Best Sportswriters

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Who are your favorites?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Christopher Robin Zimmerman is probably the best around at the moment.

During the glory days of 90 Minutes, there were some great ones around. Gavin Newsham springs to mind, as does Eleanor Levi.

Hmmm... can't think of any more at the moment. I'll come back later.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like Hunter S Thompson's columns for ESPN. They're generally concern American football, vague memories of drug use and gambling more than anything else, but they're still pretty reliably entertaining.

geeta, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ugh I meant to write "They generally" - I have The Fear

geeta, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

AJ Liebling on boxing (The Sweet Science).

fritz, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I should also add that it would be nice to try and arrive at what makes them good. I think ANYBODY who can grab your attention while recounting the details of baseball game #6,674,399 ever played is doing something magical (and perhaps necessarily dishonest?) if they can create a unique story out of it.

My favorite is Mike Lupica of the New York Daily News. He does epic bombast better than anyone.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

also I know everybody's a bit Ali-ed out already, but "King of The World" by David Remnick is a fantastic book (right, Dan?).

fritz, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

geeta he hasn't had one in like a year though! I'm annoyed at that. Lately he's been developing a Really Bad Habit of putting Everything in Capital Letters. It Works Sometimes but it's turning into a Tic. I say this knowing that nothing can diminish his freakish genius; even if he decides to write only with his thumbs and a huge inkwell I'll read it.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Lupica is a nut, really funny. I used to watch him on that ESPN show called The Sports Reporters (or something like that). Do they still have that show? Dick Schaap died, didn't he? I'm so out of the sports loop.

When Mitch Albom actually sticks to sports without writing at a first- grade level, he can be pretty great.

Geez, there must have been several that I idolized in my youth, but I can't think of any right now.

Andy K, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Last I saw, John Saunders is the host the Sports Reporters. I don't get up early enough on Sunday mid-morning anymore to know the current status.

The only reporter that I noticed back in The Day was Michael Arace, a Hartford Courant writer assigned to the Hartford Whalers (and the occasional UConn basketball game). He left eons ago for some bigger market. I have no idea where he's at nowadays. Arace was the best WRITER I ever read in the Courant sports section, that's for damn sure.

Currently, I get my sports jones from folks like Chri s Kahrl and Dere k Zumsteg, among others. Rob Neyer is solid. And the little I've read from Bill James is excellent. If there are other sports journalists & writers cover besides baseball, I wouldn't know.

Oh, and the Boston Sports Guy is good for a few laughs (when he's talking about basketball or Boston sports lore or gabbing about things tangentially related to the actual sport) (and he avoids his schtick).

Daver, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Christopher Robin Zimmerman is probably the best around at the moment.

The wrestling guy? Does he do anything else? I like Bill Simmons and Leonard Koppet and Bill James and Ralph Wiley. Most sportswriting is about as bad as it gets though.

Kris, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah, that's the guy. He does some other sports as well on his homepage, but wrestling is his main area. The reason I'm a fan is because 99% of wrestling journalism is amongst the dumbest, ignorant, self-satisfied, idiotic, puerile, braindead, anti-thoughtful shite shat into publication (qf Scott Keith and Chris Hyatte). He just has a knack of understatement, and speaking like a fan.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

stop... memories of ECW.... must &em; turn away &em;

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

oh man i was about to applaud because no one had mentioned mitch albom but then andy did, ack! rick reilly is the best.

keith, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Lupica's grown on me. Definitely an acquired taste.

Two other great ones (though more regional) -- Jerry Izenberg (Newark Star Ledger) and Bill Conlin (Philadelphia Daily News).

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Best soccer writers in the US: Grant Wahl (SI), Jeff Bradley (ex Daily News, now ESPN magazine), Michael Lewis (Daily News), Filip Bondy (Daily News), George Vecsey (NY Times, but loses points for being a snob for only doing international soccer), Steven Goff (Washington Post).

Runners-up: Graeme Jones (LA Times), Paul Gardener (Soccer America), Frank della Apa (Boston Globe).

Total drips: the two smug morons at Salon, Kaufman and Barra, and the revered idiot Deford, whose daily paper went belly-up when he refused to cover anything but baseball. All three are of the "we don't understand it, therefore it sucks" school of soccer-bashing, and all three are "general" sports columnists, a job title given only to the biggest assholes around.

Does Jim Rome deserve a thread?

Benjamin, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the sports guy on espn. funny as hell.

Chris, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My favourite bit of sportswriting ever = Donna Tartt on cheerleading.

Richard Jones, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

People write about wrestling? Would this be the college Greco-Roman variety? I cannot believe serious reporters bother with the lycra and hair fest of the other type of wrestling.

Nathan Barley, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

People write about films which aren't as deftly plotted...

Pete, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

People write about wrestling because there's tons to write about. Titles change hands once a week at least!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It really is a male soap opera. I know people who hit the rumors sites at least once a day.... (sites that are putting 'columnists' like The Slammer out of business)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But how can they be surprised? The story would surely be:

In a dramatic twist of fate, The Pulveriser took the World Ludicrous Weight Title off Kurt 'You're gonna hurt' Schlesnickerz.

Federation owner Charles Schmarmy said 'Focus group feedback said the Pulveriser is our biggest brand, and we need to up his on-screen time. We've also got a great feud lined up with the Destructo Brothers next month on PPV.'

The bout - screened next week - will most likely see the Pulveriser out for the count, but the win will be failed to be registered as the referee will be knocked out in a collision with the Pulveriser. However, he will take all the power from the little Pulverisors in the crowd and use a not very well hidden chair to knock out Schlesnickerz with a cheap chot from behind. A writers conference will finalise the details next Monday.

Nathan Barley, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Vecsey's the only passable one at the Times. I would say the New York Times on the whole has probably the worst sports section out of any major paper ('Ho ho! Those crazy "basketball" players were at each others' throats again! Silly Nets, did they really think they had a chance? Here's another lame article about tennis that should probably be in the 'Styles Section'! Pass the tea, Muffy!' etc.)

geeta, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Norman Mailer. Brian Glanville. Graham Speirs.

Ally C, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nathan the thrill of "pro" wrestling for the hard-core fan lives in the overlap between the real physicality in the ring and the scripted events and behind-the-scenes power plays that surround it. What gets written about are often the latter machinations, some of which are "real" and some of which is put out purposely by the promoters to confuse people or provoke interest in a certain event. So when you read something about someone buying out the league, an injury, or a skirmish over television rights, it's often been scripted for maximum appeal to the hard-core fan. It turns ALL journalism about it into simply another piece of its marketing strategy, which is a level of honesty other sportswriting doesn't dare to touch.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Reading the NYTimes for sports is like reading FHM for gardening tips. I almost feel for them, those sports guys at the Times. The people who do Jock Beat for the Voice must feel a little lonely too. "Uni Watch" at the Voice, where they trash and laud the finer points of uniform design, might be my favorite sports column ever though.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tracer - have to disagree. I won't get into the 'why wrestling is shit' aspect now.

I think that the overlap between PR and reporting in sports writing is not a more honest version of what others do, but a venal stitch-up by people who are a disgrace to their profession. The cosy relationship between most UK Football writers and the clubs, managers and agents prevents any serious analysis by all but the few. The clubs ban reporters who they dislike, so the pressure is on the reporter to stay on the right side of the club, which is a recipe for bad reporting.

David Conn in The Independent is a credit to the job - he is a genuine investigative reporter who doesn't cover the sound and fury of the on-the-pitch events, but the backroom stuff, about power in sport and sports politics. He covers stories no-one else is bothered with, apart from the supporters who care about the issues.

David Lacey's heart is in the right place, and Richard Williams does OK for a guy with a background in Formula One, possibly the pointless exercise known to man. As for match reports and the like, Daniel Taylor writes some great stuff, IMO.

Hugh McIlveney likes his booze (he nicked a bottle of wine of me once, the git) and Brian Glanville looks like a tramp and needs to shave more. Though he is right about getting rid of continental based qualification for the World Cup.

Nathan Barley, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Speculation over who gets ambushed with a folding chair next week IS the serious analysis in wrestling. Along with who's a bigger crybaby and things like that (as well as critiques of athleticism, style, etc). Much of this stuff is fed to the wrestling "reporters" by the promoters and owners of the league; some of it is sui generis; some of it is actually investigated. It's impossible to tell the difference amd it's precisely this overlap between PR and journalism, between the fact of the physicality inside the ring and the fictions that gets spun around it, that wrestling fans are after. That the league invests so much in creating its own marketing myth proves to the fan that the league is vital and evolving. I mean, a wrestling match without hype is a bunch of thugs in a barn. (one reason why "indie wrestling" is usually so sad.

I'm saying that most sports are like this but that wrestling is the only one to exploit its own documentation with such candor. I'm hearing you say that sport is getting ruined by coddled insiders who ought to be objective about their beat. I say: FOOTIE GUILT!! What can the word "objective" possible mean in this arena? On some level you have to buy into something, into the PR around it, without which it would be intolerable or just boring. If you don't believe me I'll have you round to watch a baseball game or two... :)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I mean, this is why I love Mike Lupica. Whatever he covers—golf, basketball, baseball—he makes these children's games played by men seem like the discovery on life on Mars or something

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Michael Jones, duh.

The Ghastly Fop, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bill Plaschke covers some interesting topics.

Rob Neyer is awesome.

George Vescey gets my respect for picking the Diamondbacks in 7.

As far as books go, Roger Kahn's The Head Game is excellent if you like pitching. Bill James has the best research but his writing can get tiresome at times. The funniest writing about baseball is in the Baseball Prospectus.

Does Jim Rome actually read and write?

felicity, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Kevin Mitchell in the Observer is good

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
Revive this thread. Anyone you read regularly?

There was a nice piece in Slate regarding the thinning of talent due to ESPN corralling sportswriters into radio and TV gigs. ihttp://slate.com/id/2112657/

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

twelve years pass...

p terrific profile of Dick Schaap, whose writing and TV work i was a fan of from the '70s til his death in 2001. I saw him at a production of Hamlet at the Public Theatre in the '80s -- he was also a drama critic.

At the Herald-Tribune, Schaap was a city editor and later a columnist. During his time as editor, young writers Tom Wolfe and Terry Smith, son of legendary sportswriter Red Smith, were on his staff. Schaap oversaw a series entitled City in Crisis. As detailed in The Paper, Richard Kluger’s massive history on the rise and fall of the Herald-Tribune, Schaap wrote the first sentence in the feature: “New York is the greatest city in the world—and everything is wrong with it.”

At the paper, Schaap was at the forefront of civil rights coverage. In the summer of 1964, he traveled to Philadelphia, Mississippi to report on two law enforcement officers, Sheriff Lawrence Rainey and Deputy Cecil Price, who were suspected of murdering civil rights workers Michael Schwerner, James Chaney, and Andrew Goodman. Schaap went to the only restaurant in town, saw the officers dining, joined their table, and watched a “stream of good ol’ boys” approach them with jokes about the deaths. “In Mississippi,” Schaap wrote in his piece. “Murder is a laughing matter.”

The next year, Schaap was out in Los Angeles following the Mets on a road trip, “for a change of pace and a few laughs.” He would not accompany the team to their next stop in Houston, because while he was in LA the Watts Riots erupted. He stayed there and covered them for a week. “It did not strike me as at all strange that one day I was asking people about fastballs and curves and the next about looting and shooting,” he wrote in his autobiography.

http://thebiglead.com/2017/05/03/dick-schaap-did-so-much-work/

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 June 2017 20:50 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.