Is ILE painfully slow at the moment?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Like, loading a thread with more than 50 or so answers either takes an age or hangs altogether?

― Earwig oh! (Mark C), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:52 (nineteen years ago)

Umm, seems ok here mate.

― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:52 (nineteen years ago)

and here.

― teh_kit has 22 friends (g-kit), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:53 (nineteen years ago)

Fine for me too...

― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:54 (nineteen years ago)

The last couple of days it's been terrible. Seems okay today though.

― More Tongue Feldman (noodle vague), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

Was lousy for me yesterday, but i put that down to my new computer. Let me see what happens loading the Doctor Who thread again...

― Pete (Pete), Friday, 14 July 2006 08:58 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, it's been quite slow over the past few days, but OK today.

― Thom Yorke Is My Spirit Guide (kate), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:08 (nineteen years ago)

Five minutes to load the first 100 posts of the Who thread. Still, series is over...

I think it might be hinting I should do more work...

― Pete (Pete), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:10 (nineteen years ago)

It was slow on Wednesday and is slow today, really slow

― Dadaismus (Are we in love like I think we be?) (Dada), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:17 (nineteen years ago)

Is this a p3r.net/wh3rd.net issue?

It's fine for me on p3r.net.

― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:20 (nineteen years ago)

"the internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck.

It's a series of tubes..."

― koogy wonderland (koogs), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:20 (nineteen years ago)

I'm on wh3rd (ooh look a shark!!) , and it's fine here too.

― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:25 (nineteen years ago)

not noticing speed probs here on ol' sharky

― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:31 (nineteen years ago)

Very slow for me today (and yesterday).

― gooblar (gooblar), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)

Perhaps a locational problem?


traceroute to ilx.p3r.net (203.123.80.12), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  [...]  3.227 ms  2.417 ms  2.460 ms
 2  [...] (10.37.0.6)  3.569 ms  2.674 ms  4.635 ms
 3  [...]  4.209 ms  3.981 ms  3.500 ms
 4  [...] (158.43.31.49)  4.076 ms  4.889 ms  6.072 ms
 5  pos3-1.cr1.cbg3.gbb.uk.uu.net (158.43.136.45)  4.993 ms  5.545 ms  7.598 ms
 6  pos1-1.cr1.lnd5.alter.net (158.43.253.45)  11.739 ms  12.275 ms  9.226 ms
 7  so-7-0-0.xr1.lnd2.alter.net (158.43.233.242)  14.555 ms  8.392 ms  8.317 ms
 8  so-0-1-0.tr1.lnd2.alter.net (146.188.7.222)  13.857 ms  8.832 ms  11.895 ms
 9  so-6-0-0.ir1.dca4.alter.net (146.188.8.169)  91.221 ms  92.725 ms  91.228 ms
10  0.so-1-0-0.il1.dca6.alter.net (146.188.13.37)  93.251 ms  92.035 ms  91.744 ms
11  0.so-7-0-0.xl1.dca5.alter.net (152.63.42.185)  93.469 ms  101.294 ms  105.174 ms
12  0.so-6-0-0.br1.dca5.alter.net (152.63.43.169)  135.311 ms  99.757 ms  93.578 ms
13  cpr1-pos-6-2.virginiaequinix.savvis.net (208.173.10.137)  95.387 ms  95.737 ms  95.214 ms
14  bcs2-so-5-3-0.washington.savvis.net (206.24.227.45)  97.477 ms  95.624 ms  97.313 ms
15  dcr2-so-7-1-0.atlanta.savvis.net (204.70.192.61)  109.059 ms  108.019 ms  116.022 ms
16  dcr2-so-2-0-0.dallas.savvis.net (204.70.192.70)  131.004 ms  131.982 ms  130.873 ms
17  dcr1.lay-so-3-2-0.losangeles.savvis.net (204.70.194.53)  160.545 ms  160.692 ms  198.373 ms
18  bpr3-so-7-0-0.losangelesequinix.savvis.net (204.70.194.2)  159.705 ms bpr3-so-0-0-0.losangelesequinix.savvis.net (208.172.44.106)  160.671 ms bpr3-so-7-0-0.losangelesequinix.savvis.net (204.70.194.2)  159.541 ms
19  singapore-telecommunications-ltd.losangelesequinix.savvis.net (208.174.196.42)  167.960 ms  166.801 ms  176.269 ms
20  laxeq-cr1.ge-3-0-0.ix.singtel.com (203.208.182.45)  237.475 ms ge-0-3-0.laxeq-cr1.ix.singtel.com (203.208.168.221)  208.939 ms 203.208.168.217 (203.208.168.217)  166.555 ms
21  203.208.172.106 (203.208.172.106)  168.008 ms 203.208.172.102 (203.208.172.102)  162.302 ms 203.208.172.106 (203.208.172.106)  167.115 ms
22  203.208.148.74 (203.208.148.74)  310.830 ms 203.208.148.2 (203.208.148.2)  308.397 ms 203.208.148.74 (203.208.148.74)  311.591 ms
23  61.88.181.230 (61.88.181.230)  337.437 ms  330.723 ms  331.297 ms
24  eftelptyltd.o3mlc76f05.optus.net.au (203.202.79.218)  329.447 ms  328.783 ms  328.906 ms
25  203.123.80.12 (203.123.80.12)  322.572 ms  323.436 ms  323.160 ms

That's a lot of hops

― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)

Come again?

― Dadaismus (Are we in love like I think we be?) (Dada), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)

Its been dreadful for me and I'm like, 4 hops from the server! I counted - some threads took 1-2 minutes to load.. but then later all was ok.

― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)

Woo, World Tour!

― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:44 (nineteen years ago)

ilx.wh3rd.net and ilx.p3r.net resolve to the same ip address so it can't be that (can it?)

― koogy wonderland (koogs), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:53 (nineteen years ago)

DNS issues then?

― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)

DNS would not cause slow link load like this, I don't think. It seems more like a database issue to me.

― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 14 July 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

I basically can't read threads that go the full 200 (the default length I've always been able to use just fine). Other websites seem to be working normally.

― Earwig oh! (Mark C), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:06 (nineteen years ago)

Same here, it means I can't comment on Momus' ridiculous contributions to the Syd Barrett thread on ILM

― Dadaismus (Are we in love like I think we be?) (Dada), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

Come again?

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:30 (nineteen years ago)

See what happens if you wanna do it twice in a row.

― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:30 (nineteen years ago)

Same here, it means I can't comment on Momus' ridiculous contributions to the Syd Barrett thread on ILM

you could mail them to me and i will post on your behalf, if you like.

― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:31 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, they'll keep

― Dadaismus (Are we in love like I think we be?) (Dada), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, I had better go and read that thread.

― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 14 July 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.