defend the indefensible: glenn fucking greenwald

Again, he needs to be torn apart by his damp jungle dogs.

i still find glenn's perspective useful

Could you summarize that "perspective" and explain how you find it "useful"? Useful for what?

usually when there's a GG flame-up the fun bit is seeing which of the shitposting lefties and amused libs i follow dunks on him (or responds substantively) and who is sitting out this round: most times most ppl sit it out, but it's always a different selection that lights into him, and it's fun to check that cycle, like they have a roster they work out in the DMs

well today literally *everyone* is pitching in, from joshtpm to the garbage ape

Probably because everyone has finally had enough of his bullshit

seems more gleeful than fed up tbh

everyone loves a crying bully

Glem is not some hapless guy he is an idiot with millions of followers and a huge platform on us media.

An idiot and actively bigoted against women, trans, non-whites who holds himself out as a leftist for a right wing audience.

not sure who yr lecturing abt this on this thread, morbs was the last person to defend him with any vigour and then largely to wind up fred b

He’s anti system without any moral core. One minute he’s Bernie, then he’s all about Trump and advocating a red-brown alliance.

Ok you seemed to be wondering why everyone picks on him.

nope i think it's unsurprising and entirely justified, he shd cry more

i actually do think he's a bit hapless

i once saw a tweet that put a picture of him next to a dog that got stung by a bee because they had the same face and i think about that tweet every day

And he owns 245 dogs

Lots of people have been asking how they can support me. I started a substack & will be posting some exclusive content for subscribers there. It’s the best way to lend support and stay connected if I get banned from social media. I will never be silenced! https://t.co/WLwnY4m2bH

— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) April 19, 2022

There we go

Pigs of Sub Stak

Could you summarize that "perspective" and explain how you find it "useful"? Useful for what?

― but also fuck you (unperson), Tuesday, April 19, 2022 5:00 PM (three hours ago)

well, i still think he has a lot of good stuff to say about the US govt, the national security state, foreign policy, war, the military industrial complex, how the defense industry at large disseminates its POVs thru the media, legal matters etc. i think his perspective on the war between ukraine and russia has been a useful counter narrative to much of what you otherwise will find in the media, same for russian interference in the election, tho he can overly focus on that to the point of boredom (for me) (i don't care about hunter biden's laptop) (i also think much of the russia based hysterics have been proven to look foolish by now). his opinions on liberal/republican culture war stuff i don't really care for or about, but i just scroll past that stuff. he cares way too much about fox news vs msnbc, taylor lorenz, the new york times etc. but again, i just scroll or click away. i think he's stayed pretty ideologically consistent over the years on stuff like privacy, censorship, speech, war etc. i disagree w/ him even on those things but the ideological basis for his arguments is pretty much always clear to me. i find his writing really tedious nowadays btw i never read his articles i'm just talking about his twitter punditry

"i find his writing really tedious nowadays

i'm just talking about his twitter punditry"

i you what why not just stop

for the record (and to ensure we all think abt it every day):

https://t.co/2DOky89U0W pic.twitter.com/7UVXEEXP1D

— in the pocket of Big Tenant (@AllezLesBoulez) April 20, 2022

btw the real shit thing about this is the LibsOfTikTok lady is probably gonna be set for life after this, nothing the right wing loves more than a martyr

I notice how almost none of the LOTT defenders, including Greenwald, actually engage with the utter dreck and hate that account traffics in. They act like it's just "making fun of liberals," but its real focus is aggressive anti-gay anti-trans hate.

Guy on Facebook yesterday was going off at me about witches in Kentucky teaching toddlers to masturbate, which he got off LOTT. Which actually turned out to be a community sex education nonprofit trying to provide decent health information and contraception access to Appalachian teenagers — who have very high teen pregnancy rates. This is what that site does, it makes people online hate things like Appalachian contraception access. It's vile.

also worth mentioning that LOTT bought in wholesale to that "litter boxes in schools" story

"News and videos you won't see anywhere else."

the fact that LOTT is sharing info with the DeSantis admin to be used in attacks on FL teachers kind of takes her out of the realm of anonymous internet posters

i watched the video in that tweet and came away with the undeniable conclusion that glenn greenwald is a huge clown with no integrity

The same folks happy that LOTT is getting teachers fired and or harassed were going crazy cuz the W. Post article originally had a link to LOTT lady's Brooklyn real estate office (and cuz the W Post writer showed up at door of her Brooklyn relatives and knocked on the door). Funny that GG ended up being cited as a source in the article confirming LOTT locations

thank you mark s!

He looks so overjoyed to be receiving the attention of Tucker, a fascist who would gladly push Glem into a gas oven at the earliest opportunity, as soon as he ceased being a useful tool.

so fucking infuriating that the LOTT lady is acting like she has to be moved to a "secure location" because one reporter knocked on her door while she has singlehandedly inspired hundreds of death threats against people just because they're queer

Since this is where we're talking LOTT, I'll add this Pareene link, which seems otm: https://theap.substack.com/p/they-know-how-journalism-works-theyre?s=r

1. In a lengthy defense of @TuckerCarlson, @ggreenwald says "there is no racial hierarchy in Carlson's view of American citizenship and to claim that there is is nothing short of a defamatory lie."

Here is exactly why this is wrong.

🧵

— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) May 15, 2022

I can't.

Can we just leave this thread alone until GG dies

Seconding

Stop censoring us

lol

Sorry, can't stop myself.

Current state of Greenwald is he's doing puff piece media for Alex Jones https://t.co/nX2Gw1BzsM

— Wild Geerters (@steinkobbe) July 18, 2022

AJ looks like shit

Xpost Yeah without question he’d vote for Rand over Bernie Sanders

― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Tuesday, April 24, 2018 1:15 PM (three hours ago)

I always wonder when people say things like this whether they're dumb or just uninformed

― k3vin k., Tuesday, 24 April 2018 21:04 (four years ago)

my man is simply the greatest to ever do it pic.twitter.com/lqTCepCaEw

— mark (@kept_simple) July 20, 2022

remember that old joke about how liberals would forgive their muggers mid-mugging?

Gaetz is holding out for a bill that lowers the marriage age to 14 nationwide.

Libertarians going full fash has ruined the market for "actually, it's ephebophilia" jokes.

JFC. The whole point of constitutionally protected rights is that the states cannot infringe on them. Saying "it should be left to the states" is an admission that (1) constitutional protections do not exist and (2) you are OK with individual states outlawing the activity in question altogether. We shouldn't concede either point.

Someone get me when Greenwald is launched into the sun

Seems like GG has found a really cool new audience.

Probably because Soros acts more like a stereotype. It's like he read antisemitic literature and was like "I could actually do that and when someone points it out I can cry 'antisemitism!'". People who actually know what soros gets up to know the complaints are legit.

— Jonathan Kadmon (@JonathanKadmon) July 25, 2022

Imagine the worst possible conversation between Greenwald and Alex Jones, then stand back in awe as it goes so much worse than that.

In case you were wondering if Glenn Greenwald was going to ask Alex Jones tough questions about Sandy Hook in their recent chat, well, here's the gist of what they said to each other about Jones' shtick (eg the massacre was a hoax, etc): pic.twitter.com/nkqD8qjYhb

— Bill Grueskin (@BGrueskin) July 26, 2022

I have to echo DJP and requesting that this thread should be bumped only when this guy is assasinated, which he does not support, by Bolsanaro, who he does not support.

Guys you don’t have to open the thread