Amazon Kindle (ebook thingy)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2836 of them)

that's what all my ladies say

DG, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd love to talk about cool lesser-known features and correct some assumptions and misconceptions about the device, but we've been specifically instructed not to do so. So for now, I'll just let it go... Sorry about the jerk comment...

schwantz, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

The quotes in The Guardian article are kind of funny...

Amazon's chief executive Jeff Bezos... "Books have stubbornly resisted digitisation. I think there's a very good reason for that, and that is the book is so highly evolved and so suited to its task that it's very hard to displace."

Philip Makinson, of Greenwich Consulting... "Do not get me wrong, it's a very nice bit of kit but what need is it fulfilling? Books are quite portable, cheap and universally available already."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2007/nov/20/amazon.news?gusrc=rss&feed=10

Jeff LeVine, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Why the fuck would anyone pay £195 for this? Reading it is never going to be as comfortable an experience as reading a book, so much isn't going to be easily or legally available and, y'know, it costs more than an iPod and not much less than an iPhone on contract. Not saying they do the same thing, but yeah, perspective.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

i feel sorry for that schwantz guy now :(

DG, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

only possible appeal of this (or any equivalent) is not having to lift boxes and boxes of books when moving.

Jordan, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

but when i fall asleep reading and the book inevitably falls off/behind the bed, i would be pretty mad if that book cost $200

Jordan, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd love to get one but the $400 is pretty steep.

calstars, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought last night about all the Library of America editions I could line a shelf with using the same $400.

calstars, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd rather add another $100 and get every Dalkey Archive book ever.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

only possible appeal of this (or any equivalent) is not having to lift boxes and boxes of books when moving
I'm paying my movers way less than this costs.

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/11/19/the-future-of-reading

stet, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, I guess you only get 100 books from them for that price nowadays.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

i would miss different-sized books and cover art and the like

omar little, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

It's interesting - my co-worker and I both worked at ReplayTV together back at the beginning of the PVR, and he pointed out how similar the two products are in some ways:

Both products are/were not available in retail stores, so nobody could really try them out before buying.

Both products were greeted with similar "why would I need this?" reactions from many people. For ReplayTV, he remembered how people said stuff like "I already HAVE a VCR that I never use - why would I want this thing?"

And on the good side, most people who used ReplayTV (or TiVo, or other PVR) for a while couldn't imagine life without one after using it.

Time will tell if the Kindle has a similar effect on customers (and, to be fair, ReplayTV did not end up being very successful, although the PVR has become almost ubiquitous), but it faces some of the same challenges.

schwantz, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 04:20 (sixteen years ago) link

schwantz, did you work at lab126 in the a9 office on hamilton? i was there for a while. congrats on the launch.

Colin M. Saunders, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 05:50 (sixteen years ago) link

so every book ever is available for this thing ?

I'm still a bit underawed by the grey lcd looking screen, is it even back lit?

Ste, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 09:58 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a pda with less functionality

ken c, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 11:39 (sixteen years ago) link

it looks nasty, and it sounds like a disaster from the planning 'how do we DRM it' PoV

Alan, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 11:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think the reaction has been so much "why would I need this" but "I'd like this, but not a DRM-crippled $10-a-pop no-hyphenating 1980s-looking one". Sorry to rag on yr work though, congrats on shipping.

stet, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 11:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Kindle Availability
Due to heavy customer demand, Kindle is temporarily sold out. Because we ship Kindles on a first-come, first-served basis, please ORDER NOW to reserve your place in line. See availability messaging above for estimated in-stock date.

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:13 (sixteen years ago) link

ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW ORDER NOW

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:13 (sixteen years ago) link

(much as i like Caecila)

Alan, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Caecilia

Alan, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm still a bit underawed by the grey lcd looking screen, is it even back lit?

It's electronic paper! No backlight necessary.

ledge, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:25 (sixteen years ago) link

(regardless of the look and functionality of the rest of the device I think that's a huge UI win)

ledge, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone who compares to the iPod is a retard.

When iPods came out, you could immediately fill them with content you'd already purchased or stolen. With Kindle, I have to...re-buy all my books if I want to read them on the kindle? That's a massive barrier to entry given the cost of a Kindle.

The Kindle is beyond ugly. I want something more cuddly to take to bed or the shitter when I read. And I want color. If having paper-like display screens is so great, then why don't we have them on our computers?

I'm waiting for tablet Mac.

Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:32 (sixteen years ago) link

If having paper-like display screens is so great, then why don't we have them on our computers?

New technology, black and white only... so far. But it'll happen.

ledge, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i'd quite like to see this screen to see how it's different.. is it just thinner?

ken c, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I've seen a Motorola F3, and it did make me go "woah!". I thought it was a fake at first, the screen looked just like some paper or card that someone had drawn on. That only has a 7-segment type display, don't know what the resolution on the Kindle is like.

ledge, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 12:45 (sixteen years ago) link

the e-paper on the kindle will be fine. i've seen other hardware with the same and it's nice. will be good for novels and a lot of straight text books. the stuff around it (hardware feel, 'product model') on the kindle seems like a giant fail though.

Alan, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 13:02 (sixteen years ago) link

ledge, that was my phone up until about a week ago. It was pretty groovy, although text messaging got to be a pain.

Ste, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 13:16 (sixteen years ago) link

One last shill post: Computerworld article

schwantz, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Can I just say that the frickin' name is possibly the goofiest thing about this?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

otm. I keep thiking there is something related to this guy
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/fugitivethe/fugitiveIMAGE/fugitivethe.jpg

James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Or these two, although it's even more of a stretch:
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/4/48/250px-KendallsGtHits.jpg

James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Would you use twigs or newspaper as kindle to light a bunch of these on fire?

calstars, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

"Kindle! We'll Turn Paper Books Into Kindling"

omar little, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the wii has shown a goofy name is fine

Jeff LeVine, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

So why no landscape mode for the screen? FAIL

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Congrats to Schwantz on a big launch and a great concept, but based on photos & early reviews I'm leaning towards "Omar Little OTM." As much as I'd love an iPod for Books, not sure this is my thing.

But I'll definitely check back around 5th/6th Gen. Look where it got Apple.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 22 November 2007 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

six months pass...

Http/1.1 Service Unavailable

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:01 (fifteen years ago) link

still sucks then

DG, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Congrats to Schwantz on a big launch and a great concept

spot the deliberate mistake(s)

DG, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I have actually seen three of these on the train. they look like medical apparati for the visually impaired.

akm, Friday, 6 June 2008 22:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Congrats to Schwantz on a big launch and a great concept

spot the deliberate mistake(s)

-- DG, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:06 (Yesterday) Link

Spot the continuing-to-troll douche.

schwantz, Saturday, 7 June 2008 02:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Medical apparatopotamuses.

libcrypt, Saturday, 7 June 2008 02:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Congrats to Schwantz on a big launch and a great concept
spot the deliberate mistake(s)

The capitalization of the "s" at the start of his name?

B.L.A.M., Saturday, 7 June 2008 03:20 (fifteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.
"This is the future of book reading. It will be everywhere." Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball and Liar's Poker.

am0n, Monday, 30 June 2008 04:33 (fifteen years ago) link

...

s1ocki, Monday, 30 June 2008 04:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Why not just make an actual e-ink phone if you're going to do that?

silverfish, Thursday, 9 May 2024 15:07 (yesterday) link

i'd love to see the super refresh (you can watch videos on it!) but yeah not sure what market / purpose they're going for, it's obviously way overspecced (and small) for an ereader.

ledge, Thursday, 9 May 2024 15:09 (yesterday) link

they quote a bigger diagonal screen size than the clara but that aspect ratio skews things

koogs, Thursday, 9 May 2024 15:17 (yesterday) link

I could see the appeal of an e-ink phone (especially if it means that the battery life is significantly longer, not sure about that though).

I feel like somebody who wants something more portable to do their reading is just going to use their actual phone rather than carry around two similarly sized devices even if the phone screen isn't quite as good for reading as e-ink is.

xxp to myself

silverfish, Thursday, 9 May 2024 15:19 (yesterday) link

Might be worth watching this video on an e-ink monitor before committing to the phone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZXrJRpA0Jw

Overtoun House windows (aldo), Friday, 10 May 2024 07:53 (nine hours ago) link

As a fortysomething with increasingly iffy vision, I don't find e-ink noticeably better than reading on my phone - my Kindle still looks a bit sparkly and overly-contrasty, even though it's noticeably better than a phone on a sunny day. But my impression is that the resolution/DPI of the text itself is still pretty poor even on the most recent e-ink readers.

Chief benefits of the Kindle for me are:
-- Reading big Victorian novels is a bit easier on my back than carrying a big Victorian novel
-- Every non-reading experience on the Kindle is bad, which keeps me focused on reading
-- Useful on holidays and stops me packing 8 books in a suitcase

But I don't find the letter-and-sentence-reading experience itself any better

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 10 May 2024 10:09 (seven hours ago) link

plus:
-- you can fall asleep whilst reading without creasing pages / facial papercuts
-- backlight means you don't need the main bedroom light on / can read between bands
-- ebooks are cheaper / free

minus:
-- ocr errors
-- amazon drm / hegemony

koogs, Friday, 10 May 2024 13:26 (three hours ago) link

plus:
-- choice of fonts (serif for victorian novels, sans for sci fi) / text size

koogs, Friday, 10 May 2024 13:26 (three hours ago) link

-- Every non-reading experience on the Kindle is bad, which keeps me focused on reading

Btw, this would basically be the main positive of an e-ink phone. Much like the reason why I am sometimes tempted to just buy a flip phone it would prevent me from wasting time doing dumb shit.

silverfish, Friday, 10 May 2024 13:41 (three hours ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.