I'd love to know from a business side what the relationship is between issues and graphic novels. Very very few graphic novels are published first in that format without being published as issues first, yet I'd say graphic novels shift far more units. But is it high sales of issues which lead to a comic then being published in graphic novel form?
thus are the rockist buyers of graphic novels parasites preying on those of us who buy issues?
― DV, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Now if graphic novels came out with the few good issues and a pile of filler at the same time and cost 5 times as much would there be any market....
― Winkelmann, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― angela, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
(The longer answer is that TPB collection does seem to depend on the original issues selling well, but this is because of publisher stupidity. TPBs seem to sell to older readers, and have a large bookshop audience, while single issues are only sold in comics shops. There are plenty of comics which would probably appeal more to the TPB crowd than they do to the single issue crowd, and that's what the decision to collect should be based on.)
― Ray, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I was an issues man through and through.
― Tom, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Ian - Aren't you due to talk a lot of shite about how comics are an inherently trashy medium about now?
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I also think that because GNs tend not to be 'collector's item' ppl feel less inclined to treat them like fanboy fetish objects - mylar bagging yr GNs wld be so silly...
And I really really like those 'Essential Marvel' GNs - a big black and white wodge of classic comic bks at a cheapish price - just like the 'glory days' of British Marvel!
― Andrew L, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
A dancing girl, an ostrich, a drunk mystic and world threatening spatial time distortion - what’s not to like.
This failure alone is enough to convince me that solely relying on TPBs is not the path of righteousness. A mixed portfolio - always the answer.
― Alan T, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― the pinefox, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
It was an issue of Eightball. Actually, like many issues of Eightball it flies the flag for issues rather than graphic novels, because it is a completely self contained story. And yes, it is brilliant (it's the one about the town where some kid disappears and it follows a load of people in the town over a week or so). My favourite bit is when Blue Bunny (a blue anthropomorphic rabbit just out of jail) says to some woman "Hey you, any chance of a suck job? I've been living on state pussy for the last two years". This has become my chat up line of choice.
Andrew F: watch it.
― Ess Kay, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But nothing beats the smell of newsprint... mmmmmmmmm luhvvvvvvvleeee.
― misterjones, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
destroy also: anti-drug ads, collectible figurine/tie-in tat ads, ads for loser sports-metal bands you've never heard of
search: army recruitment ads (if only for stunning misjudgment of their target audience, heh heh heh)
― rener, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
dude.
I have some collections and others (cf. Peter Bagge's Hate) in individual issues. It all depends...
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
term "graphic novels" = rockism
― mark s, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― brg30, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Ye-e-e-es (copyright J. Paxman). Is it not more the case that publishers and the unthinking refer to any compilation of several comics stories with a square spine as a 'graphic novel' irrespective of its actual cohesiveness as a 'novel' or not? Cf. the Ligglefield referring to the Marvel Essentials volumes as GNs supra.
But, yes, anyone who uses the term is v. v. suspect.
― Tim Bateman, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Thank you Ned - that's my first! I thought it would come on an ILM thread where someone wants lots of songs about fire or something. I feel as if I belong here now...
Tom is OTM, and I'm with Andrew all the way on Marvel's Essentials, but I think DV is mostly wrong in his guess that GNs/TPBs sell better. I don't think collections of the X-Men come near the regular issues, though I bet the Ghost World book outsold the Eightball comics.
Anyway, I think there are comics that work well as collections and ones that don't. Watchmen is entirely coherent and self-contained and was conceived as a whole in 12 episodes (there are all sorts of little structural devices that only work when it's collected), while Grant Morrison's current X-Mens are created as individual comics, and one of the best things about them is Grant's way with great endings, cliffhangers making you wonder what happens next, and really want to read the next issue, that don't have anything like the impact if instead you just continue to the next page.
And that's all TPB collections anyway - as Tim points out, the horrid GN word is misused, not just technically for any squarebound comics, but as some sort of (indeed rockist) claim to respectability - "I don't read comics, I read Graphic Novels", which is meant to mean I am grown up and intelligent, but actually = I am a twunt.
Of course there are graphic novels which are created as a single whole, and any earlier episodic publication is merely economics - a lot of Europe works this way, though it has its effects, in that the creators almost always work to the smaller units to some degree. But I have never understood what distinguishes a GN from a comic, really. If it is more pages we are all idiots. (Someone raved at Cocteau about Cinemascope, long ago - he said "Ah yes - I must get a bigger piece of paper for my next poem".) Some comics are good and some are rub and some are big and some small and some are for kids and some for adults, and these are orthogonal concepts. Carl Barks' short Scrooge stories, entirely produced for kids to read in cheaply printed comics, have more artistic worth than (ball park guess) over 99% of GNs/TPBs.
― Martin Skidmore, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Chief White Lotus, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
From a consumer standpoint, it's cheaper to buy a single TPB than all the issues, unless, in the event that one buys ishes, you take the rest of what you will pay for the remainder of the given story arc and invest it in, say, a money fund.
― Leee, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Back in the day, novels by authors such as Dickens and Twain would be serialized in periodicals before publication. Would a real snob have read "Great Expectations" in installments, and then disdained the hardcover?
Me, I'm just hanging on 'til the next Eightball. Has there been a Clowes thread hereabouts?
― briania, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
buying issues instead of TPBs = also false economy, as you file them away and never re-read them.
calling TPBs Graphic Novels = mark of the cockfarmer. I only did it in initial question because I'm an issue man.
continental european comics = all shite. They're too short, not having enough time to develop a proper story.
But everywhere has its own standard formats: Lone Wolf & Cub is one of my all-time favourite comics. It originally appeared in episodes of 60-odd pages, mostly fairly self-contained, at fortnightly intervals in an anthology, and then was collected in 300-page volumes, the format closely mimicked by the current American editions. Given the relative narrative paces, that is quite like US comic publication followed by TPB collections, but it is an overall complete story in about 8,500 pages, and that's not been done in American comics (though we could sort of argue for Dave Sim's Cerebus, maybe), though it's not unusual in Japan.
― Martin Skidmore, Saturday, 27 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Besides, the pics are usually v. pretty.
― Andrew L, Sunday, 28 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)