ah, yeah-- this is something I've had ferocious internet debates with people about before, because I do the same thing in not paying attention to trivia and dumbed-down propaganda. As far as I'm concerned, not knowing about the latest disaster people are rubbernecking over or what Cindy Sheehan is doing right this second doesn't make me uninformed. I don't really consider involvement with political posturing as "practical politics"-- I'd rather see people trying to make things better on a local, day-to-day level than spend their time writing screeds about people they're never going to get removed from office to convince people who will never be convinced and are in fact more deeply entrenched in their opposition every time the attempt is made. I find the fact that I live in a world of liars deplorable, but I'm not sure what can actually be done about it at this point.
Anyway, politics can still be discussed on ILE-- I don't think that we're making a covenant to never discuss them here by doing this.
― Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:21 (twenty years ago)
We're called The Helicopter View. I'm not sure why, exactly.
― Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)
Momus - I for one would welcome you on the mailing list, I feel that you are one of the more astute political commentators here, but that might be because I tend to agree with you. However, I think the idea of the mailing list is that it would allow a more reflective and analytical style of political discussion, as opposed to the rhetorical and competitive style that flourishes here.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:47 (twenty years ago)
The mailing list is going to rock. When my lectures start again I will bore you all with summaries of what I have learned each week
excellent!
― Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)
Asking again-- my e-mail program just ate the invite before I downloaded it.
― Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)
― distractiboy, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:54 (twenty years ago)
― ,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:06 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:14 (twenty years ago)
― ,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:15 (twenty years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:19 (twenty years ago)
― ,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:22 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:27 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:32 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)
― Chris F. (servoret), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 01:31 (twenty years ago)