Deserves its own thread, surely. First look at Penn's pre-electoral hippie Harvey:
http://www.ohlalaparis.com/ohlalaparis/2008/01/ohlala-exclusiv.html
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
this film is gonna rock.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
meh. I hate Sean Penn.
― The Brainwasher, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
whatevs, BALLwasher
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
gus van sand - classic. late sean penn - dud.
"milk" - who knows
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH
― The Brainwasher, Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
zeno otm
― The Brainwasher, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
isn't all sean penn other than 'fast times' essentially 'late' sean penn?
― gff, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
for stoners, sure
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
A process loooooong in germination. Robin Williams was discussed in '92.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
My wife is still wrangling to get a role as either lesbian protester #43 or Harvey's fag hag #11. She's got her outfit all picked out and everything.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
so van sant has abondond the abstract form in favour of an obv. political drama?
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
thank fucking god.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:59 (eighteen years ago)
'the abstract form' whuuuut? u mean boring alan clarke/bela tarr knock-offs.
Ten years from now he will do a shot-by-shot remake starring Zac Efron.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:00 (eighteen years ago)
i disagree, xpost
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
anyway, he didnt do anything good except "will hunting" and "idaho" before that period imo. so i hope it's a "new",surprising phase and not a "returning back" phase,which might be a failure. but who knows.
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:07 (eighteen years ago)
btw,van sant is also a part of this movie "8", which feature 8 directors, with 8 segmants. (another director on the project is,guuess who,sean penn!)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493101/fullcredits#directors
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
Zeno, u high. Drugstore Cowboy, Mala Noche and To Die For are all great. Cowgirls and the Psycho reshoot are his only real fuckups.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:14 (eighteen years ago)
drugstore is just ok, the other 2 i didnt see. cowgirls and psycho are fuckups indeed
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:16 (eighteen years ago)
"elephant" and "last days" on the otehr hand, are outstanding. i wanna see "paranoid park"
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:18 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I haven't seen Paranoid Park, either. Am curious.
But you really oughtta check out Mala Noche. At least as good as anything else he's done. Criterion just put out a nice version.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:22 (eighteen years ago)
i'll check it
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
"drugstore is just ok"
Crazy. He's never done anything half as good since.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
Elephant is garbage. Didn't even bother with the Cobain nonsense.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
to die for
― remy bean, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
there's nothing 'abstract' about his boring guilt-driven post-'finding forester' work.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
way to predictably regurgitate the general Van Sant thread, guys
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
way to predictably regurgitate on it, Morbs
― remy bean, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
hold your lunch, fellas. sheesh!
― latebloomer, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
in every fucking film thread ever...
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
lol
― remy bean, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
there isn't much else to discuss yet to be fair.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
let's discuss milk.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:28 (eighteen years ago)
I'm more curious what this film will have to say about Dan White than Harvey Milk actually.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
well, Harris Savides is lensing it, so it should look good.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
oh, and Victor Garber is playing Moscone.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
geez I'd forgotten HS was also the DP on Zodiac
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
has anyone seen that harvey milk documentary from the 80s? that's supposed to be good.
― J.D., Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
savides loves his SF
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:42 (eighteen years ago)
I've seen it about a million times. It is good.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
It also mostly avoids the mistake of making White out to be some sort of monster which it deserves credit for.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.sfweekly.com/2008-01-30/news/white-in-milk/
― Michael White, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:54 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah I saw that. Welcome to Munich II (aka I'm not going to let facts get in the way of the moral I want to superimpose on these events.)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
Precisely.
Man, reading that I just had a flashback to being a little kid in the Sierras when the news came through about the murders, which was only about a week after Jonestown, and being seriously intimidated by SF.
― Michael White, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
sean penn so crazy
― DavidM, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:04 (eighteen years ago)
I've never seen the (entire) Milk docufilm nor have I read any book-length bios, so I'll have to get back to you re Dan White.
If Jean-Pierre Melville had lived to make Munich, we'd all have gotten a good nap out of it.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
I suppose the good laugh we got is better then.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
I seem to recall accusations that Fincher's DV cop show deviated from some agreed-upon facts.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, apparently the bus lane on Geary St didn't exist in 1970. I was shocked too.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
Milk's career also set the horror that is her hair in motion too.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
Are you implying they used the same hairdresser?
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 11 February 2009 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
Duh, that Milk was her hairdresser.
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
I thought so.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
but who's been buffing that helmet the last 30 years?
As Oscar voting is taking place right now, won't Milk be further hurt by the dampened post-election Savior vibe?
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 11 February 2009 18:40 (seventeen years ago)
loved loved loved this film.
none of the criticisms here really make any sense to me -- i thought there was just the right balance of politics and personal life, and penn was great. i can't remember the last best picture nominee i thought was this good.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, 22 February 2009 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
Hilton Als' mixed review in the NY Review of Books.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 22 February 2009 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
good movie!!!!!
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
ehh its ok, pretty watchable, stirring at times, everyone in it is good but such a biopic in some ways (the kid who calls him, the last poignant phone calls that resolve all the relationships the night before he dies... pretty lame script imo)
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
ya but the screenwriter was pretty cute so
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
I saw this the other day. I dunno if it was because the two movies I saw before it were Notorious (urgh but at least lol) and Watchmen (urgh i want to kill myself and there is still like 4 hours left) but I just fell in love with this movie; even cried at the end.
― a hoy hoy, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 17:02 (seventeen years ago)
I liked Denis O'Hare.
― tokyo rosemary, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 21:08 (seventeen years ago)
i never understood this automatic "groan biopic" reaction a lot of ppl have, really.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 21:54 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah -- nobody said "groan, Western" in 1959.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 21:58 (seventeen years ago)
people were making better westerns in 1959 than they are biopics now
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:07 (seventeen years ago)
and actually, im sure there were a lot of people who didn't like westerns back then. to me this is not a genre i enjoy. i find they are almost always way too on the nose and the stories, by fact of being based on real events, are rarely satisfying.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Right -- the point is they are exceptions in genres we don't care about, and this is one.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:12 (seventeen years ago)
ya and i liked it except for the hamhanded stuff it had to do to make its plot work - which all biopics kind of have to do
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
i find a lot of biopics enjoyable but since they tend to bounce around from highlight to lowlight and back it's not especially interesting as a genre. stories based on real events or a real period without a singular strong focus or "biopic" style thing are stories that work better for me. (goodfellas, for one!)
― hello my name is peter francis geraci are you in debt (omar little), Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:16 (seventeen years ago)
also: the right stuff
my problem with biopics is usually structure and pacing. most of them just feel kind of even, and "and then what happened was..." for two hours.
― caek, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 01:15 (seventeen years ago)
The Right Stuff isn't remotely a biopic, it's the history of a mythology.
except for the hamhanded stuff it had to do to make its plot work
Regular folks call this "entertainment." Did you see the grosses of I'm Not There?
s1ocki, I believe the Shilts book had all those phone calls (incl from kid in wheelchair), they were factual.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 02:46 (seventeen years ago)
i never said it was a biopic, doc
― hello my name is peter francis geraci are you in debt (omar little), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 02:50 (seventeen years ago)
ya i know
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 02:55 (seventeen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, April 1, 2009 2:46 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
since when do you rep for the masses morbs?
i know the calls were real but those scenes felt like a lifetime movie
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 03:47 (seventeen years ago)
i'm just saying the structure of a big-studio film (that isn't a poptasia by Todd Haynes) about a man's life is going to adhere to a certain template; Van Sant's was fresher than I expected.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 03:51 (seventeen years ago)
ya it's just the tension when the shapelessness of a real life is bent to fit a traditional hollywood dramatic structure that often feels kinda strained to me.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 05:52 (seventeen years ago)
at least they didnt add a dead brother
it was so pretty tho! and everyone dressed so well!
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 1 April 2009 13:34 (seventeen years ago)
1) San Francisco + Harris Savides2) gays
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 13:41 (seventeen years ago)
s1ocki, Milk's life was kinda dramatic in a three-act way.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 1 April 2009 13:42 (seventeen years ago)
whoopshttp://www.thesword.com/index.php/celebritynipple/2798-hardcore-gay-fuck-shots-of-oscar-winner-dustin-lance-black.html
nsfw obv
― swag serf (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 16 June 2009 21:17 (sixteen years ago)
hardcore gay fuck shots
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 16 June 2009 21:18 (sixteen years ago)
he's already issued an apology for having unprotected sex I guess
kind of attractive in a gay clone way, which is to say, doesn't do it for me
― giovanni & ribsy (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 16 June 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)
lol hardcore gay fuck shots
saw these the other day. co-sign with elmo.
― the table is the table, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 00:16 (sixteen years ago)
the statement DLB released doesn't make clear whether the unprotected sex pictured was actually truly unsafe -- he just says that the message the images send is "misleading." i mean, it could be the case that they were taken in the context of a monogamous long-term relationship which later went south, in which case i wouldn't want to be party to some ex-lover's campaign of defamation of dude.
― giovanni & ribsy (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 00:38 (sixteen years ago)
Gus Van Sant's Fuckshot
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 06:12 (sixteen years ago)
i think he's pretty cute tbh
― swag serf (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 06:18 (sixteen years ago)
moreso w/out clothes
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 06:33 (sixteen years ago)
can i just say that i wld wear all fames francos clothes in this pretty much
― plaxico (I know, right?), Sunday, 22 November 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
uh james franco
― plaxico (I know, right?), Sunday, 22 November 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
Watched this last night and thought it was pretty good. Penn was excellent and I love Franco in pretty much anything. I cried at the end too a hoy a hoy.
― bear say hi to me (ENBB), Sunday, 22 November 2009 21:40 (sixteen years ago)
am pretty selective abt when i love franco, this n f&g really just
― plaxico (I know, right?), Sunday, 22 November 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)
im trying to clear up my harddrive so im watching all the movies that have been clogging it up to delete them. I re-watched this tonight.
Didn't remember it being so teal and orange but i guess that's what the teal and orange thing is, its only annoying once you notice it. I remember this movie being more attractive than it seemed. Weird that the crazy trite elements of the screenplay werent dumped a bit more, i mean the it gets better kid in the wheelchair was like a very special episode of boy meets world or something. But yeah theres this weird collision of van sant the populist and van sant the experimentalist in a way that doesnt really happen in his other movies. Little gimmicks like the shutter-pausing archive footage and the hockney ref seems a bit playful for such an obvious white elephant canon style movie.
Idk tho, im not normally a sucker for big formula-driven biopic things but I liked how they didnt separate out the nobleness of *the cause* from like bathhouses and tight jeans. it stays kindof attractive and sexy despite the "historical weight" partic at the moment of its prop eight issue pic. release date. idk moreso it made me feel connected to larger narratives which is a nice thing. james franco is majorly hot in it and more and more i gen think of him as a bit of a ratface.
― plax (ico), Monday, 14 March 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)
it is kindof baffling how all these dudes wanna bang sean penn in it tho, they should have explained that
― plax (ico), Monday, 14 March 2011 23:17 (fifteen years ago)
power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, i hear
― Fuck bein' hard, Dr Morbz is complicated (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2011 01:10 (fifteen years ago)
ask me about this movie, and one of the first things i picture is alison pill's hair
― Noblesse J. Blige (jaymc), Friday, 6 December 2013 05:52 (twelve years ago)
jaymc how many movies are you watching this evening
also yes for sure
― love mike love (ko komo) (schlump), Friday, 6 December 2013 05:59 (twelve years ago)
this movie was impossible to hate but also... not very good or memorable? the opening newsreel footage was the best thing in it.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 6 December 2013 06:00 (twelve years ago)
xpSaw this quite a while ago and the residue of the movie in my memory is that it was good, but unexceptional, follows the biopic conventions pretty faithfully, and made Milk seem very likeable. The ending, of course, I knew going in, so it was not a major impression.
― Aimless, Friday, 6 December 2013 06:01 (twelve years ago)