It seems kinda...relevant, nowadays
― kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 17:39 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 17:58 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 20:00 (twenty years ago)
It is however possible I am imagining all this and I never actually opened the pages of this book.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 10:56 (twenty years ago)
― 'Curt' Russell (noodle vague), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 11:46 (twenty years ago)
― The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:25 (twenty years ago)
― Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:30 (twenty years ago)
― The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:35 (twenty years ago)
― 'Curt' Russell (noodle vague), Thursday, 26 January 2006 00:20 (twenty years ago)
I don’t know how I ended up in this book at all, but it’s clear and very strong argumentation is pretty bracing. I am enjoying its clarity. Not done yet, I’m at the “why historicism is illegit” part in his evaluation and explanation of marx. This is a bit out of my depth, though I understand the arguments and have enough background study to get who and what he’s going on about. As one with good history education but not much of philosophy, I am quite surprised that many of his criticisms of parts of marx’s approach match my own heuristics re marx. i wonder how much of my general late 20th c education handed me popper’s argument without my real awareness of popper proper.anyway, yeah, it’s interesting. so far i didn’t get a sense of “laissez faire = good” so much as “the alternatives we got from plato and hegel are fascist for the former, and compromised, false, and self-interested for the latter.”
― well below the otm mendoza line (Hunt3r), Monday, 15 July 2024 20:25 (one year ago)
Lol “its”
― well below the otm mendoza line (Hunt3r), Monday, 15 July 2024 20:26 (one year ago)