Of 17 U.S. cities featured in the survey, the most expensive were New York (27th), Chicago and Los Angeles (tied for 35th), and San Francisco (40th).
Iceland's capital, Reykjavik, saw the largest proportional rise in the cost of living in 2005, moving above another Japanese city, Osaka, into third place, the survey showed. Paris was in fifth place, followed by Copenhagen, London, Zurich, Geneva and Helsinki.
The emergence of Oslo, Norway's capital, at No. 1 "highlights a much wider increase in the relative cost of living across Europe, driven by the long-term underperformance of the dollar," the Economist Intelligence Unit said.
The survey found that cities in developing countries are recording advances in the relative cost of living, some of them buoyed by entry into the European Union or accession talks. Belgrade (107th), Bucharest (95th), Kiev (82nd), Warsaw (63rd), Prague (58th) and Istanbul (48th) all saw a relative jump of more than 5 percent in the cost of living, the study showed.
In many Asian cities, economic growth has pushed up the cost of living up, the report said. Seoul, at No. 13, overtook Hong Kong (14th) as the most expensive city in the region after Tokyo and Osaka.
However, despite the appreciation of the yuan since it freed itself from a fixed rate from the U.S. dollar in July, Chinese cities have experienced a relative fall in the rankings as increased investment opens up pricing competition and lowers tariffs on branded goods in larger urban centers.
Shanghai, the most expensive Chinese city on the list, is still only at No. 51, up five places from last year.
Among cities in sub-Saharan Africa, costs rose largely because of high inflation, the report said. Lagos in Nigeria (63rd), the Zambian capital Lusaka (91st) and Nairobi, Kenya (93rd) all experienced double-digit inflation. This had the greatest impact for Lusaka, Zambia, which rose 18 places in the ranking to No. 91.
In North America, Canadian cities are now more expensive than all but the largest cities surveyed in the United States. Montreal and Vancouver shared 43rd place.
In Latin America, the sharpest rise in the rankings was shown by the Brazilian cities of Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, which each jumped 22 places to tie for 87th amid rising consumer prices.
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:40 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:42 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― Serge Protecteur (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:24 (twenty years ago)
― Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:12 (twenty years ago)
― Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:14 (twenty years ago)
For all your Finnish tax information.
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:15 (twenty years ago)
LA being more expensive than LA makes me want to know their criteria too.
― nickn (nickn), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:05 (twenty years ago)
Dude, don't you go to Canada a lot?
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:11 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:16 (twenty years ago)
― Serge Protecteur (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:18 (twenty years ago)
I do, but not by car. Even then, you can only get your rebate at the Peace Arch crossing, and you have to be sharp enough to turn right in time to go the little rebate shack or else you just lost your rebate.
By other means: train, bus, plane, or boat, you have to get the GST number of each receipt, each receipt has to be at least $50CAN before tax (which is true with the car scenario as well), and you have to include proof of travel, like the stubs for your train or boat travel or whatever, and mail all that in to some office in Prince Edward Island or something. It's needlessly complicated.
In Iceland, you just throw your receipts on the counter at the airport and say "GIMME KRONUR BITCH" and they give you kronur.
― Dom iNut (donut), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:27 (twenty years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 02:33 (twenty years ago)
Food now 11%, other stuff 25%.
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:23 (twenty years ago)
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:42 (twenty years ago)
"the Economist Intelligence Unit's biannual survey"
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:00 (twenty years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:17 (twenty years ago)
― adamrl (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)
It's very cheap to buy or rent an appartment in Oslo compared to other capitals/large cities. Compared to London it's roughly 50% cheaper.
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:27 (twenty years ago)
― adamrl (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:28 (twenty years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― The Vinmonopol's Hektogram (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:34 (twenty years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:37 (twenty years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:36 (twenty years ago)
What nickn said.
The half-strength "lettøl" is not subject to the taxation and opening-time laws that govern sales of regular beer (but to the same age limits, I think).
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Thursday, 2 February 2006 08:59 (twenty years ago)