Why do you keep so many books (if you do)?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
How many books are in your home? I've got about 3000 of the damn things, and since I'm unlikely to re-read many of them, I'm wondering why the hell I humph them from flat to flat and don't just give em all away. Even reference ones are increasingly pointless thanks to internet.

Why do you keep yrs?

stet (stet), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:10 (seventeen years ago) link

To prove I am learned and have fantastic taste.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Books do furnish a room

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

because many of them still haven't been read yet

Bernard Snowy (sixteen sergeants), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Though, I have almost as many books in my "take to the charity shop" pile as on my shelves now - I have been encouraged to purge my shelves of anything that I'm unlikely to read again which isn't a classic or which I'm not likely to want to lend to anyone (another reason for keeping books - lending is great, even though half the time you never get them back).

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link

I've been asking myself Stet's question as well -- and I work in a library = even *less* need to own so much. I really have no idea how many books I have. At some point I'm going to do with them what I've been doing with the CD collection and winnow that bastard down to brass tacks. There are a slew of things I will hold onto but the rest can go to better homes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link

(Also, I never lend books -- they always came back trashed when I did.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

ARgh, argh, argh, I don't know! I just do! I think they're a nuisance and they take up so much space and keep growing and taking up every available space, and expand to fill whatever bookshelves I buy...

BUT!

1) I really like they way they look when they are all on display together. It just pleases me.

2) I do occasionally go and look something up - or not even so much look something else as just think "I want to look at that particular picture (I have a lot of art books) and then have to drag it out.

3) Lugging them from flat to flat, putting them in storage and taking them out again... wow! Every time I do it, it's like I just discovered a whole new set of books! Like a trip to a library I already own. It brings me joy to rediscover something I'd forgotten I had.

4) Did I meantion I really really like they way they look? Especially the big art ones, and the Folio Society ones with the gold type on the binding.

I Am Totally Radioactive! (kate), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

I also like the idea that looking at my bookshelves is like looking at an externalised picture of the INSIDE OF MY BRAIN!!!

Like, that is all the knowledge that I have aquired.

I Am Totally Radioactive! (kate), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

To re-read! And to loan, to give away, to quote from, to excerpt, to smell, and to love.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago) link

the Folio Society ones with the gold type on the binding

Yes, all those I'm *definitely* keeping. I have six overstuffed bookcases at present, and I know I could narrow it down to three without trying.

That said what I think I'll do is wait for the inevitable next move, whenever that is. For now, as M. indicates, they are good for furnishing.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Even reference ones are increasingly pointless thanks to internet.

Hmmmmmmmmm, you sure about that?

Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I like lending books to people.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

(may have something to do with being raised in libraries)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link

which isn't a classic
I keep winnowing my to-read pile, as I get so many review ones from work, but you've got to watch with that, as I gave away a Richard Yates one because it had a crap cover, before I realised who he was (genius).

Kate giving all the secret answers from inside my head. I hate parting with books, but it's getting daft here. There are piles in every room, in the cupboards, in boxes, in costly storage even!

Hmmmmmmmmm, you sure about that?
Well, no, not really. But the ones I keep mostly-unread because "some day I might need to know everything about Scottish Freemasonry and Trade Unionism 1862-1904" are surely better served by just never needing to know everything about SFaTU1-1

stet (stet), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link

I keep a lot of books because I haven't finished reading so many of them yet. There's something about a book that makes me reticient to give them away or sell them anyway--not really sure why! Also, M. White is OTM about books looking very nice and helping fill out a house.

Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, my bookshelves look much nattier since I started ordering by colour (tip from a nice librarian). I'm talking myself into keeping them all, here.

stet (stet), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

For M. White's reason, for all of Laurel's reasons, and because just by looking at a book on the shelf, I can remember so much about the pleasure of reading it.

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Reference books might be online, but passages of fiction, apart from certain selected ones from the "Great Works Known to All Believers in the Western Cannon" sub-group are almost never to be found. And I'm surprised how often I want to quote someone on something and will be at work or etc and not have the book to hand! Reason I should hole up in my library #43689.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:23 (seventeen years ago) link

There's something about a book that makes me reticient to give them away or sell them anyway--not really sure why!

Walter Benjamin to thread? (There was also a great essay I read somewhere about the Victorian-era middle-class ideal of 'the home library,' as a natural product of increased literacy combined with ideals of culture, education, etc. In part we are attached to our home libraries because we've been socialized to feel just that.)

because just by looking at a book on the shelf, I can remember so much about the pleasure of reading it.

Andrew Eldritch once said that about his favorite records' spines! And, tellingly, went on to say that he hadn't listened to those records in years upon years.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I can get rid of clothes, I can even get rid of CDs. I can NEVER get rid of books. It actually pains me.

I'm trying at the moment (unsuccessfully) to simply stop bringing quite so many into the house. I'm only allowed to go to bookshops once a month, just after payday. I'm not allowed in other bookshops unless I'm specifically looking for something. Must throw away the Folio Society catalogues after I've read them. Not allowed UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES to order them online.

...and then I slip up and do something stupid like go into the Tate through the bookshop entrance and I come home with another half dozen. :-(

I Am Totally Radioactive! (kate), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Because I love them and I can't let them go. Also to re-read and to loan out. Also, a lot of them I haven't gotten around to reading yet. (And yet I can't seem to stop buying them...)

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link

XP to myself: Actually also a good argument for memorization, which I try to do for really beloved passages, but let's face it: my brain is so full of bible verses and song lyrics that it's hard to find an empty drawer sometimes.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link

A lot of great reference sources online have subscription fees (see also: OED).

While it's nice to have easy access to online dictionaries, isn't it way more satisfying to look up the word in a big giant book yourself?

molly mummenschanz (mollyd), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I have about 25,000 books. Some of these i wouldn't have got hold of if i'd had teh net before 2003, but I'm keeping them now.

cos im insane.

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I got rid of lots of books when I moved -- three vans' worth -- and still have twenty heavy-as-I-can-carry boxes plus a quantity somewhere between "two bookcases' worth" and "fuck, I need a third bookcase." When I was sorting them into Keep and Get Rid Of, the Keeps ended up falling into easy categories:

1: Books I Have Not Read Yet But Definitely Will (most of the books I read in 2006 were from this category, though I still haven't finished Proust and am not sure I'll ever bother with Joyce)

2: Books I have read and loved and will definitely read again. My memory's not so great -- I won't forget the entirety of a book, but I'll probably forget characters' names, minor subplots, etc. Enough to make a lot of books worth rereading, and I read often enough that I'm not cheating myself out of reading other books.

3: Books I have read and anticipate lending to other people.

4: Books I need for work. A large number of the books I got rid of used to fall into this category, because academics hoard a lot of books that have some tangential enough connection to what they do that they may benefit from it some day. Now my only research-related work is fiction writing and "independent scholarship," and I have pretty decent subject control over both, so if I don't keep books about the French Revolution and Puritan theology, it's cause I don't frickin want to write about them. (I still had a hundred or two books hanging around from undergraduate days, too -- I don't anticipate doing French verb drills any time sooner than quarter-to-fuck-that.) By the same token, all my almas mater have finally cancelled my computer accounts, and I no longer have access to JSTOR -- so the books I kept, I really needed to keep.

5: Books I have read and may or may not read again but fit some reasonable completism: if I have books in a series, I'll keep all of them if I keep any. I got rid of LOTS of these, though, realizing that I've read -- for instance -- Foundation enough times now that in the unlikely event I ever need to read it again, I can just spend the three bucks at a used bookstore to pick it up, and it's far less likely that I'll decide to read the later sequels.

Some of my hoarding tendencies were holdovers from when I was a kid in a town with a library small enough that I'd read all the books in the children's/young adult section, so my options were often between rereading and not reading at all.

I wonder if this will ever post or if I'll just keep cycling through the new messages showing up while I'm reading the other new messages that showed up while I was reading the other ones before that.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:27 (seventeen years ago) link

not sure I'll ever bother with Joyce

splutter

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago) link

"Why do you keep so many books (if you do)?"


i like looking at books.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago) link

(xxp) What about:

6. Books I've read half or three-quarters of the way thru but which I intend sitting down and reading all of one of these days!

Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago) link

I can get rid of clothes, I can even get rid of CDs. I can NEVER get rid of books. It actually pains me.

For me I think the corner was turned last time I moved, when I got rid of about a third of the books I owned. There simply wasn't the physical space for them and I'll be damned if I ever pay for separate storage elsewhere. The end result was remarkably freeing, so this could explain why my attitude on this is a lot different from everyone else's here so far! (Also, like my CDs I've sold on, I've not yet felt an impulse to reread what I'd given away.)

I'm actually quite pleased that so many people here lend out their books! If nothing else you are indeed treating it as an actual home library in that sense.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Also because someday either I will have children or my siblings will, and I have a library all ready-made for them to build their hearts from.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I suppose I had a massive book purge when I moved back from the US to the UK. Well, I didn't actually get rid of them. Technically I left them with my mum for safekeepting, but then they just kind of got absorbed into my mum's and my brother's collections. Thing is, so many of those I still wish I had - I might actually end up re-buying them rather than trying to have them shipped over from the States. Plus, I suspect my family have cherry-picked many of the best ones.

I Am Totally Radioactive! (kate), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link

splutter

I'm actually with Tep. (I liked Portrait and Dubliners and all...)

Also because someday either I will have children or my siblings will, and I have a library all ready-made for them to build their hearts from

I was actually just thinking about that with reference to my upbringing. I'd say I looked through a few of my folks' books over the years, but not as many as might be guessed (mostly I was looking through my own!). And I have no real idea if I'll ever have kids or not -- as my sister doesn't either, my mom buys books for our cousins' kids instead.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link

i've actually gotten pretty good at getting rid of books that i've already read and probably won't ever read again. and that aren't, like, really cool to have around or look at. mostly recent stuff, trade paperbacks, common stuff. i'm happy to give them back to the thrift store.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:31 (seventeen years ago) link

"and I have a library all ready-made for them to build their hearts from."

were you a sarah records recording artist?

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

because academics hoard a lot of books that have some tangential enough connection to what they do that they may benefit from it some day

yeh a good quarter of my books are for this reason; an author, a single page, a theme, even a phrase, that connects with other books in my collection and thus i must buy it. Now post-google i shrug and put it down.

Btw my estimate above is extremely conservative, it's more like 30 thou +

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

I am considering getting rid of in some fashion or another some of the books we have--I don't think all of the language primers are really necessary at this point, and there are doubles of a couple as well thanks to my not knowing what books Tom had. I'm running out of the sheer physical space to keep everything and get new things* at this point which pains me a little because I know someday I will be in a place where I could've housed the things I'm considering giving away--c'est la vie though, I suppose.

* I should put a moritorium on buying new books until I've read a more significant portion of the ones I've gotten the last two years and my reading time was significantly dented.

Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

But Raggetude, you're so nice about Joyce on amg

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, I should send some (back) to charity shops. There are an awful lot I got for cheap or even free (especially when I lived in Islington, people would just leave free books in boxes out in the street!) that I'm never going to read again, and wouldn't have read if they hadn't been free.

I Am Totally Radioactive! (kate), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Most of my books are from charity shops. There all the ones I would have bought anyway, and in fine condition!

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

splutter

I only wound up with an English degree because those were the credits that added up before anything else caught up -- I've never been invested in a canon or anything, so any time I pick up Joyce (other than Dubliners, which I've read) I have the same reaction I had to reading Catcher in the Rye in my 20s instead of in my teens when I should have: the sense of a ship having sailed, because too much seems over-familiar from having read the things that it influenced. Had I got to it sooner, I'd probably love Ulysses, but I just don't think there's world enough and time for me to ever get around to it now.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

They're
xpost

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I've got about 300 - 400. I guess I like having 'stuff', and deplore minimalism.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I read pretty much everything my parents owned, like BOTH volumes of Iacocca's biography and my mother's collection of fiction from the '30s and Judith Viorst's Necessary Losses and Old House Journal and the engineering society newsletter and the cereal boxes and..........hah! I predict that my sister and I will someday fight to the death over my mother's trashed out, unjacketed volumes by Gene Stratton-Porter and James Oliver Curwood.

Scott, I know, I try to keep the twee under control but then I start thinking about books and kids and transcendence and I start crying at work and I really oughtn't to be allowed out some days.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm trying to put a limit on buying new books until I've read the old ones, but they're sort of like food -- there's no point forcing down steak when you want an apple.

Tep's childhood thing rings a bell -- I had way more books than my small-town library had back then. And the thought of one day having kids, it'd be great to have more books in the house for them than I had available -- about six.

stet (stet), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I know someday I will be in a place where I could've housed the things I'm considering giving away--c'est la vie though, I suppose

That crosses my mind more than once (though I'm thinking much more in the very long term). I think it will be interesting to see how the concept of what is needed in physical space in the home plays out more and more as the Internet is more entrenched. What could have been room set aside for physical intellectual products will become something else for many people.

But Raggetude, you're so nice about Joyce on amg

I am, it's a nice disc. I might finally read all of Ulysses instead of just the bits and pieces I have; maybe one day I'll finally read all of the Bible as well. As I can't get around to everything I'll enjoy what I can as I go.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Hairy muff. I just don't get it, it's like admiring everything MBV did except Loveless.

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Hey, I know folks who think The Hobbit is a great kid's story and Lord of the Rings is a failed and tedious bore, and I'm not surprised by that at all! It's one of many logical reactions.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Ulysses is overrated, Moby Dick is underrated

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link

haha, and i was only kidding, laurel, it was sweet. and yet perhaps not entirely out of place on a field mice record.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I keep the ones I like enough to re-read and get rid of the rest.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago) link

"and I have a library all ready-made for them to build their hearts from."

I love this idea; it is beautifully put.

I didn't have a lot of books when I was little (just Mom's box of old Nancy Drews and Cherry Ames, etc.) and I didn't have a lot of guidance as to what would be good to read. Contrast that to my husband, who grew up surrounded by books and who didn't have a tv growing up, and I have a continual conversation in my life of, "what you've never read that? REALLY?" So I love buying stuff for the kids and having A.'s input on what they will love - plus I finally get to enjoy it myself.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:53 (seventeen years ago) link

my husband, who grew up surrounded by books and who didn't have a tv growing up

This is how my cousins were raised. I remember being befuddled by that when we were young! They're not doing that for their own kids, FWIW -- don't blame them at all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:59 (seventeen years ago) link

my parents were both librarians, so they always tried to make me read books. which sorta backfired since now i dont do much reading....

phil-two (phil-two), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

I've always had a serious problem with being unable to get rid of books, but that seems to have changed now; I currently have maybe 1500, but am aiming to reduce that by at least a factor of 3 (and we're well on the way). I think the reality of international shipping costs made me finally realise that I simply don't need hundreds and hundreds of novels that I haven't read and likely never will, or have read and will never reread.

Also, selling them on Amazon = cash for other things = great. And it somehow eats into my messing around on the internet time, rather than my work time, so it's like a 2nd job which reduces the amount of crap I own.

On the other hand, I suspect that I own 100s of books that I will be completely unable to make myself get rid of (and that's excluding the maths books).

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

but im very curious about 50 cent's book imprint. can't wait to read "ski mask way"

phil-two (phil-two), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost to Ned - My kids have both the tons of books and some tv time. I don't care what my in-laws say, I have to maintain some semblance of sanity. Plus I think the cultural aspects of not being exposed to tv at all are more sticky than they should be.

That being said books >>>>>>>> tv (to the nth power)

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:05 (seventeen years ago) link

I've got about 1000 books (And I'd have way more if some fucker hadn't completely trashed my flat back in the early 90s) and I'm keeping them because:

a) I like owning a lot of books
b) It means I'm always going to have something to read
c) Who in their right mind gives away their books, unless they have to?

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

which sorta backfired since now i dont do much reading....

Which you make up for by writing, so it all even out.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:07 (seventeen years ago) link

waht, no - i love tv and books in equal but different ways
xpost

rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd be loathe to give up my tv, don't get me wrong; I think I was just book deprived as a child, so if I had to choose, books win. I was actively discouraged from buying and owning books, so it always feels a little illicit when I go buy them - to this day!

(But no, I wouldn't give my tv up either... I like even some of the dumbest stuff on it. Trust me when I say this; I still occasionally watch the soaps that I watched as a kid!!!)

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago) link

that is sad that you were book deprived :(
truth be told, i do agree on limiting tv to a certain extent for kids, as part of a critical-thinking skills education, esp b/c some of it can be so mind-numbing (which is part of why i love it, right.)

rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:16 (seventeen years ago) link

i only hate my books when i have to pack and move them

rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Sara, my parents very mysteriously kept a tight lid on our TV & movie viewing (and music listening, if it comes to that) but NEVER THOUGHT TO SUPERVISE MY READING. Must have been some of those Victorian middle-class ideals at work, ie that anything in print was inherently worthy. Also, somehow fairy tales & legends & stories about magic were always taken as arguments for the mystical/unknowable and not as challenges to Christianity, so all in all it worked out very well. I'm so sorry to hear that your experience was otherwise.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Moving them sucks, but I do like reorganizing them when I get to the new place.

As for being book deprived, don't feel bad for me; now I am Totally Not. Plus my 8 year old is a much better reader than his nephew is, which I'm pretty sure has something to do with the fact that I keep all these books around and my sister doesn't (so I get to feel superior, and who doesn't secretly love that?!)

Lately all I want to do is let my kids watch tv, but they are both sick and driving me nuts right now. If I didn't have the tv (and the computer), I'd be locking myself in the bathroom to hide. With a book, probably.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Laurel, it wasn't so much that they were discouraging, just that they didn't care about it and couldn't see the point in owning them. The upside is that they never really knew what I was reading when I got older, so I got to read a lot of stuff that I'm sure they would not have approved of if they had realized the content.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, okay! Hahah, yes, that latter effect is the real reason to cultivate bookwormism at a young age, before anyone gets suspicious.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Stephen King, Sidney Sheldon, and VC Andrews... lots of interesting stuff in there to keep a person reading... ;)

The surprising thing (or not?) is that it led to me loving awesome literature, too.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes, I discovered Anne McCaffrey in maybe 5th grade and kind of never went back to non-genre lit until long after college! How I got through required lit classes for Eng major...it is a mystery.jpg.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:29 (seventeen years ago) link

"i only hate my books when i have to pack and move them"

and yet i'll take my gazillion books over my gazillion records any day when it comes to moving.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link

my parents very mysteriously kept a tight lid on our TV & movie viewing (and music listening, if it comes to that) but NEVER THOUGHT TO SUPERVISE MY READING.

Likewise, though my father kept mentioning the possibility of forbidding certain comic books etc, and I was part of the generation-within-a-generation that wasn't allowed to play Dungeons and Dragons.

I believe in limiting and to some extent supervising television intake, depending on the kid's age (though I think it's key for children to enjoy things their parents find stupid), just not in doing so in favor of reading (past the age of "practice makes perfect"). Especially these days. My parents tried it at one point, but I was reading hundreds of books anyway and my brother has a learning disability, so a uniform policy was too tough to cobble together.

(My parents don't read, watch TV, watch movies, or listen to music, so in this case this stuff all came out of my father's suspicion of Evil Influence and my mother's New England eyebrow-raising at anything that Doesn't Serve Some Practical End.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link

1. If I don't own a book, I forget all about it, sometimes even that I read it.

2. Continued lust from an adolescence of looking into Manhattan brownstones where the walls were lined with endless curious tomes.

3. A tendency towards obscurer reading, and a tendency towards only buying things on sale, meaning if there's any chance I'll want to read a book someday, and I find it cheap enough, I'll grab it, because when that day comes, I will not be able to find it again.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link

My parents don't read, watch TV, watch movies, or listen to music

Um. What exactly do they do for spare time?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Even if I rarely plan to re-read them, I also keep some books for sentimental reasons, or because I had to schlepp them all the way back from France, or because they're relatively rare or out of print, and because some of them I plan to lend or at least have on hand to lend.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Um. What exactly do they do for spare time?

My mother quilts and plays bridge, and town politics are sort of a spectator sport here. Sometimes she knits sweaters for upcoming birthdays. Bridge is kind of an indulgence, but it doesn't cost any money -- she's horrified at the number of movies I own. My father, well, he's got his own recreations. (He's Very Religious, along Pat Robertson type lines.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:37 (seventeen years ago) link

I've sold thousands of books. I've kept about 400 of them. Give me another decade and that figure may be closer to 500.

I keep the ones I keep because I like having them to open and read from. About 160 of them are volumes of poetry. About fifty are various reference works. The rest are just damn good books.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post -- Hey, keeps 'em happy...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

and yet i'll take my gazillion books over my gazillion records any day when it comes to moving.

this is pretty much the reason why i have so little vinyl. freaks me out. feel like i need more stability for me n vinyl to happen.

rrrobyn, breeze blown meadow of cheeriness (rrrobyn), Thursday, 1 February 2007 18:41 (seventeen years ago) link

1. If I don't own a book, I forget all about it, sometimes even that I read it.

I have kept a running list of every book I've read since January of 1992. Seriously! This may seem obsessive, but sometimes I'll think of something from a book but won't remember where it came from - or need to figure out a title or author - and it really helps.

(I also have a running list of books I want to read, but that is so out of hand that it should never be discussed.)

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Thursday, 1 February 2007 19:01 (seventeen years ago) link

30,000+ books = Frogm@n Henry's house =
http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/images/lab_0001_0001_0_img0017.jpg

Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Dribble

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Friday, 2 February 2007 14:04 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.