Where do you go to discuss politics?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I have a bit of a problem, at the moment, and I hope ILE can help me.

I spend a lot of my time reading and trying to get to grips with issues of political philosophy, economics, modern history, international affairs etc and generally what is going wrong with the world and what ought to be done about it. I usually lump these things together as 'politics', for convenience.

Although I do a lot of reading, I worry that reading is not really enough, and if I want to understand better I need to debate and talk to other people. There a lot of things I don't understand and perhaps won't without someone explaining them to me.

I have looked around for places on the internet, but all the forums I find either concentrate on rather limited domestic political developments, or are full of bickering idiots.

I'm interested in talking to people who have any kind of views whatsoever so long as they have thought a lot about them and are willing to explain and argue without dismissing ideas arbitrarily or point-scoring.

So, my question is, do you know of anywhere that would suit what I'm after? Or, if you don't but would be interested in joining a discussion group that I started, that is just as good and perhaps better.

I also find that a big problem I have when trying to talk to people is that when people haven't read the same books as you, you're going on such completely different information that debate becomes almost impossible without you both trying to reeducate the other person entirely based on your version of history. I wonder whether it might be worthwhile starting a sort of email-based politicsy book group. If I was doing that, I think I'd only really need a handful of people to make it worthwhile, but it would take a fair bit of commitment from them. If you are interested in that or know anyone that might be, that would be great too.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:14 (twenty years ago)

certainly not here.

yvette yreka (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Living as a monk in the Himalayas.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:18 (twenty years ago)

There is the odd good politics thread on ILE. But they do seem to be rather few and far between recently. And threads I start usually die within a few hours.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:18 (twenty years ago)

Do you study at the uni, Cathy? I'm doing my degree at the Faculty of Social Sciences, and there are a lot of people there who are willing and capable of encaging in political discussions, during lunch breaks for example. Since most of my friends are liberal leftists like me, it's sort of refreshing to talk to people with different sort of views too. We also have this discussion club which meets every two weeks in a pub, the discussion subject isn't decided beforehand, but it often veer towards world politics because most participants are interested in that. Perhaps you could find a similar club wherever you live. Talking with real people usually tends to be more constructive than on the Internet, because there's less random aggression and insults.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)

Cathy you might be interested in this site/their archives
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

lbo-talk is a forum for the discussion of economics, politics, and culture from a broad left perspective, sponsored by Left Business Observer.

S. (Sébastien Chikara), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:29 (twenty years ago)

I have the same problem wanting to discus philosophy.

What you gain by limiting the people you admit to your group you lose in terms of restricting opinions. Debate depends on disagreement, and there's a fine line between disagreement and bickering. And in a faceless environment like the Internet its very easy to misunderstand somebody else's use of rhetoric, cos you've got no tone of voice or body language to read. This tends to accentuate the bicker factor, especially when you factor in some people's apparent hypersensitivity to being disagreed with in any way.

I think we all need to master the skills of listening and filtering out bullshit at the same time.

Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:33 (twenty years ago)

Thanks, Tuomas. I do study at university but not anything related to my main interests. At the moment I'm on a year abroad in Spain and my Spanish is far from fluent, so I can't really have meaningful discussions here. I'll be going back in September, though, and I think you're probably right that university might be the best place to find people to discuss with. Unfortunately I've only really met people at university who either aren't really interested in politics, are 'activists' who don't read, or just idiots.

I wish I could go to the pub and talk to liberal leftist Finns.

Thanks very much for the link, Sebastien.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:35 (twenty years ago)

Dry, roaring farts versus the more silent ones.

;- ), Sunday, 15 January 2006 20:45 (twenty years ago)

I suppose I should also say, I'm looking for something fairly low traffic but not dead.

It seems like the ideal thing would be to assemble a small mailing list of interested people. The question is, where do I find the people? I have maybe one or two existing friends who might be interested.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:16 (twenty years ago)

I think there have been a load of magnificent threads on politics and political philosophy here, but they do seem less frequent now, and more damaged by idiots. They can still be a good way to get to know people who you like talking to, which can lead to AIM or other chats, or to other places to discuss things - but they'll also be marred by twats imagining they are being daring or funny with moronic comments.

From my experiences at university, I would not recommend that, unless you luck into a group of intelligent students.

I'd also recommend not settling too much into talking just to liberal leftists. It is often more pleasant, and causes less anger, but it is vital to get opposing views - there is nothing more valuable in developing your ideas on a subject than a genuinely clever person who disagrees with you.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:21 (twenty years ago)

that was an xpost, but my first para fits with your last one. I am not suggesting this is a perfect place, or the only place you should look, but it's a good one that you know. It's also a place where a new board can be created if needed.

(None of this reflects any will on my part to be involved - I gave up paying any attention at all to news and international affairs and all that a few years ago, and I don't miss it at all.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:23 (twenty years ago)

It seems like the ideal thing would be to assemble a small mailing list of interested people. The question is, where do I find the people?

Hello. I'd sign up to this.

theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:26 (twenty years ago)

theant, great! I will certainly involve you. Does your email address minus the x's work, or do you have a different one you prefer?

I'd also recommend not settling too much into talking just to liberal leftists. It is often more pleasant, and causes less anger, but it is vital to get opposing views - there is nothing more valuable in developing your ideas on a subject than a genuinely clever person who disagrees with you.

I'm certainly with you on that, Martin. My own views (perhaps I should say tendencies, as I have not yet made up my mind about very much), borrow from across the political spectrum, though admittedly far more on the left. But I'm quite into Green thinking which can transcend left/right.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:35 (twenty years ago)

Yup, that email works. I wouldn't claim to be any kind of expert but I'd definitely be interested in reading/learning/talking about the stuff you lumped together.

theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:43 (twenty years ago)

Who can set up an I Love Politics Board? I'd definitely be on there.

Gatinha (rwillmsen), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:45 (twenty years ago)

I'm glad to hear it. Willingness to read and talk is exactly what I'm after, really. I can't claim any expertise myself, just a lot of interest and a need to communicate my ideas and bounce off other people's.

I'll let you know as soon as I've recruited a few more people and thought a bit more about the best way to do this.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:51 (twenty years ago)

x-post - I'm rather disheartened with talking politics on ILX. I don't know whether I'd feel better about it if there was an I Love Politics board. I'd certainly check it, if there was one though. But there are so few political threads on ILE now, I can't imagine an ILP board thriving.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Talking with real people usually tends to be more constructive than on the Internet, because there's less random aggression and insults.

I disagree with this to some extent. An advantage of communicating about this kind of stuff is that you have at least the option to structure your thoughts better than in conversation.

But anyway, I wuv the politics, I would be interested in whatever kind of endeavour you would go for. I also think that limiting it to liberal leftists would be a bad idea, as you will just get the effect of people broadly agreeing with each other all the time, which is a bit pointless.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)

If I were starting an ILPolitics - which isn't to say you should do it this way - I would be very inclined to make it registered users only, as that would offer a better chance of minimising the trolling that would inevitably occur.

If you call it ILP too much you will put off those of us who are thereby reminded of their most loathed band ever.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 22:58 (twenty years ago)

Excellent, DV. That makes three of us, so far. I'll keep scouting around, especially for people likely to disagree with me/us.

Who are ILP?

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:01 (twenty years ago)

ILP = insane liberal posse? :-)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:07 (twenty years ago)

Imerson, Lake, & Palmer?

This venture, how many people doing it would be former or current politics students,

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:13 (twenty years ago)

well, not me, and not anyone I know. I have no real academic experience of studying politics, which is perhaps why I feel such a need for this venture.

It has also been my experience that university has not given me any opportunity to develop my ideas or benefit from the ideas of others. I write the odd essay, it comes back with a mark and a few scribbled comments, and that's it. Tutorials are a bit of a joke, unfortunately. This year, as I said, I'm not at university. And I'm learning a lot more than I did there, so far.

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:21 (twenty years ago)

I'm back in university, doing an international relations course. It's very exciting, I've discovered weird political theories I never knew existed (which is a tautology, obv.).

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:23 (twenty years ago)

Ooh, I would really like to do an international relations masters when I finally finish the course I'm on. Where are you doing it, DV?

Cathy (Cathy), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:26 (twenty years ago)

In Dublin City University, in Dublin. You can do it full time or part time. I'm doing it part time. Part time takes two years... taught courses and a short thesis, you know the score.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I was referring to ELP. It sounds quite similar.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)

The local salon of course!

http://www.caffepronto.com/upload/photos/24coffeehouse.gif

Abbott (Abbott), Sunday, 15 January 2006 23:58 (twenty years ago)

This site is not bad - sort of a Daily Kos spinoff - I read/post at dKos but it's almost all US domestic politics.

http://www.eurotrib.com/

dar1a g (daria g), Monday, 16 January 2006 05:58 (twenty years ago)

that eurotrib site looks like at least a nice change from the american lefty blogs. i almost can't read them anymore, they're so relentlessly angry and self-righteous. and i mean, i feel that way too sometimes but i don't think it's particularly useful.

i think political talk on ile has faded some just because so many people (americans, anyway) are so tired of the bush administration. i just feel worn down by them. my capacity for outrage is close to exhausted. illegal spying? weird "signing statements" on bills? sam alito? oh god whatever. here, take the constitution, do whatever you want with it, just give it back to us on your way out the door.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 16 January 2006 06:25 (twenty years ago)

Cathy, I might be interested in such a discussion group too, you can e-mail me at tu0mas dot alh0 at helsinki dot fi for specifics.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 16 January 2006 06:26 (twenty years ago)

I'd be up for the discussion group also-- you can e-mail me at the address below. I think an ILP could thrive, given the limited success of ILC (which seems to depend on the willingness of a few dedicated posters to generate new content every week), but how many non-leftists are there here now who argue on the political threads, other than don weiner? Where is your noble opposition going to come from?

Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 16 January 2006 08:17 (twenty years ago)

I have the same problem wanting to discus philosophy.

Dammit, I'd be willing to discuss philosophy here! I've been scouting around today for another place to do so, and the available possibilities seem rather limited-- I'm seeing a lot of sub-undergrad stoneresque rambling and obscenely open-ended questions (like "What is truth?"-- one half of my favorite Bible quote, true, but not that useful a thread starter) on the boards linked off of Wikipedia's "philosophy" entry. I don't expect to be able to keep up with the professionals, but a small community with like-minded grad student types I could probably hack. Anyone have any suggestions?

Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 16 January 2006 08:17 (twenty years ago)

I would be up for an ILP board, but I'm worried that I first thought of Independent Labour Party, and have never heard of a band called that...

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 16 January 2006 10:18 (twenty years ago)

This is looking all very promising, now. I'm still doing a bit of scouting, but I think we've got enough people for a nice, small group.

Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 16 January 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)

I have a feeling that a politics forum would need very clearly defined rules of behaviour (i.e. much stricter than the norm for ILX) and would also need to be heavily moderated. Harrumph.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 16 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)

Okay, my friend just started a mailing list. Everyone that expressed interest in this venture should have received an email invite. If not, we've misspelled your email address, sorry, can you tell us it again?

Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 16 January 2006 21:04 (twenty years ago)

Great group name. I think. I almost deleted the invite unread as spam.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:24 (twenty years ago)

I'd be interested.

kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:26 (twenty years ago)

I almost deleted the invite unread as spam.

Whoops! That was from you guys?!? Cathy, could you invite me again?

Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:41 (twenty years ago)

Can I have one? Ta.

Gatinha (rwillmsen), Monday, 16 January 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)

Not arrived yet...

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 16 January 2006 23:21 (twenty years ago)

I haven't got an email yet. This one works sans 'x's.

theantmustdance (theantmustdance), Monday, 16 January 2006 23:39 (twenty years ago)

I gave up paying any attention at all to news and international affairs and all that a few years ago, and I don't miss it at all.

I'd just like to register that I think this is a dismaying attitude, as is the idea that politics can't be discussed right here on ILE, or that political discussions serve only as ways to vet potential one-to-one chat partners. Jesus wept!

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)

Sorry to be obtuse, but who are you quoting, Momus? And who here is making the claim about vetting chat partners through political discussion? If anything, the attitude here seems to be the opposite-- people are saying that they don't want to engage in hivemind speak.

Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:48 (twenty years ago)

Momus, that's a weird comment from somebody who's pretty much the anti-Ian Mackaye.

Sinister Oink Kingpin (noodle vague), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:54 (twenty years ago)

You're Flailing

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 01:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm not the owner of the group so I can't send out the invites myself, but I will nag the owner when I get back from work.

It is taking shape, perhaps not exactly as what I envisioned but I hope as something worthwhile.

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 06:47 (twenty years ago)

i am definitely interested. invite to the email addy below please

t0dd swiss (immobilisme), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 07:18 (twenty years ago)

Cathy - you should get the owner to make you a moderator, then you can send out invites.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:21 (twenty years ago)

Momus is quoting me. To expand, I stopped reading the newspapers, which was my main source for news, when I had those horrendous eye problems which made it impossible for me to read newspapers, even with a magnifying glass. I found that not knowing whose stars were rising and falling and what Tony Blair had said today and all that was something I found extremely easy to live with, and have never got back into newspapers since my operations. I'm still interested in politics as a play of ideas, as philosophy, but not much in practical politics in action. I'm not sure why this should dismay anyone, and I am not trying to convert anyone.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:25 (twenty years ago)

current affairs as mediated etc. by oldstyle newspapers, tv, radio etc. = mostly dud - simplistic, partisan, inflexible etc - easy to give up, do w/out

newsgroups groups etc. like cathy's = classic, ie a more localised and multifaceted response to news/politics, one not beholden to business/capital/sponsors/shareholders etc

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:36 (twenty years ago)

I found that not knowing whose stars were rising and falling and what Tony Blair had said today and all that was something I found extremely easy to live with, and have never got back into newspapers since my operations.

Ah, yeah-- this is something I've had ferocious internet debates with people about before, because I do the same thing in not paying attention to trivia and dumbed-down propaganda. As far as I'm concerned, not knowing about the latest disaster people are rubbernecking over or what Cindy Sheehan is doing right this second doesn't make me uninformed. I don't really consider involvement with political posturing as "practical politics"-- I'd rather see people trying to make things better on a local, day-to-day level than spend their time writing screeds about people they're never going to get removed from office to convince people who will never be convinced and are in fact more deeply entrenched in their opposition every time the attempt is made. I find the fact that I live in a world of liars deplorable, but I'm not sure what can actually be done about it at this point.

Anyway, politics can still be discussed on ILE-- I don't think that we're making a covenant to never discuss them here by doing this.

Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 16:44 (twenty years ago)

http://graphics.jsonline.com/graphics/news/img/mar03/stingl1032003.jpg

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:21 (twenty years ago)

I'm a moderator now. I sent out invites to everyone on this thread that requested one. So if you're still not getting it, ask me again.

We're called The Helicopter View. I'm not sure why, exactly.

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)

The mailing list is going to rock. When my lectures start again I will bore you all with summaries of what I have learned each week.

Momus - I for one would welcome you on the mailing list, I feel that you are one of the more astute political commentators here, but that might be because I tend to agree with you. However, I think the idea of the mailing list is that it would allow a more reflective and analytical style of political discussion, as opposed to the rhetorical and competitive style that flourishes here.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:47 (twenty years ago)

I wanted something low-traffic where my threads wouldn't die so quickly. I'll still post on the ILE politics threads.

The mailing list is going to rock. When my lectures start again I will bore you all with summaries of what I have learned each week

excellent!

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)

Can I start a discussion on the list? I'm at the university library doing some feminist studies reading, and I'm kinda bored.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:17 (twenty years ago)

please tuomas!

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)

the sooner we start the better.

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)

So if you're still not getting it, ask me again.

Asking again-- my e-mail program just ate the invite before I downloaded it.

Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)

medium-time lurker, first-time poster here. please sign me up - i've been craving something like this for so long...

distractiboy, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)

Brilliant. I've just sent you an invite.

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:54 (twenty years ago)

lmao @ ppl scared of ilx

,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)

cathy, could i please get an invite? i'm not 100% i'd post, but i'd certainly like to read, if that's okay.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:06 (twenty years ago)

If only everyone had the courage of anonymous there.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:14 (twenty years ago)

anonymous slept on your couch for a week!

,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:15 (twenty years ago)

this is quite off-topic, but tuomas, in what subject are you getting your degree?

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:19 (twenty years ago)

unorthodox child care

,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:22 (twenty years ago)

Right now my major is Third World studies, but I've been seriouly thinking of changing it to gender studies/women's studies.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:27 (twenty years ago)

haha, I did wonder if that was your latest username! I know having launched and inspired some of the very best political threads of the last several months gives plenty of weight to your views, but you surely can see why some people want a different kind of discussion? That doesn't reduce to fear to play with the big boys. (Note that I am not involved in this or signed up to the list.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)

neat. mine is in anthropology. i wonder if there's any overlap. my school doesn't have a 3rd world studies program, probably there's more overlap with international studies and some parts of economics?

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:32 (twenty years ago)

We have lots of anthropologists minoring in 3rd World Studies, but yeah, it's more focused on international politics and economics, maybe a bit too much I think. I've grown quite tired of endless discussions about globalization, development co-operation and UN's Millennium goals. (Actually, the Finnish name for the subject is "Development Studies", which I guess reflects the content better, I'm not sure if it's used in English though.)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)

Uh, I meant to write "Developing Country Studies", not "Development Studies".

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha ha-- thanks, Cathy. Got it on the first try this time! (Apparently Thunderbird doesn't let you download message bodies after you've marked the header as junk, so I just had to change the label first.)

Chris F. (servoret), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 01:31 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.