The Liars - Drum's Not Dead (2006)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (267 of them)
First impression is that this is an amazing album.

The DVD with it, which I initially assumed to contain videos for three different songs, actually contains three different videos for the entire album!

Is Dadaismus here? I really think he'd love this!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 22:26 (eighteen years ago) link

wtf does that mean?

team jaxon (jaxon), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 22:44 (eighteen years ago) link

your calendar is out of date, homes.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 22:46 (eighteen years ago) link

did this come out today in the US?

Christopher Costello (CGC), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 23:13 (eighteen years ago) link

I put this on today in HMV, got complaints from two customers by the time it got to the second track (the usual, "this isn't music, it sounds like a factory") before the manager came down and turned it off. I'll try again tomorrow.

dmun drive-in (dmun), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 23:28 (eighteen years ago) link

on reflection, after four listens, i can confidently say that this album (which i think might come out next monday: apologies) is absolutely fucking mindblowing and i refer you all to what i said about mrs fiendish's hat on the M83 thread last year.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:28 (eighteen years ago) link

stylus gave it a 5 out of 5

Christopher Costello (CGC), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 04:19 (eighteen years ago) link

i mean tinymixtapes.com gave it a 5 out of 5

Christopher Costello (CGC), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 04:23 (eighteen years ago) link

This is not of the good.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 04:51 (eighteen years ago) link

I like this record, but not as much as Drowned .... maybe it's just the repetition of the titles but I feel like it's three or four good songs done three or four times each, instead of twelve songs. If that makes any sense. There's nothing as crazy out-there as "Broken Witch" or "Room on the Broom" ....

I do kinda appreciate that they made room for prettiness on this one. The last track is real sweet.

Renard (Renard), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:02 (eighteen years ago) link

I think my favorite track is "Drum and the Uncomfortable Can." All that buzzing and humming and reverberating coils.

Haven't watched the movies yet.

Renard (Renard), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Cutty, I needed the same clarification, btw.

regular roundups (Dave M), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:31 (eighteen years ago) link

This is really horrible.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:42 (eighteen years ago) link

wtf does that mean?

team jaxon (jaxon), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:44 (eighteen years ago) link

haha, it's not horrible! but it's not terribly interesting (I think I agree w/the notion of "three or four good songs done three or four times each")

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Which good songs?

Turangalila (Salvador), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

for all the animal collective comparisons there's at least one pretty solid example: liars' "drum gets a glimpse" vs. ac's "the softest voice"

-- inert false cat (enemy.airshi...), February 16th, 2006 12:20 AM.

yes

Eggzakly Huhh? (zachary v.), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

There's just like this guy droning on about stuff, and some scary echoey noises, and some really repetitive drumming. This is horrible! Maybe they even worship Satan!

My Inner Melissa (mike h.), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link

thas rock n roll, ladies n germs

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm totally a musical prude. Um, oh wait, no.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm an asshole.

My Inner My Inner Melissa, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, because Melissa certainly doesn't like weird shit.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:23 (eighteen years ago) link

does the dvd have a region code on it?
if it doesn't i might import it.

Christopher Costello (CGC), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:21 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/l/liars/drums-not-dead.shtml

rizzx (Rizz), Thursday, 23 February 2006 14:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Three songs in: pretty kickass.

gbx (skowly), Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

lia's rubies!

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:18 (eighteen years ago) link

dru's not dead!

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Melissa, I wasn't really mocking your interest in music, but I'd really like to hear why you don't like this album. Mostly since I do like it for many of the reasons already mentioned.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:56 (eighteen years ago) link

First of all, it's disingenuous to claim you weren't mocking me when you posted as 'My Inner Melissa'. Seriously, I don't care that much, but own what you say.

Second of all, if I had posted as Mark W, I highly doubt you would have chosen to frame that mocking as some kind of girly musical/cultural squeamishness based on ignorance and fear of the strange.

With both of those things said, I dislike the album because I think it's boring and unadventurous. It sounds joyless and monotonous and uninspired, as if they bored even themselves to death while making it. The drumming and beats aren't actually all that unusual or interesting, the songs themselves lack dynamics of any kind, continuing in the same groove like a dull saw hacking at my brain. The vocals are lethargic and entirely grating, as are the harmonics and melodies. I'm just not sure what, if anything, I'm supposed to be taking away from this album. It's like a frictionless surface. I can't hold on to anything about it when it's done, nor do I particularly want to. It's all, "Yay! Drums and feedback and chanting exist!" Oh yeah? Then do something with them. Like yeah, all of that can make for a fantastic album, but only if you're really willing to really take those things to interesting places and not play it safe like kindergarteners with safety scissors.

But hey, I'll just be sitting over here with my copy of Tago Mago instead, fearing the strange like the little girl that I am.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:04 (eighteen years ago) link

http://images.art.com/images/-/You-Got-Served-double-sided--C10117859.jpeg

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:11 (eighteen years ago) link

ha

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago) link

i really like this album, but melissa's last post ruled.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I think it works well as a monotonous record, but I don't see at all how it sounds uninspired. That is the only part of your critique that doesn't add up to me.. hmm... The rest of it is probably true, but when you add inspiration to the mix music can be both grating and engaging; or a 'frictionless surface' can be pretty entertaining to slide across... None of their albums before this were about giving you something to hold onto, and I loved the second one to pieces for just that. Yes, this album makes the statement "Yay! drums and feedback exist" and that is a big part of its appeal. I think they switch it up a little.. they play on the notion of "inspiration" (in fact, that's what the whole album's about if you listen!) and kind of twist it around into an ambivalent mess, but it's such a thoughtful mess that it seems more like a conversation. You know I'm rambling. I like the album very much. it inspires me. xpost

snnhy, Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Thanks Melissa! I only made a cursory glance over the thread so I didn't notice it was *that* Melissa. Not that it would have really mattered, since I don't really know you! But with background filled in, I can understand why it doesn't seem that hot. I pretty much threw out a straw man to mock since it seemed like you were flat-out not liking it as something that exists, not as a sub-standard album of this sort. Or so I apparently surmised from the two or three words you actually said.

The female/male issue never crossed my mind. We usually don't post on the same threads (or at least not that I notice) so my recognition was a little slow based on the short posts you made. Lacking context, "This is really horrible" kind of rubbed me the wrong way. Knowing it's from someone who might actually be into this sort of thing adds some context and your post was great (frictionless? yeah!)

That said, Tago Mago is one of my favorite albums too.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:35 (eighteen years ago) link

It was also a poor ploy to get you to post more since I didn't bother to sign out and pre-emptively apologized *before* your long post.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I haven't heard the new one, but I had the impression they should've hung it up when their original rhythm section left.

Melissa's post reinforces that notion, sounds similar to my response to their last album. Who knows though, maybe I'll like this one.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:41 (eighteen years ago) link

What's their original rhythm section up to now?

js (honestengine), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago) link

they are in a band called no things.

m.c. (clikatowi), Thursday, 23 February 2006 19:52 (eighteen years ago) link

The female/male issue never crossed my mind.

Isn't this part of the point?

xpost

regular roundups (Dave M), Thursday, 23 February 2006 20:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Liars confirmed for Sonar. (!)

Cousin yogurt beard (nordicskilla), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Now, is this only available as an import or was there a domestic release (for North America, cuz I'm in Canada). I haven't been able to find it in stores (and I'm refusing to download) and keep hearing March as the actual release.

Binjominia (Brilhante), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:08 (eighteen years ago) link

It was released yesterday.

Cousin yogurt beard (nordicskilla), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:09 (eighteen years ago) link

So this is leaping beyond what Melissa is saying about this album, but I do want to bring it up. Umm, here's Jessica Hopper doing her anti-noise crusader thing in this year's P&J comments:

See, dudes, like Yoda says, there is no try, there is only do, and this squawky noise blast / nazi-porn-racism anti-music / Jim Goad drunk on Ivy League semiotics and bukkake—it's all try and no "do." And I know that that, supposedly, IS your point, but like, I mean, really—HOW IS THAT A POINT IN 2005 A.D.? It's not.

I feel like there's a bit of shared ground between that and what Melissa's saying. (A lot of divergence, too, though; Hopper seems anti-noise, Melissa just wants noise to be good.) And in a lot of cases, I think I agree with it -- or at least I think it points to a problem that certain parts of the current noise crop are struggling with. There's a big and useful emphasis on the "trying" part -- the breaking-down of things into a raw, fluid state. But then it's kind of an open question whether a band is actually going to build it back up into something different. When they do: sweet. When they don't ... well, a lot of times I have a similar reaction to Melissa's, which is that some bands here really expose how their sounds work -- they make public what it sounds like to be in a room right next to a drum kit, or what it sounds like to really break down sounds with your pedals. And, well, especially if you've done those things yourself, it's easy to get that reaction: "so?"

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link

NB that's not really meant to class Liars as the kind of noise Hopper is talking about -- just saying that the same challenge is in operation. Liars remain more successful at it than plenty of others. (I've seen one too many bands in Brooklyn whose point seemed to be something like "this is what musical implements sound like when you're not really doing anything with them," which makes me go "duh, dude, the rest of us have fucked around with patch cords too.")

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:30 (eighteen years ago) link

so...is there a region code on the dvd?

Christopher Costello (CGC), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't necessarily think that kind of transparency of execution is anything inherently bad. In fact, I usually hate it when other musicians (or fans) dis a band because they're "just playing presets" or something. If I like a song, usually one of the last things I think about is if they messed w/the presets. (actually, I'm more apt to dis a band that sounds like they spend too much time messing w/sounds at the expense of developing their music in other ways). Melissa's complaint about doing something interesting w/the sound is something I've often said myself in reference to songs, but I can't think of any reason why using all presets would have to prevent a song from being interesting. There is a notion to transparency in general though, not sure I can put my finger on it...

Dominique (dleone), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Liars confirmed for Sonar. (!)

-- Cousin yogurt beard

Where did you hear this? There's nothing up on the Sonar site yet.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:46 (eighteen years ago) link

..actually, I know it has something to do w/form. Not really in the sense of verse-chorus-verse, but in the way the sounds interract with each other, or the shape of the phrases...pardon my hippieness, but talk of intrinsic form does this to me. If the forms in a piece of music seem too rudimentary to me, it turns me off. Which is a far cry from saying simplicity is bad - truly magnificent, inspiring form is beyond simple, it almost seems inevitable, divine, a miracle that someone was able to come up with it. This Liars record for example, though I have not lived days on end with it, seems maybe a bit, I don't know, lacking in elegance, lacking in forms that beg to create new forms, and build on themselves in a way that knock my brain for a loop, my heart a-beating. They seem just to lay still, to be gone when the song is gone. They are simplistic squares and blocks rather than simple curves and spirals, which gets translated to my post as "not very interesting".

but since I can't argue for objectivity, it's hard to say that kind of stuff without feeling like I'm trolling someone :/

Dominique (dleone), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:46 (eighteen years ago) link

If the the forms in a piece of music seem too rudimentary to me, it turns me off...
...lacking in elegance, lacking in forms that beg to create new forms, and build on themselves in a way that knock my brain for a loop, my heart a-beating. They seem just to lay still, to be gone when the song is gone. They are simplistic squares and blocks rather than simple curves and spirals, which gets translated to my post as "not very interesting".

This is exactly it. Except with more pejoratives.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Thursday, 23 February 2006 22:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I've not heard this new Liars, but I think generally adding Hopper's quote to this discussion is sorta off track. Seems to me Liars (and I did hear the last record and enjoyed it for it's fuckedupedness but only listened to it maybe a handful of times) are essentially a pop band doing experimental rock, and feeding off of song-based influences, Can or not. Whereas the NOISE JH is talking about is not pop in that its aims (as I see it) are dismantling something to take a different view towards it, more of a dada appraoch, etc. Alas, while Liars may be moving towards that place, their thing, which they continue to rebel against in a bid to remain interesting, is the song. Isn't it?

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 23 February 2006 22:15 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.