Rachel Whiteread's Plinth Thing

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Rachel Whiteread always seems very serious. Anyway there was a thread on ILM a bit ago about how you can like a record and then suddenly somebody says something crass and insulting and yet obviously COMPLETELY TRUE about it and it stays with you forever. I was all up for seeing Whiteread's inverted-plinth resin sculpture in Trafalgar Sq until the first time I read the dread words 'glacier mint' in connection with it. Has anyone been and what's it like? That book thing they had up there was apalling.

Tom, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

....and yet thinking about it strangely fascinating. There ought to be more public sculptures which look like something drawn by some kind waiting for his turn to roll the dice in a Call Of Cthulhu game.

Tom, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I took a detour to have a look at the plinth the other day and I have to say I think it looks delightful. There is a certain glacier mintiness about it, it's true, but I've never seen public art like it. It's surprisingly see-through, and I wonder what measures there are in place for cleaning it, bearing in mind where it is.

The previous thing was *completely* dreadful and sat there, huge and hideous like some warning about what would happen if we let people populate our public plinths willy-nilly, without the consultation of Those With Taste. (for those who haven't seen it, it involved a large human head apparently asleep on a book, with a leafless tree growing on and around them both).

The Mark Wallinger which was the first of the three was the best so far, for me: a life-sized (on the plinth gave the impression of quarter-sized) human figure, hands bound, in a loincloth (Jesus?) standing near the edge of the plinth, back turned to the National Gallery. Oddly quiet (especially compared to the clattery head-book- tree thing) and very great.

Tim, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I will go and have a look then - I'm in London tomorrow so that seems as good a time as any.

What gets me is, the Wallinger statue (which was great) aroused a fair bit of controversy, mostly based on its out-of-place scale and the Jesus thing - it is meant to be Jesus I think. And then Whiteread's piece has got people muttering and has been a source of many a dismissive vox pop. But the book-head-tree monster got almost no comment, let alone the kind of derision the other two have. Now the British people as lovers of modern public art I can accept is a long shot, but I wasn't so sure they were into monumentalist fantasy kitsch either. Ah well.

Tom, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"monumentalist fantasy kitsch": I don't believe there's a single 'proper' statue in the country which easily doesn't fit into this category.

As a child I was told Lord Hill (on top of the Column in Shrewsbury, out Belvedere way: column design = outrageous miniature "hommage" to Nelson's) had been put there for net going to bed at the time he was told.

mark s, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Most of the mumblings are set off by "look at what those art nutters are up to now!" stories in the papers, aren't they? The head-book- tree thing received almost no coverage that I saw. My theory is that lots of journalists like it because it reminded them of the endless hours playing terrible fantasy role-playing games at boarding school.

News journalists enjoy thinking about orcs because they all look like orcs.

Tim, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mark's right: just take a look at the other Traf. Sq. statues for fantasy kitsch at many times life size: C19th politicians and soldiers in classical robes; long-forgotten army commanders with monumental fantasy-kitch moustaches; big bronze lions.

Tim, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I am forced to concede this one totally.

We'll find out about the orc thesis before too long, alas.

Tom, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Furious having just got home & having been all the way up Charing Cross Road, while forgetting to check out Whiteread thing (OK if deeply shallow Britain-in-Y2K thing at the Photographer's Gallery, though). Whiteread generally great: does to seem to lack a sense of fun in interviews, but my policy is never to listen to what artists have to say about their work: it often puts me right off...

Mark Morris, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Feel I should add that the "Five Angels" part of the Bill Viola thing at the d'Offay in Dering Street (Whiteread's studies for the plinth are in the third d'Offay gallery around the corner, thread-relevance fans) is completely completely terrific.

Tim, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

This not drinking thing is opening up a world of culture for your Tim. You even went to see a film the other week.

The plinth looks lovely in the hazy sunlight. I think they should keep going though and build Lego tower of plinths up to the stars...

Pete, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Actually the not drinking has coincided with a barren period in looking-at-art too (partly because I was confined to quarters for some of this time).

My perfect day on my own in London would involve plotting a mazy path from caff to bus to gallery to pub to record shop to gallery to caff to record shop to pub and so on.

I don't know why people who are prepared to invest time and money in chasing obscure pop music don't spend more time looking around at the art which London has to offer... I find a similar ratio of good / bad / indifferent, and a really good show is every bit as good as a good gig, and less sweaty, to boot.

Tim, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Not far off my perfect day except I'd probably slip a movie in there instead of the art. Though my art philistinism period is slowly grinding to a halt as I have been to see at least five things this year.

Oh, I would have to cross the river somewhere along the line too - for a gaze. Love that river.

Pete, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I don't know what's wrong with me. I'm tired of art, completely burned out on it. When I first moved to London, two and a half years ago, I went to a different gallery every weekend. (It was one of the cheapest occupations when I was too poor to afford to go to gigs.) Now I can't even *remember* the last time I was in a gallery. I mean, the new Tate has opened, and I've never even been there. Shameful, isn't it?

Must make an effort to do better in the future, especially now I'm unemployed and don't have to fight the hoards of tourists at the weekends.

And BTW, how the heck do you GET to the New Tate? They built that new bridge, but you're not allowed to use it. What's up with that?

masonic boom, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Right. Not next month cos I'm on holiday but upcoming month designated Month Of Art (for me). My conscience has been pricked.

The way you get to the new Tate, Kate, is by using the old bridge, i.e. Blackfriars.

Tom, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

From Tooting, you'd be best off getting the tube to London Bridge and walking along the river from the East. I like the Tate Modern but it's a bit vast and diverse for me (I've visited a few times to look at specific things, which is of course made more difficult by their innovative curation. I tend to enjoy little one-person shows much more.

The Bill Viola thing really is fab. And loud!

Tim, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Ah, cheers, Tim, I keep forgetting which side of the river I'm on! This southern this is all still very new to me. And since this is the furthest south that the tube goes, why is it called the Northern Line? I've never understood that.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Its called the Northern Line because its shit. Like The North.

Pete, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

no no no. the north is not shit (although the fact that i am a northerner who no longer lives there and lives in london is, of course, by the by). the northern line is poor agreed, but at least its not the district line

gareth, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

We are being SUCH stereotypical Londoners, you know, turning EVERY SINGLE THREAD into a discussion of A) pubs or B) The Tube, while turning the one *actual* pub thread into veiled snideness against yanks.

Erm... back to art. My favourite museum is the Sainsburys wing of the National Gallery, not just because it has late medieval and early Rennaissance art (some of my favourite periods) but because it has A PUB built right into it. So you can get pissed and then go slither about the walls of the national gallery, giggling at all the weird UFO things in the skies of those medieval icons.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Of course, there are reputable pub-galleries around, most prominently (probably) The Approach in Beffnul Green. I've generally been disappointed with the things I've seen there, though, (including well- thought-of stuff like Machael Raedecker) and regretted tearing myself away from my beer to venture upstairs.

Tim, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Gareth, man, don't mention the District line again - you'll lower the tone of the whole board. :-) However, I think it's interesting that this one line goes to Wimbledon *and* Barking. Same planet, different worlds...

DG, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

four years pass...
only found out about this at the weekend. is due for 11th of october.
http://www.tate.org.uk/home/press/whiteread_unilever_03-03-05.htm

(ie the HUUUUUGE space in the tate modern)

koogs (koogs), Monday, 12 September 2005 14:40 (eighteen years ago) link

When I was at the tatemod the other day there were a load of boxes marked 'rachel whiteread', presumably with it in! I must confess I thought 'meh' rather than 'exciting!' but that's because I loved the gramophone-horn-tent-like thing so much that anything else in that space just cannot compare.

spontine (cis), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:12 (eighteen years ago) link

one month passes...
saw the finished thing on thursday. it's impressive because there are 14,000 boxes there. but a lot of the shapes, particularly the things that don't look like mountains, are kinda dull, just rectangular blocks. it only takes up half the turbine hall as well but short of making another 14,000 boxes, what can you do?

unfortunately, my experience was considerably lessened by the two idiots whose idea of fun is going to art galleries in order to sing along as loud as possible with their ipods. oh um.

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 15 October 2005 16:19 (eighteen years ago) link

two years pass...

The fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square is being kept free for a statue of the Queen riding a horse which will be commissioned after she dies, say senior officials.

The plan sheds new light on why the plinth has never had a full-time occupant and has been used recently to showcase the work of modern artists. It also explains why the Mayor of London, who has been informed of the plan, recently performed a mysterious U-turn on proposals for a permanent statue to be placed on the monument, blaming "complex planning issues".

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art-and-architecture/news/fourth-plinth-is-reserved-for-the-queen-887113.html

James Mitchell, Thursday, 7 August 2008 07:43 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, what?

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:27 (fifteen years ago) link

that's so boring

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:30 (fifteen years ago) link

it's so apt. i'd rather a sculpture of the queen on horseback than some rachel whiteread bollocks. what a cunt she is.

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't stand the parade of statues of dead white european male warmongers, from Parliament Square all the way down Whitehall to Trafalgar Square. Yeah yeah lol liberal guilt complex.

ledge, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:46 (fifteen years ago) link

it's so apt. i'd rather a sculpture of the queen on horseback than some rachel whiteread bollocks. what a cunt she is.

-- jed_, Thursday, August 7, 2008 11:41 AM (4 minutes ago)

*cough*

WHAT!

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Seriously WHAT!

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:47 (fifteen years ago) link

at what?

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:48 (fifteen years ago) link

basically that whole sentence!

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:48 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean statement

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:48 (fifteen years ago) link

srsly dude

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Her plinth was so beautiful. The one I'd have left up anyway.

So ghostly, such a feeling for material. So simple.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:59 (fifteen years ago) link

why wouldn't there be a statue of the queen in trafalgar square after she died? of course there will be!

as for whiteread, i've loathed the woman ever since i watched a documentary about the construction of he holocaust memorial in the judenplatz in vienna where she clearly too the various trials involved in fighting local resistance to the idea of constructing the memorial as a personal affront to her rather than seeing it for what it actually was: there being a much more pertinent object of resistance to the sculpture than whiteread herself, but she totally lost all perspective about that.

also, i have to say i find the work predictable. when i was at architecture school people used to come up with projects all the time that were almost exactly like what she ended up doing in vienna. it's just one of those pretty obvious ideas, no?

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:00 (fifteen years ago) link

too = took.

okay "loathed" is taking it too far but i think she's awful.

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually, I'm kinda with you on the Holocaust Memorial. She abandons the simplicity that works so well for her, while that grey slab of concrete is so starkly empathetic it loses something by being loaded with all this portentous backwards book nonsense.

I admit I don't really know anything about why there should be a statue of the queen on the fourth plinth, but it is pretty cool to have a plinth to the present, something that can change.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Still, I get very defensive about Rachel because her parquet floor drawings are some of my favourite things in this universe.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:13 (fifteen years ago) link

My name is plinth / and I am funky

Daniel Giraffe, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:16 (fifteen years ago) link

on a less silly note, I really liked Whiteread's contribution to Psycho Buildings.

Daniel Giraffe, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Is Rachel Whiteread the one that only has one tit?

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:18 (fifteen years ago) link

why wouldn't there be a statue of the queen in trafalgar square after she died? of course there will be!

I was going to say because we don't tend to put up statues of our monarchs any more, but I am surprised to see there is a statue of George VI and that I must have walked past it on many occasions. Having said that the fourth plinth has been empty since 1841 and so we could have had a few monarchs on it by now.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh I was so excited when I realised that was in that exhibition cause I had read a big thing with her in ArtWorld I think where she was making them, I wasn't so sure because they're really quite different from her best work, but they were amazing to see.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Is Rachel Whiteread the one that only has one tit?

-- The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, August 7, 2008 12:18 PM (1 minute ago)

What does this even mean?

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:20 (fifteen years ago) link

It means that Dom is scrapping the zing barrel.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I'd like to see the statue of the Queen look like this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/graphics/slideshows/benson/b6.jpg

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:24 (fifteen years ago) link

btw - has a winner been decided for this?

http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/dailynews/2008/05/images_unveiled_for_ebbsfleet_landmark.html

whiteread's definitely isn't the worst proposal here but:

"Rachel Whiteread's proposal is for a craggy 'recycled mountain' on top which will sit a life-size cast interior of a house"

...again?

Wallinger's is clearly the best of these but i wonder if it can be realised for £2m. i seriously doubt it.

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:26 (fifteen years ago) link

it's about NEGATIVE SPACE

THE SPACE BETWEEN SPACES

THE UNFOLDING OF A VISION

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:30 (fifteen years ago) link

wallinger's is pretty great

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:31 (fifteen years ago) link

you don't say. is it about silence as well? the difficulty of communication in the modren society?

xp

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:32 (fifteen years ago) link

all horrible, the horse at least has potential for vandalism

DG, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:33 (fifteen years ago) link

it's a gigantic fking horse!

jed_, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:33 (fifteen years ago) link

it's about NEGATIVE SPACE

THE SPACE BETWEEN SPACES

THE UNFOLDING OF A VISION

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, August 7, 2008 12:30 PM (3 minutes ago)

Like, what is this, this adds nothing, you could do this with anything.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:35 (fifteen years ago) link

her psycho buildings thing was pretty good, yeah. but her tate modern installation was really really weak.

ledge, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Never saw it so can't say anything.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:37 (fifteen years ago) link

but it doesn't look so great in photos.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Dude, it's about making the transient tangible. It explodes traditional concepts of spatiality without abandoning them. BLAH BLAH BLAH

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:40 (fifteen years ago) link

xp
I saw it and liked it actually. Definetely better irl as it were.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Would have been even better if it been made with sugar.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:42 (fifteen years ago) link

BLAH BLAH BLAH

this seems to be about as much as you're capable of saying then.

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:43 (fifteen years ago) link

the plinth modern art thing was a good idea except the ones that end up going on them are shit.

upside down plinth was shit, model of a hotel is shit.

bring back david beckham.

ken c, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:44 (fifteen years ago) link

plinth needs marble rendering of ken c

DG, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:45 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked Wallinger's plinth.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:46 (fifteen years ago) link

all of those ebbsfleet ones are shit too. i mean, if you just build a nice clocktower on there it'll be nicer than any of those nonsense

ken c, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:46 (fifteen years ago) link

xp
And Gormley's plinth could be interesting.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe we could put Gormley himself up there.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:50 (fifteen years ago) link

what actually motivates you to talk?

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I go back and forth on Gormley, I'll be interested to see what he does?

I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:52 (fifteen years ago) link

plinth needs marble rendering of ken c

well this was my idea a while ago

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/kenjuggle3/kencplinth.jpg

ken c, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I like it.
I especially like the guy at the bottom of the plinth crying at the sheer beauty he beholds.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:57 (fifteen years ago) link

her psycho buildings thing was pretty good, yeah

yeah it was! whiteread seems to veer randomly between really emotionally intuitive work and empty crap about nothing.

think a statue of the queen would be disappointing and regressive, a bit...what year is this again? why does this country give a shit about the royal family beyond the level of 'minor celebs falling out of boujis'? though i'd find it hard to get particularly angry if it did happen.

i like the idea of revolving artworks up there.

lex pretend, Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:02 (fifteen years ago) link

thought do ho suh's bisected american apartments w/the korean house crashing into the side was the best psycho building though

lex pretend, Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm all for not putting a statue of the queen up on the plinth except i can't think of anything in particular to go on there that's any better.

ken c, Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:10 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm going through every person i can think of just now and though "do i want a statue of this person on trafalgar square more than the queen" and each one of them returned no.

ken c, Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:12 (fifteen years ago) link

six months pass...

Difficult to say which of the shortlisted entries was worst. A fucking giant horse though. Why not, eh.

cat anatomy expert (ledge), Tuesday, 10 February 2009 13:24 (fifteen years ago) link

i loved his proposal but there's no way this can be built for anything close to £2m. all that huge structure sitting on 4 slim points roughly 3-4m square? the ability for all that bulk to withstand high winds? it's not impossible but it will have to be an act of engineering genius and it will cost £££.

jed_, Tuesday, 10 February 2009 13:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe they could find some way to suspend it so I could make my 'hung like a horse' joke.

Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Tuesday, 10 February 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.