Mine, once, in a surprise sub-duvet attack many years ago. They let me destroy the camera, which was at least decent of them.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link
this was a bad idea
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.dcwild.com/images/Backyard/Downy-Woodpecker%201.jpg
― Kerm, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link
happy new year ILE
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.nndb.com/people/774/000023705/peck2.jpg
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.scz.org/animals/p/pic/peccary2.jpg
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link
my friend took a picture of his dick once when he was drunk and emailed it to several people.
The fact that I still refer to him as 'friend' should imply I was not a recepient of said photograph.
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link
<img src=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/bb/The_Wire_Ziggy.jpg/250px-The_Wire_Ziggy.jpg>
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link
yes and no
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link
It's surprising that such a brilliant young man doesn't understand the concept of "film" or "recordable media".
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link
happy new year
― latebloomer, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link
I imagine it was a disposable?
― I know, right?, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link
LJ's pecker may be small, but calling it "disposable" is really unwarranted. I'm sure he gets plenty of use out of it.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link
fake louis
― max, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link
tiarn4n OTM, it was a worthless disposable, might as well have been made of cardboard. even after i took the battery out i didn't know how much those capacitors could hold. owww.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link
my sister did that thing at her wedding reception where disposable cameras were placed on all the tables so that in addition to the pro wedding photos she would have a bunch of drunken candid shots as well. There were at least a couple of dicks that popped up in the collection. Luckily she has a pretty good sense of humor.
none of these dicks were mine.
― will, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link
Yes. It was tastefully done and my pecker could only be seen near the margin of the composition. The resulting B&W negative was printed on 11x17 paper, although hardly anyone has seen it.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link
yes, but we were on ecstasy so BAD DECISIONS DON'T COUNT
― milo z, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link
"pecker" makes me think of a Kurt Vonnegut novel
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link
makes me think of http://www.takegreatpictures.com/content/images/Pecker_Edward_Furlong.jpg
― milo z, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.northrup.org/Photos/woodpecker/low/woodpecker-on-ice%20(2).jpg
― Aimless, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link
KILLFILE 2.0
― John Justen, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link
can we use this thread to discuss the "camera phone" and its role in the etiology of homo sapiens' eventual extinction
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link
Was society always so trashy and just didn't have ubiquitous cameras?
― Kerm, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link
I think that human beings have always been a pretty garbage crowd but it just seems like lately every new invention is essentially another tool for them to prove it
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link
we used to invent devices for transcendence, now we just sell objects for emphasizing our own pathetic narcissism in the face of overwhelming triviality
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link
And I don't suppose you think this development will force us to accept that reality, quit frontin', and evolve better behaviors?
Phone camera panopticon becomes the ever-present eye of a moral techno-God!
― Kerm, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link
But who's buying? Is that us, or them?
― Kerm, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link
-- El Tomboto, Tuesday, January 1, 2008 7:44 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
where's that tombot/tyler durden morph.gif again?
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link
this thread deserves its own forum
― Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link
"happy 2008. louis jagger's junk anyone?"
this thread officially has advanced Web 2.0 to Web 2.5!
― Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Tombott, have you always been so depressing when it comes to humanity? Surely forwarding pecker pixors is actually a GOOD thing? ;-)
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link
Oh to answer the question: no. I do not have a pecker. So I doubt it will ever happen. Unless I get a sex change. Something I doubt will happen either.
dude I have hated people since at least 1989 I am divided between the optimism that keeps from leaping in front of trains and my genuine rational nature that tells me that the reason we will never find any other intelligent life in the universe is because all intelligent life snuffs itself in the span of a couple of centuries once it has reached the point where it develops radio
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link
What happened in 1989? Despite sucky events, even in 2008, I remain *positively optimistic*. Or rather, I remain of the belief that all is relative. Say you have a small pecker, keep in mind that there's always a smaller out there. Somewhere.
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link
Also, I'm not a dude. I'm female and even if I was male I don't think I would achieve that status. (Cue: Runs of to that confidence thread and admits that insecurity is my middle name.)
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link
Another number, another summer.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link
everybody is a dude. sexist.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Brother he showed me the gong Brother he showed me the ding dong ding dong How to kick that gong to life Oh, none of these dicks were mine.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link
tom has an interesting mind - making his misanthropy that much more tragic - i know a lot of people like that
(at least, you know, his online persona)
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.generalcomputing.com/willow/valkilmer.jpg
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link
oh wait. here's a good one: when I was in high school my girlfriend went on a family vacation and accidentally left her camera at my house. My parents happened to be out of town, too so I decided to have a small-to-med size get-together at my house. It eventually devolved into typical 17 y.o. drunken depravity and at some point during the night I thought it would be *hilarious* to take some glamor shots of my penis w/ the gf's camera. I pretty much forgot about it until a few weeks later when she tried to get the film developed at Wal Mart and they refused to do it. Because of the wang. Fuckin Wal Mart.
― will, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link
Wal Mart ain't down with the underage porn
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link
"Because of the wang."
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link
hahaha ouch
― will, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link
i recommand against writing a paragraph about your dong containing the phrase "small-to-med size"
― and what, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link
at least he's honest, right?
― milo z, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link
noted. how's about a 'pleasantly average' number of people
x-post
― will, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link
i had a dream last night that for christmas i received a coffee table book called "goodbye cruel world"; it was all beautiful photographs of the planet earth taken from space. then i realised that the earth had been destroyed long ago and that this book, and hundreds like it, were perennial nostalgic favorites for a race that had been banished from its ancestral home forever, and that i was in fact living in a space station
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link
that's fuckin' awesome
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link
i know! then i woke up
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link
Because of the wang.
This could be a SFW picture thread involving celebrity protocol lapses.
― Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Tracer, that is one case where eternal sleep is A+++
I mailed a picture of my junk to a girl in NC that my college roommate was trying to impress. There were no "This is actually me" shenanigans or anything; basically, while they were having an online chat, he was telling her my nudity stories from high school and she kept begging/daring me through him to send her nude pictures. So I did.
They broke up shortly afterwards, mostly because she didn't realize they were in a relationship.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link
e.g. britney-shaved-head.jpg, tom-cruise-sofa-jump.jpg
xp
― Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link
They broke up shortly afterwards, mostly because of the wang
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link
^^^^^ otm as well
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link
my nudity stories from high school
o_0
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link
oh my. i've become part of the problem, haven't I?
― will, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link
it happens so subtlely.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link
I borrowed a digital camera from a (gay male) friend to take on a band tour a few years ago. The thing needed batteries and I didn't take time to buy any til I was at the Mall of America, halfway across the country from my home in Oregon.
At Radio Shack in the Mall of America, I popped in the batteries and instantly discovered 100-150 pictures of my friend's very large penis. My bandmate and I walked through the mall and around Camp Snoopy laughing and groaning at all those dick pix. It was surreal.
We deleted them all because we figured if he didn't have them backed up, he at least knew where he could shoot more photos like that.
― Nate Carson, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 08:08 (sixteen years ago) link
ie in his pants
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 08:44 (sixteen years ago) link
my wang exists somewhere on the internet
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link
our task, if we choose to undertake it...
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link
A good (and now kind-of famous) friend was visiting his girlfriends parents. The parents took a photo of him and the girlfriend. They were sitting on a couch; he was wearing shorts, commando. Still one of the funniest things I've heard. The two ended up married
― would like a calmer set (Eazy), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 04:47 (thirteen years ago) link
(carried over from an ILTMI thread)
― would like a calmer set (Eazy), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 04:48 (thirteen years ago) link
woah this is where "because of the wang" originated!
― gr8080, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 05:02 (thirteen years ago) link
my genuine rational nature that tells me that the reason we will never find any other intelligent life in the universe is because all intelligent life snuffs itself in the span of a couple of centuries once it has reached the point where it develops radio.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, January 1, 2008 1:57 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark
i read this speculation somewhere, once upon a time, in the android's dungeon of my youth. niven? clarke? heinlein? i dunno, but somewhere. has always stuck with me, though i'm not sure i really believe it.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 06:08 (thirteen years ago) link