nina gordon - "straight outta compton"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (337 of them)
Also, some of my favorite bands are guilty of this appalling practice.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I think THIS RIGHT HERE is proof that she should have done what she did. And let's not anyone here pretend to be more gangsta than Nina Gordon, because you're NOT.

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

...and come to think of it, now that he's a rich rapper and making multimillion dollar movies, Ice Cube himself is not even entitled to do that song anymore, as it no longer represents his situation. How does that sound?

King Kobra (King Kobra), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Now, if he covered "Seether"...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Mash-up artists should, by logic of the outrage of this cover, be completely railed as offensive then, because they often misappropriate gangsta culture by ripping the lyrics from their intended musical content and put them over non-gangsta contexts. Fuckers.

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Eff The Ofay Album.

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost: sm+jicks covered 50 Cent's In Da Club opening for Radiohead, well, at least part of it. didn't that make it to fluxblog or something? it's probably archived on Acid Casualties dot com.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Hang on, Hip Hop artists are hypocritical bastards who often steal the musical bread from poor black funk and jazz musicians.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:21 (nineteen years ago) link

dc i'm not sure if you're just playfully muckraking here or what, but in the event that you're more than half-serious, surely you can see the difference between mixing an original version of one thing with an original version of something else and remapping the properties of something politically, racially and sociologically charged onto something else entirely?

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:23 (nineteen years ago) link

donut, I'm not talking about mash-ups. I'm talking about acoustic covers of electronic and rap tracks which are just the most cloying thing known to man. They're supposedly "clever" and "reveal" the hidden qualities of the "real" song blah blah vomit.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

But half the arguments on this thread are that the cover betrays the "real" song. Also, at no point does "Nina Gordon" go "I am so cleeeeeeever", so where does this idea come from?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

What if she just likes the song and this is how she wanted to cover it? That's very very wrong, right? How should Nina Gordon have sung this song? What was the appropriate thing for her to have done?

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

dc i'm not sure if you're just playfully muckraking here or what, but in the event that you're more than half-serious, surely you can see the difference between mixing an original version of one thing with an original version of something else and remapping the properties of something politically, racially and sociologically charged onto something else entirely?
-- mark p (mark.p****...), January 20th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

donut, I'm not talking about mash-ups. I'm talking about acoustic covers of electronic and rap tracks which are just the most cloying thing known to man. They're supposedly "clever" and "reveal" the hidden qualities of the "real" song blah blah vomit.
-- Spencer Chow (spencercho...), January 20th, 2005.

mark, I am totally playfully muckraking here. Obviously, a lot of people don't like the cover of the song in question. Fine. I'm just amused by all the quasi-political baggage that everyone is emptying onto the whole issue, when other artists whose covers of same song we respect are on the same level, culturally/class speaking, as nina gordon.

Spencer, why are acoustic covers of hip hop/electronic songs automatically "clever" or "oooh, revealing"? Maybe someone just likes the song, and covers it, you know?

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

It's case by case obviously, but there have been so many of these types of covers that always come across wrong. Remember that "Bizarre Love Triangle" cover?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:30 (nineteen years ago) link

the one that was a huge hit in the U.S.?

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:31 (nineteen years ago) link

What if Nina Gordon was doing an elektroklash cover of "Straight Outta Compton"? I highly doubt the outrage would exist. I think she's just doing it in a style that many people aesthetically find disgusting but then unfairly projecting political issues on top of it, or making assumptions about her reasons for doing it that are unfounded.. that's my point.

I could care less for the "Bizarre Love Traingle" cover. But I never once though "Oh, they're just trying to cover it in a different style to stand out or something". How come nobody was equally outraged on a college radio level when Poi Dog Pondering did the same thing with NO's "Love Vigilantes"?

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:32 (nineteen years ago) link

I was!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

So, is it just acoustic covers of electronic songs that get to you, Spencer? What about electronic covers of acoustic songs? What's the difference?

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

dc, with respect, i don't know how many more ways i can say this: my issues with the song stem from the language. nina gordon could recruit walter ostanek and mr. ed to help her with an experimental horse remix of "straight outta compton", and if it contained her singing these lyrics, specifically the n-word, it'd probably still rub me the wrong way*. the fact that she chose to lean on something as unedifying as the one-woman/one acoustic guitar tradition is nothing but an unfortunate bonus.

* which, for the record, is hardly 'outrage'.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't know how many more ways i can say this: my issues with the song stem from the language.

why can't a straight reading of poetry include the original words?

King Kobra (King Kobra), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Really, this all boils down to "should white people be able to say 'nigger'"

polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

see: every 500+ post ilm thread ever

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

mark, when you're rapping along to something at home, do you sound a bleep or substitute an inoffensive word such as "knitter"?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm with Spencer - all politics aside, based purely on aesthetic/musical qualities, this song is vapid and pointless and uninteresting to listen to. Ergo, it is a crappy cover. I couldn't care less about the language/cultural baggage issues people are harping on.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

hm, probably not. but to be fair, it never occurs to me to record myself and make it available for download on a website either. and trust me, each and every one of you are thankful for that.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

donut, I've explained already that it's case by case, but that this track is in the tradition of similarly stupid covers. Obviously I don't hate all covers or the potential goodness of an acoustic cover of an electronic track - but I was also sickened by the acoustic take of "Blue Monday" during 24 Hour Party People - these covers are just always so 'serious' and pregnant with meaning. Maybe that's what I hate. The over-obvious serious delivery. Now, will you give me a break, thanks.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

dc, with respect, i don't know how many more ways i can say this: my issues with the song stem from the language. nina gordon could recruit walter ostanek and mr. ed to help her with an experimental horse remix of "straight outta compton", and if it contained her singing these lyrics, specifically the n-word, it'd probably still rub me the wrong way*. the fact that she chose to lean on something as unedifying as the one-woman/one acoustic guitar tradition is nothing but an unfortunate bonus.
* which, for the record, is hardly 'outrage'.

well, context is key here, and the lines between the contexts are very blurry and up for vastly different interpretations for each, I'll agree. Had this been an original song where she used the n-word, I would be far more suspicious and likely offended, I admit. but since we all know she is covering a song, she's using the n-word because the original song used it. if she changed the n-words, I would personally be more offended, because then she would be projecting her personal politics into the cover, whether PC or not. And surely, that would have caused FAR more outrage in this thread if she had done that than leaving the n-words in there.

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Kid 606 only did the first verse too!

What are the Stephen Malkmus or Stephin Merritt rap covers?

Malkmus doesn't need covers, he's got ironic rap originals under his belt (At Home With The Groovebox to thread)

kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

"Your obvious disdain for the artist stops you listening beyond the words."

~ Horseshit. I like and own albums by both NWA and Veruca Salt.

"mark, when you're rapping along to something at home, do you sound a bleep or substitute an inoffensive word such as "knitter"?
-- noodle vague (noodle_vagu...), January 20th, 2005 1:43 PM."

~ No, but then again, I don't post MP3s of myself using potentially touchy language on websites with no explanation.

"and come to think of it, now that he's a rich rapper and making multimillion dollar movies, Ice Cube himself is not even entitled to do that song anymore, as it no longer represents his situation. How does that sound?
-- King Kobra (doctorduc...), January 20th, 2005 1:16 PM."

~ Like the makings of an irrelevant and ridiculous straw man.

"NWA are political in a sense so loose that it's virtually meaningless."

~ Maybe you weren't around when "Fuck the Police" was being editorialized on throughout the media?

Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I think I would like it better if it was performed in a heavy rock style instead of a folk acoustic style, it's true. folk-acoustic rap irony is so overdone that it's hard to look past new examples, ironic or otherwise.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

donut, I've explained already that it's case by case, but that this track is in the tradition of similarly stupid covers. Obviously I don't hate all covers or the potential goodness of an acoustic cover of an electronic track - but I was also sickened by the acoustic take of "Blue Monday" during 24 Hour Party People - these covers are just always so 'serious' and pregnant with meaning. Maybe that's what I hate. The over-obvious serious delivery. Now, will you give me a break, thanks.

No problem. I'm just a little mystified (in general with listeners, not just you, Spencer) when projections are placed upon the motives of the artist for covering a song in a style that happens to be in a completely different genre, when the listeners don't really know what the motives for covering the song were/are. That issue just never phased me and still never phases me. If i like the cover, i like it. If I don't, I don't. And that's where I leave it.

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Then again, this has nothing on the ska cover of "Strange Fruit" by Eve's Plum.

Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

And just to throw more fuel here..

What about Pavement's cover of The Fall's "The Classical" and the elimination of said n-word in the cover? Was that a travesty? Or a smart move?

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:55 (nineteen years ago) link

fair points, dc, except i feel like you're absolving her of the fact that she clearly chose to cover this song. if you'd be offended by her use of the n-word in an original piece of music, why not here?

[xposts galore]

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link

The Kids Of Widney High did a cover of "Straight Outta Compton"?

dc... At some point in the near future you should bring your best Kid of Widney High impersonation to my studio, and we will record this. The b-side will be our Faux Kids of Widney High cover of the Chili Peppers' "Suck My Kiss."

We will make a mint selling these as downloadable tracks online!

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link

haha and here i was trying so hard not to bring up "strange fruit"

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I have absolutely no concern about what her intentions were to cover the song. The end result is the problem and I've explained why enough I think.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I have finally heard this and kind of like it. It's pretty!

.ada.m. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

these are all good points though

.ada.m. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Or the swing version of "Let My People Go" by K's Choice

Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Has it occurred that maybe Gordon only does Cube's verse because she didn't want to switch through multiple character voices? It's not much of a reason, but I can understand why she might want to sing as Ice Cube but not as, say, Easy.

Maybe she only did the first verse cuz it's the most 'powerful' (ie, memorable) one? I mean, the Kid 606 remix is also only the Ice Cube verse, nobody complained aboot that (I actually preferred it that way, cuz I didn't hafta hear him ruin the whole song). (xpost)

Vic Funk, Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Or Bif Naked's blistering zydeco take on Public Enemy's "Anti-Nigger Machine" (What!? That's the title?! Is she supposed to change the title?!)

Chuckling at the Tomkat's Marquee (Ben Boyer), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:04 (nineteen years ago) link

>x-post. She says "niggers" because those are the lyrics.

No. It's a slightly different word, spelled and pronounced differently.

THE PROBLEM is that she is pronouncing the word as 'Niggers'. Which is something that no one does without getting looked at funny, regardless of whichever race you happen to be. The fact that she's white and saying this makes me flinch.

(Jon L), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I get the feeling that "Fuck the Police" was problematic more because of its core audience than because of the attitudes it expressed. After all, hadn't dozens of hardcore bands and others made similar pronouncements without making national news? I didn't say that NWA didn't make political statements, but really, the subsequent history of Gangsta rap kind of shows how cheap and easy those sentiments were to express and subsequently market. All I was trying to say was that it's ludicrous to take NWA's lyrics as unironic or authentic, or to take them at face value at all.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I am reminded of the Blueshammer scene from the Ghost World film.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:06 (nineteen years ago) link

All I was trying to say was that it's ludicrous to take NWA's lyrics as unironic or authentic, or to take them at face value at all.

But you do realize that Dre was strapped with gats when you were cuddlin' a Cabbage Patch, right?

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:07 (nineteen years ago) link

He was some kind of disco person.

.ada.m. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

"But you do realize that Dre was strapped with gats..."

I think you mean "wearing eyeliner"

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

If by "wearing eyeliner" you mean "strapped with gats," then yes.

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

fair points, dc, except i feel like you're absolving her of the fact that she clearly chose to cover this song. if you'd be offended by her use of the n-word in an original piece of music, why not here?

Context, once again. Look at those list of songs.. they all seem to be songs that were big in the year 1988, 89, or 1990 or so... Skid Row? Cinderella? NWA? All huge in a very small time period. To me, I think she just chose songs she remembered from a certain time in her life... I don't know how old she is, but it must have been "a time" for her, or something. So, her choosing to cover NWA seems to (and I stress "seems to") stem from that moreso than "I'm going to be controversial, fuck yeah, niggaz!". Then again, I don't know. You don't know. She may have had the worst motives for covering the song. The point is..: we.. don't... know. So, some of us will assume the worst, some of us will be suspicious, and some of us will not be so suspicious. I'm in the latter category. I guess you're in the middle category.

I have absolutely no concern about what her intentions were to cover the song. The end result is the problem and I've explained why enough I think.

Of course you don't have any concerns about it, because you don't know her intentions (unless you personally know her, which I'm guessing you don't :) ). But I'm just musing on how listeners in general (and I used to be guilty of this, too) listen to the "end results" -- a listener's first listen of a cover -- and then often automatically make assumptions about the motives for covering the song that go beyond "well, we, uh, like the song." Not singling you out, Spencer.. a lot of people do that, but I don't. Maybe I'm just the anomaly here.

donut christ (donut), Thursday, 20 January 2005 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.