Since the economic system is unfair, is it okay to steal if you're poor?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I have done some dodgy things in my time just so that I could be comfortable instead of really really poor - ie with the dole and things like that. And surely it's okay, because the big businessmen are criminals, right? But then you have to live on tenterhooks waiting to see if you'll be found out. Is the anxiety worth it?

maryann, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Do other poor people do vaguely dodgy things? (Ethics.)

maryann, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No.

Pete, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh okay then

maryann, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes! Reappropriate and redistribute the spoils of exploitation as you see fit! Don't have a qualm. Unless it's a mom&pop store or somewhere where someone may get directly hurt from it; but fuck! even then, most small business owners are complete assholes because they've been trained by the (capitalist) system to think they have certain unique divine rights as business-people, that greed is good and enviable. Naw, fuck 'em. Make that money, take that money.

Dan I., Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes of course and then people poorer than you can steal from you and so forth and everyone will end up happy. What's the motivation for someone going out and stealing something? It's hardly a world away from the motives of a capitalist. In fact you'd almost say it was human.

Ronan, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But your not a poor person Pete.

Graham, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

My post could have been condensed as "two wrongs don't make a right, and definitely not some kind of class war right".

Ronan, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Unless it's a mom&pop store or somewhere where someone may get directly hurt from it; but fuck! even then, most small business owners are complete assholes because they've been trained by the (capitalist) system to think they have certain unique divine rights as business-people, that greed is good and enviable. Naw, fuck 'em. Make that money, take that money.

This is utter, utter bullshit Dan. In my experience, as a shop owner, it is the thieving scum who think they have a certain unique divine right, IE to help themselves to that which you have worked (hard) for. Last year a charver stole a mountainbike from my shop, we never saw it, or him again. The insurance didn't pay up, B/C it was below the excess. This year the corner shop up the road from us had £5000 cash stolen by charver thieves. Again, a total loss for a hardworking family business. Dan, the thieves you would seem to romanticise would clean your home out, or the home of anyone else out w/o a second's thought. They would sell your posessions that you worked for for far less than their worth, and would probably piss away the fruit of your work in a weekend, then go and do the same thing to you or someone else next week. They would feel no remorse whatsoever, and would most likely with a straight face sympathise w/yr loss. Do not buy any of the mythologising of the gentleman thief who only rips off the rich, b/c no such person exists - thieves prey on those who are the easiest to rip off - IE the poor & vunerable. And don't come out w/ any bullshit in a class warrior stylee please, thieves are class traitors, pure & simple. If I had caught the guy who ripped off our bike, I'd have bust his motherfucking head open, and don't even try to tell me I'd have been in the wrong. I make my money by selling & servicing stuff. I am an honourable trader, so fuck you for this sub-class war garbage Dan:

most small business owners are complete assholes because they've been trained by the (capitalist) system to think they have certain unique divine rights as business-people

Perhaps if you got ripped off w/o redress, you would talk a bit more sense. I hope you never do. Maryann, I don't think it's OK to steal wether yer rich or poor. Stealing is wrong. End of story.

Norman Phay, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

its okay to steal if you're poor but not from other poor people.

queenoftheharpies, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

and not from businesses that are trying to do good things in the world, like locally owned vegetarian cafes or organic food stores.

queenoftheharpies, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well geez people. How poor do you have to be to be poor? It all seems rather subjective. You can only steal from the bad...well what is bad? I sort of like the idea of stealing from vegetarian stores just to get back at all the publicity Moby has been getting, I'd probably never do it though. I usually steal little bitty things like the tops of fake flowers that have fallen off and landed on the floor-so maybe that's actually being helpful in a sense-cleaning up and such. There's a very slim chance that I'd ever steal anything from a mom and pop store because most of the people in my family own little shops. I'd probably only steal from a mom and pop shop if I knew them personally and their personality justified such deviant behavior.

Lindsey B, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Maryann, I don't think it's OK to steal wether yer rich or poor. Stealing is wrong. End of story.

theres obviously some people here who don't know what its like to be unable to buy food. a few years ago, WINZ fucked up my student allowance and didn't pay me anything for SIX WEEKS. how the fuck are you supposed to eat and pay your power bills when you have no money? what if your parents have no money and you can't borrow from them? what if your friends are all on benefits too, which is only enough to pay their own bills and no more? what if the bank won't lend you money cos you're not an "earner"? are you going to try to tell me i should just STARVE for SIX WEEKS?

queenoftheharpies, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's not ok to steal from other poor people. It's also not ok to steal in a way that directly hurts people like mugging. This seems a bit simplistic and I guess the complication is being able to tell whether the person you're stealing from is poor.

isadora, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

theres obviously some people here who don't know what its like to be unable to buy food.

Go on, assume away, mr/ms harpy troll. (sigh). You haven't got something. Then that makes it ok to just take it from someone else, who then hasn't got the same thing you were 'till recently without? What rubbish. And said person might not have student allowance coming in 6 weeks or whatever. In fact they could have a couple of kids, a piss poor job, and a load of debt. More likely that than be rich, certainly, for the rich are a lot better & more efficient at protecting their posessions in my experience.

Norman Phay, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This is just my opinion. There should be no reason to steal from anyone.There is so much help for the poor today, if you know where to look. I was brought up to respect people's property. I raised my children the same way. Good luck.

Gale, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

and this idea well you can steal from big bad business is folly as well because everyone ends up paying for your self-justified act as prices go up and insurance goes up and people treat everyone suspiciously because some decide they can skirt the rules of common decency.

keith, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm so sick of NZers claiming they're poor; they're nearly always people who can't look after there money and fritter it away on stupid shit. as a nation we continually rip off the third world so the dole bludgers like myself never have to work. Being on the dole means i don't have to get out of the bed on the morning and i get more money than i know what to with. okay i don't have enough to buy imported CDs, a new computer or overseas trips, but that’s probably for the best considering what the consumption of those sort of things are doing to the biosphere. yeah i had that dreaded two months without an income due to the infamous WINZ foul-up but i survived without stealing because i don't spend every cent i get as soon as i got it (or before i got it as first worlders who like to sell themselves to banks tend to do). And also because i was used to keeping money aside because i knew i couldn’t depend on my parents if something went wrong. At the time nearly every bank in the country was giving students free thousand dollar overdrafts (unless you’d already used one up) which could be repaid when WINZ backpaid everyone.

There’s heaps of problems with people advocating shoplifting as a means of wealth redistribution and a few of them have already been covered here. its generally harder to steal from large businesses because they have cameras and security people so most shoplifting affects small shops-owners who don't have the luxury of a guaranteed income each week (such as the dole). its quite easy to shoplift enough to put them out of business and then all their business goes to the multi-nationals. how that helps the poor i don't know. also a lot of shoplifting in small shops is actually a subtle form of intimidation - the shopkeeper often knows what the shoplifter is doing but feels powerless to do anything about it. Generally it causes all sorts of problems for the workers too. so much for class solidarity. And shoplifting is nearly always for luxury goods, not necessities.

hamish., Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i guess i'm saying that i wish people who steal would be more honest about their motives instead of acting righteous about it.

hamish, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What about ripping off institutions, like people getting a marriage of convenience so that they can get student allowance? It's so strange because all those people would have qualified for an allowance say a decade earlier. So obviously there is no moral absolute there. I don't steal by the way, but I don't really have a strong opinion on it. A few of my friends have been big time shoplifters, and I never thought to think that it was bad. Like what about 'property is theft'? I know it's not very practical, but it still seems true at a gut level.

maryann, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wasn't Proudhon joking when he said that? i don't know, i'm not an ethicist or political scientist. its not as if shoplifters are liberating property to be shared by society communally; they're just perpetuating the cycle of selfishness our economic system is based on. i don't mean to say that stealing is inherently wrong though.

i don't know much about ripping off institutions, people marrying for student allowances nearly always have rich parents because otherwise they would qualify for allowances themselves. But then getting married is always an amusing thing to do so if you don't believe in marriage then why waste the opportunity to get a fake one? And you know a student allowance is just some money to live off when you'd probably otherwise be on the dole or on a living loan that you never intend to pay back so it doesn't really make a difference to the intitution.

hamish, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

of course my reasons for not ripping off institutions has more to with paranoia than ethics. Hence i get a $1 per week accomodation supplement instead of $40.

hamish, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

maryann what is yr ethical stance on dealing hard drugs?

d.rag, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if the person is "poor" (NZ standards, yeah hamish i heard you) & a user theirself, say.

d.rag, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, d.rag, as long as it's to desperately miserable people who will only be dragged further down by a drug dependency, then I'd say it's okay. If, on the other hand, it's to well adjusted people who want to have a great Friday night, absolutely no way.

maryann, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

somehow i knew this thread would be populated with people from new zealand.

jess, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah theyre worse than the fucking dutch

unknown or illegal user, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

he wasn't joking.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hamish i know how disheartening it is to be unemployed, i've been there, and i didn't take it out on you so don't fukkin take it out on me. Mr K-Rad i assure you i am no troll, and i'm sorry you've been ripped off by thieves who didn't consider the consequences of their actions on you and your loved ones. all i was doing was trying to look at things from the perspective of people less fortunate than myself, and then i get called a troll and a self-righteous whinger who whitters her money away on things that destroy the biosphere! (in fact hamish, i've NEVER bought imported CDs, never owned a computer, and i've been overseas once on a trip that my brother-in-law paid for - i think its fair to say that YOU whitter your money away on these unnecessary things more than i do - so who exactly is being self-righteous here?)

queenoftheharpies, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hey i'm sorry for offending you Di, but i'm not taking anything out on you or trying to attack you. Yes i know i fritter my money away on useless shit too; i never said i haven't. if i hadn't've i would've managed to get overseas by now. The above ranting was nothing to do with you; i was just reacting against a particularly annoying part of the NZ mindset.

hamish, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry Di, I didn't know that ws you, otherwise I would not have called out "troll", coz you obv aren't. :( Poss I was also taking out general snarkiness at dan's daft comments out on your post so sorry for that also. I ws unemployed for 2 yrs in the early '80's (under Thatcher) and *never* had quite enough money, but I never ripped anyone off tho'. I feel really strongly abt this as you see. I don't like thieves or thieving, having seen thee effects on people @ the bottom ov the heap. BTW there was a notorious shoplifting woman in the UK (she died a few years ago), who appeared on TV a couple of years before she died justifying her rip-off-ness. She made great claims about only robbing them that could afford it - marks & spencer, house of frazer etc etc, & her scam was to travel the country stealing stuff, & taking it to the counter staff asking for a refund. Well, she was full of shit, b/c I recognised her - she ripped my mum off in our shop (when she used to work there) and very nearly caught me out a couple of years later. Apropos of what I relate this I don't know. Dunno abt NZ, but over here if U kick up enough of a stink w/social services, they'll stump up some money. I have some really skanky relatives who've actually lived thusly for all their lives. The recently got a new ford SUV bought for them (really!) despite having nothing wrong w/them other than terminal lazyness. So if chancers like that can get stuff, people who are genuinely up against it should be able to get emergency living expenses surely? BTW my cousin is emigrating to....(fanfare) Dunedin in 2 months. What should I tell him to look out for?

Norman Phay, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hey norman, rainy and i listed heaps of important sites to see/things to do here on Ned's thread. it should def keep him occupied. is he into music btw?

queenoftheharpies, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i was exaggerating when i said there were no poor people in NZ. There are cracks in the welfare system that people fall through particularly kids under 18 who can't live at home (there are under 18 benefits but they make them really difficult to get). In the student allowance fuckup that Di referred to, there was absolutely no way that the welfare system would give anyone emergency living expenses even though it was their fault. All they would do was lie about your application situation and put you on hold for hours (there was no physical office you could go to). The only way to get any money was to drop out of university.
Whats your cousin doing in Dunedin? Is he an academic type?

hamish, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

did my html work?

queenoftheharpies, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He is a domestic gas engineer, but he also plays rock drums. Di it made two lots of "http"s appear, but I deleted one of them in the browser window, & i'll print it out before he goes. Thanx.

Norman Phay, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i haven't stolen anything since i was in high school, btw.

What about ripping off institutions, like people getting a marriage of convenience so that they can get student allowance?
actually, this i can understand in some cases. i think its really wrong that in New Zealand there are many 18-25yearolds who are treated as dependant on their parents. but on the other hand, i know people whose parents give them $600 per week as allowance, but use a marriage of convenience to get even MORE money. that makes me sick.

queenoftheharpies, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i haven't stolen anything since i was in high school, btw.
not that that makes it all right, cos i was a selfish stupid little twat. i didn't shoplift cos i had to to survive, i did it cos i was bored. it was me and my best friends mission to beat the supermarket detectives, and we did every time. or probably they didn't care about a couple of teenage girls who just wanted to eat junk food.

queenoftheharpies, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've never understood this about people too young for benefit but 'can't live at home'. Why not? If being fucked in the ass by your dad is what it takes for three hots and a cot then jus grease your bunghole and grin and bear it. Alternately if you get sick of it kill him and claim PTSD. Anything's more dignified than being on the dole.

dave q, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yes dave i was using the word "can't" very loosely.

hamish, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what is PTSD?

hamish, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

'post-traumatic stress disorder'

alternately - claim 'gulf war syndrome'

geeta, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ergh. Nation of fucking shopkeepers. Not all stealing is equal. Absolutes are difficult. I don't know how welfare done got drug into this but you're not going to find me saying anything against it; I would've been dead by age 3 if not for. There are not always going to be supportive relatives/friends/churches/etc. , and to think so is to suffer the delusions of the rich. Fuck off asshole.

Dan I., Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have some thoughts on this, but I am on a gag order.

Winona, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Class War Dan sp3w3d

to think so is to suffer the delusions of the rich. Fuck off asshole.

"The delusions of the rich" HA HA HA, you clearly have NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE ON ABOUT DAN. Look at it this way, if, for example, Ronan or Di were to visit my tiny little house, I'd probably feel pretty OK abt it. You, OTOH, I'd probably hide away what few valuables we do own if wintermute the thief-lover came a-calling. BTW me and my wife are on "Working Families Tax Credit", which if you didn't know is a form of welfare for low-paid people, BTW, you, mr "all kinds of thieving are not equal" are certainly much better off than I am. Perhaps then you would be quite happy if I took off with your computer & sold it to buy shoes for our son? Oh, actually I wouldn't do that, b/c I do have some principles, and would not rip people off, yea verily not even the ignorant, or those w/o any sense of right or wrong whatsoever. Gah.

Norman Phay, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You know what was the most beautiful thing, in "Hunger" when the narrator was chewing his little finger to stop dying and he would still give away money to a prostitute or something every time he got it and wouldn't pawn his blanket because it belonged to his friend. Though he DID try to pawn the blanket in the end. I suppose the thing about having ridiculous moral codes about not stealing from the rich is that it makes you more HUMAN which is better than being wealthy - much deeper, life's rich tapestry etc. On the other hand, on the Brady Bunch last night they made the point that rules are not to be followed blindly, but to be applied with justice and reason. But I ask you - how human are the Brady Bunch?

maryann, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.