10 mind-numbingly stupid quotes by howard dean - must read!!!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/stupidquotes/a/deanquotes.htm

10 Mind-Numbingly Stupid Quotes by Howard Dean

10) "I think with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, you can't play, you know, hide the salami, or whatever it's called." --urging President Bush to make public Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers's White House records

9) "You know, the Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people. They're a pretty monolithic party. Pretty much, they all behave the same, and they all look the same. ... It's pretty much a white Christian party.'' --speaking about the lack of outreach to minority communities by political parties

8) "I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks."

7) "I'm a metrosexual."

6) "We've gotten rid of (Saddam Hussein), and I suppose that's a good thing."

5) "The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong."

4) "This president is not interested in being a good president. He's interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father."

3) "Now that we're on dog pee, we can have an interesting conversation about that. I do not recommend drinking urine…but if you drink water straight from the river, you have a greater chance of getting an infection than you do if you drink urine." — teaching an eight-grade science class in La Crosse, Wisconsin

2) "You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever and get home and still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well Republicans, I guess can do that. Because a lot of them have never made an honest living in their lives."

1) "Not only are we going to New Hampshire ... we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!" --Iowa concession speech (Click here for audio and remixes of the Dean scream)

and what (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

by my count theres maybe 2 or 3 actually stupid ones, a couple that are just awkward or poorly phrased, and the rest are basically otm

and what (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know why America turned its back on Howard Dean. The "Dean Scream" was the best speech ever! YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAARRRGGGHHH!

More legible and intelligent than any Dubya speech too.

wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:03 (nineteen years ago)

4) "This president is not interested in being a good president. He's interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father."

^^ mind-numbingly true

am0n (am0n), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:23 (nineteen years ago)

Oh my Ethan I am sorry for your inbox. You get the worst FWD: FWD: FWD: RE: FWD:s ever.

I don't see why the deen skreem was even a big DEAL, he was just loud. It was the dumbest reason EVER to take anyone down. I don't see why anyone thought it was foolish, at all. You should've seen how charged up folx got over singing "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too," it outscreamed Macho Man Randy Savage and Andrew W.K. combined. WHY did the people who ran "Entertainment Tongight" get to decide it was a bad political speech anyway? I am still very pissed about all this!

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:33 (nineteen years ago)

Not that I love the Deany but FUCK the guy was just enthusiastic.

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:34 (nineteen years ago)

I am honestly surprised it wasn't the urine quote that was his downfall, we've all seen how using stupid line breaks to discuss your man's giant ballsack spread between two pringles can basically ruin your career on here.

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:36 (nineteen years ago)

Now if only someone could come up with 10, 20, 50, like 6000 mind numbingly stupid quotes from George Bush.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:37 (nineteen years ago)

but the urine quote is true!!! hes a doctor!!!!

and what (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:42 (nineteen years ago)

using stupid line breaks to discuss your man's giant ballsack spread between two pringles can basically ruin your career on here.


hahhhahhaa WAHT

am0n (am0n), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:45 (nineteen years ago)

I know! I believe it, and I think things like that should be discussed in public, and I hope those eighth graders live giardia-free because of Dean's advice! But talking to kids about urine seems a little more controversial than, you know, being excited. I do not understand our world.

xpost

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:49 (nineteen years ago)

ambitious politico blowhard caught in occasional foot-in-mouth statement non-shockah!

timmy tannin (pompous), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:51 (nineteen years ago)

8) "I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks."

THIS, 8, is the dumb one.

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:51 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, um, these are mostly pretty spot on! wow.

derrick (derrick), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:21 (nineteen years ago)

Another vote for "you're grasping at straws, GOP supporter".

Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:36 (nineteen years ago)

Six, 8 and 10 are awkwardly worded or probably taken out of context. The rest of'em seem pretty dead on to me. Especially the one about Daddy issues. Hell, he's called Daddy and Daddy's Boys to clean up his mess right now. Daddy's got decades of experience in that.

I never understood why the yell became such a big deal. So he yelled. What? Is there something inherently wrong with yelling when you're excited? If so, I'm amazed we're not flooded with images of politicians and celebrities yelling at athletic events.

Eh. People who have no facts to back their arguments tend to fall back on personal attacks and the old "if I say it loud enough, it'll sound true" routine.

Hey Jude (Hey Jude), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

dean has his annoying qualities, occasional rhetorical gracelessness being one of them. but the d.c. establishment's obsession with belittling and marginalizing him is reason enough to cut him slack. (especially the democratic party establishment, even though he's ostensibly part of it.) like how quick they were to find reasons to give him no credit for election day. there's this clear sense that he's not one of "them," and they want to keep it that way.

what a surprise that the list does not include his pre-war comments about the possible dire consequences of invading iraq.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:57 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lawuQ54Cu1M

naus de lekkerste..! (Robert T), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:05 (nineteen years ago)

xpost:

dean's public personality post losing the primary is kind of douchebaggey though. it seems like once someone as inspiring and up-and-coming as he was gets to a certain level of noteriety, he/she suddenly gets surrounded with PR people, advisors and speechwriters that throw everything that got him/her to that point out the window and turn them into a boring douche.

i remember when he was on letterman like a year ago and the interview got to the point where they had planned on discussing the current state of the dems and dean totally bombed when he tried to deliver this joke: "well dave, i'm a doctor, and my diagnosis is that this party needs a spine transplant." timing all off, nervous gritting teeth smile... A W K W A R D.

while i'm on this tangent, EVERYONE should read the Atlantic's cover story on Hillary and Harper's cover story on Obama this month for more frightening examples of what i'm talking about here.

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:08 (nineteen years ago)

i remember when he was on letterman like a year ago and the interview got to the point where they had planned on discussing the current state of the dems and dean totally bombed when he tried to deliver this joke: "well dave, i'm a doctor, and my diagnosis is that this party needs a spine transplant." timing all off, nervous gritting teeth smile... A W K W A R D.

uh, that's exactly how he was before losing the primary too

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:10 (nineteen years ago)

i remember differently.

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:14 (nineteen years ago)

i was watching from 11/02, and the dude has never had good tv skills

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:16 (nineteen years ago)

it's also always seemed clear to me that he's always been pretty involved in his own message-making. the 'consultant' stuff that got him in trouble was #1 up there (courtesy joe trippi maybe? i don't remember)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:17 (nineteen years ago)

7) "I'm a metrosexual."

he actually said this?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:23 (nineteen years ago)

I just watched the scream video first time ever on Youtube, when the campaign was on I just read about it on newspapers... Was that really what all the fuss was about? The dude was excited, it didn't seem that weird to me.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:59 (nineteen years ago)

never underestimate the power of a slow news night in 24-hr-cable-land.

(also, it was the fact that the audio feed was coming directly off his mic, with none of the screaming crowd in the mix, making it sound a little like he was in a room by himself screaming into a mic)

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Monday, 20 November 2006 10:02 (nineteen years ago)

Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, Texas is a fairly famous institution and for a variety of reasons:

1. John F. Kennedy died there in 1963
2. Lee Harvey Oswald died there shortly after
3. Jack Ruby, who killed Lee Harvey Oswald, died there a few years later by coincidence

On the flip side, Parkland is also home to the second busiest maternity ward in the country with almost 16,000 new babies arriving each year. (That's almost 44 per day — every day)

A recent patient survey indicated that 70 percent of the women who gave birth at Parkland in the first three months of 2006 were illegal immigrants.' Crikey, that's 11,200 anchor babies born every year just in Dallas. According to the article, the hospital spent $70.7 million delivering 15,938 babies in 2004 but managed to end up with almost $8 million dollars in surplus funding. Medicaid kicked in $34.5 million, Dallas County taxpayers kicked in $31.3 million and the feds tossed in another $9.5 million.

The average patient in Parkland's maternity wards is 25 years old, married and giving birth to her second child. She is also an illegal immigrant. By law, pregnant women cannot be denied medical care based on their immigration status or ability to pay. OK, fine. That doesn't mean they should receive better care than everyday, middle-class American citizens. But at Parkland Hospital, they do.

Parkland Memorial Hospital has nine prenatal clinics. NINE. The Dallas Morning News article followed a Hispanic woman who was a patient at one of the clinics and pregnant with her third child — her previous two were also born at Parkland. Her first two deliveries were free and the Mexican native was grateful because it would have cost $200 to have them in Mexico. This time, the hospital wants her to pay $10 per visit and $100 for the delivery but she was unsure if she could come up with the money. Not that it matters, the hospital won't turn her away. (I wonder why they even bother asking at this point.)

How long has this been going on? What are the long-term effects? Well, another subject of the article was born at Parkland in 1986 shortly after her mother entered the U.S. illegally — now she is having her own child there as well. (That's right, she's technically a U.S. citizen.) These women receive free prenatal care including medication, nutrition, birthing classes and child care classes. They also get freebies such as car seats, bottles, diapers and formula.

Most of these things are available to American citizens as well but only for low-income applicants and even then, the red tape involved is almost insurmountable.

Because these women are illegal immigrants they do not have to provide any sort of legitimate identification — no proof of income. An American citizen would have to provide a social security number which would reveal their annual income — an illegal immigrant need only claim to be poor and the hospital must take them at their word.

My husband is a pilot for the United States Navy (yes, he fought in Iraq) and while the health care is good, we Navy wives don't get any of these perks! Car seats? Diapers? Not so much. So my question is this: Does our public medical care system treat illegal immigrants better than middle-class American citizens? Yes it does!

As I mentioned, the care I have received is perfectly adequate but it's bare bones, meat and potato medical care — not top of line.

Their (the illegals) medical care is free — simply because they are illegal immigrants? Once again, there is no way to verify their income. Parkland Hospital offers indigent care to Dallas County earn less than $40,000 per year. (They also have to prove that they did not refuse health coverage at their current job. Yeah, the 'free' care is not so easy for Americans.)

There are about 140 patients who received roughly $4 million dollars for un-reimbursed medical care. As it turns out, they did not qualify for free treatment because they resided outside of Dallas County. So the hospital is going to sue them! Illegals get it all free! But U.S. citizens who live outside of Dallas County get sued! How stupid is this?

As if that isn't annoying enough, the illegal immigrant patients are actually complaining about hospital staff not speaking Spanish. In this AP story, the author speaks with a woman who is upset that she had to translate comments from the hospital staff into Spanish for her husband. The doctor was trying to explain the situation to the family and the mother was forced to translate for her husband who only spoke Spanish. This was apparently a great injustice to her.

In an attempt to create a Spanish-speaking staff, Parkland Hospital is now providing incentives in the form of extra pay for applicants who speak Spanish. Additionally, medical students at the University of Texas Southwestern for which Parkland Hospital is the training facility will now have a Spanish language requirement added to their already jammed-packed curriculum. No other school in the country boasts such a ridiculous multi-semester (multicultural) requirement.

and what (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)

How long has this been going on? What are the long-term effects? Well, another subject of the article was born at Parkland in 1986 shortly after her mother entered the U.S. illegally — now she is having her own child there as well. (That's right, she's technically a U.S. citizen.) These women receive free prenatal care including medication, nutrition, birthing classes and child care classes. They also get freebies such as car seats, bottles, diapers and formula.

Most of these things are available to American citizens as well but only for low-income applicants and even then, the red tape involved is almost insurmountable.


^^^^ wtf on this - new mom "technically" a u.s. citizen but racist email-writing bitch is whining the care she gets isnt available to u.s. citizens

and what (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)

How dare they share more of the cost for people who can't pay than for people who can!

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

the scream played so well because there was already a lot suspicion that dean was a little bit off or totally insane or something.

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

There is a thread on ILE for dumb Republican RE: FWD:s. Where is it? I have the benefit of having a couple friends who send me these and want to post a couple of the more egregious ones.

Bnad (Bnad), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

oh just go ahead bnad we're all here

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

No, because on second thought there are more than a couple and I don't want to derail this whole thread

Bnad (Bnad), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

the "suspicion" was based on a quite open strategy of the republicans to paint him as "angry" and with a "short fuse," a theme duly carried forward by the court stenographers

and what, it's also hard to see how the woman born at parkland in 1986 is having an "anchor baby" since she's a US citizen and therefore not "an illegal" (not bothering using an actual NOUN to describe people is such a classic rhetorical tack)

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

yeah but he actually does seem a little off

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

even at the time i was like i know this is just a republican smear but i think they picked a good one

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

republican/rove strategy:

* tell press precisely how they are going to smear their opponents
* press breathlessly recites audacious, bare-knuckle plan in an article about "tactics," purporting to lay bare the machinery behind the posturing
* republicans/rove then smear their opponents in exactly the way described
* press breathlessly reports smears and democratic "response"
* repeat if desired

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:01 (nineteen years ago)

Correcting someone who's repeating an urban legend as something that "really happened": c or d?

President Bush

those are the two i could find with googleILX.

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, WTF does "technically a U.S. citizen" even mean? Is there any kind of U.S. citizenship other than the "technical" kind?

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 20 November 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

Timing of this related or not related to powerful Dems wanting to force Dean out of the DNC post? (Not that I'd object if they did)

anyways, "occasional rhetorical gracelessness" is pretty standard Dean going all the way back to the early 03 primary season. but the thing is, he never listened and learned how to not do that - thus, makes political strategists nervous because they never know when he'll accidentally make news. you know? he's never been ready for prime time..

And yes W mangles the English language constantly but that's exactly it, he does it so often you just brush it off as another Bushism & figure there's no thought behind it. Dean is plain spoken and clear for the most part, so when he says something that doesn't mean what he thinks it means, everyone goes OMG that guy's crazy.

dar1a g (daria g), Monday, 20 November 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

yeah for real imagine if like hillary or dean or kerry had dropped "doctor meth king"

anticon jemima (ooo), Monday, 20 November 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)

Well yeah, they don't mangle their English all that much, so they'd have at least been mocked on a lot of late night talk shows for that one

And hell, Dean is a little crazy. Just saying. It's understandable - governor of a small state runs for President with no intentions beyond staying in the race long enough to get some air time in the debates & in the party platform for his pet issue of early childhood education.. then gets swept up in (anti)war fevor and Joe Trippi's netroots evangelizing and party-dividing rhetoric and suddenly is the Dem frontrunner with a huge organization and record fundraising and major media following his every move.

Obv he started to believe the hype and was just stubborn when he thought he was right - such as the speech declaring that Saddam's capture didn't make America safer. Well, he was right in the long run, but at the time, if the objective was to hold on to his frontrunner status, it was.. I don't know.. maybe unsayable, in strategic terms.

dar1a g (daria g), Monday, 20 November 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

What do you mean, 'timing of this'?!
Is this list, cooked up by some desperate idiot, supposed to be the GOP's version of Mark Foley/Ted Haggart, or some kind of Late-November 'surprise'?
Are we supposed to be stunned that Howard Dean - like every single politician who has ever campaigned in the media age - has made some awkward statements that sound even weirder out of context?

Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 13:15 (nineteen years ago)

There is a thread on ILE for dumb Republican RE: FWD:s. Where is it?

Don't know where the thread is, but there's an amusing web archive of The American Taliban.

My favorite: "I'm an old-fashioned woman. Men should take care of women, and if men were taking care of women today, we wouldn't have to vote."

lick_my_stereolabia (nariposa), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 03:26 (nineteen years ago)

I just have to say that a few of those quotes make me like Dean more than I already did. He's always been kind of a nutter, but he's been that rare Democrat with a spine and an actual voice.

8) "I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks."

I remember when he said this, and it def falls into the "poorly stated" category. He was basically saying he deserved the redneck vote in addition to all the other voting blocks, not that he was catering to racist hicks or appealing to them on that level.

cosmo vitelli (cosmo vitelli), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 05:23 (nineteen years ago)

people bailing on Dean because of the scream pretty much took what was left of my faith in people - dude tries to stay psyched after a disappointing loss and fuckers either clown him or abandon ship? ftw y'know

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 23 November 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

i liked dean 800 times more after the scream.

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Thursday, 23 November 2006 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

Did Dean supporters actually ditch him after the scream? I thought it was the more the "undecideds" who broke to Kerry after the relentless
scream replays.

What I found interesting was that during the whole pre-primary season Dean bubble Rove & his cronies went on about how they'd love to see Dean get the nomination since he'd be so easy to beat, but then after the election they admitted they'd been scared the Dems would nominate someone with the balls to take Bush out to the parking lot.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Thursday, 23 November 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)

(i still voted for kucinich)

mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Thursday, 23 November 2006 01:47 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.